Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
prop wrote:
Taken on my trip to New Orleans and Baton Rouge...
kurpal_v2 wrote:http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Sunpak+-+Ultra+4STM+61.25%26%2334%3B+Tri-Monopod/2534916.p?id=1218334639460&skuId=2534916&st=tripods&cp=1&lp=19
considering this, what you guys think?
ABA Trading LTD wrote:how's this for a point & shoot?
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-S ... 915&sr=8-1
really want something with good optical zoom, only downside I see is no panoramic shooting
miguel granville wrote:
depends on your needs, what field of view you'd like, how much of a low light lens you need it to be also whether your going for portraits or you want to include more of the environ element (like a 35), even a 50 is too tight for confined spaces also, your crop factor/ or if your full frame will interfere with field of view. honestly they're both good lenses it depends on whether you need both or just deciding on an overall type" of lens for a situation..both can do portraits good, 50 even more so on a cropped sensor(non full frame).DVSTT wrote:Canon 50mm f1.4 USM vs Canon 85mm f1.8 USM
hey tuners, which would you recommend???
DVSTT wrote:CANON USM and MicroUSM
Hey tuners, just wanted to know your thoughts on Canon's USM and MicroUSMs, are they reliable?? and is the MicroUSM as good as the usual or is it doomed to die on me like some reviews suggest?
Ring Ultrasonic Motor
Beginning in 1987 with the 300/2.8, Canon has been slowly equipping its best lenses with the ring ultrasonic motor, in which the rotor and stator are big circles around the optics. These are incredibly fast and silent. Even more important, they allow simultaneous use of autofocus and manual focus. You can leave the lens in AF mode all the time and override the camera's decision at any time (or move AF to a separate button as with the EOS 5 body).
This is the "right stuff."
Micro Ultrasonic Motor
If you were a big company and figured out how to make something for 1/3rd the cost but still sold under the same name, wouldn't you? Well, that's what Canon did. The micro ultrasonic motor is a tiny little motor that they stick in the lens and then connect with gears to the focus mechanism. It is tough to see how this is any better than the Minolta/Nikon AF method of driving the lens focus mechanism from a motor inside the lens mount.
A micro USM does not allow simultaneous AF and MF. Thus, the largest user-interface advantage of the ring USM is gone. Much of the noise of a standard motor is back too. The micro USM is noticeably quieter than a regular motor, but not silent like a ring USM.
Canon puts the micro-USM mostly into its new cheap zoom lenses.
DVSTT wrote:Canon 50mm f1.4 USM vs Canon 85mm f1.8 USM
hey tuners, which would you recommend???
DVSTT wrote:need it for lowlight and better bokeh, moving up from a kit lens.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 108 guests