Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
pete wrote:Nuclear power is "green" as very little Greenhouse gases are emitted. The only issue with it is dealing with the waste.
Miktay wrote:pete wrote:Nuclear power is "green" as very little Greenhouse gases are emitted. The only issue with it is dealing with the waste.
Try telling that to thiz environmental poster child. Nuclear energy iz not part of the Big Climate lobby’s agenda…
matr1x wrote:[soundcloud][/soundcloud]Miktay wrote:pete wrote:Nuclear power is "green" as very little Greenhouse gases are emitted. The only issue with it is dealing with the waste.
Try telling that to thiz environmental poster child. Nuclear energy iz not part of the Big Climate lobby’s agenda…
They took the advice of a retarded child
nervewrecker wrote:Most of these climate change bills that are being passed seem to be ways of milking treasuries under the guise of saving the world.
Wind Farms Destroyed Our Energy Security, Says Australian Prime Minister
David Brockwell walks between wind turbines during a routine inspection at the Infigen Energy wind farm located on the hills surrounding Lake George, 50 km north of the Australian capital city of Canberra.
“This has been very much a Labor obsession, to set these heroic renewable energy targets,” Turnbull told a radio station. “They assume that they can change the composition of the energy mix and that energy security will always be there and the lights will stay on, and that has been brought into question.”
Turnbull’s government called state energy ministers to a meeting after “violent fluctuations” in the supply of wind power caused a blackout affecting 1.7 million people in South Australia in late September. The Australian state gets 41 percent of its power from wind, solar and other green sources. Australian Energy Market Operator, the country’s utility, blamed the blackout on a wind farm in Snowtown which suddenly stopped providing 200 megawatts of power, which caused the state power grid to become extremely unstable.
This instability likely caused other Australian power grids to shut off their links to South Australia, causing the state’s power grid to collapse entirely. This made the entire state look a lot like North Korea.
adnj wrote:
Compared to cold and bitter conditions in regions like the North Sea, the North Atlantic and coastal Japan, where offshore wind generation is already happening, the Gulf’s shallower water depths, warmer temperatures and calmer waves are relatively easy to manage. Water depths up to 160 feet – currently the maximum depth for fixed-bottom wind turbines – extend nearly 90 miles off the coasts of southeast Texas and southern Louisiana, compared with only about 40 miles off Nantucket and Martha’s Vineyard in the Northeast.
The Gulf’s seafloor topography features a more even and gentle slope than areas already under consideration for development off the coast of Virginia. This means that fixed-bottom wind turbines can be used in more places, rather than floating systems, which reduces complexity.
Importantly, the Gulf Coast has a robust offshore industry that was established to serve oil and gas producers, with many specialized companies offering services such as underwater welding, platform manufacturing and helicopter and boat services to get people and equipment to sea. Gulf of Mexico oil and gas production supported an estimated 345,000 jobs in 2019.
Wind farms in the Gulf can leverage existing infrastructure. There are nearly 1,200 miles of existing subsea power cables that could transfer wind energy to shore. Wind generation could also be incorporated into a larger energy system that includes green hydrogen generation and storage and carbon sequestration.
http://www.milwaukeeindependent.com/syn ... m-america/
matr1x wrote:The UN telling ppl to listen to the children is rich since for the 3 or 4th time they have had promise to stop their African staff from forcing children to trade sex for food.
Children are not capable mentally to advise on economic policies or environmental ones. The clip was pure emotional manipulation
Miktay wrote:matr1x wrote:The UN telling ppl to listen to the children is rich since for the 3 or 4th time they have had promise to stop their African staff from forcing children to trade sex for food.
Children are not capable mentally to advise on economic policies or environmental ones. The clip was pure emotional manipulation
Sense. But don’t try using common sense or logic to persuade the Big Climate lobby or their irrational disciples.
That’s why the debate iz not a scientific or logical discussion. It’s more like a religion.
Been monitoring the green agenda or whatever they call it as of late. Will keep my comments to myself.Miktay wrote:nervewrecker wrote:Most of these climate change bills that are being passed seem to be ways of milking treasuries under the guise of saving the world.
Go to the head of the line.
That's one of the primary goals of the Big Climate lobby.
The alarmist climate change agenda that many of the shrill advocates are pushing iz nothing more than a thinly disguised money grab.
adnj wrote:
Why hydrogen?
Hydrogen is already used widely in industrial applications. It’s used in refining oil into gasoline, making ammonia fertilizer and in many processed foods. Hydrogen is added to vegetable oils to turn them from a liquid to solid form. These are called hydrogenated oils.
As a fuel source, hydrogen can power large vessels along with trains and buses. NASA has used it to power rockets for 50 years. It’s also expected to fuel airplanes one day.
Today, energy experts expect it to be an essential part of meeting future, everyday energy demands with zero greenhouse gas emissions.
Hydrogen power lasts twice as long as gasoline, takes up half as much space and is lighter than a lithium battery. Hydrogen fuel cells don’t require time-consuming charges, and can withstand cold weather that can eat up electric battery power.
Green hydrogen
Green hydrogen is created when electricity, powered by a renewable source like the sun or wind, is run through water, creating a reaction that splits hydrogen from oxygen in water. The hydrogen is trapped and stored for use as fuel. The process, called electrolysis, is more than 200 years old, said Michelle Detwiler, executive director of the Portland-based Renewable Hydrogen Alliance, a nonprofit trade association.
Produced this way, it could be a carbon-neutral energy source for heavy transportation and manufacturing that requires a lot of energy. Hydrogen power gives off no emissions; instead it creates water. “For every mile of travel you get in a passenger fuel cell vehicle, you generally get a cup of water, and that water is clean enough to drink,” Detwiler said. “It falls onto the streets, and it goes into the groundwater or stream alongside the road, and it’s completely harmless.”
But the technology is expensive and few places in the U.S. are producing it using electricity powered by renewable energy.
Oregon Department of Energy’s expert on hydrogen, Rebecca Smith, described green hydrogen as a chicken and egg situation.
“You don’t have a lot of people producing it, there’s not a lot of people using it, cause no one is producing it,” Smith said.
The billions in federal money could change that dynamic.
“We have an opportunity to just immediately smash that chicken and egg dichotomy,” she said.
https://oregoncapitalchronicle.com/2022 ... en-energy/
adnj wrote:
The World Meteorological Organization, in the latest stark warning about global warming, said weather-related disasters have increased fivefold over the last 50 years and are killing 115 per day on average—and the fallout is poised to worsen.
The report, drawn from data compiled by several U.N. agencies and partners, cited a 48% chance that global temperature rise compared to pre-industrial times will reach 1.5 degree Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit) in the next five years. There’s a 93% percent chance that one year in the next five will see record heat.
It comes amid fresh warnings from scientists last week that four climate “tipping points” will likely be triggered if that temperature threshold — set in the 2015 Paris climate accord — is passed.
Many governments are already trying to address the threat of more severe weather due to climate change, and data show that deaths from natural disasters are down in recent years. Yet the economic cost of climate-induced catastrophes is projected to rise sharply.
https://time.com/6212942/un-climate-war ... disasters/
Miktay wrote:adnj wrote:
The World Meteorological Organization, in the latest stark warning about global warming, said weather-related disasters have increased fivefold over the last 50 years and are killing 115 per day on average—and the fallout is poised to worsen.
The report, drawn from data compiled by several U.N. agencies and partners, cited a 48% chance that global temperature rise compared to pre-industrial times will reach 1.5 degree Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit) in the next five years. There’s a 93% percent chance that one year in the next five will see record heat.
It comes amid fresh warnings from scientists last week that four climate “tipping points” will likely be triggered if that temperature threshold — set in the 2015 Paris climate accord — is passed.
Many governments are already trying to address the threat of more severe weather due to climate change, and data show that deaths from natural disasters are down in recent years. Yet the economic cost of climate-induced catastrophes is projected to rise sharply.
https://time.com/6212942/un-climate-war ... disasters/
For 3+ decades climate doomsayers..as amplified by a clueless mainstream media…have been been predicting a climate apocalypse
How many of these climate armageddons have come to pass?
None. Zero. Nada. Zilch. Nyet.
Certainly there are periodic episodes of drought, heatwaves, cooling, and bad weather. But there always have been such fluctuations in the earth’s history.
Nowadays everything iz blamed on climate change. Even the most ridiculous things.
One reads about increased wars, govt corruption and death of the winter fashion wardrobe, all being driven by…take one guess: climate change.
Clearly some these climate change people are unhinged. Many of them should be in the madhouse.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... drobe.html
https://www.ijpr.org/npr-news/2022-03-3 ... -the-world
matr1x wrote:Wind farms are terrible for the environment. And a complete nuisance
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 144 guests