Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Redman wrote:Lol allyuh childish when allyuh vex.
It's impossible to have a discussion to figure out who was wrong.
De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Lol allyuh childish when allyuh vex.
It's impossible to have a discussion to figure out who was wrong.
Or childish when hard headed LFD RFD PNM cult members playing(?) dotish?
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Lol allyuh childish when allyuh vex.
It's impossible to have a discussion to figure out who was wrong.
Or childish when hard headed LFD RFD PNM cult members playing(?) dotish?
Ok so YOU know.
Let me ask- How did this happen? Its either the Chair or the President that overstepped.
If the President appoints is the entity forced to take on?
If the entity factually does not have the work load or the budget to hire another person---and ALL of this during C19 times....is it responsible for the entity to bring a person on?
Are there 2 LA??? if so is the EOT LIMITED BY THE ACT, or does the Presidential appointment take precedent.
I know that it is engaging for you and the rest of the crew to keep this as a divisive PNM/UNC thing...but it isnt so limited.
And therefore there are gaps need to be cleared up.
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Lol allyuh childish when allyuh vex.
It's impossible to have a discussion to figure out who was wrong.
Or childish when hard headed LFD RFD PNM cult members playing(?) dotish?
Ok so YOU know.
Let me ask- How did this happen? Its either the Chair or the President that overstepped.
If the President appoints is the entity forced to take on?
If the entity factually does not have the work load or the budget to hire another person---and ALL of this during C19 times....is it responsible for the entity to bring a person on?
Are there 2 LA??? if so is the EOT LIMITED BY THE ACT, or does the Presidential appointment take precedent.
I know that it is engaging for you and the rest of the crew to keep this as a divisive PNM/UNC thing...but it isnt so limited.
And therefore there are gaps need to be cleared up.
Wraith King wrote:Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Lol allyuh childish when allyuh vex.
It's impossible to have a discussion to figure out who was wrong.
Or childish when hard headed LFD RFD PNM cult members playing(?) dotish?
Ok so YOU know.
Let me ask- How did this happen? Its either the Chair or the President that overstepped.
If the President appoints is the entity forced to take on?
If the entity factually does not have the work load or the budget to hire another person---and ALL of this during C19 times....is it responsible for the entity to bring a person on?
Are there 2 LA??? if so is the EOT LIMITED BY THE ACT, or does the Presidential appointment take precedent.
I know that it is engaging for you and the rest of the crew to keep this as a divisive PNM/UNC thing...but it isnt so limited.
And therefore there are gaps need to be cleared up.
What gaps? The law is specific.
Redman wrote:Wraith King wrote:Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Lol allyuh childish when allyuh vex.
It's impossible to have a discussion to figure out who was wrong.
Or childish when hard headed LFD RFD PNM cult members playing(?) dotish?
Ok so YOU know.
Let me ask- How did this happen? Its either the Chair or the President that overstepped.
If the President appoints is the entity forced to take on?
If the entity factually does not have the work load or the budget to hire another person---and ALL of this during C19 times....is it responsible for the entity to bring a person on?
Are there 2 LA??? if so is the EOT LIMITED BY THE ACT, or does the Presidential appointment take precedent.
I know that it is engaging for you and the rest of the crew to keep this as a divisive PNM/UNC thing...but it isnt so limited.
And therefore there are gaps need to be cleared up.
What gaps? The law is specific.
I've asked the questions at the point where I see the gaps.
Let's ignore the politics..I still don't see it.
Can you shed light on the questions asked?
Redman wrote:And you know the issues raised by the chair to be untrue?
Why do you think she is lying?
How?
So forget the personalities here
If in fact the President appoints someone to any entity,, and the entity does not have the need or resources required to justify the person coming on..what takes precedent?
That's Presidential discretion surpasses the act?
Redman wrote:And you know the issues raised by the chair to be untrue?
Why do you think she is lying?
How?
So forget the personalities here
If in fact the President appoints someone to any entity,, and the entity does not have the need or resources required to justify the person coming on..what takes precedent?
That's Presidential discretion surpasses the act?
justheretoreadthecomments wrote:Redman wrote:And you know the issues raised by the chair to be untrue?
Why do you think she is lying?
How?
So forget the personalities here
If in fact the President appoints someone to any entity,, and the entity does not have the need or resources required to justify the person coming on..what takes precedent?
That's Presidential discretion surpasses the act?
There was also mention by the the tribunal of alleged breach of confidential communication channels, potentially dishonoring the doctrine of separation of powers and compromising the independence of the tribunal. Everyone is seeing Veera as the damsel in distress and victim of this apparently politicized tribunal but what's that common saying again? There are two sides to a story. You ask valid questions and I too would like to know, especially in the case where the act specifies two and those positions are filled, can third post be created like that? And might I add, the claim is that she quit her private practice to assume duties.... just wondering, can she not resume HER PRIVATE practice and have the matter with the EOT resolved or are we just accumulating damages?
(Source: https://trinidadexpress.com/newsextra/g ... cfa0b.html )
De Dragon wrote:justheretoreadthecomments wrote:Redman wrote:And you know the issues raised by the chair to be untrue?
Why do you think she is lying?
How?
So forget the personalities here
If in fact the President appoints someone to any entity,, and the entity does not have the need or resources required to justify the person coming on..what takes precedent?
That's Presidential discretion surpasses the act?
There was also mention by the the tribunal of alleged breach of confidential communication channels, potentially dishonoring the doctrine of separation of powers and compromising the independence of the tribunal. Everyone is seeing Veera as the damsel in distress and victim of this apparently politicized tribunal but what's that common saying again? There are two sides to a story. You ask valid questions and I too would like to know, especially in the case where the act specifies two and those positions are filled, can third post be created like that? And might I add, the claim is that she quit her private practice to assume duties.... just wondering, can she not resume HER PRIVATE practice and have the matter with the EOT resolved or are we just accumulating damages?
(Source: https://trinidadexpress.com/newsextra/g ... cfa0b.html )
Quitting her practice would have involved concluding, or handing over her pending matters, so to resume her practice would essentially be starting over, hence the legal option for damages.
Also she didn't just "ups" and seek redress. She was appointed on March 17th and her legal letter was sent on July 30th. Confidential communication channels? Really? Did she put an ad in a newspaper, Facebook?
Sounds like grasping at straws from Mrs Prowell, if that is her defence
Wraith King wrote:Redman wrote:And you know the issues raised by the chair to be untrue?
Why do you think she is lying?
How?
So forget the personalities here
If in fact the President appoints someone to any entity,, and the entity does not have the need or resources required to justify the person coming on..what takes precedent?
That's Presidential discretion surpasses the act?
How can the discretion of the President surpass the law when the law gives the President the sole power to make the appointments? The party in the wrong is the Chairman of the EOC. She's the one trying to override the law as she had no legal power to block an appointment.
Redman wrote:Wraith King wrote:Redman wrote:And you know the issues raised by the chair to be untrue?
Why do you think she is lying?
How?
So forget the personalities here
If in fact the President appoints someone to any entity,, and the entity does not have the need or resources required to justify the person coming on..what takes precedent?
That's Presidential discretion surpasses the act?
How can the discretion of the President surpass the law when the law gives the President the sole power to make the appointments? The party in the wrong is the Chairman of the EOC. She's the one trying to override the law as she had no legal power to block an appointment.
So The Act that gives the President the sole power to appoint- is the same Act that says the President SHALL appt 2 Lay Assessors- if Veera is #3 -what then.
And again- If the Chair does not have the workload or financial resources to pay an additional LA(whether second or third-then what happens when the Prez appoints a LA???
The_Honourable wrote:The questions are valid but one thing that is pretty certain... if this goes all the way, Veera winning in court.
Redman wrote:Sam
That's my interest...what triggers the appointment?
sam1978 wrote:Serious question. Veera have a man?
zoom rader wrote:All dis because she is non red gravaments
Mr ZR, are you insinuating that dp-r is a functioning rxt@rd and a political shxte@ter, or that there are political influencers at work keeping one lil Indian girl from being appointed to a State Agency? Of what benefit may that be to anyone?zoom rader wrote:All dis because she is non red gravaments
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 106 guests