Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
lancer123 wrote:so what you saying with out 50k nothing
shogun wrote:EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:
The only solution left is to become a citizen of the greatest country on earth, the only country as a matter of fact that guarantees the right to absolute free speech and your god given right to defend yourself under a constitution.
There is no other country in the world that guarantees these 2 basic rights.
Yet I would gladly take a drunk Kamla over a "sober" Trump.
It was supposed to be a deterrent against government tyranny when it was written. Now 3% of Americans own 50% of the guns. So, as usual you're full of sheit if you think they could prevent anything against the might of the modern US government. How did allowing average Americans all those "rights"help those victims in Las Vegas, by the way?
A gun is fine. Purchasing 40 guns including 12 semi automatic rifles, refitted to have FULL automatic capabilities is insanity. Think it's time to start protecting people from themselves.
On another note, I notice Trump isn't saying much? Too bad the shooter wasn't Muslim or Mexican? Or we'd be hearing about walls and travel bans non stop. Especially since these types of attacks kill more Americans than terrorism ever does. Something to think about. Scratch that.... forgot who I was typing to for a second there.
Redman wrote:Shogun by that logic we shoul limit the number of cars a person is able to own.
If your theory held water....that gun control is a solution....The mass shootings in France would not have happened.They have strict gun control laws.
Legislative action to stop people who already breaking existing laws...smh
We need to deal with the people that seek to commit the crimes....not the tool they choose.
Gun control will work.
Just like drug control.
Monkey Man wrote:SSSavage wrote:Monkey Man wrote:lancer123 wrote:People how do you get a Firearms User License
BWHAHAAHAHAHAHA. who d fok you feel you is pal? Somebody relevant??
And just who the fok are you? People need firearms to protect against criminals. Lord knows the TTPS don't do $hit.
I is Monkey Mane aka Monk Monte. And i know that an ordinary chap off the streets who jus want to protect their family do not get such privileges. Those are meant for people like patos son and Faggis al Wawi kids. Not you, me or this lancerman.
De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Shogun by that logic we shoul limit the number of cars a person is able to own.
If your theory held water....that gun control is a solution....The mass shootings in France would not have happened.They have strict gun control laws.
Legislative action to stop people who already breaking existing laws...smh
We need to deal with the people that seek to commit the crimes....not the tool they choose.
Gun control will work.
Just like drug control.
Not really following your logic. If someone is able to amass close to 4 dozen guns, including assault rifles without authorities being flagged, then something is wrong. The US will never institute drastic gun ownership as long as the NRA has politicians on their payroll. Even the bump stock "concession" that the NRA made is a meaningless gesture in the grand scheme of gun violence.
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Shogun by that logic we shoul limit the number of cars a person is able to own.
If your theory held water....that gun control is a solution....The mass shootings in France would not have happened.They have strict gun control laws.
Legislative action to stop people who already breaking existing laws...smh
We need to deal with the people that seek to commit the crimes....not the tool they choose.
Gun control will work.
Just like drug control.
Not really following your logic. If someone is able to amass close to 4 dozen guns, including assault rifles without authorities being flagged, then something is wrong. The US will never institute drastic gun ownership as long as the NRA has politicians on their payroll. Even the bump stock "concession" that the NRA made is a meaningless gesture in the grand scheme of gun violence.
A gun is a tool-like a car, hammer etc.
It can be used-defending your life, or abused -robbing murder etc
The act of amassing a cache of 1000 weapons isnt a danger to any one-just like the fact that i have 25 cars doesnt impact on how i use the car im driving at any one time.
Collecting something is not a hard indicator of HOW I intend to use it.
Where is the nexus point between those that amass the cache of weapons to those committing the crimes?
Where is the hard data to show that there is a causal relationship between those that collect guns and those that commit crimes?
Yes the NRA has a lobby...as does the gun control proponents
Like our local law-it is the INTENT behind the possession that determines the legal result.
And like here strict gun laws just garantee a limited response to a criminal brandishing and using a weapon.
airuma wrote:Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Shogun by that logic we shoul limit the number of cars a person is able to own.
.
I can understand why you decided to use the car vs gun analogy (given the recent rise in mowing), but there are some really obvious differences between using a car vs a gun to harm people.
Since the majority of us are more concerned with local news than international, and we should be because this has the greatest risk awareness potential, it is easy to understand why, even in the absence of "hard data", our population will believe that there is a causal relationship between those that collect guns and those that commit crimes.
The thing is, if we only have corrupt people making the laws, we will NEVER get laws to protect ourselves, the INTENT will always be likened to their own which cannot be good given that they are corrupt!
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:The purpose of a car is for transport. The purpose of a gun is to kill.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:The purpose of a car is for transport. The purpose of a gun is to kill.
there are a lot more cars and people on the road. Similarly there are a lot more people with heartsRedman wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:The purpose of a car is for transport. The purpose of a gun is to kill.
And yet the numbers speak for themselves.
263M cars in the US vs 300+ guns
ADONI wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:The purpose of a car is for transport. The purpose of a gun is to kill.
You can kill with a car also ... .
Redman wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:The purpose of a car is for transport. The purpose of a gun is to kill.
And yet the numbers speak for themselves.
263M cars in the US vs 300+ guns
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR, Google [Bot] and 173 guests