Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Hook wrote:rossi wrote:Ah fine yuh know REAL things bout me padna. PLUS, yuh take real long to reply to what ah tell yuh.
what next? Like yuh want to pull up in front mih house? Yuh like ranking ting eh? calling my name and ting eh? wha kinda macomereman ting is this dred?
Yuh real remember the speed limit post...hmmm and yuh say I toting? hahahahah!
boy go from here eh.
Of course ah must take long! It have odda tings to do in d day inno. If ah happen to be here to chook ah talk, den it go happen. It's not that difficult to find out your info on the interwebz, BTW...same way you find it all too easy to flex yuh e-muscles on here...keep on typing, keyboard gangsta
nemram wrote:hey thanks Autosport.. I didn't notice that. I am seeking as much advice as possible to determine whether or not I would contest the ticket.
Thanks guys for advice.
Hook wrote:wow boy nemram, WPC Wiltshire went all back to the future on yuh ras AND put yuh almost to the next corner AND place yuh in d wrong vehicle. That's a void ticket if I ever saw one. Since they can't change the particulars of the offence and you got charged for an imaginary offence (it's 9ft or 3metres, not 9 metres) that, according to the ticket, happened 10 years ago, you just have to show up and state your case.
Contest it on Mr Gear's advice on pg1 and go to a fete wit d money you saved.
rossi wrote:kool scene man, but yuh coulda ask if ah married and my name and ting. Sorry to put you through a day and a half of searching on the internet.
rollingstock wrote:It's not 2001, it's act 5 of 2010.
The offence is parking within 9m of a corner, or 3m of a hydrant, hook me ah know where you get that 9ft from. And fyi the bad wording means nothing once the statutory reference is correct.
Hook wrote:rollupstick is ah spy *dun dun dunnnnnnnnnn*
rollingstock wrote:As hook said i am a spy...
rollingstock wrote:nemram wrote:hey thanks Autosport.. I didn't notice that. I am seeking as much advice as possible to determine whether or not I would contest the ticket.
Thanks guys for advice.Hook wrote:wow boy nemram, WPC Wiltshire went all back to the future on yuh ras AND put yuh almost to the next corner AND place yuh in d wrong vehicle. That's a void ticket if I ever saw one. Since they can't change the particulars of the offence and you got charged for an imaginary offence (it's 9ft or 3metres, not 9 metres) that, according to the ticket, happened 10 years ago, you just have to show up and state your case.
Contest it on Mr Gear's advice on pg1 and go to a fete wit d money you saved.
It's not 2001, it's act 5 of 2010.
The offence is parking within 9m of a corner, or 3m of a hydrant, hook me ah know where you get that 9ft from. And fyi the bad wording means nothing once the statutory reference is correct.
nemram wrote:rollingstock wrote:nemram wrote:hey thanks Autosport.. I didn't notice that. I am seeking as much advice as possible to determine whether or not I would contest the ticket.
Thanks guys for advice.Hook wrote:wow boy nemram, WPC Wiltshire went all back to the future on yuh ras AND put yuh almost to the next corner AND place yuh in d wrong vehicle. That's a void ticket if I ever saw one. Since they can't change the particulars of the offence and you got charged for an imaginary offence (it's 9ft or 3metres, not 9 metres) that, according to the ticket, happened 10 years ago, you just have to show up and state your case.
Contest it on Mr Gear's advice on pg1 and go to a fete wit d money you saved.
It's not 2001, it's act 5 of 2010.
The offence is parking within 9m of a corner, or 3m of a hydrant, hook me ah know where you get that 9ft from. And fyi the bad wording means nothing once the statutory reference is correct.
soo based on the ticket and the level of discussions which took place, what would be your advice?