Al Rawi children holding guns

[88sins]

Some of you all really defy logic so it's no surprise that the country is in this sad state of affairs.

This is a non issue. Don't be fool or misled.

Think carefully here. Remove all the yampee from your eyes and watch the scenes.

This took place on a military base. The Attorney General doesn't "command" our security forces etc. He cannot "command" that a gun be placed in the hands of a civilian. Weapons also need to be "signed-out" by personnel.

Therefore, the only people that can ever be culpable in this scenario is the person who signed for those guns and the military by extension. This has nothing to do with the AG or his family. Unless they forcefully took control of the wearpons then you all barking up the wrong tree.

That being said, no wrongs were committed here. Most likely this involved special forces and this would fall under "tactics and training" which isn't suppose to be "conventional" in any shape or form and not suppose to be known to the public.

Peace

Not too sure if this boi is either stupid or simple or slow.
But then again, judging by this post, maybe he won the trifecta.

[Redman]

And Sat does call me Naive

From what Ive been told this type of training has been going on for any one in public office that has cause....

Everything Ive read over the last 15 years says clearly that there is logic and benefit to sensitize kids to the sound of gun fire and to the extent that is safe handling the weapons.

The question here is under whose control were the children at the time of the snapshot?
Were the guns actually loaded?
are they real?
,did the kids fire or just pose?
And if you get those details- with PROOF you then are saying that you can kill some ones career because of this.

The AG eh falling on this...what will happen is the TTDF will provide a witch for the witch hunt.


Its pretty telling the deafening silence on the Eden Gardens 100,000,000 over pay.
Us the people dont need Moonilal to be transparent on that-and follow the letter of the law.??

Yet previous AG's never were made aware or sought this facility? What makes Lie-Wari special, aside from taking 9 years to get a law degree? Career killing? Isn't that exactly what they tried to do to Kenrick Maharaj? Or by jackarse PNM logic he was already retired , so it matters not If Moonilal and Jearlean etc have a case to answer concerning HDC misdeeds, let them. Isn't the denier of children making sure that a prosecutable case is being made against all of them?
If you or Lie-Wari want your children to be comfortable with the sound of gunshots, you have your pick of any community in Trinidad where thanks to PNM impotence against crime, we hear them pretty regularly now. Either that or let them join TTPS or TTDF of any agency/firm where you can handle firearms legally. Don't go for PNM Family Day outing to get your sheits and giggles playing with guns that you will NEVR own or be required to be comfortable around. Save that dotish reasoning when you're at your next PNM youth meetings.

So..on one hand you beyotch about anyone comparing PNM actions to UNC actions-the 'dem do it' defense as you complain about....but this AG must be bound by what the previous AGs did??
That s a double standard
Also-Griffith stated that this type of training is normal.

in 2017 we should do what makes sense in 2017.

[De Dragon]

And Sat does call me Naive

From what Ive been told this type of training has been going on for any one in public office that has cause....

Everything Ive read over the last 15 years says clearly that there is logic and benefit to sensitize kids to the sound of gun fire and to the extent that is safe handling the weapons.

The question here is under whose control were the children at the time of the snapshot?
Were the guns actually loaded?
are they real?
,did the kids fire or just pose?
And if you get those details- with PROOF you then are saying that you can kill some ones career because of this.

The AG eh falling on this...what will happen is the TTDF will provide a witch for the witch hunt.


Its pretty telling the deafening silence on the Eden Gardens 100,000,000 over pay.
Us the people dont need Moonilal to be transparent on that-and follow the letter of the law.??

Yet previous AG's never were made aware or sought this facility? What makes Lie-Wari special, aside from taking 9 years to get a law degree? Career killing? Isn't that exactly what they tried to do to Kenrick Maharaj? Or by jackarse PNM logic he was already retired , so it matters not If Moonilal and Jearlean etc have a case to answer concerning HDC misdeeds, let them. Isn't the denier of children making sure that a prosecutable case is being made against all of them?
If you or Lie-Wari want your children to be comfortable with the sound of gunshots, you have your pick of any community in Trinidad where thanks to PNM impotence against crime, we hear them pretty regularly now. Either that or let them join TTPS or TTDF of any agency/firm where you can handle firearms legally. Don't go for PNM Family Day outing to get your sheits and giggles playing with guns that you will NEVR own or be required to be comfortable around. Save that dotish reasoning when you're at your next PNM youth meetings.

So..on one hand you beyotch about anyone comparing PNM actions to UNC actions-the 'dem do it' defense as you complain about....but this AG must be bound by what the previous AGs did??
That s a double standard
Also-Griffith stated that this type of training is normal.

in 2017 we should do what makes sense in 2017.

How is no single previous AG ever getting weapons training "dem do it too?" Then again you've got so many PNM men on pedestals, you'd justify any action taken by them.

[Redress10]

Associated story if you want to lessen the butthurt....http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/com ... 52738.html


I can guarantee you that the UK has even more restrictive gun laws than us so....

Let me break it down for you. The military isn't subject to the same sort of laws that apply to the rest of us. Once you enter the "barracks" then you become subject to military laws etc. The AG has no standing over the military. He can't be held accountable for a military firearm being placed in the hands of his children. At best he can object but how is the court going to hold him accountable? The gun wasn't his own, he didn't sign for it and he can't "order" the military to let his children possess it. What you really barking at here? Ya not making sense. Being in possession of a military weapon on a military base upon the invite of the military is not the same as being in possession of a weapon in your private capacity or home. Do you even know what possession by law means?

Again, this would most likely fall under close protection tactics, which would be special forces ambit which means that public knowledge isn't required.

[Redman]

How is no single previous AG ever getting weapons training "dem do it too?" Then again you've got so many PNM men on pedestals, you'd justify any action taken by them.

Continue to be obtuse ..you seem comfortable in that position.

[De Dragon]

Associated story if you want to lessen the butthurt....http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/com ... 52738.html


I can guarantee you that the UK has even more restrictive gun laws than us so....

Let me break it down for you. The military isn't subject to the same sort of laws that apply to the rest of us. Once you enter the "barracks" then you become subject to military laws etc. The AG has no standing over the military. He can't be held accountable for a military firearm being placed in the hands of his children. At best he can object but how is the court going to hold him accountable? The gun wasn't his own, he didn't sign for it and he can't "order" the military to let his children possess it. What you really barking at here? Ya not making sense. Being in possession of a military weapon on a military base upon the invite of the military is not the same as being in possession of a weapon in your private capacity or home. Do you even know what possession by law means?

Again, this would most likely fall under close protection tactics, which would be special forces ambit which means that public knowledge isn't required.

Who is arguing about jurisdiction? You really feel Arse-Wari wasn't fully aware of what was going on in Cumuto? Why has he denied to this very day that the children are his if the "training" was so on the up and up? Why the uproar and rush to blame an outgoing Commander? Why the backtrack and apology to the Commander. Something stinks here and the behaviour of Lie-Wari, Scarfy, Stuart Little and Stupid only serve to reinforce that belief.

[De Dragon]

How is no single previous AG ever getting weapons training "dem do it too?" Then again you've got so many PNM men on pedestals, you'd justify any action taken by them.

Continue to be obtuse ..you seem comfortable in that position.

You seem to be comfortable in the roast fowl position for any PNM power broker.

[desifemlove]

How is no single previous AG ever getting weapons training "dem do it too?" Then again you've got so many PNM men on pedestals, you'd justify any action taken by them.

Continue to be obtuse ..you seem comfortable in that position.

You seem to be comfortable in the roast fowl position for any PNM power broker.

haha...

so this is why you try and goad me by saying i was bullied..haha.

where did I EVER say that on this forum? haha. you're a fag. you try and scope me out, and then demand i treat you nice/respectful. you clearly have some asperger's syndrome, since nobody taught you any reciprocity. is that what they do in temples, when you was a kid? hahaaahaha...

tell me again "don't judge me!!!" haha..Ms. man. i judge you i like, when you try and scope me out to tell me I was "bullied" via some "mental techniques" and you deserve this cuss for trying to justify bullying. It fits, if you look to mock it. lol.

[De Dragon]

How is no single previous AG ever getting weapons training "dem do it too?" Then again you've got so many PNM men on pedestals, you'd justify any action taken by them.

Continue to be obtuse ..you seem comfortable in that position.

You seem to be comfortable in the roast fowl position for any PNM power broker.

haha...

so this is why you try and goad me by saying i was bullied..haha.

where did I EVER say that on this forum? haha. you're a fag. you try and scope me out, and then demand i treat you nice/respectful. you clearly have some asperger's syndrome, since nobody taught you any reciprocity. is that what they do in temples, when you was a kid? hahaaahaha...

tell me again "don't judge me!!!" haha..Ms. man. i judge you i like, when you try and scope me out to tell me I was "bullied" via some "mental techniques" and you deserve this cuss for trying to justify bullying. It fits, if you look to mock it. lol.

Microkant, you realize no one was speaking to you? You realize that you are a tiresome little piss ant with a vocabulary of exactly 10 words which you nauseatingly use in every post? Now fack off and let big educated people speak!

[desifemlove]

How is no single previous AG ever getting weapons training "dem do it too?" Then again you've got so many PNM men on pedestals, you'd justify any action taken by them.

Continue to be obtuse ..you seem comfortable in that position.

You seem to be comfortable in the roast fowl position for any PNM power broker.

haha...

so this is why you try and goad me by saying i was bullied..haha.

where did I EVER say that on this forum? haha. you're a fag. you try and scope me out, and then demand i treat you nice/respectful. you clearly have some asperger's syndrome, since nobody taught you any reciprocity. is that what they do in temples, when you was a kid? hahaaahaha...

tell me again "don't judge me!!!" haha..Ms. man. i judge you i like, when you try and scope me out to tell me I was "bullied" via some "mental techniques" and you deserve this cuss for trying to justify bullying. It fits, if you look to mock it. lol.

Microkant, you realize no one was speaking to you? You realize that you are a tiresome little piss ant with a vocabulary of exactly 10 words which you nauseatingly use in every post? Now fack off and let big educated people speak!

You're not educated. lol. I KNOW my vocabulary exceeds yours by a factor of a billion. But then you're not very manly, are you? especially as everybody "needs to like you" haha.

[De Dragon]

How is no single previous AG ever getting weapons training "dem do it too?" Then again you've got so many PNM men on pedestals, you'd justify any action taken by them.

Continue to be obtuse ..you seem comfortable in that position.

You seem to be comfortable in the roast fowl position for any PNM power broker.

haha...

so this is why you try and goad me by saying i was bullied..haha.

where did I EVER say that on this forum? haha. you're a fag. you try and scope me out, and then demand i treat you nice/respectful. you clearly have some asperger's syndrome, since nobody taught you any reciprocity. is that what they do in temples, when you was a kid? hahaaahaha...

tell me again "don't judge me!!!" haha..Ms. man. i judge you i like, when you try and scope me out to tell me I was "bullied" via some "mental techniques" and you deserve this cuss for trying to justify bullying. It fits, if you look to mock it. lol.

Microkant, you realize no one was speaking to you? You realize that you are a tiresome little piss ant with a vocabulary of exactly 10 words which you nauseatingly use in every post? Now fack off and let big educated people speak!

You're not educated. lol. I KNOW my vocabulary exceeds yours by a factor of a billion. But then you're not very manly, are you? especially as everybody "needs to like you" haha.

Your "vocabulary" as you generously put it, wouldn't be a challenge for a 5 year old to replicate and surpass in a weekend. Now try to reply without using "cos", "judge", "cuss" and "mandir" Ok pumpkin?

[Redman]

Allyuh stop quoting my post nah.
Tenks

[desifemlove]

How is no single previous AG ever getting weapons training "dem do it too?" Then again you've got so many PNM men on pedestals, you'd justify any action taken by them.

Continue to be obtuse ..you seem comfortable in that position.

You seem to be comfortable in the roast fowl position for any PNM power broker.

haha...

so this is why you try and goad me by saying i was bullied..haha.

where did I EVER say that on this forum? haha. you're a fag. you try and scope me out, and then demand i treat you nice/respectful. you clearly have some asperger's syndrome, since nobody taught you any reciprocity. is that what they do in temples, when you was a kid? hahaaahaha...

tell me again "don't judge me!!!" haha..Ms. man. i judge you i like, when you try and scope me out to tell me I was "bullied" via some "mental techniques" and you deserve this cuss for trying to justify bullying. It fits, if you look to mock it. lol.

Microkant, you realize no one was speaking to you? You realize that you are a tiresome little piss ant with a vocabulary of exactly 10 words which you nauseatingly use in every post? Now fack off and let big educated people speak!

You're not educated. lol. I KNOW my vocabulary exceeds yours by a factor of a billion. But then you're not very manly, are you? especially as everybody "needs to like you" haha.

Your "vocabulary" as you generously put it, wouldn't be a challenge for a 5 year old to replicate and surpass in a weekend. Now try to reply without using "cos", "judge", "cuss" and "mandir" Ok pumpkin?

haha...I don't need to expound myself on a Web forum. I keep telling you, you give it, I respond. I don't owe you sheit, and you're a fag for a grown man with kids to "demand" i respect you. The fact you try and make these grand judgments of who I am, makes me give it back to you, and laugh when you beyotch. You're not a man, you're probably some kid who goes to Presentation, and hasn't experienced true life yet.

[RedVEVO]

Some of you all really defy logic so it's no surprise that the country is in this sad state of affairs.

This is a non issue. Don't be fool or misled.

Think carefully here. Remove all the yampee from your eyes and watch the scenes.

This took place on a military base. The Attorney General doesn't "command" our security forces etc. He cannot "command" that a gun be placed in the hands of a civilian. Weapons also need to be "signed-out" by personnel.

Therefore, the only people that can ever be culpable in this scenario is the person who signed for those guns and the military by extension. This has nothing to do with the AG or his family. Unless they forcefully took control of the wearpons then you all barking up the wrong tree.

That being said, no wrongs were committed here. Most likely this involved special forces and this would fall under "tactics and training" which isn't suppose to be "conventional" in any shape or form and not suppose to be known to the public.

Peace

Yes repeat loud and clear the AG not responsible for his children .

Then AG not responsible for anything

[Redress10]

^^^ because at that moment...they are civilians on a military base. Why is that so hard for you to comprehend. Remember when Robbie said "attack with full force". That was meaningless. He can't command the defense force. Only the President can. They report to the President. The AG cannot command the defense force so you still talking absolute rubbish about his "responsibility as a parent". This is a military base. The chain of command is very clear. The procedure for possessing a firearm on a military base is very clear. Any questions that you have need to be directed towards the military and not politicians and their family members who have no legal authority there.

[RedVEVO]

^^^ because at that moment...they are civilians on a military base. Why is that so hard for you to comprehend. Remember when Robbie said "attack with full force". That was meaningless. He can't command the defense force. Only the President can. They report to the President. The AG cannot command the defense force so you still talking absolute rubbish about his "responsibility as a parent". This is a military base. The chain of command is very clear. The procedure for possessing a firearm on a military base is very clear. Any questions that you have need to be directed towards the military and not politicians and their family members who have no legal authority there.

All AG had to do was to pay attention to what his kids were doing .

A problem so-called "parents" have great difficulty in understanding .

AG was irresponsible . He can run but he cannot hide .

[De Dragon]

^^^ because at that moment...they are civilians on a military base. Why is that so hard for you to comprehend. Remember when Robbie said "attack with full force". That was meaningless. He can't command the defense force. Only the President can. They report to the President. The AG cannot command the defense force so you still talking absolute rubbish about his "responsibility as a parent". This is a military base. The chain of command is very clear. The procedure for possessing a firearm on a military base is very clear. Any questions that you have need to be directed towards the military and not politicians and their family members who have no legal authority there.

You aren't getting it bro. How did the entourage get access to the base and the guns? Why is the AG yet to acknowledge that the kids are his, and were on the base, and are pictured holding the firearms? Notice too how the Minister of Everything, normally afflicted with verbal diarrhea, hasn't said a word about his presence there. The initial mere appearance of impropriety is only furthered by the AG's nonsensical denial of the children being his, handling the guns, and advantaging his position as AG. You think he didn't pull a political string to get on that base? Noone is saying that the AG "commanded" any army personnel, but it is very apparent that a fun evening playing soldier was ruined because someone saw them, took pics, and it came to light. Which brings to mind how many others have abused their office for kicks and laughs that we don't know about

[matr1x]

If it was opposition, you would hear no end to it.

[De Dragon]

If it was opposition, you would hear no end to it.

It is our duty to keep it in the spotlight, never mind those who wish it would go away or that we "move on"

[Redress10]

^^^ because at that moment...they are civilians on a military base. Why is that so hard for you to comprehend. Remember when Robbie said "attack with full force". That was meaningless. He can't command the defense force. Only the President can. They report to the President. The AG cannot command the defense force so you still talking absolute rubbish about his "responsibility as a parent". This is a military base. The chain of command is very clear. The procedure for possessing a firearm on a military base is very clear. Any questions that you have need to be directed towards the military and not politicians and their family members who have no legal authority there.

You aren't getting it bro. How did the entourage get access to the base and the guns? Why is the AG yet to acknowledge that the kids are his, and were on the base, and are pictured holding the firearms? Notice too how the Minister of Everything, normally afflicted with verbal diarrhea, hasn't said a word about his presence there. The initial mere appearance of impropriety is only furthered by the AG's nonsensical denial of the children being his, handling the guns, and advantaging his position as AG. You think he didn't pull a political string to get on that base? Noone is saying that the AG "commanded" any army personnel, but it is very apparent that a fun evening playing soldier was ruined because someone saw them, took pics, and it came to light. Which brings to mind how many others have abused their office for kicks and laughs that we don't know about

I have been to military bases on Trinidad. It's not as difficult as you are stating. He will never have to account for getting his hands on guns on a military base. Possession always remains with the military. The only way that fault lies on the AG for possessing the gun is if he forcefully takes it from the armory/soldier etc. He doesn't need to acknowledge the kids etc. He literally has nothing to explain. This is basic close protection training and tactics. Teaching your client/subject how to wield the weapon in case of emergency. This is usually done by special forces. Special forces never ever have to acknowledge training and tactics to the general public and exists in an area that allows complete deniability. Had that been a police weapon, it would have been a completely different story.

[Redress10]

^^^ because at that moment...they are civilians on a military base. Why is that so hard for you to comprehend. Remember when Robbie said "attack with full force". That was meaningless. He can't command the defense force. Only the President can. They report to the President. The AG cannot command the defense force so you still talking absolute rubbish about his "responsibility as a parent". This is a military base. The chain of command is very clear. The procedure for possessing a firearm on a military base is very clear. Any questions that you have need to be directed towards the military and not politicians and their family members who have no legal authority there.

All AG had to do was to pay attention to what his kids were doing .

A problem so-called "parents" have great difficulty in understanding .

AG was irresponsible . He can run but he cannot hide .

He is not accountable for his children on a military base. You talking about "paying attention". Next time you see a soldier walk up to him and ask him to possess his weapon. You realise that a soldier can spend 30 days plus in military jail for wrongful discharge of a weapon or a missing bullet right. The weapon that they are posing with is a variant of the heckler and koch g36. That is a weapon that is favored by special forces or teams that conduct direct action. That isn't even a normal weapon used within the Defense Force. You really think that the AG and his children simply went and took weapons from the armory? The majority of you all don't even understand what illegal possession involves. Sigh.....

What is the issue here? Are we debating gun control? Parental irresponsibility and neglect? On what grounds? The gun isn't illegal. The gun actually belongs to the state of Trinidad and Tobago. The children needed parental supervision on a military base accompanied by military personnel?

[Redman]

If it was opposition, you would hear no end to it.

If it was the opposition it would have cost 175,000,000.
With a 175,000,000 mobilization.

[sMASH]

There are laws to prevent the welding of high powered assault weapons. If u can find any which can make legal exception, please quote the black and white.

Any person putting the weapons in the possession of the children, would be the guilty party. Any other persons Instructing that that be done, will also be culpable... that could possibly be the AG, or not.
If he had proir knowdege of that activity, then he would be guilty of abetting the unlawful weilding of high powered assault weapons by his children.




Quote the black and white where military can grant civilians the permission to weild high-powered assault weapons.

Quote that or stop braying.

[De Dragon]

Yes let's be happy that any person in authority could organize a shooting party/family day on a military base and people here defend it without question Had he, or the children shot someone, what would be the situation then? Wrong and strong, and I don't care how many bases one has been to, improper is improper. Next thing joyriding in Coast Guard cutters down the islands will be okay too

[sMASH]

^^They do like their boat cruise...don't give them more ideas

[Redress10]

There are laws to prevent the welding of high powered assault weapons. If u can find any which can make legal exception, please quote the black and white.

Any person putting the weapons in the possession of the children, would be the guilty party. Any other persons Instructing that that be done, will also be culpable... that could possibly be the AG, or not.
If he had proir knowdege of that activity, then he would be guilty of abetting the unlawful weilding of high powered assault weapons by his children.




Quote the black and white where military can grant civilians the permission to weild high-powered assault weapons.

Quote that or stop braying.

That guilty party would be subject to military laws and not civilian laws. The act occurred on a military base. That changes everything. It didn't happen on Frederick street.. That's CAN'T be the AG. The AG can't instruct defence force personnel. There are also laws against murder but that doesn't stop soldiers from using deadly force. The military has its own laws and jurisdiction. It's basically a country within itself. The only person responsible for placing the weapons in the hands of civilians would be the person instructing or the personnel. That person CANNOT be a civilian. Again, you fail to realise that special forces is also another part that is exempt from even military rule. They are both a part and separate from the military structure and its rules as well.

So when the defense force having displays and showing off their weapons and vehicles to the public with the hope of recruiting members, that is also illegal? Steupssssss

[Redress10]

Yes let's be happy that any person in authority could organize a shooting party/family day on a military base and people here defend it without question Had he, or the children shot someone, what would be the situation then? Wrong and strong, and I don't care how many bases one has been to, improper is improper. Next thing joyriding in Coast Guard cutters down the islands will be okay too

The military would have had to answer for that. He is a CIVILIAN. He isn't a commanding officer. They can deny him entry if they want to. He needs permission and clearance to go on to the base. There is no chain of command that exist between the military and the Attorney General. What is so difficult to understand in that?

You are assuming that I was illegally on the base. Nothing I did on the base was wrong. There are foreign nationals who are also allowed onto our base. Access for some doesn't mean access for none. You do realise who protects the Attorney General right. It's s the military. Same for the PM

Who you think also protected the Attorney Generals of the recent past?

[sMASH]

There are laws to prevent the welding of high powered assault weapons. If u can find any which can make legal exception, please quote the black and white.

Any person putting the weapons in the possession of the children, would be the guilty party. Any other persons Instructing that that be done, will also be culpable... that could possibly be the AG, or not.
If he had proir knowdege of that activity, then he would be guilty of abetting the unlawful weilding of high powered assault weapons by his children.




Quote the black and white where military can grant civilians the permission to weild high-powered assault weapons.

Quote that or stop braying.

That guilty party would be subject to military laws and not civilian laws. The act occurred on a military base. That changes everything. It didn't happen on Frederick street.. That's CAN'T be the AG. The AG can't instruct defence force personnel. There are also laws against murder but that doesn't stop soldiers from using deadly force. The military has its own laws and jurisdiction. It's basically a country within itself. The only person responsible for placing the weapons in the hands of civilians would be the person instructing or the personnel. That person CANNOT be a civilian. Again, you fail to realise that special forces is also another part that is exempt from even military rule. They are both a part and separate from the military structure and its rules as well.

So when the defense force having displays and showing off their weapons and vehicles to the public with the hope of recruiting members, that is also illegal? Steupssssss

So u are saying that they are not subject to the laws of Trinidad and tobago?

[Redress10]

This is what is entailed in close protection. They will be taught combat maneuvers. Depending on their age (14-17 etc) they will also be taught emergency evasive driving tactics. They will also be taught vehicle transfer, how to move from vehicle to vehicle under fire. They will also be taught how to use the weapon/s in the case of having no protection and having to use the weapon themselves. They are not being taught to be Jason Bourne. They are being taught how to survive/delay death until help arrives. Remember when an attack occurs, every second counts until support arrives. it really is that simple.

All of this, is conducted in a military base/controlled location for practical and specific legal purpose. Because the military can do whatever it needs to do to secure the life of a high value target that is under its protection and that includes placing teaching "minors" how to use a firearm in case of a "life or death" situation.

[Redress10]

There are laws to prevent the welding of high powered assault weapons. If u can find any which can make legal exception, please quote the black and white.

Any person putting the weapons in the possession of the children, would be the guilty party. Any other persons Instructing that that be done, will also be culpable... that could possibly be the AG, or not.
If he had proir knowdege of that activity, then he would be guilty of abetting the unlawful weilding of high powered assault weapons by his children.




Quote the black and white where military can grant civilians the permission to weild high-powered assault weapons.

Quote that or stop braying.

That guilty party would be subject to military laws and not civilian laws. The act occurred on a military base. That changes everything. It didn't happen on Frederick street.. That's CAN'T be the AG. The AG can't instruct defence force personnel. There are also laws against murder but that doesn't stop soldiers from using deadly force. The military has its own laws and jurisdiction. It's basically a country within itself. The only person responsible for placing the weapons in the hands of civilians would be the person instructing or the personnel. That person CANNOT be a civilian. Again, you fail to realise that special forces is also another part that is exempt from even military rule. They are both a part and separate from the military structure and its rules as well.

So when the defense force having displays and showing off their weapons and vehicles to the public with the hope of recruiting members, that is also illegal? Steupssssss

So u are saying that they are not subject to the laws of Trinidad and tobago?

I am saying that the military could never be instructed by the AG or a member of the cabinet. No civilian could ever instruct the military on a military base. Police can't go on a base and arrest a soldier. Military Police need to arrest the soldier and take him to the police. He is held in military prison during his trial. The military has its own set of rules and protocols.