Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
shogun wrote:I still stand by the fact that i think ZR is the second account of another well known tuner.
ruffneck_12 wrote:yes, but not because of this
maybe if people would stop burning fossil fuels and killing off so much plants and animals, the world mightn't end so fast
But nah, what 2 consenting adults do in a bed room more important that sheit like Global warming and Isis
nick639 wrote:Just how the fags and les can't help who they in love with, Well I guess just now incest and pedophilia would be supported?? Cuz they can't help it either ... Jus saying.....
nick639 wrote:Just how the fags and les can't help who they in love with, Well I guess just now incest and pedophilia would be supported?? Cuz they can't help it either ... Jus saying.....
this is a stupid argument.Ronaldo95163 wrote:Pedos coming out now for rights
Bring on the petitions. I will personally sign them in agreement.
Equal rights for all iymc
Daran wrote:Why is it People's Partnership and their supporters are much more likely to support LGBT Rights?
There are biggots on both sides, but I just went through the facebook pages of both parties and some of their support groups.
PPG has significantly (almost a magnitude of 5 times) more Rainbow profile pics vs PNM.
RASC wrote:Daran wrote:Why is it People's Partnership and their supporters are much more likely to support LGBT Rights?
There are biggots on both sides, but I just went through the facebook pages of both parties and some of their support groups.
PPG has significantly (almost a magnitude of 5 times) more Rainbow profile pics vs PNM.
PP supporters are more likely to be openly homosexual than PNM counterparts.
The PP has always been the party of choice for Gays and Lesbians.
Deadric wrote:Not even jumping on the anti-LGBT train, but it would make sense.
Isn't the PNM generally more conservative, much like the Republicans in the US?
nick639 wrote:
heavyweight280 wrote:weed should have been legal first
PinkNews Exclusive
Natalie Bennett has said she is “open” to polyamorous marriages and civil partnerships.
Green Party leader Natalie Bennett has said her party is “open” to discussion on the idea of civil partnership or marriages between three people.
Speaking in a question and answer session with PinkNews readers, Ms Bennett was asked whether she supported the right of polyamorous relationships to get married or have civil partnerships.
The PinkNews reader, Dr Redfern Jon Barrett, asked: “At present those in a ‘trio’ (a three-way relationship) are denied marriage equality, and as a result face a considerable amount of legal discrimination.
“As someone living with his two boyfriends in a stable long-term relationship, I would like to know what your stance is on polyamory rights. Is there room for Green support on group civil partnerships or marriages?”
To which Ms Bennett responded: “At present, we do not have a policy on civil partnerships involving more than two people.
“We are, uniquely in this country, a party whose policies are developed and voted for by our members.
“We have led the way on many issues related to the liberalisation of legal status in adult consenting relationships, and we are open to further conversation and consultation.”
Opponents of same-sex marriage have long argued that ‘redefining’ marriage would lead to unions between more than two people.
Tory MP Craig Whittaker warned in 2012: “What will our successors be discussing and have to legislate for in the future? Polygamy? Three-way relationships? Who knows what else?”
Lib Dem Parliamentary candidate Zoe O’Connell recently opened up about living in a polyamorous relationships with her partners.
The Green Party is launching its LGBT manifesto today in London’s Soho.
In the Q&A, Ms Bennett backed gender X passports and addressed a number of LGBT issues.
Natalie Bennett’s partner Jim Jepps came under scrutiny earlier this month for a blog about rape fantasies.
PinkNews election coverage is generously supported by KPMG.
RASC wrote:Daran wrote:Why is it People's Partnership and their supporters are much more likely to support LGBT Rights?
There are biggots on both sides, but I just went through the facebook pages of both parties and some of their support groups.
PPG has significantly (almost a magnitude of 5 times) more Rainbow profile pics vs PNM.
PP supporters are more likely to be openly homosexual than PNM counterparts.
The PP has always been the party of choice for Gays and Lesbians.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 48 guests