Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Habit7 wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:^ By ya'll you referring to Hindus right? I have stated before within this thread I believe in a oneness/singularity of God. This one god doesn't care that you call him Jesus, Yahweh, Krishna, Allah, Flying Spaghetti monster. But he is dissapointed when you take his any of his names and wage hate, ignorance, fear and wars all in the name of who is right. But just as with any of the established religions thats an opinion though. (My opinion)
What you are saying sounds very ecumenical and inclusive and is uttered by many in society. But if you are to call "God" by any name, attached to that name would be the requisite teaching that goes along with it. So when you have the God of the Bible saying He is the only way, the Allah of the Quran saying the same, Sikhs, Mormon, etc. while Hindus technically say the monotheists are wrong, their gods are apart of our polytheism. The fact is most religions are mutual exclusive. To say that there is one all embracing god who doesnt regard names would be creating your own god and religion, while passively saying all who dont believe like you, are wrong.
Habit7 wrote:Isaiah 45:5 "I am the LORD, and there is no other; Besides Me there is no God"
Can a Hindu say the Bible is right when it says this?
Habit7 wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:^ By ya'll you referring to Hindus right? I have stated before within this thread I believe in a oneness/singularity of God. This one god doesn't care that you call him Jesus, Yahweh, Krishna, Allah, Flying Spaghetti monster. But he is dissapointed when you take his any of his names and wage hate, ignorance, fear and wars all in the name of who is right. But just as with any of the established religions thats an opinion though. (My opinion)
What you are saying sounds very ecumenical and inclusive and is uttered by many in society. But if you are to call "God" by any name, attached to that name would be the requisite teaching that goes along with it. So when you have the God of the Bible saying He is the only way, the Allah of the Quran saying the same, Sikhs, Mormon, etc. while Hindus technically say the monotheists are wrong, their gods are apart of our polytheism. The fact is most religions are mutual exclusive. To say that there is one all embracing god who doesnt regard names would be creating your own god and religion, while passively saying all who dont believe like you, are wrong.
Habit7 wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:^ By ya'll you referring to Hindus right? I have stated before within this thread I believe in a oneness/singularity of God. This one god doesn't care that you call him Jesus, Yahweh, Krishna, Allah, Flying Spaghetti monster. But he is dissapointed when you take his any of his names and wage hate, ignorance, fear and wars all in the name of who is right. But just as with any of the established religions thats an opinion though. (My opinion)
What you are saying sounds very ecumenical and inclusive and is uttered by many in society. But if you are to call "God" by any name, attached to that name would be the requisite teaching that goes along with it. So when you have the God of the Bible saying He is the only way, the Allah of the Quran saying the same, Sikhs, Mormon, etc. while Hindus technically say the monotheists are wrong, their gods are apart of our polytheism. The fact is most religions are mutual exclusive. To say that there is one all embracing god who doesnt regard names would be creating your own god and religion, while passively saying all who dont believe like you, are wrong.
turbotusty wrote:by logic.. nothing can be infinite. and that is proven by the limitation of calculators. they cant handle a calculation with infinity in it.
mamoo_pagal wrote:Habit7 wrote:Isaiah 45:5 "I am the LORD, and there is no other; Besides Me there is no God"
Can a Hindu say the Bible is right when it says this?
why only point to hindu's, can any other have a claim, btw that line you quoted only has the terms "Lord" "Me". Where is the particular name you refer too?
If you are to ask such a question, it simply indicates that you know nothing of their philosophy......
plz don't ask questions in ignorance
Habit7 wrote:mamoo_pagal wrote:Habit7 wrote:Isaiah 45:5 "I am the LORD, and there is no other; Besides Me there is no God"
Can a Hindu say the Bible is right when it says this?
why only point to hindu's, can any other have a claim, btw that line you quoted only has the terms "Lord" "Me". Where is the particular name you refer too?
If you are to ask such a question, it simply indicates that you know nothing of their philosophy......
plz don't ask questions in ignorance
Hinduism is the world largest polytheistic religion, that is why I reference them. LORD in uppercase in the Bible refers to God's Hebrew name YHWH. I am sorry if I caused any undue offence, but if there is any truth in Hinduism, it would render Judaism, Christianity and Islam false. My question was meant to lead to that conclusion. Most questions are asked in ignorance.
The oldest known religious texts are Pyramid texts of Ancient Egypt that date to 2400-2300 BCE. The earliest form of the Phoenician alphabet found to date is the inscription on the sarcophagus of King Ahiram of Byblos. ( The Sumerian Temple Hymns ). The Epic of Gilgamesh from Sumeria is also one of the earliest literary works dating to 2150-2000 BCE, that includes various mythological figures. The Rigveda of Hinduism is proposed to have been composed between 1700–1100 BCE making it possibly the world's oldest religious text still in use.
The oldest portions of the Zoroastrian Avesta are believed to have been transmitted orally for centuries before they found written form, and although widely differing dates for Gathic Avestan (the language of the oldest texts) have been proposed, scholarly consensus floats at around 1000 BCE.[citation needed]
The majority of scholars agree that the Torah's composition took place over centuries. From the late 19th century there was a general consensus around the documentary hypothesis, which suggests that the five books were created c.450 BCE by combining four originally independent sources, known as the Jahwist, or J (about 900 BCE), the Elohist, or E (about 800 BCE), the Deuteronomist, or D, (about 600 BCE), and the Priestly source, or P (about 500 BC).
The first scripture printed for wide distribution to the masses was The Diamond Sutra, a Buddhist scripture, and is the earliest recorded example of a dated printed text, bearing the Chinese calendar date for 11 May 868 CE.
Habit7 wrote:Dizzy28 that being understood...what are the theological (study of God) views of Hinduism that are reconcilable with Christianity?
Hinduism’s Many Gods
Published: Thursday, September 13, 2012
Sat Maharaj
The 7th Annual Hindu Mandir Executives’ Conference was held in San Jose California, USA on August 17—19, 2012. Out of this conference many Hindu publications have emerged. In one publication Mandir Vani, (The Voice of Hindu Temples,) the message of the Maha Sabha of T&T is published. It reads: “A temple is not a building. It is the abode of the Lord. A temple’s strength is not in the bricks. Its fortitude comes from the dedication of its members. A temple is not held together by plaster and mud. Its glue is the piety and devotion of the community. A temple is not simply a place we visit. It should be the axis around which our lives revolve,” wrote Swami Chidananda Saraswati.
“By coming together and working together to ensure that programmes are implemented within the temples and also between/amongst the temples for the youth, you will bring even greater benefit to all Hindus living in the USA. “Creating an environment where the youth understand, appreciate and love their Hindu culture is a crucial need today, as is uniting all Hindu temples under one umbrella. When we are all united in the name of Sanatan Dharma, we can truly bring the message of peace, harmony and universal brotherhood to the world.”
Many aspects of Hinduism seem to confuse the average westerner who is steeped in the Christian traditions. The conference provided answers to some of these questions and we produce hereunder answers to the perception that there are numerous Gods in Hinduism: “Hindus believe in one Supreme God who created the universe. He is all-pervasive. He created many Gods, highly advanced spiritual beings, to be His helpers.
Contrary to prevailing misconceptions, Hindus all worship a one Supreme Being, though by different names. This is because the peoples of India with different languages and cultures have understood the one God in their own distinct way. Through history there arose four principal Hindu denominations—Saivism, Shaktism, Vaishnavism and Smartism. For Saivites, God is Siva. For Shaktas, Goddess Shakti is supreme. For Vaishnavites, Lord Vishnu is God. For Smartas—who see all Deities as reflections of the One God—the choice of Deity is left to the devotee.
This liberal Smarta perspective is well known, but it is not the prevailing Hindu view. Due to this diversity, Hindus are profoundly tolerant of other religions, respecting the fact that each has its own pathway to the one God. One of the unique understandings in Hinduism is that God is not far away, living in a remote heaven, but is inside each and every soul, in the heart and consciousness, waiting to be discovered. This knowing that God is always with us gives us hope and courage. Knowing the One Great God in this intimate and experiential way is the goal of Hindus spiritually.
Hinduism is both monotheistic and henotheistic. Hindus were never polytheistic, in the sense that there are many equal Gods. Henotheism (literally “one God”) better defines the Hindu view. It means the worship of one God without denying the existence of other Gods.
We Hindus believe in the one all-pervasive God who energises the entire universe. We can see Him in the light shining out of the eyes of humans and all creatures. This view of God as existing in and giving life to all things is called panentheism. It is different from pantheism, which is the belief that God is the natural universe and nothing more.
It is also different from strict theism which says God is only above the world, apart and transcendent. Panentheism is an all-encompassing concept. It says that God is both in the world and beyond it, both immanent and transcendent. That is the highest Hindu view.
Hindus also believe in many Gods who perform various functions, like executives in a large corporation. These should not be confused with the Supreme God. These Divinities are highly advanced beings who have specific duties and powers—not unlike the heavenly spirits, overlords or archangels revered in other faiths. Each denomination worships the Supreme God and its own pantheon of divine beings.
What is sometimes confusing to non-Hindus is that Hindus of various sects may call the one God by many different names, according to their denomination or regional tradition. Truth for the Hindu has many names, but that does not make for many truths. Hinduism gives us the freedom to approach God in our own way, encouraging a multiplicity of paths, not asking for conformity to just one.
There is much confusion about this subject, even among Hindus. Learn the right terms and the subtle differences in them, and you can explain the profound ways Hindus look at divinity. Others will be delighted with the richness of the Indian concepts of God.
You may wish to mention that some Hindus believe only in the formless Absolute Reality as God. Others believe in God as personal Lord and Creator. This freedom makes the understanding of God in Hinduism, the oldest living religion, the richest in all of earth’s existing faiths.”
Satnarayan Maharaj
Secretary General
Sanatan Dharma Maha Sabha
http://www.guardian.co.tt/columnist/201 ... -many-gods
Habit7 wrote:Isaiah 45:5 "I am the LORD, and there is no other; Besides Me there is no God"
Can a Hindu say the Bible is right when it says this?
MG Man wrote:dude, the bible is irreconcilable with itself
your god so effing clueless, he built World 1.0 with so many inherent bugs, he had to wipe it clean and come back with a reboot..............then had to install the Jesus 1.0 patch to try and fix World 1.0.1
MG Man wrote:dude, the bible is irreconcilable with itself
your god so effing clueless, he built World 1.0 with so many inherent bugs, he had to wipe it clean and come back with a reboot..............then had to install the Jesus 1.0 patch to try and fix World 1.0.1
Habit7 wrote:Jesus coming to earth wasn't an ambulance rushing to the scene of an accident. Everything is a according to His ordained plan, so that He will display His attributes ranging from love, peace and forgiveness to justice, holiness and wrath. Nothing has ever caught God by surprise.
turbotusty wrote:yup. theyre all right. all hold the meat of the truth. but the majority of their followers are misguided due to poor interpretation and not doing their own homework.
ill have to include the local spiritual shouter baptiste as well. they are on to something. they understand a core component which i think they follow very well to accessing divine revelations. not all of them of course. but that core component is devotion and reverance in prayer. allowing the spirit to flow stronger thru the body.
remember spirit and flesh is said to be at war. the key is bringing a harmony between the 2. there are a variety of ways to do this. meditation is one. devoting ur entire being in prayer while reaching out to ur higher power is another.. among others. but they all accomplish the same process.. at least a temporary ceasefire between flesh and spirit where more is revealed to u for opening ur mind and ur eyes to perceive. in eastern religions there is a term called samadhi, buddha's enlightenment.. all the same thing, referred to in the jewish torah in codified form, which makes the connection permanent.
check out the video i posted earlier from manly p hall. it's a sort of audiobook. but in it he explains the concepts as scholars of the past have deciphered. at the very least on listening to his speech.. u will have an understanding of how the flesh and spirit interact. u might have to listen to it more than once. but the gereal premise places u directly on the path. an initiation for those who choose to walk it. it is difficult, challenging, but also fun and rewarding path. it is above religious dogma. it will favour no religion over another.
it really is not very important which name u call ur God. just as long as the symbolic reference that is conjured in ur mind when u say it is of ur creator. the supreme being.
turbotusty wrote:yeah.. but we cant even create a buggy version like he did. he is still a boss.
Kasey wrote:turbotusty wrote:by logic.. nothing can be infinite. and that is proven by the limitation of calculators. they cant handle a calculation with infinity in it.
Yunno I now see this? Laawwwd!!!!
Tusty, your English is ok, but statements like these really begs one to question the seriousness of your arguments, not to mention the IQ level.
MG Man wrote:ah yes, I see...so god knows when that woman is going to be brutally raped or that child abducted and sold as a sex slave
gotcha
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 37 guests