Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
elec2020 wrote:
......(i think demerit points are when u going 30 kph over the speed limit)
maj. tom wrote:elec2020 wrote:Speaking about air fresheners https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_NqZnm7wQeg&t=3s
jeeze that cop looks like he attends the monthly KKK bbq feast of his local Arizona chapter.
https://www.unclefinneyspoker.com/arizo ... ive-leave/
Bad, stink cops. Link to the BLM thread because it have a lot of people here who still don't understand what's going on.
16 cycles wrote:elec2020 wrote:
......(i think demerit points are when u going 30 kph over the speed limit)
If there is a quota system for issuing tickets then that cop will sure make to fill his bookmaj. tom wrote:I think it can be up to the discretion of the officer to give you a warning if it's less than 10 over, but they're not obliged. They can give you a ticket for 1 km/h over the limit. As the system now roll out, they going to rest it hard on everyone. Plus the 3 CXC mandated critical thinking of traffic cops will go far...
maj. tom wrote:I think it can be up to the discretion of the officer to give you a warning if it's less than 10 over, but they're not obliged. They can give you a ticket for 1 km/h over the limit. As the system now roll out, they going to rest it hard on everyone. Plus the 3 CXC mandated critical thinking of traffic cops will go far...
maj. tom wrote:but yet they will do it. You think dem 3 o-level occifers know what is Limits of Accuracy?
Whatever that radar gun say, so it will print on the ticket.
redmanjp wrote:maj. tom wrote:but yet they will do it. You think dem 3 o-level occifers know what is Limits of Accuracy?
Whatever that radar gun say, so it will print on the ticket.
you can contest a ticket for 1km/h over the limit citing the accuracy of the speed gun being +/-2km/h in court. if it registers 101, the actual speed could be anywhere between 99-103, creating reasonable doubt.
Dizzy28 wrote:redmanjp wrote:maj. tom wrote:but yet they will do it. You think dem 3 o-level occifers know what is Limits of Accuracy?
Whatever that radar gun say, so it will print on the ticket.
you can contest a ticket for 1km/h over the limit citing the accuracy of the speed gun being +/-2km/h in court. if it registers 101, the actual speed could be anywhere between 99-103, creating reasonable doubt.
But suppose the Magistrate say if you know that then drive 95-98 to not have any worries and then buss your throat with a fine??
Dizzy28 wrote:redmanjp wrote:maj. tom wrote:but yet they will do it. You think dem 3 o-level occifers know what is Limits of Accuracy?
Whatever that radar gun say, so it will print on the ticket.
you can contest a ticket for 1km/h over the limit citing the accuracy of the speed gun being +/-2km/h in court. if it registers 101, the actual speed could be anywhere between 99-103, creating reasonable doubt.
But suppose the Magistrate say if you know that then drive 95-98 to not have any worries and then buss your throat with a fine??
kamakazi wrote:If you are going to charge someone for going over the limit but can't say with any certainty that they were above the limit... What are they being charged for.
Also the speedometer on most vehicles usually read slightly faster than the speed you are actually going (erring on the side of caution as the vehicle is delivered/equipped; changing tyre sizes will obviously change this scenario)Dizzy28 wrote:redmanjp wrote:maj. tom wrote:but yet they will do it. You think dem 3 o-level occifers know what is Limits of Accuracy?
Whatever that radar gun say, so it will print on the ticket.
you can contest a ticket for 1km/h over the limit citing the accuracy of the speed gun being +/-2km/h in court. if it registers 101, the actual speed could be anywhere between 99-103, creating reasonable doubt.
But suppose the Magistrate say if you know that then drive 95-98 to not have any worries and then buss your throat with a fine??
maj. tom wrote:
zoom rader wrote:I really hope more folk get tickets and points .
They all wanted PNM so let them take bull
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:speedmelter wrote:my friend got a speeding ticket for 104 km/hr today, funny thing is i begging the girl to not be driving 80 all trip to south but the jackass police set themselves on the decline of a hill on the highway heading to south. Obviously your car will naturally accelerate a bit on the decline, what are you supposed to do? mash brakes going up the hill to reduce to abt 80 to compensate for the natural increase as you go over the hill? or are you supposed to slow down to 50 before you get to the incline then slowly accelerate up?
this thing is not about safety one bit. the stupid policeman ran out into the middle of the lane to stop the vehicle like a madman trying to commit suicide. No reflective gear, no proper gesture to pull over. I foresee someone bouncing down one of them these days and winning that case easily in court.
Claxton Bay?
maj. tom wrote:whole video: "cyak cyak cyak cyak!"
pause
Man cudda buy some Trinity white Chinese lacquer and fix that himself long time ago.
88sins wrote:maj. tom wrote:whole video: "cyak cyak cyak cyak!"
pause
Man cudda buy some Trinity white Chinese lacquer and fix that himself long time ago.
the front plate is clearly defective, so exactly what is his problem?
better he start driving bison cart in d lagoon. no plates required, no tickets to be issued, no points on a license that doesn't exist.
zoom rader wrote:88sins wrote:the front plate is clearly defective, so exactly what is his problem?
better he start driving bison cart in d lagoon. no plates required, no tickets to be issued, no points on a license that doesn't exist.
Make sure and have your pick up bucket on the cart cause that's a charge .
Bull & Donkey carts can still be charged
88sins wrote:zoom rader wrote:88sins wrote:the front plate is clearly defective, so exactly what is his problem?
better he start driving bison cart in d lagoon. no plates required, no tickets to be issued, no points on a license that doesn't exist.
Make sure and have your pick up bucket on the cart cause that's a charge .
Bull & Donkey carts can still be charged
show me which ttps officer/licensing officer going to walk behind a bison & cart in a lagoon to see if the operator picking up his manure/have a pick up bucket
Ray Laks wrote:maj. tom wrote:
This clears up everything. Think I will keep my tail in neutral and pay the fine.
Thanks to all you good folks for you input. All comments were appreciated.
Lights and have to be on and off as the times published.redmanjp wrote:Ray Laks wrote:maj. tom wrote:
This clears up everything. Think I will keep my tail in neutral and pay the fine.
Thanks to all you good folks for you input. All comments were appreciated.
So according to this if you are driving during the day with bulbs that aren't working u Ok? As long as you have them?
Gonna have to do this. Riding the limit when u know it do easy to go over.Dizzy28 wrote:redmanjp wrote:maj. tom wrote:but yet they will do it. You think dem 3 o-level occifers know what is Limits of Accuracy?
Whatever that radar gun say, so it will print on the ticket.
you can contest a ticket for 1km/h over the limit citing the accuracy of the speed gun being +/-2km/h in court. if it registers 101, the actual speed could be anywhere between 99-103, creating reasonable doubt.
But suppose the Magistrate say if you know that then drive 95-98 to not have any worries and then buss your throat with a fine??
I will also pay the ticket cause it easier.Ray Laks wrote:maj. tom wrote:
This clears up everything. Think I will keep my tail in neutral and pay the fine.
Thanks to all you good folks for you input. All comments were appreciated.
THE police are reporting a 19 per cent decrease in fatal accidents and 1,300 errant drivers being ticketed for various traffic offences since the launch of the UTURN Traffic Enforcement, E-ticketing system in May.
The State can expect $1.3 million in revenue from the fines issued to the drivers and front seat passengers who failed to buckle up while commuting in a vehicle. Drivers also incurred four demerit points for failing to adhere to this road regulation.
A release from the police said that road regulation enforcement exercises on Friday led to the Traffic and Highway Patrol Branch’s Road Policing Task Force (RPTF) issuing 126 Electronic Fixed Penalty Notices to drivers for exceeding speed limits, failing to wear seatbelts, driving while using a mobile phone, driving a motor vehicle without an identification light illuminating the registration plate and driving a vehicle at night with one headlight.
The exercises also resulted in the arrest of 12 drivers for Driving Under the Influence (DUI) offences with one driver producing a reading of 119 microgrammes of alcohol per 100 millilitres of breath – over three times the legal limit of 35 microgrammes of alcohol.
The exercises were conducted along three major highways, namely the Beetham Highway, the Churchill Roosevelt Highway and the Uriah Bulter Highway. Officers also conducted exercises along Main Roads such as the Dinsley Main Road, Arouca, Orange Grove, Tacarigua, and the Caura Royal Road.
The team was led by Senior Superintendent Dominique, Superintendent Gordon, ASP Williams, Inspector Charles and supervised by Sgt Harrylal.
The RPTF, the driving thrust behind the police’s road policing efforts, hopes this will act as a deterrent to drivers, further decreasing the 19 per cent reduction in fatal accidents achieved for 2020. Between January – June, 55 road users died in accidents as when compared to 68 for the same period in 2019.
Police Traffic Safety Co-ordinator Sgt Brent Batson, expressed disappointment that many drivers are still being ticketed for seatbelt offences. He said the police will soon start its “Sit, Click & Drive” awareness programme under the umbrella of its iRoadsafe Education and Awareness Campaign aimed at helping road users practice safer and more responsible behaviour and avoid points n their driver’s permits.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests