Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
kamakazi wrote:The new Ranger still going through teething issues. As time goes on they should be resolved but who wants to buy a brand new vehicle to have problems right from the get go.
The navara had its problems in the earlies... not sure if all have been rectified.
As far as ride quality goes... Once you have driven a d22... almost everything rides better by comparison. The navara is reasonably comfortable but if a man wants to put on 22s, ride quality is lower down that list of priorities.
I believe that van suspensions are better suited to handle our beautiful roads
I personally decided on a Lux
It was the cheapest automatic van at the time (the navara auto was $40k more than its manual counterpart and I couldn't justify that premium).
It's slow but vans have poor handling dynamics at speed so didn't really need the extra power. As for the auto. ...a manual in traffic isn't something I would like on a daily.
The navara would have been my choice for a manual van though
I think the manual ranger is a 5 speed....its a 6 speed in the nav.
kamakazi wrote:The new Ranger still going through teething issues. As time goes on they should be resolved but who wants to buy a brand new vehicle to have problems right from the get go.
The navara had its problems in the earlies... not sure if all have been rectified.
As far as ride quality goes... Once you have driven a d22... almost everything rides better by comparison. The navara is reasonably comfortable but if a man wants to put on 22s, ride quality is lower down that list of priorities.
I believe that van suspensions are better suited to handle our beautiful roads
I personally decided on a Lux
It was the cheapest automatic van at the time (the navara auto was $40k more than its manual counterpart and I couldn't justify that premium).
It's slow but vans have poor handling dynamics at speed so didn't really need the extra power. As for the auto. ...a manual in traffic isn't something I would like on a daily.
The navara would have been my choice for a manual van though
I think the manual ranger is a 5 speed....its a 6 speed in the nav.
optimisticcharlie wrote:Hey guys wanna hear ur reviews on either or both vehicles, would be really appreciated.
tr1ad wrote:Spitfir3 wrote:skylinechild wrote:no indian chariot no care....
the almighty Mahindra is in a caste of its own...its not even worth comparing its greatness to these peasant pickups
bodow
Slartibartfast wrote:I assume you mean crashed. Or you talking about vehicle problems?
Slartibartfast wrote:Hmm. Well that's a shame cuz the ranger so sexy otherwise and well you know the elantra is basically a race car.
HahahahahaLalChun wrote:Bess? And u considering a nissan? Lmao
I saw that also ...Hyperion wrote:I worked for a while close to the new Ford service center in P.O.S., I can't begin to tell you the number of new Ford Rangers that I would see coming in on the back of wreckers on a weekly basis.
My old car broke down earlier this year, TCM did my wrecking. I was talking to the CSR about which vehicles they get the most call outs on, Ford Rangers and the new Hyundai Elantra topped the list.
Just my two cents.
When is the new ranger raptor comingrebound wrote:Neither is good......rock and a hard place there..
D irony . HahahaMonkey Man wrote:Men shud sav dey monee and go for some spellen lessons
Joshie23 wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:Hmm. Well that's a shame cuz the ranger so sexy otherwise and well you know the elantra is basically a race car.
Indeed, the Ranger is very sexy. I heard there were teething issues, but after four years, 'teething' can't be the operative word here..those issues however, I think, are limited to the 2.2L engine. I've heard good things about the 3.2L. But what'd limiting these problems to Ford and not it's Mazda twin or is SSL better at hiding it's issues better than McEnearney??
To be honest.. months i scanning thru all these threads.. and barely see complaints of these vehicles on d list. I doh trust the hilux commenters.. hahaahaa... all i know is dmax engine loud.. and well yea never see a complaint for sportero.. but d new one still ugly...lol ... but i leaning to d older hilux.. cause d new one cabin space too small for a tall person. N yes i tested it. LolToyopet wrote:That said, you really looking for the lesser of 2 evils. If these were my only 2 options in the world I'd choose the Ford. Both gonna break down sooner rather than later but the Ranger looks better and performs better...when it isn't broken.
I tend to be biased toward the Toyotas but objectively, my top 3 pics in order of preference are:
1 - Mitsubishi Sportero
2 - Toyota Hilux
3 - Isuzu D-Max
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], VexXx Dogg and 11 guests