Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
i'd agree only on the fact that macOS does not support touch. They have iOS for that. And yes I wish they just had one OS, but handover and continuity fills the gaps.neexis wrote:MacOS might be a step back for this machine.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:http://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2016/10/26/13380462/microsoft-surface-studio-pc-computer-announced-features-price-release-date
192 ppi Density? YUCK!!! not even a retina display. What a fail....
neexis wrote:Do you know what those numbers mean and how they translate to real world use? If so can you tell the difference between 192 ppi and the 220 or so that Apple calls "retina" ?
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:neexis wrote:Do you know what those numbers mean and how they translate to real world use? If so can you tell the difference between 192 ppi and the 220 or so that Apple calls "retina" ?
Yes 192ppi is bad. Its significantly less ppi than the galaxy S2 screen its easily noticeable.
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9100_g ... i-3621.php
Apple Retina is significantly better and easily noticeable compared to the surface studio. there is a reason that the 4K imac retina is only 21.5 inch large or their 5K Retina is only 27 inch. The 5K mac has the same ppi as the galaxy S2 but because you will sit further away you will not observe the pixels that easily but if you go 10 inches away from the screen you will see it is inferior to an iphone. 192ppi is pixelated to the human eye especially for the $3000 price microsoft is asking.
I still don't see the reason for the epic beatup. Even if it came with a 540 screen you wouldn't be able to afford it anyway.EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:Slartibartfast I did not say retina display was perfect, yes I use Ipads and yes you can see pixels.
However what Steve Jobs said was retina display is based on pixel density by a certain distance from your eyes. At a certain point the human eye can no longer tell the difference for the example the 4K resolution on the 5 inch sony xperia is really pointless. It drains the batter quickly just because they are using a 4K screen for marketing purpose. 4K on 5 inch is useless.
Mac retina displays are based on the distance you will have the macbook from your eyes, you are not going to be holding a 27 inch imac 10 inches from your eyes its going to be a lot further. Is it still perfect? nope but its as good as current technology will get us until the price of 8K screens come down and we have mobile GPU powerful enough to run it without creating problems.
But the surface studio is significantly less resolution than the 5K imac and even worse its 1 inch bigger. And even worse its touch screen and designed for very close up use so you are going to notice a lot of pixelation. For a $3000 USD computer it should have for the very least a 5K display which is becoming standard now for 27 inch. Even dell is selling a 5K monitor on Amazon now
https://www.amazon.com/Dell-Monitor-UP2 ... 5K+monitor
Slartibartfast wrote:
All I saying is that it's a refreshing new spin on things (yes I know most if not all of the tech existed prior to the release of the MS Studio). I'm curious to see how it is received. I'm also hoping this shakes up Apple a bit to get them to start being innovative again. Their latest iPhone was just sad and the new MacBook Pros are just embarrassing; and it took them three years to develop it! Take a look at the comments on the youtube videos for the MS Studio and the MBP and compare them if you don't believe me.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests