Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
eliteauto wrote:Tourist attractionseriously the bridge there since 1881 how many tourists visited? Prior to it's removal anyone even paid attention to it or everyone just assumed it was always there? Not everything old should be saved
RASC wrote:eliteauto wrote:Tourist attractionseriously the bridge there since 1881 how many tourists visited? Prior to it's removal anyone even paid attention to it or everyone just assumed it was always there? Not everything old should be saved
Thank you.
I think you guys taking this thing a bit too far...Geez An Ages...good thing allyuh not running the country yes~Place woulda been looking like 1964![]()
Allyuh real like ole ting on this forum
Ole Car
Ole Building
Ole Caroni
Sanchia
Ole House
Oh gorm man give it a rest! (Leywe hope she doh see this thread)
embellishfrost wrote:RASC wrote:eliteauto wrote:Tourist attractionseriously the bridge there since 1881 how many tourists visited? Prior to it's removal anyone even paid attention to it or everyone just assumed it was always there? Not everything old should be saved
Thank you.
I think you guys taking this thing a bit too far...Geez An Ages...good thing allyuh not running the country yes~Place woulda been looking like 1964![]()
Allyuh real like ole ting on this forum
Ole Car
Ole Building
Ole Caroni
Sanchia
Ole House
Oh gorm man give it a rest! (Leywe hope she doh see this thread)
The bridge wasn't posing a problem...maybe they want to wipe out all efficient structures so people can't say "back in the old days" things used to be built stronger and last longer.
RASC wrote:embellishfrost wrote:RASC wrote:eliteauto wrote:Tourist attractionseriously the bridge there since 1881 how many tourists visited? Prior to it's removal anyone even paid attention to it or everyone just assumed it was always there? Not everything old should be saved
Thank you.
I think you guys taking this thing a bit too far...Geez An Ages...good thing allyuh not running the country yes~Place woulda been looking like 1964![]()
Allyuh real like ole ting on this forum
Ole Car
Ole Building
Ole Caroni
Sanchia
Ole House
Oh gorm man give it a rest! (Leywe hope she doh see this thread)
The bridge wasn't posing a problem...maybe they want to wipe out all efficient structures so people can't say "back in the old days" things used to be built stronger and last longer.
Oh really...
Show me a field of technology that has REGRESSED over the years.
Let's compared 1881 bridges to 2010 bridges and let's see which where built better. Hell we could use it for anything...let's compare 1881 Hammers to 2010 Hammers...or what about 1881 Shoes to 2010 Shoes...Let's see which were built better.
ingalook wrote:RASC wrote:embellishfrost wrote:RASC wrote:eliteauto wrote:Tourist attractionseriously the bridge there since 1881 how many tourists visited? Prior to it's removal anyone even paid attention to it or everyone just assumed it was always there? Not everything old should be saved
Thank you.
I think you guys taking this thing a bit too far...Geez An Ages...good thing allyuh not running the country yes~Place woulda been looking like 1964![]()
Allyuh real like ole ting on this forum
Ole Car
Ole Building
Ole Caroni
Sanchia
Ole House
Oh gorm man give it a rest! (Leywe hope she doh see this thread)
The bridge wasn't posing a problem...maybe they want to wipe out all efficient structures so people can't say "back in the old days" things used to be built stronger and last longer.
Oh really...
Show me a field of technology that has REGRESSED over the years.
Let's compared 1881 bridges to 2010 bridges and let's see which where built better. Hell we could use it for anything...let's compare 1881 Hammers to 2010 Hammers...or what about 1881 Shoes to 2010 Shoes...Let's see which were built better.
Well that doesn't really hold true in Trinidad... bridges fall after only a couple of years here
I'm sure there were lots of things build better/stronger back then, furniture now is MDF etc.
ingalook wrote:Well yeah... BUT IN TRINIDAD this bridge last 129 years while our modern bridges failing after 2![]()
I wouldn't doubt shoes were stronger in the 1800s either![]()
We may have gained alot with technology, but so much of the artistry, ingenuity , and pride in ones work has been lost IN TRINIDAD
RASC wrote:ingalook wrote:Well yeah... BUT IN TRINIDAD this bridge last 129 years while our modern bridges failing after 2![]()
I wouldn't doubt shoes were stronger in the 1800s either![]()
We may have gained alot with technology, but so much of the artistry, ingenuity , and pride in ones work has been lost IN TRINIDAD
When last has the bridge been used?
What kind of traffic did it encounter when in operation?
How many times was it repaired during it's operation?
Answer those questions before you start getting all misty eyed at the loss of an old rust bucket hanging in the sky
equipped2ripp wrote:RASC wrote:ingalook wrote:Well yeah... BUT IN TRINIDAD this bridge last 129 years while our modern bridges failing after 2![]()
I wouldn't doubt shoes were stronger in the 1800s either![]()
We may have gained alot with technology, but so much of the artistry, ingenuity , and pride in ones work has been lost IN TRINIDAD
When last has the bridge been used?
What kind of traffic did it encounter when in operation?
How many times was it repaired during it's operation?
Answer those questions before you start getting all misty eyed at the loss of an old rust bucket hanging in the sky
you talking like you apparently know the answers to those questions you're asking...
ingalook wrote:RASC
I'm no historian, so I don't know the answer to your questions unfortunately
But you seem to be of the opinion that newer = better
I don't share that position, just look at any genre of music![]()
I believe we should take the best of the old and combine with the best of the new... if it ain't broke... and all that
I just thought it was an interesting piece of our country's history and should be preserved... perhaps there are better things that should be/have been preserved
ingalook wrote:RASC
I'm no historian, so I don't know the answer to your questions unfortunately
But you seem to be of the opinion that newer = better
I don't share that position, just look at any genre of music![]()
I believe we should take the best of the old and combine with the best of the new... if it ain't broke... and all that
I just thought it was an interesting piece of our country's history and should be preserved... perhaps there are better things that should be/have been preserved
RASC wrote:equipped2ripp wrote:RASC wrote:ingalook wrote:Well yeah... BUT IN TRINIDAD this bridge last 129 years while our modern bridges failing after 2![]()
I wouldn't doubt shoes were stronger in the 1800s either![]()
We may have gained alot with technology, but so much of the artistry, ingenuity , and pride in ones work has been lost IN TRINIDAD
When last has the bridge been used?
What kind of traffic did it encounter when in operation?
How many times was it repaired during it's operation?
Answer those questions before you start getting all misty eyed at the loss of an old rust bucket hanging in the sky
you talking like you apparently know the answers to those questions you're asking...
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 101 guests