Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
sMASH wrote:any ting to do with pressures and flows, a couple guys in the field, or really just one, and one guy in a control room will handle dat. thats a non issue so long as the physical tie-ins are there.
sMASH wrote:even if the tie-ins werent there, just hadda issue some hot tap permits and viola, jump over!
DreamWeaver wrote:
If the returns are better for the govt then great. It all seems to be working out that way. If it heads that way then we'll be getting more profits as a country. Can you not agree to that? Point Lisas might be screwed though so the workers need to be aware of what is coming.
So calm down.
DreamWeaver wrote:
I said things bad for Point Lisas.
carluva wrote:DreamWeaver wrote:
If the returns are better for the govt then great. It all seems to be working out that way. If it heads that way then we'll be getting more profits as a country. Can you not agree to that? Point Lisas might be screwed though so the workers need to be aware of what is coming.
So calm down.
Never disagreed my boy. In fact, that was what I alluded to.DreamWeaver wrote:
I said things bad for Point Lisas.
The Pt. Lisas model was a failed model that did not monetise our country's resources properly. The initial vision was good, but there needed to be a review of the model and contracts several times between the 50's, 60's and now. Unfortunately, the model has proven itself to be unsustainable which is why we are now seeing these emerging issues.
carluva wrote:sMASH wrote:any ting to do with pressures and flows, a couple guys in the field, or really just one, and one guy in a control room will handle dat. thats a non issue so long as the physical tie-ins are there.
This statement alone shows the complete lack of understanding of pressures and flows into a network even though physical infrastructure may be in place.sMASH wrote:even if the tie-ins werent there, just hadda issue some hot tap permits and viola, jump over!
You make it sound as if it is as simple as going in your yard to lock off your mains valve and then cutting the PVC line to install a TEE. Hot taps are not as simple as you have suggested.
All is easier said than done and for several reasons mentioned and not, this is just not possible.
carluva wrote:sMASH wrote:any ting to do with pressures and flows, a couple guys in the field, or really just one, and one guy in a control room will handle dat. thats a non issue so long as the physical tie-ins are there.
This statement alone shows the complete lack of understanding of pressures and flows into a network even though physical infrastructure may be in place.sMASH wrote:even if the tie-ins werent there, just hadda issue some hot tap permits and viola, jump over!
You make it sound as if it is as simple as going in your yard to lock off your mains valve and then cutting the PVC line to install a TEE. Hot taps are not as simple as you have suggested.
All is easier said than done and for several reasons mentioned and not, this is just not possible.
carluva wrote:
The Pt. Lisas model was a failed model that did not monetise our country's resources properly. The initial vision was good, but there needed to be a review of the model and contracts several times between the 50's, 60's and now. Unfortunately, the model has proven itself to be unsustainable which is why we are now seeing these emerging issues.
carluva wrote:And this proves what? That there is a gas pipeline network in Trinidad and Tobago as well as jumpovers. This does not demonstrate that gas is being preferentially redirected.
sMASH wrote:carluva wrote:
The Pt. Lisas model was a failed model that did not monetise our country's resources properly. The initial vision was good, but there needed to be a review of the model and contracts several times between the 50's, 60's and now. Unfortunately, the model has proven itself to be unsustainable which is why we are now seeing these emerging issues.
it didnt fail because it was inherently flawed, cause many people came in and made a lot of money. it failed because of the management.
if rowley paid as much attention to pt lisas as he doing with pt. fortain, it might get something right.
... on second thought, scrap that. cause they negotiated their way into paying for a whole turn around for 10% shared project, and negotiated their way to unitizing and getting 5% share in the whole complex, rather than 10 and 11% in two plants.
sMASH wrote:they gone to sapp rowley head
Redman wrote:When Caroline Seepersad Bachan said she was going to Cabinet to deal with all of these issues.....what happened?
Redman wrote:When Caroline Seepersad Bachan said she was going to Cabinet to deal with all of these issues.....what happened?
SuperiorMan wrote:How long would it take to get back all these people if UNC win the next election? Like how many years would it take? Fedup of reading what these clowns are doing to this country.
De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:When Caroline Seepersad Bachan said she was going to Cabinet to deal with all of these issues.....what happened?
Nothing, but a fairer comparison is what happened after JUHN Scarfy and Goebbels inserted themselves into the "negotiations" which is half of Pt. Lisas is now down, $300M has been spent on a no gas, 10% plant and the shut down of M4/M5. 7150 MTPD gone just like that, along with Nutrien's ,Yara's plants.
I don't recall these things happening after CSB's grandcharge.
Oh yeah the unitization coming "jess now"
These clowns of pastor Habit7 and Redman, they have never worked in industry. They sit and read articles from red government story tellers and then try to pass it on as gospel truth.Cantmis wrote:Lol non energy personnel explaining the oil and gas industry .
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:When Caroline Seepersad Bachan said she was going to Cabinet to deal with all of these issues.....what happened?
Nothing, but a fairer comparison is what happened after JUHN Scarfy and Goebbels inserted themselves into the "negotiations" which is half of Pt. Lisas is now down, $300M has been spent on a no gas, 10% plant and the shut down of M4/M5. 7150 MTPD gone just like that, along with Nutrien's ,Yara's plants.
I don't recall these things happening after CSB's grandcharge.
Oh yeah the unitization coming "jess now"
Well she was moved.
Ramnarine came in....nothing done until Poten was engaged and began their gas study.
Despite knowing that there was a problem in 2011..they did not engage the MNCs in order to recover value, avoid these issues or improve the dynamic.
The reccs in general are
Solve the supply problem.
Solve the transfer pricing problem.
Optimize the supply to an equilibrium point between PTL and LNG.
We are in a crappy period no matter what.
Not doing train 1 TAR would have prevented plant closures how?
Please identify how Train 1 impacts the price of gas that NGC suppliers have set.
Be specific
YawnRedman wrote:Any answer to the question?
Or just the same blather?
Morning Zoombindranath.
ent!!!!zoom rader wrote:YawnRedman wrote:Any answer to the question?
Or just the same blather?
Morning Zoombindranath.
Your questions are not relevant
He has to be spoon fed misleading information from the other red government bloggers, then he will get back to youDe Dragon wrote:Notice how Red Colostomy Bag disappears when you present a cogent argument? Then he'll return with some dotish red herring argument.
De Dragon wrote:Notice how Red Colostomy Bag disappears when you present a cogent argument? Then he'll return with some dotish red herring argument.
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Notice how Red Colostomy Bag disappears when you present a cogent argument? Then he'll return with some dotish red herring argument.
I agree ...when I don't 'disappear' your cogency is lacking.
....
Flow ballzing up on the internet at the office.
@smash.
I would agree with you...except that the decision on where train 1 s gas would have gone would be
BP and Shell s to make.
Not NGC.
And of course they raised the price on their gas.
They would have maxed out 2 3 and 4 and still be increasing prices to NGC for supply to PTL.
Of course there is the minor issues of what are the net back margins on Methanol and Ammonia with current prices where they are.
So if it is that NGC had gas....seems that the product pricing globally would still indicate crappy plant economics, and closure if it was advantageous to the MNC.
As we are now
I know this gobbledegook isnt important to allyuh, but it matters to the people that matter.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 37 guests