Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Miktay wrote:crash dummy wrote:Miktay wrote:Country_Bookie wrote:Most millionaires who own their own company don't even pay the current 25% tax on their income.
Most of their personal expenses are funneled thru the company's books, so they can pay themselves what appears to be a low salary for tax purposes, plus their company records a lower profit and hence pays less tax.
Friend of mine has a smallish construction business. Few years ago she had a really good year.
Accountant called her near year end to warn the tax was going to be high.
When she saw the est tax bill she was shocked. She asked if there was anything she could do to mitigate the tax bill.
Accountant say she must acquire company assets.
So said. So done.
Tax bill reduced.
That was the accountants solution? She bought a SUV/"company assets"?
![]()
Carry on....
No she acquired a company car that she uses for company business that she charges off against company revenue reducing company taxable expense.
Read b/t the lines.
overwhelmed with tax avoidance? tax evasion? tax returns? what are the overwhelmed with?Dave wrote:There is a difference between tax avoidance and tax evasion. The later being illegal. I was recently included in a meeting at the BIR and they literally said they are overwhelmed.
It really works like that ?
Dave wrote:Lol all of the above. Seriously. However they have spent a lot of money in pieces of software for a database to be able link their field audit so they can link suppliers with customers and be in more comfortable position to target who are the offenders.
pugboy wrote:it is kinda hard to tell a privately owned company how to spend their money
Dizzy28 wrote:pugboy wrote:it is kinda hard to tell a privately owned company how to spend their money
Thats just it though..its not always their money. Sometimes it the country's money via legally due taxes that they spending.
pugboy wrote:NoDizzy28 wrote:pugboy wrote:it is kinda hard to tell a privately owned company how to spend their money
Thats just it though..its not always their money. Sometimes it the country's money via legally due taxes that they spending.
eliteauto wrote:Salaried employees is not the same as business owners. As stated above many business owners pay themselves below the threshold and have living expenses passed through the company. It's not illegal
Dizzy28 wrote:pugboy wrote:it is kinda hard to tell a privately owned company how to spend their money
Thats just it though..its not always their money. Sometimes it the country's money via legally due taxes that they spending.
eliteauto wrote:Salaried employees is not the same as business owners. As stated above many business owners pay themselves below the threshold and have living expenses passed through the company. It's not illegal
Income Tax Act 134
Subject to sections 135 to 141, where a company incurs expense in or in connection with the provision, for any of its directors or for any person employed by it in an employment to which sections 133 to 141* apply, of living or other accommodation, of entertainment, of domestic or other services or of other benefits or facilities of whatsoever nature, and, apart from this section the expense would not be chargeable to tax as income of the director or employee, so much of the said expenses as is not made good to the company by the director or employee shall be chargeable to tax under the provisions of this Act as if the expense had been incurred by the director or employee and the amount thereof had been refunded to him by the company by means of a payment in respect of expenses, and section 76 and subsection (2) of this section shall have effect in relation thereto.
pugboy wrote:So what does bit say about judges and magistrates who prob make an equivalent amount of money as their salary as "housing allowance" along with a good few other "allowances"
pugboy wrote:Some animals are more equal than others
pugboy wrote:well then why bother break down their "salary" into a list of "allowances"
just say taxpayers giving you X amount taxfree and not beat around the bush
S_2NR wrote:if they are overwhelmed doing their job, maybe they should find a new one (or push for changes that would ease them up)
pugboy wrote:only when you get older you realise the benfits of some govt jobs if you willing to stick it out a lifetime
i have a padna doing basic clerical work in central bank, he is over 50 now and with the kind of
benefits he have and pension he can't afford to leave at all
bluesclues wrote:pugboy wrote:only when you get older you realise the benfits of some govt jobs if you willing to stick it out a lifetime
i have a padna doing basic clerical work in central bank, he is over 50 now and with the kind of
benefits he have and pension he can't afford to leave at all
I just cant deal with being trapped in one situation my whole life. I need to be self employed, stay home when i want.. sleep late when i want. Expanding and doing multiple things for money. My life philosophy just doesnt allow for me to hold one job for 40 yrs no way! that feels like jail the more i think about it. Hoping to enter a new tax bracket for 2017 but i dont see why someone making $100,000 a month would need to duck taxes. 70,000 is not enough for one human being???? Hommuch money yuh want so? Hommuch yuh need so??? What is yuh goal? To become fu man chu? 700,000 a year and the pride of having contributed 300,000 to society in taxes singlehandedly should be reward enough. wah you want so? A 30million dollar house? I doh know nah. But it does boil down to what ppl living this life for and what is their philosophy. I personally happy with just having no financial worries.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: stillwater and 29 guests