Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Savita Yantraih Prithiveem Aramnaat Dyaam Andahat Atoorte Baddham Ashwam Iv Adhukshatmatr1x wrote:timelapse wrote:Newton was late in the gamematr1x wrote:Without Newton, many would not be possible
Gravity is a concept that can be traced back to the vedas.
Many of his other work also existed elsewhere.
Thats like saying Justin Bieber invented music
Half true. Vague alluding to concepts differs from a fundamental theory of nature and mathematical representation.
Nine people are now reported to have been killed at protests in Iran sparked by the death of a woman detained for allegedly breaking strict hijab rules.
Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old Kurdish woman from the north-western city of Saqez, died in hospital on Friday, after spending three days in a coma.
She was visiting the capital Tehran with her family when she was arrested by morality police, who accused her of violating the law requiring women to cover their hair with a hijab and their arms and legs with loose clothing. She collapsed after being taken to a detention centre to be "educated".
The police have denied that she was mistreated and said she suffered "sudden heart failure". But her family has said she was fit and healthy.
Mahsa Amini, 22, died in hospital in Tehran on Friday. Police claimed that she suffered "sudden heart failure".
Acting UN human rights chief Nada al-Nashif called on Tuesday for prompt, independent and impartial investigation into Ms Amini's death.
She noted that her office had received "numerous, and verified, videos of violent treatment of women" by morality police, who have stepped up their enforcement of hijab rules in recent months.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-62986057
maj. tom wrote:Iran. 22-year-old Mahsa Amini, was arrested in Tehran by Morality Police a dedicated unit that enforces strict dress codes for women, such as wearing the compulsory headscarf. A number of doctors opined that Amini suffered a brain injury based on the clinical symptoms, including bleeding from the ears and bruises under the eyes. This was also confirmed by medical scans of Mahsa's skull, leaked by hacktivists, showing bone fracture, hemorrhage, and brain edema. The women who were detained with Amini said she was severely beaten for resisting the insults and curses of the officers who arrested her. The Iran Morality Police said she died of heart failure while in custody.Nine people are now reported to have been killed at protests in Iran sparked by the death of a woman detained for allegedly breaking strict hijab rules.
Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old Kurdish woman from the north-western city of Saqez, died in hospital on Friday, after spending three days in a coma.
She was visiting the capital Tehran with her family when she was arrested by morality police, who accused her of violating the law requiring women to cover their hair with a hijab and their arms and legs with loose clothing. She collapsed after being taken to a detention centre to be "educated".
The police have denied that she was mistreated and said she suffered "sudden heart failure". But her family has said she was fit and healthy.
Mahsa Amini, 22, died in hospital in Tehran on Friday. Police claimed that she suffered "sudden heart failure".
Acting UN human rights chief Nada al-Nashif called on Tuesday for prompt, independent and impartial investigation into Ms Amini's death.
She noted that her office had received "numerous, and verified, videos of violent treatment of women" by morality police, who have stepped up their enforcement of hijab rules in recent months.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-62986057
matr1x wrote:Blaming shias for what the sunni would do so is playing games. The faith is rotten to the core, and there are some who virtue signaling about how they respect women, but ignore and make excuses for Islam.
FrankChag wrote:matr1x wrote:Blaming shias for what the sunni would do so is playing games. The faith is rotten to the core, and there are some who virtue signaling about how they respect women, but ignore and make excuses for Islam.
You need to make the distinction between shia-ism nonsense, and Islaam.
No where is that abuse part of Islaam.
If you say otherwise, bring valid proofs for your statements, or don't make them.
The onus of proof is always on the claimant.
The Gasht-e Ershad (Guidance Patrols) are special police units tasked with ensuring the respect of Islamic morals and detaining people who are perceived to be "improperly" dressed.
Under Iranian law, which is based on the country's interpretation of Sharia, women are obliged to cover their hair with a hijab (headscarf) and wear long, loose-fitting clothing to disguise their figures.
In a rare interview, one morality police officer spoke anonymously to the BBC about his experience working in the force.
"They told us the reason we are working for the morality police units is to protect women," he said. "Because if they do not dress properly, then men could get provoked and harm them."
The Iranian authorities' fight against "bad hijab" - wearing a headscarf or other mandatory clothing incorrectly - began soon after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, a major aim of which was to make women dress modestly.
By 1981, women and girls were legally required to wear modest "Islamic" clothing. In practice this meant wearing a chador - a full-body cloak, often accompanied by a smaller headscarf underneath - or a headscarf and a manteau (overcoat) covering their arms.
President Ebrahim Raisi, a hard-line cleric who was elected last year, signed an order on 15 August to enforce a new list of restrictions.
They included the introduction of surveillance cameras to monitor and fine unveiled women or refer them for "counselling", and a mandatory prison sentence for any Iranian who questioned or posted content against the hijab rules online.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-62984076
FrankChag wrote:matr1x wrote:Blaming shias for what the sunni would do so is playing games. The faith is rotten to the core, and there are some who virtue signaling about how they respect women, but ignore and make excuses for Islam.
You need to make the distinction between shia-ism nonsense, and Islaam.
No where is that abuse part of Islaam.
If you say otherwise, bring valid proofs for your statements, or don't make them.
The onus of proof is always on the claimant.
maj. tom wrote:The Gasht-e Ershad (Guidance Patrols) are special police units tasked with ensuring the respect of Islamic morals and detaining people who are perceived to be "improperly" dressed.
Under Iranian law, which is based on the country's interpretation of Sharia, women are obliged to cover their hair with a hijab (headscarf) and wear long, loose-fitting clothing to disguise their figures.
In a rare interview, one morality police officer spoke anonymously to the BBC about his experience working in the force.
"They told us the reason we are working for the morality police units is to protect women," he said. "Because if they do not dress properly, then men could get provoked and harm them."
The Iranian authorities' fight against "bad hijab" - wearing a headscarf or other mandatory clothing incorrectly - began soon after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, a major aim of which was to make women dress modestly.
By 1981, women and girls were legally required to wear modest "Islamic" clothing. In practice this meant wearing a chador - a full-body cloak, often accompanied by a smaller headscarf underneath - or a headscarf and a manteau (overcoat) covering their arms.
President Ebrahim Raisi, a hard-line cleric who was elected last year, signed an order on 15 August to enforce a new list of restrictions.
They included the introduction of surveillance cameras to monitor and fine unveiled women or refer them for "counselling", and a mandatory prison sentence for any Iranian who questioned or posted content against the hijab rules online.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-62984076
MG Man wrote:FrankChag wrote:matr1x wrote:Blaming shias for what the sunni would do so is playing games. The faith is rotten to the core, and there are some who virtue signaling about how they respect women, but ignore and make excuses for Islam.
You need to make the distinction between shia-ism nonsense, and Islaam.
No where is that abuse part of Islaam.
If you say otherwise, bring valid proofs for your statements, or don't make them.
The onus of proof is always on the claimant.
wjat's the difference? Asking an honest question here. What is shi-ism, and why is it nonsense / different to islam?
MG Man wrote:got any objective links I can follow for further reading?
shaha87 wrote:Thoughts?
From a Pakistani textbook apparently.
IMG_5408.JPG
What school? If it was taught in a public school, it was illegal.alfa wrote:shaha87 wrote:Thoughts?
From a Pakistani textbook apparently.
IMG_5408.JPG
Some US schools teach creationism as well
shaha87 wrote:Thoughts?
From a Pakistani textbook apparently.
IMG_5408.JPG
one eye wrote:I truly feel sorry for those who do not have faith in the Father.
Those who choose ego over the Father.
Choosing the follow the same imperfections they criticize.
Two wrongs do not make a right.
My father badda than his fatherDe Dragon wrote:one eye wrote:I truly feel sorry for those who do not have faith in the Father.
Those who choose ego over the Father.
Choosing the follow the same imperfections they criticize.
Two wrongs do not make a right.
Why feel "sorry" for them? Aren't you secure in your beliefs? Isn't that enough?
Also, how do you equate "ego" with non-believing?
How do you feel about Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs etc, who don't believe in "the Father?"
If you have your beliefs, then fine, if other people don't that should be similarly fine, because tolerance of others was one of Jesus' teachings.
De Dragon wrote:one eye wrote:I truly feel sorry for those who do not have faith in the Father.
Those who choose ego over the Father.
Choosing the follow the same imperfections they criticize.
Two wrongs do not make a right.
Why feel "sorry" for them? Aren't you secure in your beliefs? Isn't that enough?
Also, how do you equate "ego" with non-believing?
How do you feel about Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs etc, who don't believe in "the Father?"
If you have your beliefs, then fine, if other people don't that should be similarly fine, because tolerance of others was one of Jesus' teachings.
Is one eye a rastafarian? Should change his name to Sir Loss he eyeDizzy28 wrote:De Dragon wrote:one eye wrote:I truly feel sorry for those who do not have faith in the Father.
Those who choose ego over the Father.
Choosing the follow the same imperfections they criticize.
Two wrongs do not make a right.
Why feel "sorry" for them? Aren't you secure in your beliefs? Isn't that enough?
Also, how do you equate "ego" with non-believing?
How do you feel about Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs etc, who don't believe in "the Father?"
If you have your beliefs, then fine, if other people don't that should be similarly fine, because tolerance of others was one of Jesus' teachings.
Bruv he has repeatably stated how he feels about Hindus
daring dragoon wrote:shaha87 wrote:Thoughts?
From a Pakistani textbook apparently.
IMG_5408.JPG
so how does this explain the dinosaurs and other extinct creatures? is it allah kept failing at creating the perfect creation? then allah is a failure then.
one eye wrote:Username De Dragon since you cannot decipher simple English let me help you.
I am referring to the atheists who reject that there is a God.
Jews - Elohim
Muslims - Allah
Hindus - Brahma
Sikh - God
Christians - the Father
All are just names referring to the Creator.
I am quite tolerant of other religions and ways of life.
Username Dizzy28 you left out a keyword in that. Trini hindus.
These people do wicked and corrupt practices in their temples, practice archaic methods and use Hinduism for all the wrong reasons.
I have stated before I have hindu friends from India.
Even they are baffled and disgusted at Hinduism in Trinidad.
shaha87 wrote:daring dragoon wrote:shaha87 wrote:Thoughts?
From a Pakistani textbook apparently.
IMG_5408.JPG
so how does this explain the dinosaurs and other extinct creatures? is it allah kept failing at creating the perfect creation? then allah is a failure then.
I think about this quite often.
How does creationism explain such things?
FrankChag wrote:shaha87 wrote:daring dragoon wrote:shaha87 wrote:Thoughts?
From a Pakistani textbook apparently.
IMG_5408.JPG
so how does this explain the dinosaurs and other extinct creatures? is it allah kept failing at creating the perfect creation? then allah is a failure then.
I think about this quite often.
How does creationism explain such things?
And (He has created) horses, mules and donkeys,
for you to ride and as an adornment.
And He creates (other) things
of which you have no knowledge.
https://quran.com/16/8
matr1x wrote:FrankChag wrote:shaha87 wrote:daring dragoon wrote:shaha87 wrote:Thoughts?
From a Pakistani textbook apparently.
IMG_5408.JPG
so how does this explain the dinosaurs and other extinct creatures? is it allah kept failing at creating the perfect creation? then allah is a failure then.
I think about this quite often.
How does creationism explain such things?
And (He has created) horses, mules and donkeys,
for you to ride and as an adornment.
And He creates (other) things
of which you have no knowledge.
https://quran.com/16/8
What about kangaroos?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 160 guests