Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
pete wrote:Maybe they will use a factor like in motor racing like 1.4x the cc rating for turbocharged vehicles to determine the n/a equivalent cc. So that 1.0 turbo fiesta wouldnt be affected.
ingalook wrote:I guess the Vanilla Civic is a luxury car then...
Habit7 wrote:pete wrote:Maybe they will use a factor like in motor racing like 1.4x the cc rating for turbocharged vehicles to determine the n/a equivalent cc. So that 1.0 turbo fiesta wouldnt be affected.
I really cant understand this beat up for this though. It is obvious that they'll have to tax OEM turbo charged vehicles that circumvent the 2.0L NA tax.
A VW 1.4TSI engine (turbocharged) is comparable to a VW 2.0FSI engine (normally aspirated) and both fall under 1999cc. The economical turbo charged engine will not be taxed.
I am yet to hear of an economical middle class targeted +1999cc engine car on the local market. Likewise if you can buy a +1.5T you must have paper. Pay the tax and save the environment.
Habit7 wrote:So I should carp like an idiot and bawl that MVT going to increase on 1.0T Fiesta that even on the market yet?
Habit7 wrote:ingalook wrote:I guess the Vanilla Civic is a luxury car then...
Actually I recently spoke to a ansa sales rep and he said the new Civic is being priced to compete with the Kia Optima and Hyundai Sonata
aaron17 wrote:So why can't they charge on cars with emission figures or mpg?
pete wrote:Fuel consumption is more dependent on driving style though. Never saw the top gear episode where they had a sports car drive around behind a prius for some laps of a track? Prius being driven at 100% burned more fuel than the sports car that just kept up.
Fact is that under normal(conservative) driving conditions the smaller the engine the less fuel it burns.
Another thing is that turbocharged vehicles generally cost more than a N/A version with the same displacement(from the supplier). How that's relevant? We need forex to buy the cars to begin with, the less forex the dealer uses to buy the cars the more forex we have to use for other things.
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Habit7 wrote:pete wrote:Maybe they will use a factor like in motor racing like 1.4x the cc rating for turbocharged vehicles to determine the n/a equivalent cc. So that 1.0 turbo fiesta wouldnt be affected.
I really cant understand this beat up for this though. It is obvious that they'll have to tax OEM turbo charged vehicles that circumvent the 2.0L NA tax.
A VW 1.4TSI engine (turbocharged) is comparable to a VW 2.0FSI engine (normally aspirated) and both fall under 1999cc. The economical turbo charged engine will not be taxed.
I am yet to hear of an economical middle class targeted +1999cc engine car on the local market. Likewise if you can buy a +1.5T you must have paper. Pay the tax and save the environment.
all that to show support for the gov't.
novastar1 wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Habit7 wrote:pete wrote:Maybe they will use a factor like in motor racing like 1.4x the cc rating for turbocharged vehicles to determine the n/a equivalent cc. So that 1.0 turbo fiesta wouldnt be affected.
I really cant understand this beat up for this though. It is obvious that they'll have to tax OEM turbo charged vehicles that circumvent the 2.0L NA tax.
A VW 1.4TSI engine (turbocharged) is comparable to a VW 2.0FSI engine (normally aspirated) and both fall under 1999cc. The economical turbo charged engine will not be taxed.
I am yet to hear of an economical middle class targeted +1999cc engine car on the local market. Likewise if you can buy a +1.5T you must have paper. Pay the tax and save the environment.
all that to show support for the gov't.
Turbos are used to increase the fuel efficiency and thus save the environment.
Habit7 wrote:novastar1 wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Habit7 wrote:pete wrote:Maybe they will use a factor like in motor racing like 1.4x the cc rating for turbocharged vehicles to determine the n/a equivalent cc. So that 1.0 turbo fiesta wouldnt be affected.
I really cant understand this beat up for this though. It is obvious that they'll have to tax OEM turbo charged vehicles that circumvent the 2.0L NA tax.
A VW 1.4TSI engine (turbocharged) is comparable to a VW 2.0FSI engine (normally aspirated) and both fall under 1999cc. The economical turbo charged engine will not be taxed.
I am yet to hear of an economical middle class targeted +1999cc engine car on the local market. Likewise if you can buy a +1.5T you must have paper. Pay the tax and save the environment.
all that to show support for the gov't.
Turbos are used to increase the fuel efficiency and thus save the environment.
No.
Turbos are used to increase power to match that to an engine of greater displacement.
Adding a turbo to an engine doesn't increase fuel efficiency.
desifemlove wrote:so what? since few people own them, i doh see the issue. people need to read up on progressive taxation. or make a case why it shouldn't be so.
timelapse wrote:desifemlove wrote:so what? since few people own them, i doh see the issue. people need to read up on progressive taxation. or make a case why it shouldn't be so.
You on Tuner and spewing this bullcrap?
Do you even know how to drive?
desifemlove wrote:timelapse wrote:desifemlove wrote:so what? since few people own them, i doh see the issue. people need to read up on progressive taxation. or make a case why it shouldn't be so.
You on Tuner and spewing this bullcrap?
Do you even know how to drive?
yes, i have, and i does have a car. and? this tax doh affect me.
ingalook wrote:Habit7 wrote:novastar1 wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Habit7 wrote:pete wrote:Maybe they will use a factor like in motor racing like 1.4x the cc rating for turbocharged vehicles to determine the n/a equivalent cc. So that 1.0 turbo fiesta wouldnt be affected.
I really cant understand this beat up for this though. It is obvious that they'll have to tax OEM turbo charged vehicles that circumvent the 2.0L NA tax.
A VW 1.4TSI engine (turbocharged) is comparable to a VW 2.0FSI engine (normally aspirated) and both fall under 1999cc. The economical turbo charged engine will not be taxed.
I am yet to hear of an economical middle class targeted +1999cc engine car on the local market. Likewise if you can buy a +1.5T you must have paper. Pay the tax and save the environment.
all that to show support for the gov't.
Turbos are used to increase the fuel efficiency and thus save the environment.
No.
Turbos are used to increase power to match that to an engine of greater displacement.
Adding a turbo to an engine doesn't increase fuel efficiency.
What decade you living in boss?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Marct and 71 guests