Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
joker wrote:De Dragon wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:De Dragon wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Clearly it's never the employer's fault.
Yes, but when obstructionist union idiots involved, it usually hastens the demise.
Steel in a mess generally though. Mittal would have closed regardless. Mittal already laid off people locally despite the presence of a union. Problem is on both sides. Can't just blame Union alone.
Never said they were solely to blame, but the work ethic, safety at Arcelor Mittal is horrible. This leads to worker apathy and demotivation, but when you have a union encouraging the irresponsible behaviour by defending insubordination, high absenteeism, etc, well nobody wins as we can tell.joker wrote:A lot of idiots on this topic sah. Apparently they heard the other side of the story not knowing that ampl created Arcelormittal tru subsidies, cheap labour. Not once the topic of acquisitions came into your elaborate minds from 1plant in pt Lisas to over 100 plants globally or never was price transfer mentioned...
Admin staff would've gone home with one or 2mths pay..... Not 50 k but less than 18k and a person with 36 year s service would go home with less than 30k. Excluding vacation and the court judgement . One worker lost over 700k cus of a judgment awarded and company went into liquidation...and
over 2000contract workers would have benefitted from that landmark judgement.
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:I guess y'all right on this one. Spoke to someone in management who was employed at arcelor. They said the union there wasn't willing to work with the company. Excuses like "not within job spec" were used. No willingness to compromise in terms of working with the company to accept any pay cuts via different methods.
Person also said that what mittal did was unethical though. How not every person was in the union so they got a raw deal by the abrupt pull out.
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:I guess y'all right on this one. Spoke to someone in management who was employed at arcelor. They said the union there wasn't willing to work with the company. Excuses like "not within job spec" were used. No willingness to compromise in terms of working with the company to accept any pay cuts via different methods.
Person also said that what mittal did was unethical though. How not every person was in the union so they got a raw deal by the abrupt pull out.
EmilioA wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:I guess y'all right on this one. Spoke to someone in management who was employed at arcelor. They said the union there wasn't willing to work with the company. Excuses like "not within job spec" were used. No willingness to compromise in terms of working with the company to accept any pay cuts via different methods.
Person also said that what mittal did was unethical though. How not every person was in the union so they got a raw deal by the abrupt pull out.
Most of the money AM owes is to other AM companies. How the union responsible for that ? Looks like shady accounting, Now that they want to pull they using debt that they never bother about before as an excuse to shut down.
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:EmilioA wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:I guess y'all right on this one. Spoke to someone in management who was employed at arcelor. They said the union there wasn't willing to work with the company. Excuses like "not within job spec" were used. No willingness to compromise in terms of working with the company to accept any pay cuts via different methods.
Person also said that what mittal did was unethical though. How not every person was in the union so they got a raw deal by the abrupt pull out.
Most of the money AM owes is to other AM companies. How the union responsible for that ? Looks like shady accounting, Now that they want to pull they using debt that they never bother about before as an excuse to shut down.
Well I guess that's why they said mittal unethical as well. Just giving actual feedback from someone inside Mittal as opposed to giving and outside view all the time.
joker wrote:Nothing about pay cuts or compromise was mentioned in the meetings also in mittal if u do something other than what u were trained for more than likely would be fatal or that person would be seriously injured .
desifemlove wrote:How big was this plant, compared to their overseas operations? Could it be that the T&T was small, and not worth having? it bad to see people lose jobs, but perspective is key here, eh? most global firms does retract the smaller plant, and keep the bigger ones.
And people saying "dey did buy ting in Iran!" yes, they did, but this was an iron ore mine. where do people tink steel does come from? Even if the steel market is depressed, no reason why not to secure a major raw material deposit for current and future operations.
This imho is unfortunate, but then it's called globalisation, get over it.
joker wrote:Did your inside source tell u that the marketing department had no power and that orders were sent from Costa Rica for Point lisas to produce ?
joker wrote:Dragon , do you know the union never lost a case against mittal for over 7 yrs? Also u have no clue of what is/was going on .
joker wrote:If I have to go deeper than what I have already posted then I can't help u understand.
joker wrote:Dragon , do you know the union never lost a case against mittal for over 7 yrs? Also u have no clue of what is/was going on .
joker wrote:Mittal exported over 1m tons of DRI every year up to 2015 with prices of US $600-675 billets 400000 tons around same price ...wire rods 300000 tons US$500-600 every year...cost of production US650m.....
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], pugboy and 289 guests