Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
gundeleroy2k wrote:
K74T wrote:gundeleroy2k wrote:
sMASH wrote:Just like the dangerous dogs bill, this marriage bill was another cheap political points topic that played on the emotions of the simple minded.
The issue they were trying to solve was forced marriages, but eVeryone focused on the age part about it.
Some people can handle starting families at 16. Some people just want to get their rocks off. Either case, just institute some form of legal counseling to confirm that no party is being forced or under duress to wed.
Now u make it illgal and then families can still force their 18 year old to marrid some ole man.
Or Do the religious ceremony and when 18 reaches, then u register it.
Simpletons, the lot who thought this law will solve under age pregnancies and forCed marriages.
dude2014 wrote:Law pass. Big deal.
My problem is how many men over the age of 16 or 18 who got lock up/before the court for the 2500 girls under the age of 16 who got pregnant in 2016. Sex is an act that does not need a visa or passport, just raging hormones (for persons under 18). For person over 18, Tuners doh have enough storage to deal with da one
So, by making marriage allowable at age 18 plus, can we now be better off and we will no longer have pregnancies and abortions by girls under the age of 18?
What happens to male and female under the age of 18 who is to now to become parents after this law is proclaimed. Who we sending to JAIL, mummy or daddy? It is inconsequential until your child is about to go to jail. Are we happy that there are already people in the jail who ought not to be there?
HURRAH FARIS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. We have solve child/teenage marriage. What about child/teenage pregnancy?
We will have no marriage or persons under the age of 18, just girls or women under the age of 18 who gets pregnant. Without fear of contradiction, we have truly used the steam roller to iron out this bug.
I urge ALL who are for and those who are against .......... THINK AGAIN, BECAUSE ONCE WE GO DOWN THIS ROAD, THE PERSONS WE LOVE AND ARE TRYING TO PROTECT WILL GET HURT.
sMASH wrote:Just like the dangerous dogs bill, this marriage bill was another cheap political points topic that played on the emotions of the simple minded.
The issue they were trying to solve was forced marriages, but eVeryone focused on the age part about it.
Some people can handle starting families at 16. Some people just want to get their rocks off. Either case, just institute some form of legal counseling to confirm that no party is being forced or under duress to wed.
Now u make it illgal and then families can still force their 18 year old to marrid some ole man.
Or Do the religious ceremony and when 18 reaches, then u register it.
Simpletons, the lot who thought this law will solve under age pregnancies and forCed marriages.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:This is actually a really good Law, Rowley deserves a trophy for this and for having the balls to implement this. Kamla would never in a million years implement a law like this because the first thing she would ah study is who it would upset and would it cost her votes, Rowley on the other hand just doesn't give a sh!t.
But what I don't understand if you listen to the radio stations is people like Sat and the other fella Sadro Mohammed who hosts the 90.5Fm late night talk show who are defending child marriage.
Is only old old men really defending this child marriage thing. The other night Sadro went onto say as a Muslim he does not care about the law of Trinidad he goes by the Law of the Koran so it begs the question if this Law will even do anything. In this country people doh really care about the law on the whole.
abducted wrote:
Where is Sat getting his information from?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_ma ... ted_States
This says 18 years in all states except Nebraska which is 19.
A 17-year-old from Aranguez, who allegedly went missing after eloping with her 28-year-old boyfriend last month, has surrendered to police.
The T&T Guardian understands that after the teenager read an exclusive report in Tuesday’s edition of this newspaper on her husband Mitchum Deosingh’s arrest over their marriage and her subsequent disappearance, she decided to go to police to clarify the issue.
http://www.guardian.co.tt/news/2017-09- ... hild-bride
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Duane 3NE 2NR and 28 guests