Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
This is a trial , the lane merge is too far east but it should be pass the intersection . They do vehicle mapping as in time travel for vehicles coming into Port of Spain .
The lights at the intersection should be removed by this Thursday . The lane merge is to facilitate a better merging of East West and South West at "goer" as he termed it .
Tonight to tomorrow this merging area should be adjusted closer to the now intersection .
We don't understand why the right lanes need to come to a stop after the interchange . It seems as those coming from the east wanting to go to Aranguez don't know how to merge.
Aranguez south traffic has increased exponentially with many new businesses.
On an afternoon 52% of the traffic coming out of Aranguez is heading to the south ramp , an additional lane is to be created for this traffic to access this ramp directly.
src1983 wrote:What about ppl in the east that lane was developed to ease congestion coming from the east.
X_Factor wrote:its a dumb move, even if the lights are removed
commute time increased by at least 15 mins this morning....
i cant see how reverting to two lanes will help
New_SPECIES wrote:SR wrote:Stupid decision added an addtional 15 minutes to my commute time this morning ......what a waste of paved road
That extra 15 mins was due to a man who “shut down” on beetham and police was around him.... people jus slow down to maco!
After I passed that scene this morning... the highway was “flying”...
src1983 wrote:What about ppl in the east that lane was developed to ease congestion coming from the east.
New_SPECIES wrote:X_Factor wrote:its a dumb move, even if the lights are removed
commute time increased by at least 15 mins this morning....
i cant see how reverting to two lanes will helpNew_SPECIES wrote:SR wrote:Stupid decision added an addtional 15 minutes to my commute time this morning ......what a waste of paved road
That extra 15 mins was due to a man who “shut down” on beetham and police was around him.... people jus slow down to maco!
After I passed that scene this morning... the highway was “flying”...
X_Factor wrote:New_SPECIES wrote:X_Factor wrote:its a dumb move, even if the lights are removed
commute time increased by at least 15 mins this morning....
i cant see how reverting to two lanes will helpNew_SPECIES wrote:SR wrote:Stupid decision added an addtional 15 minutes to my commute time this morning ......what a waste of paved road
That extra 15 mins was due to a man who “shut down” on beetham and police was around him.... people jus slow down to maco!
After I passed that scene this morning... the highway was “flying”...
shouldnt put this here
but i left home at 815
pioneer wrote:New species enough about the beetham shutdown nah geez
Clearly you didn't see the chaos taking place by the VALPARK intersection.
People from north valsayn trying to head west, the usual west bound traffic, the bamboo u-turners and people exiting from south valsayn all trying to head west at the same time.
Further compounded by the fact the light was turnin red in less than 15 seconds.
I think we all know by now someone shutdown on the beetham, but that's not the issue.
pioneer wrote:I guess everyone except new species noticed 4 lanes of traffic being crammed into two lanes, with one set trying to merge all the way to the left and the chaos that ensued.
Yeah man, there's no big change...what people experienced was just an illusion
one neckbeard's opionion>the masses
pete wrote:What's stopping the south drivers from merging into the lanes the people coming from the east are in for that perfect scenario to work?
pioneer wrote:Why would westbound drivers coming from the east merge if someone is trying to merge infront them?
The obvious choice is either blow ur horn and deny the merge or slow down and let the person merge...as it was before and it caused no problem.
Those south people are still goin to try to dart all the way from the left to the right lane into POS...they always hog the right lane for some stupid reason....jus check what they do on evenings...the exact opposite.
This plan is full of flaws and once again the ministry duncee heads didn't really think it through.
I hope people start driving on that "closed" off lane just for spite.
No offense to new species if you're one of those ministry duncee heads.
pioneer wrote:Why would westbound drivers coming from the east merge if someone is trying to merge infront them?
The obvious choice is either blow ur horn and deny the merge or slow down and let the person merge...as it was before and it caused no problem.
Those south people are still goin to try to dart all the way from the left to the right lane into POS...they always hog the right lane for some stupid reason....jus check what they do on evenings...the exact opposite.
This plan is full of flaws and once again the ministry duncee heads didn't really think it through.
I hope people start driving on that "closed" off lane just for spite.
No offense to new species if you're one of those ministry duncee heads.
cornfused wrote:an additional lane is to be created for this traffic to access this ramp directly.
kg494EJ-1 wrote:Why do they continue to test these theories, when schools have started closing and the traffic patterns change.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: pugboy and 40 guests