Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Redman wrote:Dragon.
Tell me how does NGC force BP and Shell to sell NGC sufficient gas for PTL and not direct it straight to LNG where they still have 2,3 and 4 under supply contracts and shareholding.
And excellent control of where and who they sell to.
They also have zero liability for shortfalls into PTL.
demented wrote:Prices are increasing on Ammonia and Methanol:
Ammonia
Methanol
De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Dragon.
Tell me how does NGC force BP and Shell to sell NGC sufficient gas for PTL and not direct it straight to LNG where they still have 2,3 and 4 under supply contracts and shareholding.
And excellent control of where and who they sell to.
They also have zero liability for shortfalls into PTL.
If by "they" you mean NGC, then you are wrong again. NGC has contracted amounts that it must supply to companies on the Estate. Enforcement of the contracted amount is pointless, as NGC frequently cites(falsely) force majeures in their curtailments, and involves protracted, and costly maneuverings which most companies seem unwilling to undertake. The only use of the contracted amount is to fend off curtailments by NGC by pointing out how much you are already below the contracted amount, and that they should look elsewhere.
The "negotiations" that JUHN Scarfy and Goebbels had with BP/Shell's top brass should have rectified that issue in your first question, but what did we get? Not only continuing to cede ALL power to BP/Shell, but coughing up $300M to fully fund a TAR, to get gas which mysteriously wasn't available, and threatened said Train 1's future operations.
As much as you worship JUHN Scarfy and Goebbels and every thing LFD RFD PNM, they got outfoxed, outmaneuvered and out classed by PP/Shell.
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Dragon.
Tell me how does NGC force BP and Shell to sell NGC sufficient gas for PTL and not direct it straight to LNG where they still have 2,3 and 4 under supply contracts and shareholding.
And excellent control of where and who they sell to.
They also have zero liability for shortfalls into PTL.
If by "they" you mean NGC, then you are wrong again. NGC has contracted amounts that it must supply to companies on the Estate. Enforcement of the contracted amount is pointless, as NGC frequently cites(falsely) force majeures in their curtailments, and involves protracted, and costly maneuverings which most companies seem unwilling to undertake. The only use of the contracted amount is to fend off curtailments by NGC by pointing out how much you are already below the contracted amount, and that they should look elsewhere.
The "negotiations" that JUHN Scarfy and Goebbels had with BP/Shell's top brass should have rectified that issue in your first question, but what did we get? Not only continuing to cede ALL power to BP/Shell, but coughing up $300M to fully fund a TAR, to get gas which mysteriously wasn't available, and threatened said Train 1's future operations.
As much as you worship JUHN Scarfy and Goebbels and every thing LFD RFD PNM, they got outfoxed, outmaneuvered and out classed by PP/Shell.
They meant BP and Shell.They have zero liability in the shortages to PTL.
They also have little or no shareholding.
NGC has been using FM as a way to avoid liability for the shortfalls but it is not a correct application and really not good business.
You have not answered the Q..
Trains 2,3 and 4 s gas supply are not under the control of the NGC.
So negotiation s of supply to NGC would be limited to the quantity that BP and Shell are willing to supply NGC ....which would be after they...(BP and Shell) supply 2,3 and 4.
So again...the question is
Can you please me how does NGC force BP and Shell to sell NGC sufficient gas for PTL and not direct it straight to LNG where they still have 2,3 and 4 under supply contracts and shareholding.???
DreamWeaver wrote:Anybody could confirm if Atlantic Train 1 is back in production and the current estimated mmscf usage per day?
Joshie23 wrote:Yk, it would be interesting to see the points/data surrounding ALNG, NGC, Producers, Point Lisa's, etc., laid out from start to finish (as in where we are now) and possible solutions, without the name-calling, vitriol, mudslinging, etc.
I mean, we're following the points and you guys are saying brilliant stuff, but I just think there would be more credibility to each poster of the facts were laid out without any apparent bias or anything like that.
Engineers et al, surely we're capable of something like that, right? Please?
Musical Doc wrote:DreamWeaver wrote:Anybody could confirm if Atlantic Train 1 is back in production and the current estimated mmscf usage per day?
Plant down until the 16th I was told
Hoss we are now an islands of waiters and store clerks.carluva wrote:Real experts on Trinituner here yes.
Folks here versed in hot taps, tie ins, plant operations, gas redistribution, root cause analysis, welding, CWI, instrumentation, natural gas value chain, natural gas marketing, commercial/legal, energy contracting and energy governance (well at least seem that way but there's no tangible facts or evidence to confirm or refute the same) but yet, none of these knowledge houses effecting a change. Curious, isn't it
Redman wrote:Joshie23 wrote:Yk, it would be interesting to see the points/data surrounding ALNG, NGC, Producers, Point Lisa's, etc., laid out from start to finish (as in where we are now) and possible solutions, without the name-calling, vitriol, mudslinging, etc.
I mean, we're following the points and you guys are saying brilliant stuff, but I just think there would be more credibility to each poster of the facts were laid out without any apparent bias or anything like that.
Engineers et al, surely we're capable of something like that, right? Please?
Ignore the opinions here.
Take a look at the experts on the global industry reports/ analysis on TnTs current position...Poten Gas Master Plan ...and
Farrell'sPoint of Inflexion.
Both docs are available in full and in condensed form for presentation.
Read those, see what has been published by GORTT, BP and Shell on what has been done over the years.
There are other international reports that cover the industry and make conclusions.
Read the local press
Form your own opinions.
Come back and discuss.
Same thing for Petrotrin, Solomon Report etc.
carluva wrote:Real experts on Trinituner here yes.
Folks here versed in hot taps, tie ins, plant operations, gas redistribution, root cause analysis, welding, CWI, instrumentation, natural gas value chain, natural gas marketing, commercial/legal, energy contracting and energy governance (well at least seem that way but there's no tangible facts or evidence to confirm or refute the same) but yet, none of these knowledge houses effecting a change. Curious, isn't it
We are left with idiots like eliteauto, pastor p¤rnhabit 7 and Redman.sMASH wrote:carluva wrote:Real experts on Trinituner here yes.
Folks here versed in hot taps, tie ins, plant operations, gas redistribution, root cause analysis, welding, CWI, instrumentation, natural gas value chain, natural gas marketing, commercial/legal, energy contracting and energy governance (well at least seem that way but there's no tangible facts or evidence to confirm or refute the same) but yet, none of these knowledge houses effecting a change. Curious, isn't it
320,000 trinis went leffff foot,,,, rittttte fooot. no amount of education, training, skills, experience can compete with that, bruh.
Redman wrote:White people lies.
sMASH wrote:Down is Titan, m1(?) , m4, m5 and trinigen 1 or 3, can't remember.
M2 and m3 getting supplied by denovo, so unaffected by anything ngc mandate.
Not sure if the denovo supply also extends to cnc, n2k and aum.
But since denovo came on stream, fellas say the ammonia plants running steady.
When lng tr1 restarts u could vibes back and see which still remain up.
sMASH wrote:jess like the press release from niquan saying the 'DA-301' vessel ruptured, and the brave boy report that said the 'hydrogen compressor exploded', and the man previously that said its 'physically impossible, to divert gas from pt fortain to pt lisas', every jargon thrown out is just word salads to those not familiar with the industry, and hoping nobody dares to challenge their own ignorance, and ask a follow up question.
carluva wrote:Alot of word salad here from you sir.
Amazing how your tank building and piping experience translates to all things operations, the gas value chain and a comprehensive incident analysis from just looking at two pictures and some Facebook posts... All tied together with a political twist.
You'll be surprised to know just how much people on tuner and society have the knowledge but don't need to defend the slurs that empty vessels throw at them.
So I'll leave you to lead by example and ask you to simply answer this... What is your experience in the industry, at what level (contractor, operator/owner, shareholder or government) and how do these enable you to make such contributions to effect a change in the industry?sMASH wrote:jess like the press release from niquan saying the 'DA-301' vessel ruptured, and the brave boy report that said the 'hydrogen compressor exploded', and the man previously that said its 'physically impossible, to divert gas from pt fortain to pt lisas', every jargon thrown out is just word salads to those not familiar with the industry, and hoping nobody dares to challenge their own ignorance, and ask a follow up question.
sMASH wrote:yuh lining up ah wuk for meh?
sMASH wrote:carluva wrote:
So I'll leave you to lead by example and ask you to simply answer this... What is your experience in the industry, at what level (contractor, operator/owner, shareholder or government) and how do these enable you to make such contributions to effect a change in the industry?sMASH wrote:jess like the press release from niquan saying the 'DA-301' vessel ruptured, and the brave boy report that said the 'hydrogen compressor exploded', and the man previously that said its 'physically impossible, to divert gas from pt fortain to pt lisas', every jargon thrown out is just word salads to those not familiar with the industry, and hoping nobody dares to challenge their own ignorance, and ask a follow up question.
yuh lining up ah wuk for meh?
carluva wrote:Alot of word salad here from you sir.
Amazing how your tank building and piping experience translates to all things operations, the gas value chain and a comprehensive incident analysis from just looking at two pictures and some Facebook posts... All tied together with a political twist.
You'll be surprised to know just how much people on tuner and society have the knowledge but don't need to defend the slurs that empty vessels throw at them.
So I'll leave you to lead by example and ask you to simply answer this... What is your experience in the industry, at what level (contractor, operator/owner, shareholder or government) and how do these enable you to make such contributions to effect a change in the industry?sMASH wrote:jess like the press release from niquan saying the 'DA-301' vessel ruptured, and the brave boy report that said the 'hydrogen compressor exploded', and the man previously that said its 'physically impossible, to divert gas from pt fortain to pt lisas', every jargon thrown out is just word salads to those not familiar with the industry, and hoping nobody dares to challenge their own ignorance, and ask a follow up question.
De Dragon wrote:carluva wrote:Alot of word salad here from you sir.
Amazing how your tank building and piping experience translates to all things operations, the gas value chain and a comprehensive incident analysis from just looking at two pictures and some Facebook posts... All tied together with a political twist.
You'll be surprised to know just how much people on tuner and society have the knowledge but don't need to defend the slurs that empty vessels throw at them.
So I'll leave you to lead by example and ask you to simply answer this... What is your experience in the industry, at what level (contractor, operator/owner, shareholder or government) and how do these enable you to make such contributions to effect a change in the industry?sMASH wrote:jess like the press release from niquan saying the 'DA-301' vessel ruptured, and the brave boy report that said the 'hydrogen compressor exploded', and the man previously that said its 'physically impossible, to divert gas from pt fortain to pt lisas', every jargon thrown out is just word salads to those not familiar with the industry, and hoping nobody dares to challenge their own ignorance, and ask a follow up question.
Soldier, tanks/vessels/piping doesn't fail catastrophically like that "jess so"
Human error, substandard inspections, poor QA/QC on welds and flanges, incompatible materials, lack of pressure testing and a host of other things cause that type of failure. Asking someone what qualifies them to express an opinion, where in my view had you read some of his posts properly, you would realize that he has much experience, doesn't advance the high brow debate you seem to so deperately crave.
At the end of the day, a newly commissioned plant should not have a failure of this type.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 122 guests