Flow
Flow
TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

Malicious Obedience!

this is how we do it.......

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

bluefete
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14659
Joined: November 12th, 2008, 10:56 pm
Location: POS

Malicious Obedience!

Postby bluefete » April 19th, 2015, 5:56 pm

So this report is kind of long for Tuners who are word challenged. I have pulled out the "Malicious Obedience" part from the main body of the report.

After reading that part, I was like - WHAT??????

http://www.newsday.co.tt/news/0,209938.html

TT comes to a halt

Sunday, April 19 2015

From the investigation I have conducted, I wish at this time to advance three (3) reasons on what may have caused the massive pile up as a result of the roadblock exercises conducted between 4 am and l0 am on Monday 23rd March 2015 by some members of the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service.

1. Malicious Obedience

In conducting the roadblock exercises on that day the Police Officers who participated in those activities were maliciously obedient to the Laws and Regulations of Trinidad and Tobago. They were also maliciously obedient to instructions by following all Standing Orders, Departmental Orders, Rules, Policies and Procedures.

The reality is those Police Officers maliciously performed their duties based on the Total Policing Day concept and the Police Visibility Patrol concept without any regard or concern for the plight of the general public or even to maintain a relationship with the general public.

The point to note, they did exactly what they were told to do in the memorandum dated 19th January 2015 on “Total Policing Day” and the memorandum dated February 10th 2015 on “Police Visibility Patrol.” However, their actions were without disposition and relationship to sustain the spirit of the Total Policing Day concept and moreover they have failed to accept any responsibility for the results.



The findings contained in a report on the day of “total policing” on March 23 were that senior police officers in charge of six out of nine police divisions “lost control of their divisions and stations respectively to a small group of junior officers” who enacted a “malicious” campaign. The report, compiled by Acting Assistant Commissioner of Police Vincel Edwards, and tabled in Parliament on Friday by National Security Minister, Brigadier Carl Alfonso, identified the three causes of the massive traffic pile-up on the day as “malicious obedience”, a breakdown of systems within the Police Service and a breach of regulations mandating officers in charge to have command of their posts.

Following is the full text of the report:

Executive Summary

On Monday March 23, 2015 between the hours of 4 am and 10 am some officers of the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service embarked on a nationwide roadblock which caused a massive traffic pile up along the nation’s roads. Persons heading to the capital city, Port-of-Spain had to undergo bumper to bumper traffic for hours. The business activities in the nation came to a halt with some major stakeholders indicating that they were unaware of what was happening and the real reason behind this dilemma.

The entire East/West corridor was affected terribly. Even as far as San Fernando the gridlocked was experienced and some commuters disembarked maxi taxis which resulted in them having to journey by foot to the rest of their destination. The sister isle Tobago was not left out of the equation with the Claude Noel Highway and Scarborough being mostly affected with traffic congestion. Some of the Police Officers who took part in the roadblock exercises indicated that it was a Total Policing Day which was directed by the Police Executive. Other officers said it was part of the Police Crime Plan 2015 which was initiated by the Commissioner of Police.

However, the general public shared a different view. They believed that the roadblock exercises which caused the nationwide gridlock were a direct result of the unsettled salary negotiations between Police Officers and the Chief Personnel Officer.

The Trinidad and Tobago Police Service Social and Welfare Association has since distanced themselves from what may appear to be an industrial action by some members of the Police Service.

On the said day Ms. Alleyne-Daly the then Acting Commissioner of Police held a press conference and apologised to the nation for the actions of those members of the Police Service.

She then appointed me to investigate the cause/causes of the event of that day.

From the investigation conducted three (3) causes were discovered and they are detailed herein.

In addition six (6) recommendations are offered as a guide to deal with any fallout.



Facts of Roadblock Exercises

On Monday 23rd March 2015, there were police roadblock exercises throughout Trinidad and Tobago. Those roadblocks caused massive pile up of traffic which resulted in numerous complaints of inconvenience made by members of the travelling public. The traffic on all the main thoroughfares in the country was at a standstill. This including the Eastern Main Road, the Priority Bus Route, the Churchill-Roosevelt Highway, the Sir Solomon Hochoy Highway, the Uriah Butler Highway, the Audrey Jeffers Highway, the Western Main Road, Maraval Road, the Lady Young Road and the Claude Noel Highway.

While roadblock exercises by the police are not uncommon in this country, it is widely perceived by the general public that the exercises conducted on Monday 23rd March 2015 were in reality industrial action brought about by a break down in the 2010 to 2013 salary negotiations. Even the media crystallised the action of the police as industrial action. This had brought condemnation against the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service by some members of the general public.

As a consequent the Acting Commissioner of Police Ms Annmarie Alleyne-Daly together with Deputy Commissioner of Police Mr Harold Phillip and Deputy Commissioner of Police Mr Glen Hackett held a news conference and apologised to the nation for the action of those Police Officers who were involved in the roadblock exercise. The Acting Commissioner of Police then appointed me to investigate the cause/causes of the traffic congestion on that day. The instrument which authorised me to pursue this investigation said:

“I refer to the above mentioned subject and hereby advise that you have been appointed to investigate the cause/causes for the massive traffic ‘pile up’ throughout Trinidad during the period from 4.30 am — 9 am on Monday 23rd March, 2015.”

While the mandate given to me for the investigation identified Trinidad to be the geographical frame for the investigation I have not limited myself to Trinidad but have also included Tobago for the obvious reason.



The Investigation of

Roadblock Exercises

I commenced this investigation by communicating with the Senior Superintendent of the nine (9)

Police Divisions. I asked them to provide me with a report of whether there were any roadblock exercises in their division during the period 4am to 10am on Monday 23rd March 2015. I also asked them if there were exercises, to furnish me with information as to who sanctioned the exercises, who were the officers detailed and the purpose for same.

It is instructive to note that the Senior Superintendent of Police in charge of the Central, Southern and South Western Divisions reported that there were no road block exercises conducted in their division. This therefore means that none of the officers attached to those three divisions were responsible for the massive traffic pile up in the country on Monday 23rd March 2015.

However, the Senior Superintendent of Police in charge of the Eastern, North Eastern, Northern, Port-of-Spain, Western and Tobago Divisions indicated that there were roadblock exercises carried out on the 23rd March 2015 in their divisions.

In addition, it was discovered that officers from the Guard and Emergency Branch (South), officers from Port-of-Spain CID and one officer from the Special Branch participated in the road block exercises.

The under mentioned is a presentation in terms of the Divisions, Section and Branch areas where roadblock exercises were conducted, who authorised/supervised them and also the results of those roadblock exercises.

(a) Eastern Division

1. Station involved - Sangre Grande Police Station

Area of roadblock - Turure Junction

No fixed penalty notices issued;

No arrest;

This road block was authorised by Inspector Thorn and supervised by No. 14504 Ag Sgt Sookdeo.



(b) North Eastern Division

1. Station involved - Santa Cruz Police Station

Area of roadblock - Bourg Mulatresse

This road block was authorised by Inspector Jacob.

2. Station involved- San Juan Police Station

Area of roadblock - Saddle Road Santa Cruz in the vicinity of the San Juan North Secondary School fixed penalty notices were issued;

No arrest;

This roadblock was authorised by Ag. Inspector Ramlogan.

3. Station involved- Barataria Police Station

Area of roadblock - Corner Priority Bus Route and Morvant Junction

No arrest;

This roadblock was authorised by Ag. Inspector Ramlogan.

4. Station involved- Morvant Police Station

Area of roadblock - Eastern Main Road, Barataria

6 fixed penalty notices were issued;

1 person was arrested;

This roadblock was supervised by No. 12744 Cpl Richards.



(c) Northern Division

1. Station involved- Piarco Police Station

Area of roadblock - Corner Churchill Roosevelt Highway and Piarco traffic lights

15 fixed penalty notices were issued;

15 stop and search forms were written up;

3 persons arrested;

This road block was authorised by No. 12558 Ag Sgt Moona.

2. Station involved- Pinto Police Post

Area of roadblock - Corner Churchill Roosevelt Highway and Pinto Road

14 fixed penalty notices were issued;

12 stop and search forms were written up;

1 person arrested;

This road block was supervised by No. 14696 Ag Sgt Thomas

3. Station involved- Cumuto Police Station

Area of roadblock - Cumuto Main Road

6 fixed penalty notices were issued;

137 stop and search forms were written up;

5 persons arrested;

This road block was supervised by No. 13213 Ag Cpl Gordon.

4. Station involved- San Raphael Police Station

Area of roadblock - San Raphael Junction

3 fixed penalty notices were issued;

25 stop and search forms were written up;

No arrest;

This road block was supervised by No. 12812 Ag Sgt Williams.



5. Station involved- Maloney Police Station

Area of roadblock - Priority Bus Route by Red Hill lights

15 fixed penalty notices were issued;

No arrest;

This road block was supervised by no. 12666 Ag Sgt Greene.

6. Stations involved- La Horquetta and Arima Police Stations

Area of roadblock - Comer De Freitas Boulevard and Churchill Roosevelt Highway, Arima

15 fixed penalty notices were issued

144 stop and search forms were written up

No arrest

This road block was supervised by No. 12774 Ag Sgt Waldropt.

7. Station involved- Arouca Police Station

Area of roadblock - Five Rivers Junction, Arouca

9 fixed penalty notices were issued;

No arrest;

This roadblock was supervised by No. 12626 Ag Sgt Joseph.

8. Station involved- St Joseph Police Station

Area of roadblock- Priority Bus Route and Eastern Main Road in the vicinity of TML Primary School

1 fixed penalty notice issued;

No arrest;

This roadblock was supervised by No. 13694 Ag Sgt Peters.





(d) Port-of-Spain Division

1. Station involved- Central Police Station

Area of roadblock - Beetham Highway by Light house

7 fixed penalty notices were issued;

No arrest;

This road block was supervised by No. 12271 Ag Sgt Seepersad.



(e) Western Division

1. Section involved-Western Division Task Force

Area of roadblock- Western Main Road, Cocorite

5 fixed penalty notices were issued;

48 stop and search forms were written up;

No arrest;

This road block was supervised by No. 16086 Ag Cpl Nurse.



(f) Tobago Division

1. Stations involved- Roxborough and Charlotteville Police Stations -

Area of roadblock - Windward Road Good wood

13 Fixed penalty notices were issued;

101 stop and search forms were written up;

No arrests;

This road block was authorised by No. 11867 Ag Sgt Williams.

2. Station involved- Scarborough Police Station

Areas of roadblocks - Claude Noel Highway, Orange Hill

Road and Milford Road

12 fixed penalty notices were issued;

No arrest;

This road block was authorized by No. 14786 Ag. Sgt Alleyne of Scarborough Police Station and No. 13745 Ag Cpl Sebro.

3. Station involved - Moriah Police Station

Area of roadblock - Big River Hill

1 fixed penalty notice was issued;

No arrest;

This roadblock was authorised by No. 12877 Ag Sgt George.

4. Station involved - Old Grange Police Station

Area of roadblock - Auchenskeoch Road

13 fixed penalty notices were issued;

7 stop and search forms were written up;

This road block was authorised by Inspector Powder.



(g) Guard and Emergency Branch

The investigation revealed that officers from the Guard and Emergency Branch named hereunder conducted roadblock exercise at Gasparillo in the vicinity of the flyover. That roadblock exercise was authorised and supervised by No. 11946 Acting Sergeant Ogunshaye.

Efforts were made to have the Acting Sergeant submit reports on the nature of his exercise but to date he has not done so.

No. 11946 Acting Sergeant Ogunshaye;

No. 13543 Constable De Govia;

No. 14094 Constable Breed;

No. 14839 Constable Pierre;

No. 14955 Constable Reid;

No. 17973 Constable Crawford and

No. 7974 Constable Charles



(h) Criminal Investigations Department

The Criminal Investigations Department I Criminal Records Office Operational Unit conducted a roadblock exercise on Independence Square South in the vicinity of the Cathedral. One person was arrested and this roadblock was supervised by No. 13393 WPC Collette.



The senior officers involved in the mentioned exercises were also asked to provide reports on the roadblock duties that they performed. They were specifically asked that in their report they should include inter alia the time of commencement and completion of the exercises, the officers who participated, purpose of the exercises, who instructed them to conduct the exercise and the period of time they were rostered. It should be noted some reports and diary extracts were obtained from the Divisions.

Inspector Thorn who in the Eastern Division authorised the roadblock exercises in the area of Turure Junction indicated in his report that he took a proactive measure to prevent crimes and criminal activities in general. This he said was as a result of an incident which occurred on March 21, 2015 where a Police Officer was shot and wounded. He further indicated that his action was in response to the mandate and strategic plans of the Commissioner of Police.

The Senior Officer who actually supervised the exercise; No. 14504 Acting Sergeant Sookdeo also provided a report. In his report, Ag Sgt Sookdeo indicated that No. 12685 Acting Sergeant Waldropt of the Special Branch asked to join the exercise which he was allowed to do.

However, Acting Sergeant Waldropt left the exercise ten minutes later.

A report was also obtained from Acting Sergeant Waldropt.

In the North-Eastern Division, reports were obtained from several officers from Morvant, San Juan, Barataria and Santa Cruz Police Stations. No. 12744 Corporal Richards of the Morvant Police Station indicated that the exercise was conducted as instructed by the Senior Superintendent North Eastern Division re: Crime Plan.

Ag Inspector Ramlogan of the San Juan Police Station stated in his report that as a result of a mandate given to the Station Commanders by the Senior Superintendent North Eastern Division, a decision was taken to conduct road block exercises on the 23rd March 2015.

Generally the officers of the North-Eastern Division indicated in their reports that the road block

exercises were conducted in keeping with the Strategic Crime Plan as instructed by the Commissioner of Police.

In the Northern Division, reports were obtained from officers attached to the St Joseph, Arima, La Horquetta, Arouca, San Raphael, Maloney, Cumuto, Pinto and Piarco Police Stations. No.

14732 Acting Corporal Rampersad of the La Horquetta Police Station stated in his report that the exercise was in keeping with the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service Anti-Crime (Strategic Plan 2014-2016).

No. 12626 Acting Sergeant Joseph of the Arouca Police Station indicated that the roadblock was geared towards apprehending wanted persons and dealing with persons violating the Motor Vehicle and Road Traffic Act.

In the Port-of-Spain Division, a report was obtained from No. 12771 Acting Sergeant Seepersad of the Central Police Station who indicated that the roadblock exercise was held as a result of the Commissioner’s Operation Plan for 2015.

In the Western Division, a report was obtained from No. 16086 Acting Corporal Nurse of the Western Division Task Force who stated that the roadblock exercise was held in an effort to recover two motor vehicles which were reported stolen on the 21 and 22nd March 2015.

In the Tobago Division, reports were obtained from several officers from the Scarborough, Moriah, Old Grange, Charlotteville and Roxborough Police Station. No. 14411 Acting Sergeant Sterling of the Roxborough Police Station indicated in her report that as a result of a lecture held on the 16th March 2015 at the Roxborough Police Station, a decision was made to conduct roadblocks in an effort to curb the upsurge of incidents of larceny of motor vehicles in that district.

Inspector Powder of the Old Grange Police Station stated in his report that he decided to conduct pre-Easter roadblock and traffic exercises and the roadblock exercise held on the 23rd March 2015 was coordinated and supervised by him.

No. 14786 Acting Sergeant Alleyne of the Tobago Division Task Force and No. 15084 Acting Corporal Bishop of Scarborough Police Station both stated in their reports that the roadblock exercises were conducted as a result of the policing concept of a ‘Total Policing Day Exercise.’



Synopsis

Having carefully reviewed the contents of the reports submitted by the Officers it seems to me that the roadblock duties they performed on Monday 23rd March 2015 maybe consistent with the concept of ‘Total Policing Day’ which is a crime fighting initiative. I shall briefly review the concept of Total Policing Day.



Total Policing Day

The concept of a total policing day is a crime fighting initiative from the office of the Deputy Commissioner of Police Operation Mr Harold Phillip who mandated all Divisional Commanders by way of a memorandum dated 19th January 2015 to conduct a ‘Total Policing Day’ each week with effect from the 19th January 2015.

In the memorandum, the Deputy Commissioner stated that the Total Policing Day should include “roadblock exercises stop and search exercises, ticket exercises, search warrant executions, warrant exercises, targeting of priority offenders and priority crimes as well as gang members”.

On the completion of such, the various Divisions were instructed to generate and submit by 12 midday after the date of the exercise a report of the outcome.

In addition to the Total Policing Day concept, the Deputy Commissioner of Police Operations issued a further memorandum dated February 10th 2015 titled “Police Visibility Patrof’.

Divisional Commanders were to detail officers to perform visibility patrols (foot I mobile) within their respective Divisions. The patrols were to include police officers performing duties at the main thoroughfare that is — Highways, Main Roads, Key institutions,

Road and Milford Road

12 fixed penalty notices were issued;

No arrest;

This road block was authorized by No. 14786 Ag. Sgt Alleyne of Scarborough Police Station and No. 13745 Ag Cpl Sebro.

3. Station involved - Moriah Police Station

Area of roadblock - Big River Hill

1 fixed penalty notice was issued;

No arrest;

This roadblock was authorised by No. 12877 Ag Sgt George.

4. Station involved - Old Grange Police Station

Area of roadblock - Auchenskeoch Road

13 fixed penalty notices were issued;

7 stop and search forms were written up;

This road block was authorised by Inspector Powder.



(g) Guard and Emergency Branch

The investigation revealed that officers from the Guard and Emergency Branch named hereunder conducted roadblock exercise at Gasparillo in the vicinity of the flyover. That roadblock exercise was authorised and supervised by No. 11946 Acting Sergeant Ogunshaye.

Efforts were made to have the Acting Sergeant submit reports on the nature of his exercise but to date he has not done so.

No. 11946 Acting Sergeant Ogunshaye;

No. 13543 Constable De Govia;

No. 14094 Constable Breed;

No. 14839 Constable Pierre;

No. 14955 Constable Reid;

No. 17973 Constable Crawford and

No. 7974 Constable Charles



(h) Criminal Investigations Department

The Criminal Investigations Department I Criminal Records Office Operational Unit conducted a roadblock exercise on Independence Square South in the vicinity of the Cathedral. One person was arrested and this roadblock was supervised by No. 13393 WPC Collette.



The senior officers involved in the mentioned exercises were also asked to provide reports on the roadblock duties that they performed. They were specifically asked that in their report they should include inter alia the time of commencement and completion of the exercises, the officers who participated, purpose of the exercises, who instructed them to conduct the exercise and the period of time they were rostered. It should be noted some reports and diary extracts were obtained from the Divisions.

Inspector Thorn who in the Eastern Division authorised the roadblock exercises in the area of Turure Junction indicated in his report that he took a proactive measure to prevent crimes and criminal activities in general. This he said was as a result of an incident which occurred on March 21, 2015 where a Police Officer was shot and wounded. He further indicated that his action was in response to the mandate and strategic plans of the Commissioner of Police.

The Senior Officer who actually supervised the exercise; No. 14504 Acting Sergeant Sookdeo also provided a report. In his report, Ag Sgt Sookdeo indicated that No. 12685 Acting Sergeant Waldropt of the Special Branch asked to join the exercise which he was allowed to do.

However, Acting Sergeant Waldropt left the exercise ten minutes later.

A report was also obtained from Acting Sergeant Waldropt.

In the North-Eastern Division, reports were obtained from several officers from Morvant, San Juan, Barataria and Santa Cruz Police Stations. No. 12744 Corporal Richards of the Morvant Police Station indicated that the exercise was conducted as instructed by the Senior Superintendent North Eastern Division re: Crime Plan.

Ag Inspector Ramlogan of the San Juan Police Station stated in his report that as a result of a mandate given to the Station Commanders by the Senior Superintendent North Eastern Division, a decision was taken to conduct road block exercises on the 23rd March 2015.

Generally the officers of the North-Eastern Division indicated in their reports that the road block

exercises were conducted in keeping with the Strategic Crime Plan as instructed by the Commissioner of Police.

In the Northern Division, reports were obtained from officers attached to the St Joseph, Arima, La Horquetta, Arouca, San Raphael, Maloney, Cumuto, Pinto and Piarco Police Stations. No.

14732 Acting Corporal Rampersad of the La Horquetta Police Station stated in his report that the exercise was in keeping with the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service Anti-Crime (Strategic Plan 2014-2016).

No. 12626 Acting Sergeant Joseph of the Arouca Police Station indicated that the roadblock was geared towards apprehending wanted persons and dealing with persons violating the Motor Vehicle and Road Traffic Act.

In the Port-of-Spain Division, a report was obtained from No. 12771 Acting Sergeant Seepersad of the Central Police Station who indicated that the roadblock exercise was held as a result of the Commissioner’s Operation Plan for 2015.

In the Western Division, a report was obtained from No. 16086 Acting Corporal Nurse of the Western Division Task Force who stated that the roadblock exercise was held in an effort to recover two motor vehicles which were reported stolen on the 21 and 22nd March 2015.

In the Tobago Division, reports were obtained from several officers from the Scarborough, Moriah, Old Grange, Charlotteville and Roxborough Police Station. No. 14411 Acting Sergeant Sterling of the Roxborough Police Station indicated in her report that as a result of a lecture held on the 16th March 2015 at the Roxborough Police Station, a decision was made to conduct roadblocks in an effort to curb the upsurge of incidents of larceny of motor vehicles in that district.

Inspector Powder of the Old Grange Police Station stated in his report that he decided to conduct pre-Easter roadblock and traffic exercises and the roadblock exercise held on the 23rd March 2015 was coordinated and supervised by him.

No. 14786 Acting Sergeant Alleyne of the Tobago Division Task Force and No. 15084 Acting Corporal Bishop of Scarborough Police Station both stated in their reports that the roadblock exercises were conducted as a result of the policing concept of a ‘Total Policing Day Exercise.’



Synopsis

Having carefully reviewed the contents of the reports submitted by the Officers it seems to me that the roadblock duties they performed on Monday 23rd March 2015 maybe consistent with the concept of ‘Total Policing Day’ which is a crime fighting initiative. I shall briefly review the concept of Total Policing Day.



Total Policing Day

The concept of a total policing day is a crime fighting initiative from the office of the Deputy Commissioner of Police Operation Mr Harold Phillip who mandated all Divisional Commanders by way of a memorandum dated 19th January 2015 to conduct a ‘Total Policing Day’ each week with effect from the 19th January 2015.

In the memorandum, the Deputy Commissioner stated that the Total Policing Day should include “roadblock exercises stop and search exercises, ticket exercises, search warrant executions, warrant exercises, targeting of priority offenders and priority crimes as well as gang members”.

On the completion of such, the various Divisions were instructed to generate and submit by 12 midday after the date of the exercise a report of the outcome.

In addition to the Total Policing Day concept, the Deputy Commissioner of Police Operations issued a further memorandum dated February 10th 2015 titled “Police Visibility Patrof’.

Divisional Commanders were to detail officers to perform visibility patrols (foot I mobile) within their respective Divisions. The patrols were to include police officers performing duties at the main thoroughfare that is — Highways, Main Roads, Key institutions,

School crossings, business areas, malls, squares, parks and coastal areas such as beaches.

The patrols were to be performed at the aforementioned locations at the times of the day when maximum impact could be derived.

The patrols were also to be instituted daily and the officers conducting the patrols were to be “People Centred”, that is courteous, attentive, responsive and tactful.

NB: Assuming that the Total Policing Day concept was the driving force of the exercises conducted by the Police Officers on Monday 23rd March 2015, then its application was disastrous on the general citizenry of Trinidad and Tobago. It caused a massive traffic pile up along the East-West corridor and also Scarborough, Tobago.

Based on several newspaper articles the action caused great inconvenience to the travelling public. The Trinidad Express newspaper reporter Ms Sharlene Rampersad reported that “commuters had to sit in standstill traffic for up to an hour or more.”

Another story by Mr. Richard Charan of the Trinidad Express newspaper dated March 24th 2015 stated that the action was deemed by the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service as a “Total Policing Day” but outraged citizens considered it an act of police brutality.’ He opined that it was a calculated move that brought torture to thousands of citizens on 23/03/2015. The Police found a way to protest the compensation package being offered by the State by setting up surprise road blocks along all major roads in Trinidad and Tobago.

A Guardian newspaper article dated March 24th, 2015 indicated that commuters leaving San Fernando were delayed for up to two hours or more in traffic on the north bound lane just to get to Gasparillo. Standstill traffic backed up into San Fernando clogging the by-pass and causing hundreds of commuters to arrive late for school and work.

Commuters in Tobago were also severely affected. First Citizens Bank Roxborough Branch and Republic Bank Auchenskeoch Branch remained closed as staffs were reportedly stuck in traffic.

Several passengers scheduled to fly with Caribbean Airlines (CAL) and other airlines on the morning of 23/03/2015 were also affected. Several regional and international CAL flights were delayed.

Another newspaper article reported that the Chaguanas Chamber of Industry and Commerce was deeply concerned by the action taken by Police Officers which brought the legitimate business of the country to a near standstill and affected thousands of commuters throughout the nation.

Newsday reporter Ms Carol Matroo reported “that thousands of commuters heading out to work and school yesterday were greeted with endless miles of traffic, many having to return home after reaching nowhere fast as the Police Service conducted what they called “a total day of policing”. Traffic also snaked into central and south Trinidad leaving motorists and passengers disgusted and frustrated with what they believed to be an exercise in futility.

At the Arima dial where people were usually hustling to the maxi taxi hub to get to work or school, most were taking the opposite direction to head back home saying the situation was ‘madness.’

Regional and International News Agencies also highlighted the situation in Trinidad and Tobago such as the Jamaica Observer and Yahoo News website.

Finally, it was concluded that the Police lost big in the court of public opinion with officers condemned for showing no consideration for the people. As a result, persons streamed out of Port-of-Spain early in the evening of Monday 23rd March 2015.



Industrial Action

In addition, the roadblock exercises conducted by the Police Officers were crystallised in several circles and in the media as an act of industrial action. It has now become necessary to briefly review this area of concern to have an understanding of it.

According to Section 2 (1) of the Industrial Relations Act Chapter 88:01, industrial action, means:

“strikes and lockouts, and any action, including sympathy strikes and secondary boycotts (whether or not done in contemplation of, or in furtherance of a trade dispute), by an employer or a trade union or other organisation or by any number of workers or other persons to compel any worker, trade union or other organisation, employer or any other person, as the case may be, to agree to terms of employment, or to comply with any demands made by the employer or the trade union or other organisation or by those workers or other persons, and includes action commonly known as a “sit-down strike” a “go-slow” or a “sick-out”, except that the expression does not include - (a) a failure to commence work in any agricultural undertaking where work is performed by task”.

caused by a delay in the conclusion of customary arrangements between employers and workers as to the size or nature of a task; and (b) a failure to commence work or a refusal to continue working by reason ofthefact that unusual circumstances have arisen which are hasardous or injurious to health or life”.



Synopsis

There is the notion that the roadblock exercises conducted by Police Officers throughout Trinidad and Tobago on the 23rd March 2015 between the hours of 4 am and 10 am were a form of industrial action as a result of their on-going salary negotiations. While there may seem to be a correlation between industrial action and the police roadblock exercises in Trinidad and Tobago there ~ really no evidence to substantiate this view.

Firstly, it is my view that the action taken by the Police Officers on the said date does not fall within the definition of industrial action as outlined in the Industrial Relations Act Chapter 88:01.

Secondly, the Police Officers who conducted the roadblock exercises in general claimed that the exercises were done in adherence to the directive on Total Policing Day.

Thirdly, the secretary of the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service Social and Welfare Association submitted a written report distancing the Association from the Police activities on Monday 23rd March 2015. In fact he said:

“This letter serves to confirm that the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service Social and Welfare Association (TTPSSWA) is unaware that these activities were in anyway related to salary negotiations.”

I do recognise the enormous sensitivity generated by the general public in this area and I do share their pain. However, in spite of the emotional feelings advocated in this area one needs to take an objective view bearing in mind the three (3) factors illustrated above before one can come to an informed position. For me there is no evidence to substantiate the fact that the Police Officers were engaging in industrial action although there are some obvious superficial parallels that can be drawn.



Causes of The Roadblock Exercises

From the investigation I have conducted, I wish at this time to advance three (3) reasons on what may have caused the massive pile up as a result of the roadblock exercises conducted between 4 am and l0 am on Monday 23rd March 2015 by some members of the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service.

1. Malicious Obedience

In conducting the roadblock exercises on that day the Police Officers who participated in those activities were maliciously obedient to the Laws and Regulations of Trinidad and Tobago. They were also maliciously obedient to instructions by following all Standing Orders, Departmental Orders, Rules, Policies and Procedures.

The reality is those Police Officers maliciously performed their duties based on the Total Policing Day concept and the Police Visibility Patrol concept without any regard or concern for the plight of the general public or even to maintain a relationship with the general public.

The point to note, they did exactly what they were told to do in the memorandum dated 19th January 2015 on “Total Policing Day” and the memorandum dated February 10th 2015 on “Police Visibility Patrol.” However, their actions were without disposition and relationship to sustain the spirit of the Total Policing Day concept and moreover they have failed to accept any responsibility for the results.

2. It seems that there is a breakdown in some of the systems within the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service.

The activities of Monday 23rd March, 2015 are a clear indication of the breakdown of some of the systems in the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service. There is no indication that the intelligence agencies within the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service reported on the possibility of such activities taking place or in the planning stage. In fact correspondence was sent to the Head of the Special Branch, Head of Divisions, Head of Cyber Crime Unit and Head of Criminal Gang and Intelligence Unit requesting kindly from them whether they had prior information on any planned roadblock exercise in the country.

The Head of the Special Branch was not helpful. She was more concerned with her seniority over me and refused to provide me with any information. This is unfortunate because I have no personal interest in this investigation. I was detailed to conduct this investigation by the Commissioner of Police and this is known throughout the country. I really thought that we were part of a complementary team with one vision in mind

However, the courtesy I received from her suggested otherwise. Her mere refusal to engage in discussions with me on the subject matter showed a communication issue and it is evident of a breakdown of systems in the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service.

The other Heads of Divisions and Branches, Cyber Crime Unit, Criminal Gang and Intelligence Unit supplied information that they were unaware of any planned roadblock exercises. Again their failure to know or have intelligence in this area is evident of breakdown of systems in the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service.

3. There was a breach of paragraph 131 (2) and (3) of the Police Service Regulations 2007.

Accordingly paragraph 131 (2) states:

An officer in the First Division who is in charge of a Division or Branch shall be responsible for the state of his command as well as the state of his district and for the conduct and efficiency of all the officers under his command.

Accordingly paragraph 131 (3) states:

An officer in the Second Division who is in charge of a Police Station shall be responsible for such Station and its district and for the conduct and efficiency of all the officers under his charge.



Rhetorically:

* Can we truly say that the First Division Officers in charge of Eastern Division, North Eastern Division, Northern Division, Port-of-Spain Division, Western Division and Tobago Division were in charge of their Divisions and responsible for the state of their command as well as the state of their district and for the conduct and efficiency of all the officers under their command between 4:00am and 10:00 am on Monday 23rd March, 2015?

* Can we truly say that the Second Division Officers who were in charge of Police Stations within the six Divisions mentioned above were responsible for such Stations and districts and for the conduct and efficiency of all the officers under their charge?

The reports obtained from the First Division Officers in charge of the Divisions indicated that they were unaware of what was taking place in their Divisions. They alluded that they received calls from the Acting Commissioner and The Deputy Commissioners to cease the roadblock activities within their Divisions.



Rhetorically:

* Are they saying that the Acting Commissioner of Police and the Deputy Commissioner of Police knew what was taking place in those six Divisions before the First Division Officers in charge of their Divisions?

NB: The point to note is that for a brief moment that is between 4 am and l0 am on Monday 23rd March, 2015, the First Division Officers who were in charge of six Police Divisions and Second Division Officers who were in charge of Police Stations within the six named Police Divisions lost control of their Divisions and Stations respectively to a small group of Junior Officers.

This small group of Junior Officers took control of six Police Divisions in Trinidad and Tobago and conducted their brand of malicious obedience to the Total Policing Day and the Police Visibility Patrol concepts.

Thanks for the astute leadership of the Acting Commissioner of Police Ms Annmarie Alleyne- Daly, Deputy Commissioner of Police Mr Harold Phillip and Deputy Commissioner of Police Mr Glen Hackett who intervened and took control of the situation in the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service. They certainly averted further crisis since the information obtained suggested that the said officers would have taken control of the streets of Trinidad and Tobago again by 2.00 pm the said Monday 23rd March, 2015.



Recommendations

In view of the investigation conducted and in view of the causes identified I wish to suggest the following recommendations to deal with any fallout from the roadblock exercises conducted by some Police Officers between 4 am and 10 am on Monday 23rd March, 2015.

1. In relation to any breach of Paragraphs 131(2) and (3) of the Police Service Regulation 2007, I am suggesting that a conference be called with the officers of the First Division who are in charge of Divisions or Branches and the officers in the Second Division who are in charge of Police Stations. There are two main reasons for such a conference:

* The first is to enlighten them of the provision of the Regulations illustrated above and to show them of its applicability to them.

* The second is to reprimand them for their failure to be in control of the state of their command as well as the state of their district and for the conduct and efficiency of all the officers under their command on Monday 23rd March, 2015.

2. It is my respectful view that serious consideration should be given to your relationship with the Police Officer who co-hosts the talk show programme Beyond the Tape. The programme is a great way to articulate the views and interest of the Police Service.

However, I am not sure that the Police Officer who co-host, such a programme is really articulating the views of the Police Service.

On Monday 23rd March, 2015, the Acting Commissioner of Police Ms Alleyne-Daly held a news conference apologising to the nation of the action of the Police Officers who on that day held the roadblock exercises that caused massive traffic pile up. However, the co-host of the programme “Beyond the Tape” which is aired during the hours of 6 pm to 7 pm on that said day was praising the Police Officers who conducted the roadblock exercises.

Both views are diametrically opposing to each other and have clearly demonstrated mixed signals. Thus it is my respectful view that the support of the Police Service to this officer be reconsidered.

3. Although there is evidence that officers of the Guard and Emergency Branch took part in road block exercises in the Southern Division, it is noteworthy that there was no evidence that officers within the Central Division, Southern Division and South Western Division took part in any roadblock exercises between 4 am and 10 am on Monday 23rd March, 2015. This means that in no way officers attached to those Divisions were responsible for the traffic gridlock that took place on the main thoroughfare in Trinidad and Tobago on that day. This to my mind is commendable and it is my respectful view that you compliment all officers in those Divisions accordingly for their devotion to duty.

4. Information coming to hand is that some members of the general public felt that they were victimised and unfairly treated by the Police Officers who performed roadblock duty on that day. Bearing in mind that one of the causes of the massive roadblock exercises is “malicious obedience” by Police Officers to the Standing Orders, Departmental Orders, Rules, Policies, Procedures, Laws and Regulations of Trinidad and Tobago.

Then it may be prudent to lobby the State to hold a Commission of Inquiry into the Police activities on that day.

The conclusion and findings of this inquiry may help to win back the public trust and confidence since the public will have a medium to let us know exactly what they endure at the hands of some Police Officers.

5. No 12685 Ag. Sgt Waldropt of The Special Branch, who is posted in the Eastern Division and performed roadblock duty dressed in police uniform, should be realigned. The Special Branch should provide support in terms of intelligence and avoid participating in situations like these yet this officer chose to do the opposite.

6. Finally, it may be worthy for the Commissioner of Police and the three (3) Deputy Commissioners of Police to formally apologise to the nation for the actions of the few Police Officers who were able to simultaneously hold roadblock exercises between the period 4 am and 10 am on Monday 23rd March, 2015. This effort may help to build back the bridge of confidence between the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service and the members of the public.



Limitations of this Enquiry

There were several limitations I encountered pursuing this enquiry. In this regards I shall identify two of those concerns:

* Time.

I was given two weeks to complete this enquiry. However, the magnitudes of this enquiry required in excess of that time to gather more information and also to interview and obtain reports from other Police Officers involved in this road block. Lack of sufficient time has been a disadvantage in this regard.

* Support and Co-operation.

Even though I was appointed by the Acting Commissioner to investigate this matter I certainly did not get the co-operation of some my colleagues to address some areas of concern to me.

Many thanks for affording me the opportunity to serve in this capacity.

User avatar
megadoc1
punchin NOS
Posts: 3261
Joined: January 9th, 2006, 7:33 pm
Location: advancing the kingdom of heaven

Re: Malicious Obedience!

Postby megadoc1 » April 20th, 2015, 9:04 am

looks like police exposed themselves

User avatar
eliteauto
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14175
Joined: March 10th, 2006, 1:36 am
Location: PPP
Contact:

Re: Malicious Obedience!

Postby eliteauto » April 20th, 2015, 4:33 pm

semantics and politics, Commission of Enquiry for what? More tax payers money to be wasted, if disciplinary action is to be taken it can be done internally, if the reports have indicated that no illegal action was done what is "Malicious Obedience" they did their jobs too well? I agree with the assumption it was tied to wage negotiations, but all action can be done internally if necessary no need to play politics with this

STORM1234
Riding on 17's
Posts: 1306
Joined: September 14th, 2010, 7:40 pm
Contact:

Re: Malicious Obedience!

Postby STORM1234 » April 20th, 2015, 5:02 pm

n e pics owah?

User avatar
~Vēġó~
3NE 2NR Moderator
Posts: 45606
Joined: April 18th, 2003, 12:18 am
Location: Being the Change that I want to See
Contact:

Re: Malicious Obedience!

Postby ~Vēġó~ » April 20th, 2015, 6:04 pm

holy fck my finger geh tired scrollin....

User avatar
Slartibartfast
punchin NOS
Posts: 4650
Joined: May 15th, 2012, 4:24 pm
Location: Magrathea

Re: Malicious Obedience!

Postby Slartibartfast » April 22nd, 2015, 2:53 pm

eliteauto wrote:semantics and politics, Commission of Enquiry for what? More tax payers money to be wasted, if disciplinary action is to be taken it can be done internally, if the reports have indicated that no illegal action was done what is "Malicious Obedience" they did their jobs too well? I agree with the assumption it was tied to wage negotiations, but all action can be done internally if necessary no need to play politics with this


Think of "malicious obedience" as "Legal Harassment". They did not do anything illegal but their actions were premeditated and the ill effects (total gridlock) completely desired.

What if I was a police officer, and every day as you pulling onto the highway I stop you so I could check your tire pressure, oil level, license and insurance. But I always take at least an hour to do it because I have to keep going back to the police car for by "checking" tools (pressure guage, dipstick and reading glasses for each size font). Would you be ok with it? Would I be doing anything wrong? Would I be doing anything illegal?

EDIT: Ok I read it over and I think the writer had the wrong perspective on that part. From what I understand the officer's have to obey commands from higher up. So the real problem is the person that issued the commands. The policemen would have had no choice but to obey all the orders or risk insubordination (a real officer could correct me here).

User avatar
eliteauto
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14175
Joined: March 10th, 2006, 1:36 am
Location: PPP
Contact:

Re: Malicious Obedience!

Postby eliteauto » April 22nd, 2015, 3:18 pm

"comply then complain" words that you hear from the time you enter the Police Training College, you must comply with lawful instructions, I'm sure the officers complied with gusto knowing fully well the deleterious effect it would have on the traffic situation and the resultant domino effect. As I said I have no issue with disciplinary action but it should be kept internal and should not realistically affect an officer's service record, e.g. an officer can be transferred as transfers are within the service, even if it is effected as punishment, but if an officer were to get a letter placed on file for what in essence is doing his job then he'd better get litigious real quick and sue.

I see the Chamber of Commerce endorsing the recommendations of the report, because the actions affected their bottom line, but seriously a COE for a 6hr roadblock could only serve to enrich the attorneys and appointed Commissioners it's a waste, time to move on

User avatar
Dizzy28
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 18912
Joined: February 8th, 2010, 8:54 am
Location: People's Republic of Bananas

Re: Malicious Obedience!

Postby Dizzy28 » April 22nd, 2015, 4:21 pm

Cliffs??

User avatar
Slartibartfast
punchin NOS
Posts: 4650
Joined: May 15th, 2012, 4:24 pm
Location: Magrathea

Re: Malicious Obedience!

Postby Slartibartfast » April 23rd, 2015, 8:20 am

Yeah elite I agree. I would even go so far as saying the only person that should really be penalised in the person the should be removed from his position and replaced by someone competent enough to understand the risks and possible effects involved when carrying out nationwide security exercises. Even if the officers got out of hand, as long as they didn't do anything illegal they should leave them alone. Could probably blame some of the a$$ness on frustration cuz they didn't look like they were having fun IMO.

They need good leadership so the course of action should focus on that.

User avatar
De Dragon
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17908
Joined: January 27th, 2004, 3:49 am
Location: Enjoying my little miracles............

Re: Malicious Obedience!

Postby De Dragon » April 23rd, 2015, 11:39 pm

That CoE will never see the light of day..........

seaside
Ricer
Posts: 26
Joined: April 28th, 2015, 9:46 am

Re: Malicious Obedience!

Postby seaside » April 28th, 2015, 10:06 am

sad but true , Trinidad is a police state ,,, in many ways than one , its like going to KFC you knowbad service is a norm its the same with a police station you know you go get same old time bad john service when you go to a station for any service ......

User avatar
Slartibartfast
punchin NOS
Posts: 4650
Joined: May 15th, 2012, 4:24 pm
Location: Magrathea

Re: Malicious Obedience!

Postby Slartibartfast » April 28th, 2015, 10:25 am

If you think it hard, imagine how it must be for the good officers inside there. There were a few times I got really good service from some officers and bad service some other times. They have to find a way to weed out the bad ones.

pugboy
TunerGod
Posts: 29320
Joined: September 6th, 2003, 6:18 pm

Re: Malicious Obedience!

Postby pugboy » May 2nd, 2015, 11:05 am

Word is they gong to subpoena certain members here as there were several posts days in advance warning of this
Duane better shred all evidence

User avatar
rollingstock
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17931
Joined: June 29th, 2009, 8:21 am
Location: Ain't got no chill!

Re: Malicious Obedience!

Postby rollingstock » May 2nd, 2015, 4:48 pm

pugboy wrote:Word is they gong to subpoena certain members here as there were several posts days in advance warning of this
Duane better shred all evidence


:skurry: :skurry: :skurry:

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 25585
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: Malicious Obedience!

Postby sMASH » May 2nd, 2015, 7:43 pm

No officer can be held accountable for what hey did, because nothing illegal was done.
Fair is fair.
As long as none of them got an instruction to NOT carry out any roadblocks at those specific periods of time, then nothing was legally wrong.

User avatar
megadoc1
punchin NOS
Posts: 3261
Joined: January 9th, 2006, 7:33 pm
Location: advancing the kingdom of heaven

Re: Malicious Obedience!

Postby megadoc1 » May 9th, 2015, 8:50 am

these fellas under pressure but its scary, their response that is
yuh mean the head of police welfare aint read a report that is now public? he really care about the welfare of the police and how they are viewed by the public?

http://www.newsday.co.tt/news/0,210872.html

Ramesar grilled

By Sasha Harrinanan Saturday, May 9 2015

PRESIDENT of the Police Social Welfare Association (PSWA) Insp Anand Ramesar was yesterday grilled as he faced a barrage of questions by a Joint Select Committee of Parliament on the ‘total policing’ roadblocks which crippled the entire country on March 23.

Ramesar came in for strong criticism from members of the Committee (JSC) on National Security yesterday, when he said he did not try to determine who was responsible for total policing and had not yet read the report compiled by an Assistant Commissioner of Police on the issue.

Ramesar defended his association saying the timing of the total policing incident in relation to ongoing wage negotiations with the Chief Personnel Officer (CPO) was a mere coincidence.

Opposition Senator Faris Al- Rawi put it to Ramesar, “It appears to have been an event of pseudo industrial action on the part of people who have genuine problems and issues that have not been addressed.”

This was followed up by Legal Affairs Minister Prakash Ramadhar, asking if Ramesar considered “what happened on March 23 to be purely coincidental.”

“I cannot say if it’s coincidental or otherwise (because) I have not been in mainstream policing since 2010,” Ramesar said adding that when he became union head he stopped participating in day-to-day police work.

This seemed to stump the usually quick-witted Al-Rawi, who replied, “Sorry, sorry, sorry. How long have you been in the TTPS?” Ramesar replied, “15 years”. Al-Rawi asked Ramesar if he had ever seen an incident where 19 police stations (from) six division exercised an event of road blocks simultaneously. “Where not a person can be identified as having orchestrated it?”

“I have not,” was Ramesar’s response. Asked if he was concerned by this, Ramesar told Al-Rawi, “it does.” Ramadhar later asked if Ramesar had taken any steps to ascertain how the incident occurred, but the union head replied, “We are not an investigative body.”

“No, I didn’t ask you that sir,” Ramadhar stated. “Did you take any step whatsoever, you being the president of an organisation to whom you have responsibility for those officers who actually participated, take no step whatsoever to ascertain how it occurred?”

Ramesar started to say, “We have met with the Commissioner of Police...” when Ramadhar interrupted, “No, no, no. With all due respect sir...with your membership you have taken no step directly to ascertain?” Ramesar finally answered directly, stating, “I have taken no step directly with my membership.”

He was also questioned about the public perception that a statement he made on March 3, 2015 now seems to have been a warning of the March 23 incident.

Ramesar was quoted as saying, “The thread that keeps the stability in the police service is about to be broken...This situation is volatile and we call on the Prime Minister to intervene.”

Yesterday he was adamant that no such link existed, telling the JSC, “Nothing in that statement referred to what we call total policing, which took place on March 23.”

“It had to do with issues...of promotion, of disenchantment, of frustration...because we would have met with successive ministers of National Security...and nothing would have been done in relation to the problems we kept articulating,” Ramesar stated.

Further criticism of how Ramesar and the PSWA has responded to the total policing incident came from JSC Chairman and Independent Senator Dr Rolph Balgobin, who said he was “particularly disappointed and concerned” that Ramesar had not read the now public report into the incident, even though it was specifically mentioned in his letter of invitation to appear before the committee.

“(You should) take every available opportunity to ascertain the truth of the matter so that you can prevent your organisation from being maligned,” Balgobin cautioned, “because I don’t think that I was comfortable with your minimisation of what happened.”

“As a citizen of this country, I would take grave objection to someone in whose arms I’ve put a gun, abusing their authority to make a point in relation to a negotiation for wages. That for me would be something,” Balgobin told Ramesar, “I would find utterly frightening and I think that is where the country has reached in its conclusion.”

Three other agencies were also questioned during the nearly three-hour JSC meeting — the Strategic Services Agency (SSA), the Special Branch of the TTPS (SB) and the National Operations Centre (NOC).

SSA Director, ASP Bisnath Maharaj, had little to add since he was overseas during the total policing incident and had no prior knowledge of it.

NOC Executive Director, Garvin Heerah and its Strategic Coordinator, Mervyn Richardson, were also unaware of the incident prior to March 23.

Heerah was out of the country on that day so Richardson ‘took point’ on contacting various national security agencies to determine the cause of the nationwide gridlock.

Asked why NOC didn’t have a more proactive response to the incident, Heerah said NOC is reviewing its processes so that if it suspects a similar action is about to recur, it can take steps to prevent this.

“We are going to ensure there is a national alert state that can tell us what are the levels of alert based on an action that is taking place...So if an agency in TT, who may for instance carry arms and ammunition, (poses) a threat and is positioning itself under the guise of doing something official...through our alert state and through the information, we are going to ensure that the other agencies can move in and treat with this accordingly,” Heerah stated.

The JSC asked that a report on the details of this plan be submitted within a week.

It remains a mystery however, what was said by SB Head, ACP Erla Christopher, since she requested, and was granted, an in-camera (private) session with the JSC “because of the nature of our (work).”

Redman
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10430
Joined: August 19th, 2004, 2:48 pm

Re: Malicious Obedience!

Postby Redman » May 9th, 2015, 9:08 am

So...

We have the largest single operation in our non SOE history....and no one knows who ordered.

That is remains the single day of Total Policing in our history means that we havent had it since.

Apparently what we get is halfarsed policing day to day

the PSWA came across yesterday as either grossly dishonest or inept.

That the TTPS as a body expects the population to believe that the exercise was not causal to the state of their negotiation indicates that they feel the gen population are idiots.

And I support the TTPS call for more money and better equipment.

but this is crap

Advertisement

Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests