Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
gastly369 wrote:Road done Sinking near Bridge...
Rovin wrote:instead of elevating d old 1 why they didnt build another double lane right next to d new 1 ? ....
sMASH wrote:its not about over take, is about man shut down, or road getting pot hole and impassible... no laybye or shoulder.. its a hazard and would reduce the whole ting to one way ... is like any ting pnm do, they build in a flaw.
sMASH wrote:its not about over take, is about man shut down, or road getting pot hole and impassible... no laybye or shoulder.. its a hazard and would reduce the whole ting to one way ... is like any ting pnm do, they build in a flaw.
Rory Phoulorie wrote:sMASH wrote:its not about over take, is about man shut down, or road getting pot hole and impassible... no laybye or shoulder.. its a hazard and would reduce the whole ting to one way ... is like any ting pnm do, they build in a flaw.
They building what was designed under the UNC. But you're still somewhat right. PNM real chupid to build a flawed design.
Mr Pates was talking to the BBC as part of a new feature looking into smart motorways and how they work.
He said the need for hard shoulders had become redundant because modern cars are now fitted with technology that warns the driver when they're about to break down, giving them plenty of time to take action and exit a motorway.
He also argued that vehicles are more reliable today than ever before and the chances of suffering a reliability issue are at an all time low.
Emergency services staff and vehicle recovery mechanics have also been critical of smart motorways, saying they can make it difficult for them to respond to urgent calls and conduct their jobs safely.
PC Stuart King from the motorway police said in a BBC interview: 'We have to force our way through the small gaps between lorries, cars and whereas before we would use the hard shoulder to get there much quicker. We are now stuck.' https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/car ... gland.html
The issue is the foundation more than likely, marsh and peat, expect "settling " . The warranty talk is the minister putting out a caveat for what is likely to occurpugboy wrote:Rohani say it have a defect warranty period
Lewwe see how 72 work stand up or if they claim the design is the issue and not their work.
...But Sinanan is reminding the travelling public that the change is temporary and asking them to bear with the ministry.
"It is not the actual highway. The reason we had to move to the embankment is so that we can now raise the other side of the road. That is going to be a two-lane highway all the way down, with shoulders, lights – everything, just like all the other areas are. Once they raise it and they have the entire area levelled, then they repave it and paint the line."
He said it is an ongoing project and it should not be expected that traffic can be completely eliminated.
"This is the most technical part. Of course, you're still going to get some traffic, because you're coming from two lanes into one lane, then back into two lanes.
"But the fact is there will be no stopping, no flooding, no saltwater on your car and it is a work in progress.
"So they will have to bear with us but it's a quantum leap from where we were before."
The highway extension is due to be completed in 2020.
https://newsday.co.tt/2019/10/24/driver ... -shoulder/
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: wx_klb and 241 guests