Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Miktay wrote:De Dragon wrote:Did you just watch 2012?
There isn't going to be a sudden "climate Armageddon" but a series of small, but distinct changes, which have started already fyi. A glacier doesn't melt in days, atmospheric temps don't get suddenly unbearable, BUT when the series of small changes trigger giant repercussions like sea level rise, hooter temps leading to increased droughts, hurricanes etc, then the real effect will be felt.
Also Daily Mail? Really? Don't you see real life flooding in Pakistan, droughts in the US leading to critical dam levels, as in India?
I cyar believe what ah reading.
De Dragon citing Hollywood movies as the basis for apocalyptic climate change predictions.
Thiz iz typical of brainwashed paranoid eco-marxists who think cuz they see it in ah movie it muss be true.
Oh gorm man. Movies are primarily made for entertainment. Nothing more.
Miktay sounds like a flat earther, except that flat earthers are correct.The earth consists of 71% un-carbonated water.Therefore it is flatDe Dragon wrote:Miktay wrote:De Dragon wrote:Did you just watch 2012?
There isn't going to be a sudden "climate Armageddon" but a series of small, but distinct changes, which have started already fyi. A glacier doesn't melt in days, atmospheric temps don't get suddenly unbearable, BUT when the series of small changes trigger giant repercussions like sea level rise, hooter temps leading to increased droughts, hurricanes etc, then the real effect will be felt.
Also Daily Mail? Really? Don't you see real life flooding in Pakistan, droughts in the US leading to critical dam levels, as in India?
I cyar believe what ah reading.
De Dragon citing Hollywood movies as the basis for apocalyptic climate change predictions.
Thiz iz typical of brainwashed paranoid eco-marxists who think cuz they see it in ah movie it muss be true.
Oh gorm man. Movies are primarily made for entertainment. Nothing more.
Are you stupid? Read my reply again, you brainwashed, climate change denying ninny.
De Dragon wrote:Miktay wrote:De Dragon wrote:
Are you stupid? Read my reply again, you brainwashed, climate change denying ninny.
timelapse wrote:Miktay sounds like a flat earther, except that flat earthers are correct.The earth consists of 71% un-carbonated water.Therefore it is flat
Miktay wrote:De Dragon wrote:Miktay wrote:De Dragon wrote:
Are you stupid? Read my reply again, you brainwashed, climate change denying ninny.
Let me ask a question: where iz the evidence to support your claims? iz there any?
Or are we supposed to take your word that all of these apocalyptical predictions are true?
Just cuz it iz in the papers and the movies doh make it true....
If I drop a hammer on your big toe, would you require studies and data before you feel the pain? Wake up and smell the coffee.The evidence is all around us.Miktay wrote:timelapse wrote:Miktay sounds like a flat earther, except that flat earthers are correct.The earth consists of 71% un-carbonated water.Therefore it is flat
Evidence please. Where iz the body of repeatable experiments and outcomes that demonstrate the catastrophe theory of global warming?
If you don't have proof its not me who iz deluded. More likely its you.
timelapse wrote:If I drop a hammer on your big toe, would you require studies and data before you feel the pain? Wake up and smell the coffee.The evidence is all around us.Miktay wrote:timelapse wrote:Miktay sounds like a flat earther, except that flat earthers are correct.The earth consists of 71% un-carbonated water.Therefore it is flat
Evidence please. Where iz the body of repeatable experiments and outcomes that demonstrate the catastrophe theory of global warming?
If you don't have proof its not me who iz deluded. More likely its you.
But since you asked...
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence
https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/what-evidence-exists-earth-warming-and-humans-are-main-cause
https://www.nytimes.com/article/climate-change-global-warming-faq.html
DMan7 wrote:Would be hearing about climate change from now for every hurricane season we face every year?
Miktay wrote:DMan7 wrote:Would be hearing about climate change from now for every hurricane season we face every year?
Yes. But that iz due to the marketing machine of the Big Climate Change lobby.
Even in year's where there iz fewer than predicted tropical storms, hurricanes or typhoons there will be some other unsubstantiated marketing mantra such as climate change increasing wild fires or locust swarms. Even though the earth has been experiencing wildfires and locusts plagues for thousands of years.
Next they'll be telling us Trinidad lorse to Guyana iz due to climate change..
So the earth is the same temperature it always was,or colder than it was then?Miktay wrote:timelapse wrote:If I drop a hammer on your big toe, would you require studies and data before you feel the pain? Wake up and smell the coffee.The evidence is all around us.Miktay wrote:timelapse wrote:Miktay sounds like a flat earther, except that flat earthers are correct.The earth consists of 71% un-carbonated water.Therefore it is flat
Evidence please. Where iz the body of repeatable experiments and outcomes that demonstrate the catastrophe theory of global warming?
If you don't have proof its not me who iz deluded. More likely its you.
But since you asked...
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence
https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/what-evidence-exists-earth-warming-and-humans-are-main-cause
https://www.nytimes.com/article/climate-change-global-warming-faq.html
Am sure u appreciate we are referring to a much more complex system than hammer falling...big toe pain.
We are talking about global climate. Which really implies global everything because everything on the planet influences climate and vice versa. Flora, fauna, the earth's rotation, sunspots, algae blooms, animal migrations, atmospheric and oceanic currents, precipitation, deforestation, hurricanes, Sahara dust etc. The list of influencers on global climate iz much too large to cite.
Therefore NONE of ur citations constitute a scientific body of experiments capable of supporting the catastrophe theory of global warming.
Are there Conjectures yes. Hypothesis yes. Theories yes. Simulations yes. But no validated repeatable experiments
But experiments to validate a catastrophe global climate due to human emitted C02 are not there.
adnj wrote:Miktay wrote:DMan7 wrote:Would be hearing about climate change from now for every hurricane season we face every year?
Yes. But that iz due to the marketing machine of the Big Climate Change lobby.
Even in year's where there iz fewer than predicted tropical storms, hurricanes or typhoons there will be some other unsubstantiated marketing mantra such as climate change increasing wild fires or locust swarms. Even though the earth has been experiencing wildfires and locusts plagues for thousands of years.
Next they'll be telling us Trinidad lorse to Guyana iz due to climate change..
Six of the ten most active hurricane seasons in history have occurred within the last twenty years. Ten of the fifteen most active occurred this century.
timelapse wrote:So the earth is the same temperature it always was,or colder than it was then?Miktay wrote:timelapse wrote:If I drop a hammer on your big toe, would you require studies and data before you feel the pain? Wake up and smell the coffee.The evidence is all around us.Miktay wrote:timelapse wrote:Miktay sounds like a flat earther, except that flat earthers are correct.The earth consists of 71% un-carbonated water.Therefore it is flat
Evidence please. Where iz the body of repeatable experiments and outcomes that demonstrate the catastrophe theory of global warming?
If you don't have proof its not me who iz deluded. More likely its you.
But since you asked...
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence
https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/what-evidence-exists-earth-warming-and-humans-are-main-cause
https://www.nytimes.com/article/climate-change-global-warming-faq.html
Am sure u appreciate we are referring to a much more complex system than hammer falling...big toe pain.
We are talking about global climate. Which really implies global everything because everything on the planet influences climate and vice versa. Flora, fauna, the earth's rotation, sunspots, algae blooms, animal migrations, atmospheric and oceanic currents, precipitation, deforestation, hurricanes, Sahara dust etc. The list of influencers on global climate iz much too large to cite.
Therefore NONE of ur citations constitute a scientific body of experiments capable of supporting the catastrophe theory of global warming.
Are there Conjectures yes. Hypothesis yes. Theories yes. Simulations yes. But no validated repeatable experiments
But experiments to validate a catastrophe global climate due to human emitted C02 are not there.
Miktay wrote:adnj wrote:Miktay wrote:DMan7 wrote:Would be hearing about climate change from now for every hurricane season we face every year?
Yes. But that iz due to the marketing machine of the Big Climate Change lobby.
Even in year's where there iz fewer than predicted tropical storms, hurricanes or typhoons there will be some other unsubstantiated marketing mantra such as climate change increasing wild fires or locust swarms. Even though the earth has been experiencing wildfires and locusts plagues for thousands of years.
Next they'll be telling us Trinidad lorse to Guyana iz due to climate change..
Six of the ten most active hurricane seasons in history have occurred within the last twenty years. Ten of the fifteen most active occurred this century.
Speaking of catastrophe you've just added to the fear cacophony that the Big Climate lobby loves to use to influence ppl.
And why are these hurricane seasons worse primarily due to human induced climate change? Can u cite the repeatable and verifiable experiments to prove thiz?
Or are you expecting us to take your word for it?
timelapse wrote:That video was a very fancy way of him saying he doesn't know a thing about climate change.
Lemme break it down for you.
Global:relating to the whole world
Warming: make or become warm
Earth's temperature has risen by 0.14° Fahrenheit (0.08° Celsius) per decade since 1880, but the rate of warming since 1981 is more than twice that: 0.32° F (0.18° C) per decade. 2021 was the sixth-warmest year on record based on NOAA's temperature data.
Thats basic English.
People have been measuring it and the data is there.The globe has been warming up.
[Nobody asked about ideal temperature or equilibrium temperature.Do you realize if we fail at this,there is no going back?
Nobody asked about ideal temperature or equilibrium temperature.Do you realize if we fail at this,there is no going back?
De Dragon wrote:Miktay wrote:adnj wrote:Miktay wrote:DMan7 wrote:Would be hearing about climate change from now for every hurricane season we face every year?
Yes. But that iz due to the marketing machine of the Big Climate Change lobby.
Even in year's where there iz fewer than predicted tropical storms, hurricanes or typhoons there will be some other unsubstantiated marketing mantra such as climate change increasing wild fires or locust swarms. Even though the earth has been experiencing wildfires and locusts plagues for thousands of years.
Next they'll be telling us Trinidad lorse to Guyana iz due to climate change..
Six of the ten most active hurricane seasons in history have occurred within the last twenty years. Ten of the fifteen most active occurred this century.
Speaking of catastrophe you've just added to the fear cacophony that the Big Climate lobby loves to use to influence ppl.
And why are these hurricane seasons worse primarily due to human induced climate change? Can u cite the repeatable and verifiable experiments to prove thiz?
Or are you expecting us to take your word for it?
So Big Oil and Gas is dummies then?
Dem just taking it jesso?
Dem spending BILLIONS in sustainable green energy jesso?
You izza anti vax too ent?
Miktay wrote:Yep. The usual set of unsubstantiated, unverifiable, pseudo scientific, sensational articles will be published in the mainstream media and cited by others for a simple reason: fear sells.
The average global temperature in 2021 was about 1.11 (± 0.13) °C above the pre-industrial (1850-1900) levels. 2021 is the 7th consecutive year (2015-2021) where global temperature has been over 1°C above pre-industrial levels, according to all datasets compiled by WMO.
WMO uses six international datasets to ensure the most comprehensive, authoritative temperature assessment. The same data are used in its annual State of the Climate reports which inform the international community on global climate indicators.
The rankings of individual years should be considered in the long-term context, especially since the differences between individual years are sometimes marginal. Since the 1980s, each decade has been warmer than the previous one. This is expected to continue.
The warmest seven years have all been since 2015, with 2016, 2019 and 2020 constituting the top three. An exceptionally strong El Niño event occurred in 2016, which contributed to record global average warming.
https://public.wmo.int/en/media/press-r ... data-shows
adnj wrote:Miktay wrote:Yep. The usual set of unsubstantiated, unverifiable, pseudo scientific, sensational articles will be published in the mainstream media and cited by others for a simple reason: fear sells.
Try harder.The average global temperature in 2021 was about 1.11 (± 0.13) °C above the pre-industrial (1850-1900) levels. 2021 is the 7th consecutive year (2015-2021) where global temperature has been over 1°C above pre-industrial levels, according to all datasets compiled by WMO.
WMO uses six international datasets to ensure the most comprehensive, authoritative temperature assessment. The same data are used in its annual State of the Climate reports which inform the international community on global climate indicators.
The rankings of individual years should be considered in the long-term context, especially since the differences between individual years are sometimes marginal. Since the 1980s, each decade has been warmer than the previous one. This is expected to continue.
The warmest seven years have all been since 2015, with 2016, 2019 and 2020 constituting the top three. An exceptionally strong El Niño event occurred in 2016, which contributed to record global average warming.
https://public.wmo.int/en/media/press-r ... data-shows
Miktay wrote:Data sets are not repeatable or valid scientific experiments. Datasets are used for computer simulations.
What defines a dataset?
A data set is a collection of data. The data is usually presented in a table form. The data can be numerical or categorical. The data can be two variables, multiple variables and the the variable can have different relationships.
What are the different types of data sets?
There are different types of data sets One type is numerical. It has data represented with numbers instead of words. Categorical data set is another and it displays data based on characteristics or qualities of an item. Bivariate data sets consist of two variable that have a relationship. Multivariate data sets have three or more variables that all depend on each other. Correlation data sets are data that have have 1 of 3 relationships. Positive relationships happen when the variables change in the same direction. Negative relationships happen when the variables change in opposite directions. No or zero relationships occur when the variable have no affect on each other.
What is meant by data set?
A data set is a collection data presented usually in a table. The data can have a relationship where both variables change in the same direction. The data can have a relationship where the variable change in opposite directions. And some times the data have no relationship at all.
What is a data set example?
A data set can contain data comparing time of day to the number customers. A data set can also contain data regarding an individual's income, expenses, savings and how the three affect each other.
What is the purpose of dataset?
The purpose of a data set is organize the collected data so that is easier to understand. The data set places the data into columns and rows for comparison.
https://study.com/learn/lesson/data-set ... mples.html
adnj wrote:Miktay wrote:Data sets are not repeatable or valid scientific experiments. Datasets are used for computer simulations.What defines a dataset?
A data set is a collection of data. The data is usually presented in a table form. The data can be numerical or categorical. The data can be two variables, multiple variables and the the variable can have different relationships.
What are the different types of data sets?
There are different types of data sets One type is numerical. It has data represented with numbers instead of words. Categorical data set is another and it displays data based on characteristics or qualities of an item. Bivariate data sets consist of two variable that have a relationship. Multivariate data sets have three or more variables that all depend on each other. Correlation data sets are data that have have 1 of 3 relationships. Positive relationships happen when the variables change in the same direction. Negative relationships happen when the variables change in opposite directions. No or zero relationships occur when the variable have no affect on each other.
What is meant by data set?
A data set is a collection data presented usually in a table. The data can have a relationship where both variables change in the same direction. The data can have a relationship where the variable change in opposite directions. And some times the data have no relationship at all.
What is a data set example?
A data set can contain data comparing time of day to the number customers. A data set can also contain data regarding an individual's income, expenses, savings and how the three affect each other.
What is the purpose of dataset?
The purpose of a data set is organize the collected data so that is easier to understand. The data set places the data into columns and rows for comparison.
https://study.com/learn/lesson/data-set ... mples.html
Miktay wrote:
So lemhih splain yuh one more time. i go make it large:
Data sets are not repeatable or valid scientific experiments. Datasets are used for computer simulations.