Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Men studying Sat and hindus but meanwhile 1% marry their cousins and keep the money all in the family.Lou Screuz wrote:I am a hindu and i reading some of these comments here and on other topics and i have to wonder what and where d moddacont people does get their information about hindu people from ?
I never in my life ever hear anybody beat up or talk about caste other than what caste is - everybody born with certain gifts and traits - and if you smart you will pay close attention to yourself and align your life. You dont have to - but if you smart you will. If you have a natural inclination to construction and technical drawing but you cannot sing to save your life- is bess you go and do that instead of trying to be a soca artist. It means if you smart you marrid somebody you most compatible with. That wrong ?
It cannot be a "skin colour" thing neither - my whole life almost EVERY hindu couple i know up to my own mother and father is different skin tone / facial structure / body type / hair type/ height. About 1/8 people in the temple i attend is visibly mixed race and everybody does get along. Same temple raise money for a black woman nearby to get medical help. Same temple raise money for dominica. Same temple donate food and schoolbooks to Greenvale.
so what all you people does be talking about ?
Hindu "child marriage". Long time marriage was about community - not 2 people "falling in love". Life wasn't about what you an darlin want - it was about you and she AND your inlaws not starving and living in d road. So that is why my granny and grandpa get married at 15 and 17 - it was a pledge and pooling of family resources - They meet each other in d morning for the first time ever - married just before lunch - then that afternoon grandpa went back to rio claro and granny went back to siparia and then they did not see each other again until they was about 19 and grandpa had a actual trade. They did not start making children left right center that night at age 14 and then cry that HDC give them a house and is d syrian and kamla thief out dey morney.
Last I heard the sdms was suggesting 16 be the age - simply because sometimes teenage couples get pregnant and this would give them options. I see no reason to be against that - especially if their parents are involved. By 16 you can get a job - or at least be in training for one - you know what you are doing and where babies come from. Funny how nobody calls out the people of another certain religion who was pushing for age 12.
Aye I-Carly, if you name man - stop worring about people name maraj - why you don't go and find and video people name bakr and abdulla and ask them about ACTUAL child marriage ? Why you don't go and do an interview about that ? Livestream it - Ask them about how a famous middle eastern man who we does wish peace onto did marrid a six year old and consummate it when she turn 9. I would be most interested in seeing their response to you, LIVE on youtube .
It have a man who openly admitted to recruiting trinidadians for ISIS walking around free and literally hugging up attorney general - all ah wee quiet about that - But Sat Maharaj reads an article written by a tobagonian about tobagonians and points out the fact that 12000 people getting more money than 1200000 and gets charged for sedition . we forking mad in this place.
- it needs to be said - Most of the Sat-Maharaj-hate in this country is nothing more than jealousy and an attempt to pull down an otherwise harmless person who never force anybody to do anything. It have a kind of people who just plain hate hindus for political reasons and they take any chance they can get to pull down what and who they believe gives Hindu people structure. The envy is real.
Stop getting your information about hindu people from pentecostal churches, pnm/small-islander-hosted talk radio and the not-so-secret-isis-imams.
88sins wrote:if they adults and don't mind having diseased or deformed progeny for the sake of keeping the money within the family, daz dem business.
Lou Screuz wrote:I am a hindu and i reading some of these comments here and on other topics and i have to wonder what and where d moddacont people does get their information about hindu people from ?
I never in my life ever hear anybody beat up or talk about caste other than what caste is - everybody born with certain gifts and traits - and if you smart you will pay close attention to yourself and align your life. You dont have to - but if you smart you will. If you have a natural inclination to construction and technical drawing but you cannot sing to save your life- is bess you go and do that instead of trying to be a soca artist. It means if you smart you marrid somebody you most compatible with. That wrong ?
It cannot be a "skin colour" thing neither - my whole life almost EVERY hindu couple i know up to my own mother and father is different skin tone / facial structure / body type / hair type/ height. About 1/8 people in the temple i attend is visibly mixed race and everybody does get along. Same temple raise money for a black woman nearby to get medical help. Same temple raise money for dominica. Same temple donate food and schoolbooks to Greenvale.
so what all you people does be talking about ?
Hindu "child marriage". Long time marriage was about community - not 2 people "falling in love". Life wasn't about what you an darlin want - it was about you and she AND your inlaws not starving and living in d road. So that is why my granny and grandpa get married at 15 and 17 - it was a pledge and pooling of family resources - They meet each other in d morning for the first time ever - married just before lunch - then that afternoon grandpa went back to rio claro and granny went back to siparia and then they did not see each other again until they was about 19 and grandpa had a actual trade. They did not start making children left right center that night at age 14 and then cry that HDC give them a house and is d syrian and kamla thief out dey morney.
Last I heard the sdms was suggesting 16 be the age - simply because sometimes teenage couples get pregnant and this would give them options. I see no reason to be against that - especially if their parents are involved. By 16 you can get a job - or at least be in training for one - you know what you are doing and where babies come from. Funny how nobody calls out the people of another certain religion who was pushing for age 12.
Aye I-Carly, if you name man - stop worring about people name maraj - why you don't go and find and video people name bakr and abdulla and ask them about ACTUAL child marriage ? Why you don't go and do an interview about that ? Livestream it - Ask them about how a famous middle eastern man who we does wish peace onto did marrid a six year old and consummate it when she turn 9. I would be most interested in seeing their response to you, LIVE on youtube .
It have a man who openly admitted to recruiting trinidadians for ISIS walking around free and literally hugging up attorney general - all ah wee quiet about that - But Sat Maharaj reads an article written by a tobagonian about tobagonians and points out the fact that 12000 people getting more money than 1200000 and gets charged for sedition . we forking mad in this place.
- it needs to be said - Most of the Sat-Maharaj-hate in this country is nothing more than jealousy and an attempt to pull down an otherwise harmless person who never force anybody to do anything. It have a kind of people who just plain hate hindus for political reasons and they take any chance they can get to pull down what and who they believe gives Hindu people structure. The envy is real.
Stop getting your information about hindu people from pentecostal churches, pnm/small-islander-hosted talk radio and the not-so-secret-isis-imams.
Slartibartfast wrote:Lou Screuz wrote:I am a hindu and i reading some of these comments here and on other topics and i have to wonder what and where d moddacont people does get their information about hindu people from ?
I never in my life ever hear anybody beat up or talk about caste other than what caste is - everybody born with certain gifts and traits - and if you smart you will pay close attention to yourself and align your life. You dont have to - but if you smart you will. If you have a natural inclination to construction and technical drawing but you cannot sing to save your life- is bess you go and do that instead of trying to be a soca artist. It means if you smart you marrid somebody you most compatible with. That wrong ?
It cannot be a "skin colour" thing neither - my whole life almost EVERY hindu couple i know up to my own mother and father is different skin tone / facial structure / body type / hair type/ height. About 1/8 people in the temple i attend is visibly mixed race and everybody does get along. Same temple raise money for a black woman nearby to get medical help. Same temple raise money for dominica. Same temple donate food and schoolbooks to Greenvale.
so what all you people does be talking about ?
Hindu "child marriage". Long time marriage was about community - not 2 people "falling in love". Life wasn't about what you an darlin want - it was about you and she AND your inlaws not starving and living in d road. So that is why my granny and grandpa get married at 15 and 17 - it was a pledge and pooling of family resources - They meet each other in d morning for the first time ever - married just before lunch - then that afternoon grandpa went back to rio claro and granny went back to siparia and then they did not see each other again until they was about 19 and grandpa had a actual trade. They did not start making children left right center that night at age 14 and then cry that HDC give them a house and is d syrian and kamla thief out dey morney.
Last I heard the sdms was suggesting 16 be the age - simply because sometimes teenage couples get pregnant and this would give them options. I see no reason to be against that - especially if their parents are involved. By 16 you can get a job - or at least be in training for one - you know what you are doing and where babies come from. Funny how nobody calls out the people of another certain religion who was pushing for age 12.
Aye I-Carly, if you name man - stop worring about people name maraj - why you don't go and find and video people name bakr and abdulla and ask them about ACTUAL child marriage ? Why you don't go and do an interview about that ? Livestream it - Ask them about how a famous middle eastern man who we does wish peace onto did marrid a six year old and consummate it when she turn 9. I would be most interested in seeing their response to you, LIVE on youtube .
It have a man who openly admitted to recruiting trinidadians for ISIS walking around free and literally hugging up attorney general - all ah wee quiet about that - But Sat Maharaj reads an article written by a tobagonian about tobagonians and points out the fact that 12000 people getting more money than 1200000 and gets charged for sedition . we forking mad in this place.
- it needs to be said - Most of the Sat-Maharaj-hate in this country is nothing more than jealousy and an attempt to pull down an otherwise harmless person who never force anybody to do anything. It have a kind of people who just plain hate hindus for political reasons and they take any chance they can get to pull down what and who they believe gives Hindu people structure. The envy is real.
Stop getting your information about hindu people from pentecostal churches, pnm/small-islander-hosted talk radio and the not-so-secret-isis-imams.
Also consider that the life expectancy back then was around 35 years old. Getting married at half the age of your expected life span is not unreasonable to think about. Btw, the information I talked about was from the podcast with Sat. I'm basically repeating what he said and throwing in my opinion of it. Feel free to agree or disagree as you like.
As for talking to Muslims about child marriage.... yeah... I want to but haven't found anyone willing to come on that could hold people's attention. If you know anyone, please link me up, that will be a very interesting podcast.
And lastly, man... I wish I could do this youtube thing live but I funding this from my pocket and it's just me alone so I can't afford that kind of equipment or staff. You see I'm striving for a certain quality. I already have a long way to go in terms of quality and I'm trying to at least keep consistent with it. If the demand and funding is there in the future then I'm all for it. But in the meanwhile, just know that I only do very minor editing to my podcasts. I only remove long silences and mishaps. I'm doing this to capture people's point of view in context so going live with no audience does not offer any real benefit at this time.
Thanks for the feedback though. If you want you can find the entire podcast on the youtube channel.
You will see that people will quicker attack hindus on child marriages, they see Hindus as weaker but will stay silent on Muslims.Slartibartfast wrote:Lou Screuz wrote:I am a hindu and i reading some of these comments here and on other topics and i have to wonder what and where d moddacont people does get their information about hindu people from ?
I never in my life ever hear anybody beat up or talk about caste other than what caste is - everybody born with certain gifts and traits - and if you smart you will pay close attention to yourself and align your life. You dont have to - but if you smart you will. If you have a natural inclination to construction and technical drawing but you cannot sing to save your life- is bess you go and do that instead of trying to be a soca artist. It means if you smart you marrid somebody you most compatible with. That wrong ?
It cannot be a "skin colour" thing neither - my whole life almost EVERY hindu couple i know up to my own mother and father is different skin tone / facial structure / body type / hair type/ height. About 1/8 people in the temple i attend is visibly mixed race and everybody does get along. Same temple raise money for a black woman nearby to get medical help. Same temple raise money for dominica. Same temple donate food and schoolbooks to Greenvale.
so what all you people does be talking about ?
Hindu "child marriage". Long time marriage was about community - not 2 people "falling in love". Life wasn't about what you an darlin want - it was about you and she AND your inlaws not starving and living in d road. So that is why my granny and grandpa get married at 15 and 17 - it was a pledge and pooling of family resources - They meet each other in d morning for the first time ever - married just before lunch - then that afternoon grandpa went back to rio claro and granny went back to siparia and then they did not see each other again until they was about 19 and grandpa had a actual trade. They did not start making children left right center that night at age 14 and then cry that HDC give them a house and is d syrian and kamla thief out dey morney.
Last I heard the sdms was suggesting 16 be the age - simply because sometimes teenage couples get pregnant and this would give them options. I see no reason to be against that - especially if their parents are involved. By 16 you can get a job - or at least be in training for one - you know what you are doing and where babies come from. Funny how nobody calls out the people of another certain religion who was pushing for age 12.
Aye I-Carly, if you name man - stop worring about people name maraj - why you don't go and find and video people name bakr and abdulla and ask them about ACTUAL child marriage ? Why you don't go and do an interview about that ? Livestream it - Ask them about how a famous middle eastern man who we does wish peace onto did marrid a six year old and consummate it when she turn 9. I would be most interested in seeing their response to you, LIVE on youtube .
It have a man who openly admitted to recruiting trinidadians for ISIS walking around free and literally hugging up attorney general - all ah wee quiet about that - But Sat Maharaj reads an article written by a tobagonian about tobagonians and points out the fact that 12000 people getting more money than 1200000 and gets charged for sedition . we forking mad in this place.
- it needs to be said - Most of the Sat-Maharaj-hate in this country is nothing more than jealousy and an attempt to pull down an otherwise harmless person who never force anybody to do anything. It have a kind of people who just plain hate hindus for political reasons and they take any chance they can get to pull down what and who they believe gives Hindu people structure. The envy is real.
Stop getting your information about hindu people from pentecostal churches, pnm/small-islander-hosted talk radio and the not-so-secret-isis-imams.
Also consider that the life expectancy back then was around 35 years old. Getting married at half the age of your expected life span is not unreasonable to think about. Btw, the information I talked about was from the podcast with Sat. I'm basically repeating what he said and throwing in my opinion of it. Feel free to agree or disagree as you like.
As for talking to Muslims about child marriage.... yeah... I want to but haven't found anyone willing to come on that could hold people's attention. If you know anyone, please link me up, that will be a very interesting podcast.
And lastly, man... I wish I could do this youtube thing live but I funding this from my pocket and it's just me alone so I can't afford that kind of equipment or staff. You see I'm striving for a certain quality. I already have a long way to go in terms of quality and I'm trying to at least keep consistent with it. If the demand and funding is there in the future then I'm all for it. But in the meanwhile, just know that I only do very minor editing to my podcasts. I only remove long silences and mishaps. I'm doing this to capture people's point of view in context so going live with no audience does not offer any real benefit at this time.
Thanks for the feedback though. If you want you can find the entire podcast on the youtube channel.
Thanks man. I appreciate the support. I tried approaching some sponsors already but I they don't seem interested as yet. But I share you opinion. It may have made sense back in the day because the world was very different back then but it does not make sense today. It was sad that he said the consent of the woman was never considered back then.l33t2 wrote:You doing a great job. When you build up enough followers try to approach sponsors, also try to network amongst social media influencers etc.
But you both raise good points although I really don't think lifespan was ever averaging as low as 35 but it's still relevant. And secondly marrying for survival is and was fine but our societies structure has changed dramatically.
Lastly, ofc we don't follow a caste system here. It's also why Indians here look very different to many Indians from India. But to say ppl don't discriminate against skin colour here (both Indian and Blacks) is being ignorant. 9/10 of ten women will choose a fair skin guy over darker (all things being equal) because they don't want no dark skin children. I've heard dozens of women say that.
Anyway my earlier argument against child marriage, was, back then it was a defensible position, at present it's not. And Sat has a very archaic view of women. I have two sisters one has always wanted kids and a family. The other wanted a career and never too be married. I see how drastic their personality and goal is, not all women cut out or even want to be mothers. Leave them be.
Well I mean, Mary had Jesus out of immaculate conception and Joseph married her to prevent her from being ostracized. I don't know if they ever had sex. If anything, God was the perv in that story (not the first time)zoom rader wrote:You will see that people will quicker attack hindus on child marriages, they see Hindus as weaker but will stay silent on Muslims.
Christans are most silent on Mary and Joseph when she was 13 years old.
Jesus had four brothers: James, Joseph, Simon, and JudasSlartibartfast wrote:Thanks man. I appreciate the support. I tried approaching some sponsors already but I they don't seem interested as yet. But I share you opinion. It may have made sense back in the day because the world was very different back then but it does not make sense today. It was sad that he said the consent of the woman was never considered back then.l33t2 wrote:You doing a great job. When you build up enough followers try to approach sponsors, also try to network amongst social media influencers etc.
But you both raise good points although I really don't think lifespan was ever averaging as low as 35 but it's still relevant. And secondly marrying for survival is and was fine but our societies structure has changed dramatically.
Lastly, ofc we don't follow a caste system here. It's also why Indians here look very different to many Indians from India. But to say ppl don't discriminate against skin colour here (both Indian and Blacks) is being ignorant. 9/10 of ten women will choose a fair skin guy over darker (all things being equal) because they don't want no dark skin children. I've heard dozens of women say that.
Anyway my earlier argument against child marriage, was, back then it was a defensible position, at present it's not. And Sat has a very archaic view of women. I have two sisters one has always wanted kids and a family. The other wanted a career and never too be married. I see how drastic their personality and goal is, not all women cut out or even want to be mothers. Leave them be.Well I mean, Mary had Jesus out of immaculate conception and Joseph married her to prevent her from being ostracized. I don't know if they ever had sex. If anything, God was the perv in that story (not the first time)zoom rader wrote:You will see that people will quicker attack hindus on child marriages, they see Hindus as weaker but will stay silent on Muslims.
Christans are most silent on Mary and Joseph when she was 13 years old.
I think with Islam Muhammed married his wife when she was 9 years old and waited until she was 12 to consummate the marriage. I asked a Muslim friend about it once and all he replied was that she was a very mature 12 year old. I'm hoping that someone else can give me a better answer one day, like how Sat explained the reasoning behind it back then.
maj. tom wrote:lol it have some relllll idle ppl in this country while Petrotrin, human rights, the judiciary, the Treasury and the economy going down the toilet.
Ent 100 days before Christmas is a fixed calendar event despite whatever year it is? Diwali is a set of moon-crab-running-astrology-reading the patra-after feeding the dead ancestors- kind of date that varies every year. So if by chance Ramadan and Eid falls in the week before Christmas they should have a beat up too about it?
Yuh know who fault this is? Kamla. Big Hindu from Penal and she letting this happen.
bluefete wrote:But ent Sat have a whole radio AND tv station to push diwali?
How come his stations do not play christmas music?????
bluefete wrote:But ent Sat have a whole radio AND tv station to push diwali?
How come his stations do not play christmas music?????
Dizzy28 wrote:bluefete wrote:But ent Sat have a whole radio AND tv station to push diwali?
How come his stations do not play christmas music?????
Probably for the same reason Issac Radio doesn't play bhajans or qasidas
What Sat is saying is that Tax payers dollars is used to fund TTT and it must have an equal programming for all.bluefete wrote:But ent Sat have a whole radio AND tv station to push diwali?
How come his stations do not play christmas music?????
zoom rader wrote:PNM ppl will throw venom as usual
rspann wrote:When zoom see the PNM crowd in the savannah today he might get a stroke too.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 236 guests