Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Wraith King wrote:
Why is a vaccine better than a cure?
i_code_and_stuff wrote:Wraith King wrote:
Why is a vaccine better than a cure?
Because to use a cure, you have to know that you're infected. By the time you realize you're infected, the virus has already had a chance to do significant damage to you, but what's worse is that by this time, you would have already infected other people. Vaccines prevent both of these scenarios
i_code_and_stuff wrote:Wraith King wrote:
Why is a vaccine better than a cure?
Because to use a cure, you have to know that you're infected. By the time you realize you're infected, the virus has already had a chance to do significant damage to you, but what's worse is that by this time, you would have already infected other people. Vaccines prevent both of these scenarios
Wraith King wrote:i_code_and_stuff wrote:Wraith King wrote:
Why is a vaccine better than a cure?
Because to use a cure, you have to know that you're infected. By the time you realize you're infected, the virus has already had a chance to do significant damage to you, but what's worse is that by this time, you would have already infected other people. Vaccines prevent both of these scenarios
Does the vaccine prevents you from getting and spreading the virus?
Wraith King wrote:i_code_and_stuff wrote:Wraith King wrote:
Why is a vaccine better than a cure?
Because to use a cure, you have to know that you're infected. By the time you realize you're infected, the virus has already had a chance to do significant damage to you, but what's worse is that by this time, you would have already infected other people. Vaccines prevent both of these scenarios
Does the vaccine prevents you from getting and spreading the virus?
hover11 wrote:That's with regular vaccine point being driven here is that even though you take the covid vaccine you still get covid so damage to lungs is done either way
Wraith King wrote:
Does the vaccine prevents you from getting and spreading the virus?
pugboy wrote:not getting permanent lung damage might be a plus
hover11 wrote:No it doesn't thats the long and short of it even though you are vaccinated you can still be infected and spread it among othersWraith King wrote:i_code_and_stuff wrote:Wraith King wrote:
Why is a vaccine better than a cure?
Because to use a cure, you have to know that you're infected. By the time you realize you're infected, the virus has already had a chance to do significant damage to you, but what's worse is that by this time, you would have already infected other people. Vaccines prevent both of these scenarios
Does the vaccine prevents you from getting and spreading the virus?
I say I alone was thinking this idk...Gem_in_i wrote:Was that a planned thingWith regard to decreasing numbers
PariaMan wrote:The odds of death and damage to the body so high if you get covid as compared to the low odds of side effect from the vaccine makes it a no brainer for most people
That idea of the vaccine reducing the risk of spreading it and/or getting real sick is really the core of the matterpugboy wrote:not getting permanent lung damage might be a plus
redmanjp wrote:hover11 wrote:No it doesn't thats the long and short of it even though you are vaccinated you can still be infected and spread it among othersWraith King wrote:i_code_and_stuff wrote:Wraith King wrote:
Why is a vaccine better than a cure?
Because to use a cure, you have to know that you're infected. By the time you realize you're infected, the virus has already had a chance to do significant damage to you, but what's worse is that by this time, you would have already infected other people. Vaccines prevent both of these scenarios
Does the vaccine prevents you from getting and spreading the virus?
the US ones at least dramatically reduce the chance of infection. also even if u do get infected the viral load is lower so still less chance of transmission. this data allowed the CDC to decide that masks no longer needed for fully vaccinated ppl.
the chini vaccine? not so much, but all vaccine keeping u out of hospital so take it now or ASAP.
matr1x wrote:Anyone feel they playing with these numbers from the start?
How is cpep still getting paid? For what exactly? We money taking a walk
Dohplaydat wrote:redmanjp wrote:hover11 wrote:No it doesn't thats the long and short of it even though you are vaccinated you can still be infected and spread it among othersWraith King wrote:i_code_and_stuff wrote:Wraith King wrote:
Why is a vaccine better than a cure?
Because to use a cure, you have to know that you're infected. By the time you realize you're infected, the virus has already had a chance to do significant damage to you, but what's worse is that by this time, you would have already infected other people. Vaccines prevent both of these scenarios
Does the vaccine prevents you from getting and spreading the virus?
the US ones at least dramatically reduce the chance of infection. also even if u do get infected the viral load is lower so still less chance of transmission. this data allowed the CDC to decide that masks no longer needed for fully vaccinated ppl.
the chini vaccine? not so much, but all vaccine keeping u out of hospital so take it now or ASAP.
I honestly need to understand the logic of anti-vaxxers.
Are they relying on our herd immunity to keep them safe? If so that is utterly selfish.
Are they thinking if they get covid 'naturally' to become immune that's better than a vaccine? Well, it's not even close, you have lesser immunity for a shorter time and likely will have permanent damage shortening your lifespan.
Are they logically weighing out the risks to getting covid versus the risks of taking the vaccine? Aside from the AZ & JJ causing blood clots in 1 in 250k persons who are predominantly female, there is no real risk of anything bad happening to you.
Are they scared of long-term effects? A fair point, but also a moot point as vaccines have been long studied and very little if any had long-term effects. The real grave side effects tend to always show up quickly. But also, do these same persons consider the long term effect of everything they ingest? No, then why exercise such scrutiny on something that is NEEDED. It reeks of fear and illogic.
Wraith King wrote:matr1x wrote:Anyone feel they playing with these numbers from the start?
How is cpep still getting paid? For what exactly? We money taking a walk
They control the information being released. Ask yourself, do you trust any politician in Trinidad?
matr1x wrote:Wraith King wrote:matr1x wrote:Anyone feel they playing with these numbers from the start?
How is cpep still getting paid? For what exactly? We money taking a walk
They control the information being released. Ask yourself, do you trust any politician in Trinidad?
Pnm have always been excellent at being opportunistic. They have been cooking the figures to suit their need.
drchaos wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:redmanjp wrote:hover11 wrote:No it doesn't thats the long and short of it even though you are vaccinated you can still be infected and spread it among othersWraith King wrote:i_code_and_stuff wrote:Wraith King wrote:
Why is a vaccine better than a cure?
Because to use a cure, you have to know that you're infected. By the time you realize you're infected, the virus has already had a chance to do significant damage to you, but what's worse is that by this time, you would have already infected other people. Vaccines prevent both of these scenarios
Does the vaccine prevents you from getting and spreading the virus?
the US ones at least dramatically reduce the chance of infection. also even if u do get infected the viral load is lower so still less chance of transmission. this data allowed the CDC to decide that masks no longer needed for fully vaccinated ppl.
the chini vaccine? not so much, but all vaccine keeping u out of hospital so take it now or ASAP.
I honestly need to understand the logic of anti-vaxxers.
Are they relying on our herd immunity to keep them safe? If so that is utterly selfish.
Are they thinking if they get covid 'naturally' to become immune that's better than a vaccine? Well, it's not even close, you have lesser immunity for a shorter time and likely will have permanent damage shortening your lifespan.
Are they logically weighing out the risks to getting covid versus the risks of taking the vaccine? Aside from the AZ & JJ causing blood clots in 1 in 250k persons who are predominantly female, there is no real risk of anything bad happening to you.
Are they scared of long-term effects? A fair point, but also a moot point as vaccines have been long studied and very little if any had long-term effects. The real grave side effects tend to always show up quickly. But also, do these same persons consider the long term effect of everything they ingest? No, then why exercise such scrutiny on something that is NEEDED. It reeks of fear and illogic.
The Bold text above is not true.
The data suggests you are protected for AT LEAST (or at mininmum) 6 months with natural infection.
Also new data is finding long lived memory B cells which means even longer lasting immunity.
Vaccine and Natural infection are both acceptable ways of being protected.
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Wraith King wrote:i_code_and_stuff wrote:Wraith King wrote:
Why is a vaccine better than a cure?
Because to use a cure, you have to know that you're infected. By the time you realize you're infected, the virus has already had a chance to do significant damage to you, but what's worse is that by this time, you would have already infected other people. Vaccines prevent both of these scenarios
Does the vaccine prevents you from getting and spreading the virus?
Only thing a vaccine gonna do is keep you out of ICU and HDU!!
Regarding our numbers.. expect numbers to be decreasing from now
matr1x wrote:Wraith King wrote:matr1x wrote:Anyone feel they playing with these numbers from the start?
How is cpep still getting paid? For what exactly? We money taking a walk
They control the information being released. Ask yourself, do you trust any politician in Trinidad?
Pnm have always been excellent at being opportunistic. They have been cooking the figures to suit their need.
Dohplaydat wrote:drchaos wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:redmanjp wrote:hover11 wrote:No it doesn't thats the long and short of it even though you are vaccinated you can still be infected and spread it among othersWraith King wrote:i_code_and_stuff wrote:Wraith King wrote:
Why is a vaccine better than a cure?
Because to use a cure, you have to know that you're infected. By the time you realize you're infected, the virus has already had a chance to do significant damage to you, but what's worse is that by this time, you would have already infected other people. Vaccines prevent both of these scenarios
Does the vaccine prevents you from getting and spreading the virus?
the US ones at least dramatically reduce the chance of infection. also even if u do get infected the viral load is lower so still less chance of transmission. this data allowed the CDC to decide that masks no longer needed for fully vaccinated ppl.
the chini vaccine? not so much, but all vaccine keeping u out of hospital so take it now or ASAP.
I honestly need to understand the logic of anti-vaxxers.
Are they relying on our herd immunity to keep them safe? If so that is utterly selfish.
Are they thinking if they get covid 'naturally' to become immune that's better than a vaccine? Well, it's not even close, you have lesser immunity for a shorter time and likely will have permanent damage shortening your lifespan.
Are they logically weighing out the risks to getting covid versus the risks of taking the vaccine? Aside from the AZ & JJ causing blood clots in 1 in 250k persons who are predominantly female, there is no real risk of anything bad happening to you.
Are they scared of long-term effects? A fair point, but also a moot point as vaccines have been long studied and very little if any had long-term effects. The real grave side effects tend to always show up quickly. But also, do these same persons consider the long term effect of everything they ingest? No, then why exercise such scrutiny on something that is NEEDED. It reeks of fear and illogic.
The Bold text above is not true.
The data suggests you are protected for AT LEAST (or at mininmum) 6 months with natural infection.
Also new data is finding long lived memory B cells which means even longer lasting immunity.
Vaccine and Natural infection are both acceptable ways of being protected.
Yea and no. Many problems with making it seem like a viable choice.
Getting the virus naturally can kill you, or in most cases leave you with permanent damage.
Secondly, natural immunity lasts 6-8 months, and that's against the same strain. With new strains surfacing now, efficacy goes down a lot. In some cases, the 2nd reinfection resulted in far worse outcomes.
So yea it's a choice, but it's quite a stupid choice to go the non-vaccine route.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: matr1x and 72 guests