Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
meccalli wrote:
I hope they know the seriousness of claiming to be a prophet and be the voice of God.
meccalli wrote:megadoc1 wrote:which one is God?
The Father, Yehoshua is the Son of God.bluesclues wrote: meccali are you a christian? what denomination?
I consider my self a servant of God. Nothing more or less. I fellowship at a Pentecostal assembly, have been there for the past 14 years ever since I started going to church @ 7 when my household was saved through the literal transformation of my Father's lifestyle upon finding salvation and consequently my mother and grandparents who were all Hindu.
meccalli wrote:Habit7 wrote:In one sense YES.
So the concept of equality is not equal to being the same person. Right?Habit7 wrote:Before you were saying that the Holy Spirit is just a personified force ("impersonal, a breath or pneuma(wind)"). Can one lie to a personified force? Is lying to a personified force equal to lying to God?
Now you are trying to muddle the Holy Spirit as the Father's spirit.
Lets see if I can finally clear this up. This should also shed light on the issue of oneness. What is spirit?
Original Word: πνεῦμα, ατος, τό
Part of Speech: Noun, Neuter
Transliteration: pneuma
Short Definition: wind, breath, spirit
Definition: wind, breath, spirit.
Flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit gives birth to spirit.
I baptize you with water, but he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit."
For there are three that testify: the Spirit and the water and the blood; and the three are in agreement.
Spirit is a medium or state, an essence or an element. Spirit is substance, not a person this is what I was pointing out then proceeding to show the relationship of The father and son as spirit. We see that God is Spirit. The verse says, for He will not speak on His own initiative, but whatever He hears, He will speak. My hand has no will or mind of its own, it does what I tell it to do.
Here's what the word of God says.
As before. 'Now the Lord is that Spirit and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.'
And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father.'
And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you. I will not leave you comfortless. I will come to you. Yet a little while, and the world seeth me no more; but ye see me: because I live, ye shall live also. At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you.'
Judas saith unto him, not Iscariot, Lord, how is it that thou wilt manifest thyself unto us, and not unto the world? Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.'
For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.'
You see, all these scriptures tell us of one spirit that belongs to the father and the son. When the Lord speaks of the comforter, he says I will come to you. Yehoshua all throughout scripture refers to himself in third person as if he is speaking of someone other than himself, another comforter. This is the parakletos, the other comforter, Yehoshua. Its is the spirit of God which dwells within us, that of the son and the father. He dwells in me and I in him. They are of one spirit. In response to Judas, he says ,We will come and make our abode in him referring in that very verse to himself and the father. Paul implores, Don't you know that you yourselves are God's temple and that God's Spirit dwells in your midst? But here's the kicker and ultimately the main point, the holy spirit is not a separate third person. No trinity.
It depends on the context. If we talking equality with respect to persons then there are equal persons. Likewise righteousness, divinity, power and responsibility, it all depends on the context of what is equal.meccalli wrote:So the concept of equality is not equal to being the same person. Right?
meccalli wrote:Before you were saying that the Holy Spirit is just a personified force ("impersonal, a breath or pneuma(wind)"). Can one lie to a personified force? Is lying to a personified force equal to lying to God?
So since you liken the Holy Spirit as just being the spirit of the Father that operates like your impersonal hand that does what you tell it under your will, doesn't John 16:13 counter that and speaks of the Holy Spirit as a person (He) who has a will/initiative (unlike your hand) but submits it to the Father?
Habit7 wrote:Allow me to repost since I don't see an answer
Godhead is simply the term we refer to when dealing in the topic of divinityrspann wrote:I know that, my question is, how do you go from "divinity" to the word Godhead? What is the meaning of divinity and how did they,or should I ask, why did they translate divinity as Godhead. The next question is,what is the meaning of Godhead?megadoc1 wrote:Bible is not found in the bible eitherrspann wrote:Godhead is not found in the bible,
the discussion we are having is about the Godhead that's all to it, you are allowing your personal convictions to blind you,how does a simple term like this becomes a doctrine? this is simply a term used in Theology now don't tell me you have issues with the word Theology also!meccalli wrote:Hmmn, where to start..rspann wrote:I know that, my question is, how do you go from "divinity" to the word Godhead? What is the meaning of divinity and how did they,or should I ask, why did they translate divinity as Godhead. The next question is,what is the meaning of Godhead?
Strange doctrines of the elements and of men, to confuse and cause division among the brethren and to promote their own beliefs.
do you have an example of this happening?meccalli wrote:megadoc1 wrote:so you are suggesting that those who sought to investigate and try to understand these stuff don't love God?
Nah, I'm saying they wouldn't create their own doctrines and push it as God's words. I hope they know the seriousness of claiming to be a prophet and be the voice of God.
Jesus also made the very claims that the father made ,so in your opinion who really is the first and who really is the last? who is really the "I AM" ?meccalli wrote:megadoc1 wrote:which one is God?
The Father, Yehoshua is the Son of God.
MG Man wrote:I thought godhead was when god suckin off allyuh piggy
megadoc1 wrote: personal convictions
megadoc1 wrote:do you have an example of this happening?
megadoc1 wrote:Jesus also made the very claims that the father made ,so in your opinion who really is the first and who really is the last? who is really the "I AM" ?
even in john 1 also said the WORD who became flesh was God, are there two Gods despite the fact that YHWH said there is none besides him?
Your hand cannot be lied to neither does it have a will. You analogy breaks down because you doctrine doesnt square with the Bible.meccalli wrote:Like I said before about my hand or spirit, it is me. As the scripture shows clearly there, Lying to the spirit of God is lying to God.
We use clear verses to state the clear, and these clear verses distinguish the person of the Holy Spirit from the Father, not as being the spirit of the Father.Habit7 wrote:In fact I can further say that the Holy Spirit is God Acts 5:3-4, Lord 2 Corinthians 3:18 and can be blasphemed Matthew 12:31.Habit7 wrote:The Holy Spirit is eternal Hebrew 9:14, omnipotent Luke 1:35, omnipresent Psalm 139:7-10, will 1 Corinthians 12:11, loves Romans 15:30 and speaks Acts 8:29; 13:2.
meccalli wrote:YHVH does share his glory with the son and the son glorifies the father.
Isaiah wrote:I am the Lord (YHVH), that is My name;
I will not give My glory to another,
Nor My praise to graven images.(42:8)
thanks for clearing that up but you will mature soon enoughmeccalli wrote:megadoc1 wrote: personal convictions
very much so, that registers to me as something in the esoteric eastern mysticism. I don't feel right about it. Leave it at that.
sorry I asked you to give me an example of this happeningmeccalli wrote:megadoc1 wrote:do you have an example of this happening?
Jeremiah 27:15-22
15 ‘I have not sent them,’ declares the Lord. ‘They are prophesying lies in my name. Therefore, I will banish you and you will perish, both you and the prophets who prophesy to you.’” There's a good bit of em in Jeremiah, like hannaniah and shemaiah.
Paul raises the red flag that it would happen. 3 years is alot of emphasis.
Be shepherds of the church of God,[a] which he bought with his own blood.[b] 29 I know that after I leave, savage wolves will come in among you and will not spare the flock. 30 Even from your own number men will arise and distort the truth in order to draw away disciples after them. 31 So be on your guard! Remember that for three years I never stopped warning each of you night and day with tears.
give me a real life exampleNah, I'm saying they wouldn't create their own doctrines and push it as God's words. I hope they know the seriousness of claiming to be a prophet and be the voice of God.
so is Jesus God like how the bible puts it?meccalli wrote:megadoc1 wrote:Jesus also made the very claims that the father made ,so in your opinion who really is the first and who really is the last? who is really the "I AM" ?
even in john 1 also said the WORD who became flesh was God, are there two Gods despite the fact that YHWH said there is none besides him?
There is no God other than the Father and no Lord other than the Son.
In the beginning, God created
Elohim is plural, it's translated as God because of the singular verb.
Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.
Slartibartfast wrote:God makes fake O's too? Is my girl God?
Habit7 wrote:You analogy breaks down because you doctrine doesnt square with the Bible.
meccalli wrote:Our mechanisms of operating aren't the same with God. They are spirit beings while we are flesh
Habit7 wrote:Either you are right and Isaiah is wrong, or Isaiah is speaking the inspired word of God and "the son" you worship is a graven image.
megadoc1 wrote:give me a real life example
megadoc1 wrote:so is Jesus God like how the bible puts it?
meccalli wrote:megadoc1 wrote:give me a real life example
" God is speaking to me right now, he's telling me he wants you to sow $$X", majority of tbn?
The absurdities with regard to doctrine is way too much to list, benny, joyce, joel, the asian guy. If the trinity is false its a tickle compared to the things i've heard em teach their loyal disciples.
meccalli wrote:I've seen people try to explain a trinity and claim God's complexity. "Can you solve the mysteries of God? Can you discover everything about the Almighty? I will never make a statement on God that the Bible doesn't say, I just trust what it says. What's there is sufficient for salvation of the human race and it's what we should be concerning ourselves with, there is plenty time in eternity to learn about God when he restores the world. Those who love God will trust the words of our Lord Yehoshua without having to resort to strange doctrines and mechanisms. There is a father and a son, 2 beings who are of the same nature, spirit and mind.
then you repliedso you are suggesting that those who sought to investigate and try to understand these stuff don't love God?
then I askedmeccalli wrote:Nah, I'm saying they wouldn't create their own doctrines and push it as God's words. I hope they know the seriousness of claiming to be a prophet and be the voice of God.
do you have an example of this happening?
meccalli wrote:megadoc1 wrote:so is Jesus God like how the bible puts it?
"But what about you?" he asked. "Who do you say I am?" Simon Peter answered, "You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God." Jesus replied, "Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven.
megadoc1 wrote:In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God
And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth.
what do we do with those verses ? was Jesus really the word who was God or just the son of God?
Nomeccalli wrote:That may be more semantics, the scripture tells us there's an entity called the Word as well as God.
Nomeccalli wrote:This verse affirms the word as being of the nature of his father as deity
that's because you are all over the place with your arguments ! please lets stick to the topicmeccalli wrote:I thought believers were generally more aware of the matters affecting the church today like the dubbed 'prosperity gospel', this is a form of doctrine not so. I'm sorry you didn't recognize what I was highlighting.
Habit7 wrote:theos en ho logos" means the Word was God.
but Jesus also said he was the son of man so was he the son of God or the son of man or both? ..also, in a passage you quoted made mention of Jesus being in the form of God ,can you tell me if he was God then?meccalli wrote:megadoc1 wrote:In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God
And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth.
what do we do with those verses ? was Jesus really the word who was God or just the son of God?
That may be more semantics, the scripture tells us there's an entity called the Word as well as God. As I pointed out before with the plural nature of the word Elohim. When it comes down to the nitty gritty, I would expect that we trust what the actual Son of God says he is.
but if they are of same nature and the father is God then Jesus must be God too!!! but then you end up with a problem because you claimed that they are separate beings ,remember when God said there is no God besides him?meccalli wrote:Let me expand some more on that verse before I get greek thrown at me. Like I've been saying all along. Yehoshua, is God's son. They are of the same nature which is God.
so If God was the word and the word became flesh, then Jesus is God right? I did tell you that whatever you try to suggest other than the trinity comes in second but this is worst than i thoughtmeccalli wrote:Here's John 1.1 in Koine Greek
en arche en ho logos kai ho logos en pros ton theon kai theos en ho logos
in the beginning was the word and the word was with the god and god was the word. This was initially a string of text before english introduced all its devices of caps and spacing etc.
ton theon means the God
theos en ho logos
god was the word
This verse affirms the word as being of the nature of his father as deity.
Heb 1:8 But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.
Heb 1:9 Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.
Heb 1:10 And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands:
Heb 1:11 They shall perish; but thou remainest; and they all shall wax old as doth a garment;
Heb 1:12 And as a vesture shalt thou fold them up, and they shall be changed: but thou art the same, and thy years shall not fail.
He was in the beginning with God. 3All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being.
Thus says the LORD, your Redeemer, and the one who formed you from the womb, "I, the LORD, am the maker of all things, Stretching out the heavens by Myself And spreading out the earth all alone,
megadoc1 wrote:but Jesus also said he was the son of man so was he the son of God or the son of man or both? ..also, in a passage you quoted made mention of Jesus being in the form of God ,can you tell me if he was God then?
looks like you started your own bandwagon ..continue trusting God and practice restraint from making statements regarding the trinity until u investigate it ,what you can do in the mean time if you wish, is to learn the concept of it so you can at least be informed on what you so desire to denouncemeccalli wrote:
All these plain proclamations of God's nature and i'm apparently applying eisegesis by quoting scripture and basic understanding. Guys, I think I've said enough and made that point mega wanted to urge from me. I'm sorry I can't accept 3 persons in one essence as God. My convictions are against that as well, and it's been developed from meditation and study on the word, not bandwagons. If its anyone who lives in an environment that preaches the trinity night and day, it's me, my ministry is based in video production, music, dance and drama in a major new testament church of God here.
So you are saying there is ton theon kai theos, the God and god?meccalli wrote:Habit7 wrote:theos en ho logos" means the Word was God.
You missed the point of me quoting the greek.
ton theon, THE God
theos, God
It's a distinction clearly seen, how can it mean the same person. There's 2 titles and 2 descriptions. That's basic. I don't even need to go into this, the very source says it. That's all the proof I'll ever need.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 56 guests