Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Why you beating up with Redman he's knows nothing about LNG or how industrial plant and its businesses work .De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:If only the NGCs capital base wasn't raided via an unheard of dividend policy.
16B TTD plus debt, plus
And yes Dragon the renegotiating of the complex has increased the revenue we get from LNG... especially given the prices in Euro and Asia
In terms of the loan I haven't read what it's for.
But if the ROI is higher than the cost of funds..then it makes sense in that regard.
So, when we projected to clear the half Billion that NGC squander on TAR and the compressor project? Is that included in the 3.3B that was borrowed?
Is NGC's unchanged Board competent to give that advice to borrow 3.3B dollars?
A few things you'll never see from the LFD RFD PNM and their lackeys/agents, honesty, integrity and an ROI.
zoom rader wrote:Why you beating up with Redman he's knows nothing about LNG or how industrial plant and its businesses work .De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:If only the NGCs capital base wasn't raided via an unheard of dividend policy.
16B TTD plus debt, plus
And yes Dragon the renegotiating of the complex has increased the revenue we get from LNG... especially given the prices in Euro and Asia
In terms of the loan I haven't read what it's for.
But if the ROI is higher than the cost of funds..then it makes sense in that regard.
So, when we projected to clear the half Billion that NGC squander on TAR and the compressor project? Is that included in the 3.3B that was borrowed?
Is NGC's unchanged Board competent to give that advice to borrow 3.3B dollars?
A few things you'll never see from the LFD RFD PNM and their lackeys/agents, honesty, integrity and an ROI.
De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:If only the NGCs capital base wasn't raided via an unheard of dividend policy.
16B TTD plus debt, plus
And yes Dragon the renegotiating of the complex has increased the revenue we get from LNG... especially given the prices in Euro and Asia
In terms of the loan I haven't read what it's for.
But if the ROI is higher than the cost of funds..then it makes sense in that regard.
So, when we projected to clear the half Billion that NGC squander on TAR and the compressor project? Is that included in the 3.3B that was borrowed?
Is NGC's unchanged Board competent to give that advice to borrow 3.3B dollars?
A few things you'll never see from the LFD RFD PNM and their lackeys/agents, honesty, integrity and an ROI.
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:If only the NGCs capital base wasn't raided via an unheard of dividend policy.
16B TTD plus debt, plus
And yes Dragon the renegotiating of the complex has increased the revenue we get from LNG... especially given the prices in Euro and Asia
In terms of the loan I haven't read what it's for.
But if the ROI is higher than the cost of funds..then it makes sense in that regard.
So, when we projected to clear the half Billion that NGC squander on TAR and the compressor project? Is that included in the 3.3B that was borrowed?
Is NGC's unchanged Board competent to give that advice to borrow 3.3B dollars?
A few things you'll never see from the LFD RFD PNM and their lackeys/agents, honesty, integrity and an ROI.
To answer your question if you include the fees paid by BP and She'll to settle the transfer pricing...we still ahead...by far.
https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/eclac-f ... 4b89990012
The Gas plan of 2015 also included estimates of what our revenue should have been if we were to solve the TP.
Off the top of my head it increased our take from $3 usd to $7 ish per mmbtu.
With oil where it is the govt has gotten a shot in the arm.
De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:If only the NGCs capital base wasn't raided via an unheard of dividend policy.
16B TTD plus debt, plus
And yes Dragon the renegotiating of the complex has increased the revenue we get from LNG... especially given the prices in Euro and Asia
In terms of the loan I haven't read what it's for.
But if the ROI is higher than the cost of funds..then it makes sense in that regard.
So, when we projected to clear the half Billion that NGC squander on TAR and the compressor project? Is that included in the 3.3B that was borrowed?
Is NGC's unchanged Board competent to give that advice to borrow 3.3B dollars?
A few things you'll never see from the LFD RFD PNM and their lackeys/agents, honesty, integrity and an ROI.
To answer your question if you include the fees paid by BP and She'll to settle the transfer pricing...we still ahead...by far.
https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/eclac-f ... 4b89990012
The Gas plan of 2015 also included estimates of what our revenue should have been if we were to solve the TP.
Off the top of my head it increased our take from $3 usd to $7 ish per mmbtu.
With oil where it is the govt has gotten a shot in the arm.
Oho, so is still small ting?
Well I guess in the light of it being 15% of the 3.3 B we just borrowed, a LFD RFD PNM could view it that way
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:If only the NGCs capital base wasn't raided via an unheard of dividend policy.
16B TTD plus debt, plus
And yes Dragon the renegotiating of the complex has increased the revenue we get from LNG... especially given the prices in Euro and Asia
In terms of the loan I haven't read what it's for.
But if the ROI is higher than the cost of funds..then it makes sense in that regard.
So, when we projected to clear the half Billion that NGC squander on TAR and the compressor project? Is that included in the 3.3B that was borrowed?
Is NGC's unchanged Board competent to give that advice to borrow 3.3B dollars?
A few things you'll never see from the LFD RFD PNM and their lackeys/agents, honesty, integrity and an ROI.
To answer your question if you include the fees paid by BP and She'll to settle the transfer pricing...we still ahead...by far.
https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/eclac-f ... 4b89990012
The Gas plan of 2015 also included estimates of what our revenue should have been if we were to solve the TP.
Off the top of my head it increased our take from $3 usd to $7 ish per mmbtu.
With oil where it is the govt has gotten a shot in the arm.
Oho, so is still small ting?
Well I guess in the light of it being 15% of the 3.3 B we just borrowed, a LFD RFD PNM could view it that way
It is YOU that asked to quantify.
You don't like the answer so you get pissy.
Redman wrote:So again you don't like the answer so you get pissy.
It was you who asked....when we projected to clear the half Billion that NGC squander on TAR and the compressor project?
By clear you imply inflow /outflow.
But the maths is mathsing.
https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/shell-a ... c2b5f35d81
The announcement was made by Energy Minister Franklin Khan who gave details to the Parliament on Monday following more a year of negotiations. He revealed that Shell agreed to pay government $2.5 billion by the end of 2019, the money to be paid in US to the sum of US $397 million.
Like the BPTT payment last year to government of $1 billion, Shell is making its payment but not admitting to cheating the country of large sums of revenue in transfer pricing......
The Energy Minister said between 2010 and 2014 it was estimated that the country lost up to US$6 billion annually
Redman wrote:No dumbass.
You asked a narrow question....I answered it narrowly in the terms you asked.
You don't like the answer.
You get pissy.
You still are pissy.
Redman wrote:You ask when we clear the expense....but don't like the facts?
Then bring some information to support your view
Maybe you can say when we clear the "half billion squander on the TAR and compression project"
So to answer your question based on the payments from She'll and BP being larger than the spend on TAR and compression...we are still ahead.
The maths mathsing.
Can you show otherwise?
Or you remain limited to your normal juvenile drivel?
Cyatulal, I asked about the $3.3B LOAN in relation to TAR/Compressor project
Also, this mysterious TP money doesn't seem to exist anywhere but in LFD RFD PNM liars like JUHN Scarfy and Goebbels and Guy Smiley (RIP) mind, because if there was a payment Jackarse JUHN and his goons would tout that far and wide as an achievement, and yes it would be one, but again, with these liars, I wait to see it materialize.
He revealed that Shell agreed to pay government $2.5 billion by the end of 2019, the money to be paid in US to the sum of US $397 million.
Like the BPTT payment last year to government of $1 billion, Shell is making its payment but not admitting to cheating the country of large sums of revenue in transfer pricing.
“The outcome of these phase 1 negotiations, with Shell, resulted in an agreement to pay the government approximately, US$397m to the end of 2019 and the parties are moving into phase 2 of the negotiations which surround the restructuring of Atlantic LNG,” Khan told the Parliament.
Oho, so it move from "small ting" to an "expense"
Typical LFD RFD PNM response, by next week it'll be petty cash...............
Yea he quietly slipped it in during the press conference.sMASH wrote:Is this new news. Did i miss sumting?
To be fair, from the time they announced they was GOING to do it, I called it as dead money.wtf wrote:Yea he quietly slipped it in during the press conference.sMASH wrote:Is this new news. Did i miss sumting?
The NGC train 1 investment is dead money.
Money well spentsMASH wrote:To be fair, from the time they announced they was GOING to do it, I called it as dead money.wtf wrote:Yea he quietly slipped it in during the press conference.sMASH wrote:Is this new news. Did i miss sumting?
The NGC train 1 investment is dead money.
Last feeding trough for his friendly contractors.
This was pure gross fiduciary misbehavior.
wtf wrote:Yea he quietly slipped it in during the press conference.sMASH wrote:Is this new news. Did i miss sumting? Screenshot_2021-11-07-17-59-28_1.jpg
The NGC train 1 investment is dead money.
Joshie23 wrote:wtf wrote:Yea he quietly slipped it in during the press conference.sMASH wrote:Is this new news. Did i miss sumting? Screenshot_2021-11-07-17-59-28_1.jpg
The NGC train 1 investment is dead money.
Feeling lazy..you got the source?
Redman will defend himsMASH wrote:i woudl jail his mc.
The_Honourable wrote:Joshie23 wrote:wtf wrote:Yea he quietly slipped it in during the press conference.sMASH wrote:Is this new news. Did i miss sumting? Screenshot_2021-11-07-17-59-28_1.jpg
The NGC train 1 investment is dead money.
Feeling lazy..you got the source?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpppTkpbo0Y
Start from 42:26
sMASH wrote:This one for red plastic.
I may be a simpleton, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out rowley et al did sheit.
And with NO valid reason to justify their actions, many reasons to NOT take those actions, and the other shareholders not taking those actions, I want to say that the actions of Keith and the directors of ngs was criminally negligent and possibly corrupt FB_IMG_1636478485126.jpgFB_IMG_1636478490399.jpgFB_IMG_1636478494034.jpg
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], pugboy and 18 guests