Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Bizzare wrote:i mean, it can still be hacked that way, but not as easily. no one will take the time to decompile the flash app and all that cha la la.
Pseudo code - Every time the flash app is loaded, generate a random string in the flash app, encrypt the values to be sent to the server according to that random code. Anytime values are being passed to the server, send the random string, along with the encrypted values, so on the server side, it can be decrypted according to what the random string is. Only the server and the flash app will know how to read the values according to what the random string and not these cheaters who intercept the values and change it.
e.g. if the random string generated is 69 and your score is 10:30, the flash app will for example - multiply 1030*69 and send it to the server - 71070... along with that it will send the random string generated - 69... plus the time non-encrypted version - 10:30.
The server will know to divide the value "71070" by the random string value - "69" and get 1030.....
Then it will match it up to the non-encrypted version "1030" & "10:30" and see if they match. If they don't, fork even entering anything to the database....
That was just an example. Of course the method of encryption will be WAYYYY more mathematically complicated. But as simple as that is, even I wouldn't have took the time to figure out how were the values being "encrypted".
Mark! wrote:I say we fight for the hampa
Bizzare wrote:I don't think that should alter the budget, doesn't take much to implement. These securities are protocol for any client where a SERIOUS competition is concerned I suppose.
adriano7910 wrote:Mark! wrote:I say we fight for the hampa
see what i tell you the roids will do to you. now yuh wanna play muscle man
JoKeR1980 wrote:wait....d ting get pull off yes...no lambo to clean again....
perhapsadriano7910 wrote:dont say it gd. i might of come first if it was honestly done. and you know we good so you could of gotten to borrow products once you use it sparingly![]()
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:perhapsadriano7910 wrote:dont say it gd. i might of come first if it was honestly done. and you know we good so you could of gotten to borrow products once you use it sparingly![]()
but there was also a huge disparity between your score of 5:41 and then Marc Harripaul at 7:20. All the times after follow with only one or two seconds apart after that. Makes it look like the 7sec area were the true honest ones. Not doubting you though
Bizzare wrote:so those guys cheated and were gonna win unfairly
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:perhapsadriano7910 wrote:dont say it gd. i might of come first if it was honestly done. and you know we good so you could of gotten to borrow products once you use it sparingly![]()
but there was also a huge disparity between your score of 5:41 and then Marc Harripaul at 7:20. All the times after follow with only one or two seconds apart after that. Makes it look like the 7sec area were the true honest ones. Not doubting you though
adriano7910 wrote:trying over a 5 day period
Bizzare wrote:adriano7910 wrote:trying over a 5 day period
Sherlock says BUSTED!!!!
Game wasn't even up for five days. This thread itself is evidence of that![]()
adriano7910 wrote:7.61
Dont think i could do it faster. Highly doubt there is a prize for second. lol
MichaelR wrote:7:20 Did a 6:92 last night but for some reason it didnt save! It wasnt working properly late yesterday evening. When is the end of this competition?
MichaelR wrote:I figure out a strategy, 6:53
MichaelR wrote:is me alone playing or what? 6:17
MichaelR wrote:I give up, best was a 5:78 Really doubt 3 or even 4 seconds is humanly possible. Do like drag racing and give me the win in the 5 second bracket please.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: pugboy and 49 guests