Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Slartibartfast wrote:All the schools are still there buddy. All of them are still last choice schools. So what if Junior Sec isn't in the name. Or they aren't shift scheduled anymore. I am more concerned with "What do they expect to happen by putting all of the delinquents in one place? Teachers are doomed from the start and then blamed for their failure. On the other end of the spectrum you have some crappy teachers in prestige schools getting a good rep because the students do a lot of the work on their own."EmilioA wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:What they call it now is insignificant.EmilioA wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:I'm more concerned about the junior secs. What do they expect to happen by putting all of the delinquents in one place? Teachers are doomed from the start and then blamed for their failure. On the other end of the spectrum you have some crappy teachers in prestige schools getting a good rep because the students do a lot of the work on their own.
I thought they got rid of Junior Secs about 6 years ago. The whole deshifting process. All schools are 5 year now. That's why Eldo Junior is now Eldo West.
It kind of matters if Junior Secs no longer exist
pugboy wrote:So u jump on a train with say 3 guys
And when it roll off they rob you then run off at the
Next stop while u holding a busshead
hustla_ambition101 wrote:Numb3r4, many of the "disadvantaged" in this country and elsewhere in the world use welfare as a means of income to support a lifestyle of laziness. There are lots of disabled people in T&T who work regular jobs and don't rely on a welfare check or smart card to survive. Most who claim poverty are plain LAZY. If you able to have sex, you more than able to learn a skill and look for a job.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:^ 40% of the time I waited 2 hours because the first bus never showed up even though they supposed to send a bus every hour.
20% of the time I waited 3 hours, the response from customer service has been we cannot find a working bus or we do not have any drivers.
Cheap and Lazy is none of your concern, if the government is providing public transport I expect them to do it at the best of their ability not at the worst of their ability.
drchaos wrote:$150 a week? Someone give this guy a food card!!!
Daran wrote:EFFECTIC DESIGNS,
Have you ever been outside of Trinidad? Buses provide are extremely reliable and quick service throughout most of Europe, and especially in the UK. Frequent service buses cover areas of usually 10 to 30km radius (with some intercity links covering longer distances). Buses and trains are meant to compliment each other there.
You need to ask yourself what is PTSC doing wrong. Look at the personnel and unions. Privatize the bus service and introduce penalties if timetable schedules are not met. You'll see how quickly things turn around.
An effective traffic plan for Trinidad requires many changes. The Rapid Rail is like a brute force solution with ultimately very high risks.
Do you know the entire project plan for the rapid rail is almost 10 years? I'm pretty sure the cost will double, the timeline for completion will exceed what was planned and the project scope will be reduced along the way.
And in the mean time what are we going to do?
Easy:
- Replace maxis with organized shuttle systems and designated bus stops (no more F*cking stopping where ever they please. A few years back I did a stochastic analysis of that start stop behavior of maxis and the resultant effect on traffic was horrendous)
- Investigate all bottle necks and introduce flyovers/tunnels/overpasses/roundabouts
- Use intelligent traffic lights that can sense traffic and give priority to the major roads while anticipating impacts in upcoming bottlenecks
- Offer comfortable rapid (little or no stops) intercity links
- Use bus stop timers at major stops so passengers can see how far away their next bus is
- School bus shuttles
- Mandatory staggered company hours
- Encourage private business to decentralize
A combination or all of the above will be exponentially cheaper, create more jobs and far less havoc on our infrastructure.
Don't get me wrong though, the Rapid Rail would be very very nice to have, but it aint solving many of existing traffic problems. Meaning, it's far from the best solution to our traffic woes.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:A small highway cost us $10 billion?
A bus rapid system also needs its own road network by the time you done you would be better off with the Rapid Rail. There is nothing rapid about a bus sitting in traffic for 3 hours and cheap Chinese buses breaking down by each traffic light. This small minded thinking is what has us in such a 3rd world state.
btw almost forgot to mention couple months ago was on the Piarco bus same deluxe coach and a lady from Denmark was visiting Trini, she put her luggage and backpack on the lower compartment that the driver has to open for you outside the bus. This was at City Gate when the woman reach the Airport and she pull out the bag and luggage if you see how much black grease and dirty oil was on the woman thing. This is an idea of what we dealing with when we talking about PTSC, they clean absolutely nothing the woman had to go on a plane with that oil, diesel and grease on her backpack. I saw the woman broke down in tears and all the passengers on the bus could say is "iz she fault this is Trinidad she supposed to know better what makes she think PTSC does clean anything"
And allyuh want to stand here and talk about expanding our bus service as an alternative to the RR? allyuh really eh have no shame nah.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:^ But hoss allyuh not easy. I remember these same tuners who complaining about the RR, was backing Rowley and the PNM 100% right here on tuner just before election infact I remember allyuh was 100% for the RR because the PNM has the best ideas. Infact we made joke about Kamla and the bridge to Tobago with Rowley schooling her on Engineering
Then what went on? everybody get a nice surprise, imbert say fuel subsidy will be gone to instead subsidize the RR. This one allyuh was not expecting ent? Now man get quiet and yuh doh hear that great is the PNM talk no more.
Not a single tuner complained about the money to fund this RR, but the minute Imbert mention that fuel subsidy and how they going to subsidize the RR everybody all of ah sudden concerned about this tax payers money and how this is real money to waste and we can't afford that, now is $4000 a month in Gasoline when the subsidy is gone. All I could say is time for us to listen to the raging bull and tighten we jockey shorts. It looks like he means business.
ingalook wrote:ED
We already have a Bus Route, it just needs to be upgraded... BRT can move 40,000 persons per hr, and believe it or not they can do it with our CURRENT bus route.
I wonder if you ever bothered to watch a single video on BRT posted here or if you just talking out yuh posterior
Then there is already a 3rd lane ripe for use from Chaguanus straight to the top of the highway - doh tell me that lane is for cars, I tort yuh say yuh wanted cars off de roads???
Of course there would have to be some upgrades to be made (like a concrete separation for the bus lane on the highway) but it is doable WE WILL SEE THE BENEFIT IN JUST A YEAR, surely this must count for something???
Then you point out private cars using the bus route, with this reform not even the PRIME MINISTER will be allowed to drive on the Bus Route (unless he is a passenger of the bus service). It must become inconceivable for Trinis to consider driving on the bus route because is instant lockup.
We talking about camera surveillance, control rooms staffed 24hrs, GPS trackers on every bus etc. NOT WHAT WE HAVE NOW
With a regular closely monitored schedule it would mean that at those places where motorist have to cross the Bus route it can now be done in a way that maximizes efficiency and minimizes traffic. If 8 buses runs every 5 mins during rush hour then it means that these lights crossing the Bus Route can be kept green for 4 minutes, and red for just 1 minute.
Basically why improve transport next ten years (while seriously hampering transport during that 10 year period because of construction of such a large scale project) when you can radically improve transport in 1 year?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 83 guests