Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:shogun wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Shitlickers wish he coda b at that table
Why? Uninvited for going against the policy/wishes of the Trump administration? Sit at a table with Trump and John Bolton? LOL!!
I'd wear that sh!t like a badge of honour. The only sh!teaters are at that table giving that administration the time of day. But cyak on cyakers.....
Its amazing that there is such acquiescence to the arbitrary choices of the US.
Golan Heights is another unilateral US decision to redraw borders and election results.
Try again, that picture is of participants of a video conference call with Juan Guiado. Notice Yuh Eh Know Who Is Me Oar Moses at left.
Really?
Like I said...the problem is obvious.
You denying that that is what the picture is of?
Yes, vacillation by ill equipped PNM PM and Ministers who couldn't run a sno cone cart.
Espinet "eet fuh sale"
Guy Smiley' no, izza mistake tee hee hee"
JUHN Scarfy "eet fuh sale tuh de highest biddah"
JUHN Scarfy " we is neutral"
Moses "congrats on a second term Mads"
JUHN Scarfy "we eh get blank from de US"
Moses "aye Guides, wah gwaan"?
No baxide
The fact that the two posts I quoted were posted before your posted pic...means that my post has nothing to do with your pic...but referenced the CNC vid...with trump.
FOr fack sake
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:All of a sudden shitlickers in Guaido bamsee...told u all he wanted to be at the table
The_Honourable wrote:So our position is now... playing both sides?
shogun wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:All of a sudden shitlickers in Guaido bamsee...told u all he wanted to be at the tableThe_Honourable wrote:So our position is now... playing both sides?
F'real.
Having the minister attend a Caricom meeting hosted by Canada (who invited him) to have diplomatic talks with Guaido's team and listening to their input, is totally "playing both sides" and "shitlicker" tactics. Lmao. Isn't a solution to this situation the focus? Nuh, the suffering of the Venezuelan population and threats of war on the horizon (and right on our doorstep) is all a game. I notice the brown-nose crew, never once asked themselves why Trump is such a habitual snow-flake that he couldn't just invite representatives from a country, merely because they disagreed with his actions/policy? Who really looking more weak here? Chupid is basically currency to these fellas, yes.
Damned if you do, damned if you don't. You'd swear they really think a government should be run like their effin' Facebook friend-list? Carry on, yes...
De Dragon wrote:No, you can't have it both ways. If you're neutral, you stay to fack away from the people business. Guiado, and his people specifically did not want T&T involved, but because you get a roundabout invitation from Canada you rush to play pretend diplomat?
shogun wrote:De Dragon wrote:No, you can't have it both ways. If you're neutral, you stay to fack away from the people business. Guiado, and his people specifically did not want T&T involved, but because you get a roundabout invitation from Canada you rush to play pretend diplomat?
Neutrality/disagreement doesn't mean that you shouldn't listen to the other side. That's the whole point of diplomacy/dialogue. In addition to the fact that I can't find any reference to Guiado "not wanting Trinidad involved in any talks" as you stated, there's also the fact that (1) They could have backed out of the talks (2) It doesn't matter what Guiado wants, when events in Venezuela will definitely have a direct impact on Trinidad. So, who cares what he wants? "The people business" just happens to pose lots of consequences for this country. Guiado doesn't appreciate our input? Tough luck. Roundabout invitation? Canada was the host/facilitator of the talks. How less "roundabout" does it get? Replacing an unfit, illegitimate leader (Maduro), with a US/Trump administration installed leader, by way of essentially a coup, isn't any more legitimate to me. I want talks that lead to new elections with international oversight. Both ways? The article that corresponded to the photo you posted, clearly stated that our position remains the same... not to mention that the government of Trinidad is also still willing to even have talks with Maduro. Hell, I want there to be more talks. As many as needed to halt the US and Russia's positioning themselves militarily in the region. This isn't a game fellas. Things could get serious very quickly.
On Friday, the leaders of four Caricom nations were hosted by United States President Donald Trump. Those four nations sided with the US in its support of Guaido over Maduro. At that meeting Trump promised financial investments to the countries that stood with him in his support and recognition of Guaido as the elected leader of Venezuela.
LOL! No wonder they ran to stain their noses brown at Trump's table? When you have to bribe countries to stand with you, instead of instilling principled support for such a serious action, you know things shady. Looks like that table was literally for the actual shiteaters?
shogun wrote:Lmao @ how vocal le Honourable get suddenly. Serious ED/piggyback/pothound tactics. Where you come from dred?
Thank goodness most of his "contribution" was already answered.
The_Honourable wrote:Under your mother dress
You're a harden child as you don't pay attention otherwise you would know that I'm always active. You just don't like when someone challenges your opinion. Typical.
De Dragon wrote:JUHN Scarfy and Bypass Moses like neighbourhood pipers, accepting any opportunity to a free meal, even if you're not really wanted, and were only "invited" out of politeness/charity. Caricom is, and will always be a non-entity on the world stage. Even here in the Caribbean they cannot agree on very much, hence the group that went and met with Trump, while spurning the non-interventionist stand.
Times are hard, and leaders are doing what they feel they need to do to get an advantage for their people. The thing is, you respect them for their openness and honesty. you might not like, or agree with it, but you have to respect it. Contrast that with the dummies we have here in T&T, first going to Maduro's inauguration, and now turning up in Guaido's video conference, all while braying about non-intervention.
shogun wrote:De Dragon wrote:JUHN Scarfy and Bypass Moses like neighbourhood pipers, accepting any opportunity to a free meal, even if you're not really wanted, and were only "invited" out of politeness/charity. Caricom is, and will always be a non-entity on the world stage. Even here in the Caribbean they cannot agree on very much, hence the group that went and met with Trump, while spurning the non-interventionist stand.
Times are hard, and leaders are doing what they feel they need to do to get an advantage for their people. The thing is, you respect them for their openness and honesty. you might not like, or agree with it, but you have to respect it. Contrast that with the dummies we have here in T&T, first going to Maduro's inauguration, and now turning up in Guaido's video conference, all while braying about non-intervention.
Dude!
Just face it nuh, you seriously and personally don't like Rowley and the current administration. Which is fine, but it makes this debate pointless.
So let's unpack some of what you said and the glaring contradiction therein. It's funny that those leaders that ran to Trump's table knowing fully well that'd they'd all be sanctioning US interference/regime change and all the possible consequences, get a pass, even your "respect" because they're doing it for the "advantage of their people." Yet when our representatives (not even the PM himself) shows up at an inauguration, to preserve relations and possibly help in securing the gas deal, (which without doubt would benefit Trinidad) they're labelled "pipers." Especially when there were a few notable attendances to Maduro's inauguration. Also, non-intervention doesn't mean completely severing ties/relations, but about lessening/limiting. So sending a representative to an inauguration, or to a meeting for talks, still wouldn't rise to the level of intervention, unless there was some expressed pledge from our government towards either side, with relation to this issue. Finally I'm not going to redebate our representatives meeting with Guiado, Maduro and any other party to help find a solution to this situation.... label it what you like.
I'm still looking for any proof that "Guiado, and his people specifically did not want T&T involved" by the way. I've seen the tweets from Valero, but given his ties, that's to be expected. Not seeing anything about Guaido's expressed wishes for our government to not be involved? Because that would be both shocking and prove how not ready to lead he might actually be.
VexXx Dogg wrote:Jesucristo, when will this sheit finish?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], shake d livin wake d dead and 128 guests