Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
crock101 wrote:As a child I was told that I was a hindu, I was way to young to understand what that meant.it was around the time that I was introduced to hanuman,that it became clear that I was not going to be hindu for very long. A story that involves a flying, talking monkey that claims to be factual , was and still is ridiculous.
Eitech will have no problem seeing how dumb, a flying talking monkey is....but when it comes to a talking snake or a talking donkey, suddenly he is convinced that the story is not just sensible but is definitely true, even though both stories have the same amount of "proof" to backup their claims ..this is the very definition of hypocrisy.
crock101 wrote:Eitech....I am sure you can see the Hindus are crazy for believing in a flying,talking monkey....yet you seem to think that your belief in talking a snake and a talking donkey is somehow sophisticated and perfectly logical..... the hypocrisy is truly a wonder to gaze upon.
crock101 wrote:I really have no idea megdoc wants me to explain about a talking donkey that I don't believe in, last time I checked you guys were the ones who think that on earth there was a talking donkey.
Eitech ... dude.... less that two hours ago on this very thread, you directly asked me which faith I used to practice, so I answered.
Perhaps you are the one having trouble keeping track with the delusions that inhabitant that underutilized organ sitting in your skull......
Can you please explain to me why you don't believe in hanuman ?
brainchild wrote:These two is kix yea...eitech avoids answering when he's stumped and ends up quoting scripture and bluesclues claims enlightenment while being oblivious to basic information.
I expect them both to reply to this comment with some dramatic statement while leaving my previous questions and statements unanswered.
brainchild wrote:@eitech....this is how you reply after I highlight a common misconception? Why is it so hard to say "interesting, I never knew that" then look it up and maybe find out what else you have been mislead about and move on...faith intact and a little wiser?
@bluesclues...you didn't answer my first question and then you went ahead to attempt to justify the murder and then raping of over 150,000 little girls. Are you serious?
So you really believe these ppl were all bad...every last one? This city containing families that woke up every day farmed, tend to animals etc. Were collectively evil. ..all pushing the same agenda making them deserving of death, rape and servitude?
that is enlightenment? Because it sounds like genocide to me.
Take a look at yourself, if you are Indian, African, Latino or anything in between, and realise that if the world maintained that kind of thinking you wouldn't be here.
Wow dude!!
crock101 wrote:Bluesclues... while you say that you have nothing against gays ,after reading your posts, it does seem clear that you would be pretty unhappy with the idea of them not paying a hefty price , via torment in an eternal fire ,for what you see as a transgression against your god.
Just imagine if God was real and he was fine with homosexuals....that would mean that heaven would be full of fudge packers ,who god loves just as much as you..would you be ok going to this version of heaven?
.
bluesclues wrote:
Do i believe they were collectively evil? Well if they were all worshipping false man-made Gods then yes they were evil. And im sure very adamant and would not give up their false Gods. They would try to spread their futile teachings if left alive. Some of the teachings might survive, and as it seems God did not want any of that huff to mistakenly get mixed in with the true teachings of spirituality which he was creating by guiding each of the prophets. Those false teachings would be a source of confusion. To set back and slowdown an evolutionary process he was pushing. U also see him mention that it will ensnare them. This means it could bring to a halt their spiritual evolution. Nothing is more important, so yes i will agree with God.
no all I wanted was for you to read the passage about the talking donkey and discuss it on herecrock101 wrote:I really have no idea megdoc wants me to explain about a talking donkey that I don't believe in, last time I checked you guys were the ones who think that on earth there was a talking donkey.
even if one started with reading Wikipedia on the kjv and then research the information on there its enough for them not to utter such rubbish.brainchild wrote:eitech wrote:Daran wrote:^ and yet he quotes from the King James Bible.
interesting, you say i quoting from a bible, yet you quoting from some pic to which u urself cannot validate except some post u copy and paste from thE internet. LMAO. Try doin some research for YOURSELF
Actually it have real books on the topic, the kjv is a farce n contains stories found nowhere else. Is it the main bible you subscribe to?
brainchild wrote:bluesclues wrote:
Do i believe they were collectively evil? Well if they were all worshipping false man-made Gods then yes they were evil. And im sure very adamant and would not give up their false Gods. They would try to spread their futile teachings if left alive. Some of the teachings might survive, and as it seems God did not want any of that huff to mistakenly get mixed in with the true teachings of spirituality which he was creating by guiding each of the prophets. Those false teachings would be a source of confusion. To set back and slowdown an evolutionary process he was pushing. U also see him mention that it will ensnare them. This means it could bring to a halt their spiritual evolution. Nothing is more important, so yes i will agree with God.
Firstly it's statically impossible for everyone in Canaan to be evil, especially since there were children there, who could not know better.
Secondly, is this is the same God that spoke to a guy thru a bush, sent him to Egypt to have several meetings issuing threats and comparing tricks accompanied by several warnings, till some folks were eventually released leaving the rest of the citizenry alive? Why no time to talk now?
Also why is he having people killed to push an evolutionary agenda? Isn't he God?
He had time for 12 plagues but not one miracle to redeem a city?
It all sounds very political to me, almost sounds like a ruler trying to rationalize atrocities to maintain his grip on a docile population.
crock101 wrote:Did bluesclues just say that he is ok with the murder of innocent,defenseless children , as long as God is doing the killing.......okkeeeeee
brainchild wrote:Somehow they can't see this objectively
brainchild wrote:@ bluesclues...I'm wondering how much i should say since you clearly don't get what I meant by seeing things objectively. No one is trying to lure you to a false God or away from believing in a supreme being. I am simply drawing to your attention the inconsistencies, injustice and inanity of these religious books. They perpetuate the very faults we as humans are trying to overcome to make the world a better place. There is nothing wrong with seeing through the fiction and striving for something greater, something more attainable.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR and 167 guests