Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
pioneer wrote:I'm guessing you collected this data from all hospitals and went through all employee attendance files etc etc?
*KRONIK* wrote:FYI
1) dont believe everything u read in the papers if u werent there to see/hear it urself...cuz most if the time....is 1 man version of the story...not what actually happened....and the news does always carry the most controversial version
2) jr doctors are not allowed to do any c-sections
3) the mother was being a pain/troublesome to hospital staff before and after the c-section and more than likely the baby got cut due to her lack of co-operation...and this is coming from persons who were there that night...
So carry on....talk a set of $hit allyuh eh know bout...blame everybody....
And yes...the way it was handled was very improper....
But allyuh need to stop judging ppl if allyuh eh know the whole story...
Toilet Cleaner wrote:In about 7 days it will all be forgotten.
vtec-ghost wrote:stueps wtf dred
that sheit needs to stop
they need to set a precedent and severely deal with those at fault
so subsequently ppl will know that if they mess up, there will be consequences
*KRONIK* wrote:FYI
1) dont believe everything u read in the papers if u werent there to see/hear it urself...cuz most if the time....is 1 man version of the story...not what actually happened....and the news does always carry the most controversial version
2) jr doctors are not allowed to do any c-sections
3) the mother was being a pain/troublesome to hospital staff before and after the c-section and more than likely the baby got cut due to her lack of co-operation...and this is coming from persons who were there that night...
So carry on....talk a set of $hit allyuh eh know bout...blame everybody....
And yes...the way it was handled was very improper....
But allyuh need to stop judging ppl if allyuh eh know the whole story...
VexXx Dogg wrote:*KRONIK* wrote:FYI
1) dont believe everything u read in the papers if u werent there to see/hear it urself...cuz most if the time....is 1 man version of the story...not what actually happened....and the news does always carry the most controversial version
2) jr doctors are not allowed to do any c-sections
3) the mother was being a pain/troublesome to hospital staff before and after the c-section and more than likely the baby got cut due to her lack of co-operation...and this is coming from persons who were there that night...
So carry on....talk a set of $hit allyuh eh know bout...blame everybody....
And yes...the way it was handled was very improper....
But allyuh need to stop judging ppl if allyuh eh know the whole story...
a doctor I aint, but HOW can this happen?
Ent C section requires the use of anaesthesia?
pugboy wrote:The senior "consultant" doc was probably delivering a baby at his private practice
QuietGiant wrote:Mt. Hope gettin' REL outta hand lately. Ppl dying from little or no injuries cuz of their slackness. Next ting u know u go to buy a drink & dey kill u too yes :$
pioneer wrote:Didn't know chuna have so many lawyers, doctors and CSI all in one place.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests