Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
pioneer wrote:So what's true here?...i'm confuse
pioneer wrote:aware me
sensiman wrote:pioneer wrote:aware me
Baby probably just had a moderate infection? Can't understand how a medical examiner could mix up molestation with infection or inflammation.
S_2NR wrote:sensiman wrote:pioneer wrote:aware me
Baby probably just had a moderate infection? Can't understand how a medical examiner could mix up molestation with infection or inflammation.
he probably didn do that question in the exam.
crossdrilled wrote:After all the beat-up, I think something is still not addressed. What are the sanitary conditions at the facility that the child got a vaginal infacetion/ allergic reaction? MOH and vector control should comb this place to find the broblem, or other children might be at risk.
dougla_boy wrote:it must be mandatory to tie some people tubes yes.....wanna bull down d place but when a child is born cannot take care of it? cannot buy pampers but could be seen in the latest brands and whatnot......
Humes wrote:I would wait for more details on what happened here before getting enraged.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:Something isn't right here. No one can be turned on by a 10 month old baby such a thing is impossible.
There has to be more to this that we not hearing.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:Something isn't right here. No one can be turned on by a 10 month old baby such a thing is impossible.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 76 guests