TriniTuner.com | Latest Event:
Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
The_Honourable wrote:Most of us agree that the President's wife needs a fashion stylist but the question is... was Rachel just giving her displeasure and providing constructive criticism on her manner of dress and what should it be? or was she going off on the man's wife by being slanderous, derogatory and nasty?
LalChun wrote:First time he actually do something
Casper23 wrote:It have something called freedom of speech in the constitution last time I checked...so is it everyone who has something to say abt his wife special sense of fashion will recieve such letters? He need to give his wife a PAP to stop dressing so
fouljuice wrote:Me eh know nah.
I thought this was about how somebody send a letter for Racial Price to go for a pap smear.
ruffneck_12 wrote:what she said tho?
shogun wrote:ruffneck_12 wrote:what she said tho?
^What he asked.
I dunno nuh. This seems to be an infringement of freedom of speech and a slippery slope. She is a comedienne after all. If his skin that thin maybe he should rethink holding office in T&T.... that sorta thing goes with the territory. Still waiting to hear what exactly was said though.
thelem wrote:It good for her. She talks too much and lingers on a topic too long in my opinion. Her only source of comedy seems to be on matters ongoing in the country then she milks it dry by trying to embarrass them.
Anyhow. For those asking what she said. It relates to this picture.
She (along with others) found it was distasteful and inappropriate for a First Lady to be dressed like that and meeting with dignitaries at the Fashion for Development at the Pierre Hotel during the 69th Session of The United Nation General Assembly last month.
Rachel price went on and on, during her morning show radio Programme about how Mrs. Carmona is a disgrace. And how it was classless of her. Blah blah. And she even went as far to mention for her upcoming "comedy" show, that she will be discussing the topic of Mrs. Carmona's distasteful and embarrassing representation of our country as the First Lady once again.
It's because of that, I believe the Letter was issued to her. Once again I agree. About time someone shut her up. It's a pity it had to start so high up.
rollingstock wrote:Uhmmmm but it was a belt, looked flesh coloured.
btw freedom of speech is enshrined in the constitution.............of the united states of America.
orangefox wrote:shogun wrote:ruffneck_12 wrote:what she said tho?
^What he asked.
I dunno nuh. This seems to be an infringement of freedom of speech and a slippery slope. She is a comedienne after all. If his skin that thin maybe he should rethink holding office in T&T.... that sorta thing goes with the territory. Still waiting to hear what exactly was said though.
All politicians thin skin ? Yes sir re bob ! Ba ! Hahahahahah
Again Camona focus on fixing President House ..
Camona embrassing Trinidad & Tobago .
Going like 7 years now and it still falling ..
rollingstock wrote:Uhmmmm but it was a belt, looked flesh coloured.
btw freedom of speech is enshrined in the constitution.............of the united states of America.
youthman wrote:Wat is a pap letter
j.o.e wrote:rollingstock wrote:Uhmmmm but it was a belt, looked flesh coloured.
btw freedom of speech is enshrined in the constitution.............of the united states of America.
nah RS daiz not a belt..... as much as I can't stand Rachel Price, the Prez shouldn't even waste time on giving her the spotlight. People will always talk, no sense drawing attention to them . Trinidad done forgot about that wardrobe thing and now he bring it back in the news
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 88 guests
