Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
j.o.e wrote:
That’s not practical and a waste of resources. If you can’t afford training doesn’t mean you even interested in getting the training. We need responsible pet ownership across the board. From pothound all the way up.
Too much dog sheit all over and strays bursting garbage etc.
A roaming and not secured dog should be a dead dog. Dangerous or not
Phone Surgeon wrote:sins...that would apply to who?
general dog ownership?
or certain breeds of dogs?
rollingstock wrote:I have a feel good story. Neighbour at the end of the street always leaving their gate open and their 3 bullies and other dogs left roaming the streets. They use to target my pompeks. Sad to say last week one attacked me as I was coming out my vehicle and suffered a fatal dose of lead poisoning.
Safeguard your dogs from lead poisoning folks.
alfa wrote:Can cops jump a fence or break in to gain access to a property if they have a warrant? What if I have a lil trap for bandits and one of them fall prey to it just as if said dog had killed one of them am I legally responsible? Makes for interesting court proceedings
SuperiorMan wrote:Wait MaxPower is Guyanese?
Can a doubles in front of an open second story window count as a cop trap?rollingstock wrote:alfa wrote:Can cops jump a fence or break in to gain access to a property if they have a warrant? What if I have a lil trap for bandits and one of them fall prey to it just as if said dog had killed one of them am I legally responsible? Makes for interesting court proceedings
The answer is yes they can.
And if you set a trap to cause injury to someone, that is premeditated as it's intention is to cause harm. You will be held liable.
88sins wrote:j.o.e wrote:
That’s not practical and a waste of resources. If you can’t afford training doesn’t mean you even interested in getting the training. We need responsible pet ownership across the board. From pothound all the way up.
Too much dog sheit all over and strays bursting garbage etc.
A roaming and not secured dog should be a dead dog. Dangerous or not
Good. Now, I hope you can accept that a similar fate should befall the people that love to set off extremely loud fireworks in residential areas at all ungodly hours of the night and cause several dogs to escape their homes in abject terror.
Also, humans killing humans in this place far more frequently than canines do. Yet I don't see very much of us making that as big a deal. Over the last decade, how many murders have there been in comparison to deaths by mauling. I think the ratio is a few hundred to one.
This kind of thing is a problem, but it benefits no one to go on emotionally charged rants. Emotions don't keep people safe, or prevent possible future incidents.
j.o.e wrote:88sins wrote:j.o.e wrote:
That’s not practical and a waste of resources. If you can’t afford training doesn’t mean you even interested in getting the training. We need responsible pet ownership across the board. From pothound all the way up.
Too much dog sheit all over and strays bursting garbage etc.
A roaming and not secured dog should be a dead dog. Dangerous or not
Good. Now, I hope you can accept that a similar fate should befall the people that love to set off extremely loud fireworks in residential areas at all ungodly hours of the night and cause several dogs to escape their homes in abject terror.
Also, humans killing humans in this place far more frequently than canines do. Yet I don't see very much of us making that as big a deal. Over the last decade, how many murders have there been in comparison to deaths by mauling. I think the ratio is a few hundred to one.
This kind of thing is a problem, but it benefits no one to go on emotionally charged rants. Emotions don't keep people safe, or prevent possible future incidents.
Likewise I’m against private use of fireworks. My point is instead of focusing on dangerous dogs let us legislate for responsible pet ownership across the board.
Those are the most entitled pot hounds in the country.Try telling the party crowd to stop sleeping around and breeding with random people nah.Nobody wants to hear that.alfa wrote:j.o.e wrote:88sins wrote:j.o.e wrote:
That’s not practical and a waste of resources. If you can’t afford training doesn’t mean you even interested in getting the training. We need responsible pet ownership across the board. From pothound all the way up.
Too much dog sheit all over and strays bursting garbage etc.
A roaming and not secured dog should be a dead dog. Dangerous or not
Good. Now, I hope you can accept that a similar fate should befall the people that love to set off extremely loud fireworks in residential areas at all ungodly hours of the night and cause several dogs to escape their homes in abject terror.
Also, humans killing humans in this place far more frequently than canines do. Yet I don't see very much of us making that as big a deal. Over the last decade, how many murders have there been in comparison to deaths by mauling. I think the ratio is a few hundred to one.
This kind of thing is a problem, but it benefits no one to go on emotionally charged rants. Emotions don't keep people safe, or prevent possible future incidents.
Likewise I’m against private use of fireworks. My point is instead of focusing on dangerous dogs let us legislate for responsible pet ownership across the board.
I want to legislate for responsible parenting, to much idiots making children to become wards of the state or young 'entrepreneurs' by the traffic lights. As it stands we can't even do that we go regulate who owning dog
How about chipping chile faddas88sins wrote:Phone Surgeon wrote:if you want to enforce regulated dog ownership....then it come like you hadda get rid of ALL stray dogs and register all other dogs to owners.
because i sure everyone know of stray dogs in the area that does go by specific persons houses on evenings for meals. but they're strays at the end of the day, and the person feeding them really isnt responsible for them
it had a case in valsayn recently where some doctor dog kill a next dentist dog in their yard and it was a whole scene
will see if i can find it
Not a terrible idea, but it have a problem with it, and that problem is the definition of what's a stray.
If a dog is startled and fearful and jumps a fence and runs a away, where he ends up people will call it a stray and the next thing is it dead if the owner can't find it in time.
If doing something like this, it must also be mandatory that all dogs be chipped with the owners information. And even that has potential for problems, if people sell or give away a dog and fail to transfer ownership, if that dog gets into an incident is the original owner they looking for if the current owner don't come forward. Original owner can direct the authorities to the current owner tho, so maybe it COULD work.
timelapse wrote:How about chipping chile faddas88sins wrote:Phone Surgeon wrote:if you want to enforce regulated dog ownership....then it come like you hadda get rid of ALL stray dogs and register all other dogs to owners.
because i sure everyone know of stray dogs in the area that does go by specific persons houses on evenings for meals. but they're strays at the end of the day, and the person feeding them really isnt responsible for them
it had a case in valsayn recently where some doctor dog kill a next dentist dog in their yard and it was a whole scene
will see if i can find it
Not a terrible idea, but it have a problem with it, and that problem is the definition of what's a stray.
If a dog is startled and fearful and jumps a fence and runs a away, where he ends up people will call it a stray and the next thing is it dead if the owner can't find it in time.
If doing something like this, it must also be mandatory that all dogs be chipped with the owners information. And even that has potential for problems, if people sell or give away a dog and fail to transfer ownership, if that dog gets into an incident is the original owner they looking for if the current owner don't come forward. Original owner can direct the authorities to the current owner tho, so maybe it COULD work.
While we busy studying dogs, humans who supposed to have sense out in the streets murdering people.We almost at 600 and nobody gives a fvck about it.Allyuh keep studying dogs.
timelapse wrote:How about chipping chile faddas
While we busy studying dogs, humans who supposed to have sense out in the streets murdering people.We almost at 600 and nobody gives a fvck about it.Allyuh keep studying dogs.
Phone Surgeon wrote:if you want to enforce regulated dog ownership....then it come like you hadda get rid of ALL stray dogs and register all other dogs to owners.
because i sure everyone know of stray dogs in the area that does go by specific persons houses on evenings for meals. but they're strays at the end of the day, and the person feeding them really isnt responsible for them
Two year old Vishal Deonath was bitten on the neck by his grandfather;s pitbull mixed breed dog while visiting their Hylife trace South Oropouche home on Tuedsay
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 136 guests