TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

who should have to answer for this police or witness?

this is how we do it.......

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

User avatar
hong kong phooey
punchin NOS
Posts: 2973
Joined: July 10th, 2006, 8:37 am
Location: ah lorse

who should have to answer for this police or witness?

Postby hong kong phooey » July 20th, 2019, 6:40 am

http://guardian.co.tt/news/cctv-footage ... d6f5fc912f

CCTV footage has helped to ex­on­er­ate two men, who were ac­cused of mur­der­ing two friends in east Port-of-Spain, al­most a decade ago.

It took a 12-mem­ber ju­ry be­fore Jus­tice De­van Ram­per­sad, half an hour or one-eighth of the time al­lot­ted to them for de­lib­er­ate, to re­turn with unan­i­mous not guilty ver­dicts for Robert “Para­noid” Lea­Rooster and Michael Les Pierre.


How­ev­er, Lea­Rooster and Les Pierre did not walk out of the Hall of Jus­tice in Port-of-Spain to greet their rel­a­tives as they were re­mand­ed back in­to cus­tody on a shoot­ing charge, aris­ing out of the same in­ci­dent, that was sep­a­rat­ed from the mur­der charges by the Of­fice of the Di­rec­tor of Pub­lic Pros­e­cu­tions (DPP) at the tri­al.

Their rel­a­tives were frus­trat­ed by the sit­u­a­tion when they spoke briefly with Guardian Me­dia.

“Af­ter 10 years, now this. They feel spend­ing an­oth­er week­end in there (re­mand) is noth­ing,” Lea­Rooster’s fe­male rel­a­tive said.

The duo’s at­tor­neys were ex­pect­ed to file a writ of habeas cor­pus, late yes­ter­day evening, to chal­lenge the is­sue and at­tempt to se­cure the duo’s free­dom over the week­end as they claim that the charge should have been dis­con­tin­ued by the DPP’s Of­fice.


Lea­Rooster and Les Pierre were charged with mur­der­ing Travis “Wet Mon­ey” Breedy, 29 of Dun­can Street, Port-of-Spain, and Gar­net Lake, 26, of Diego Mar­tin, on Sep­tem­ber 21, 2009.

Ac­cord­ing to the ev­i­dence pre­sent­ed in the tri­al, Breedy and Lake were lim­ing at the cor­ner of Prince and George Streets in Port-of-Spain when they were at­tacked by two gun­men.

Breedy was shot first and when he fell to the ground, one gun­man stood over him and shot him sev­er­al times. Lake at­tempt­ed to run away but was chased by the sec­ond gun­man, who shot him sev­er­al times. He was tak­en to hos­pi­tal but died while re­ceiv­ing treat­ment. The State’s main wit­ness was walk­ing in the area when the shoot­ing oc­curred.

How­ev­er, his ev­i­dence in the case was con­tra­dict­ed by CCTV footage of the shoot­ing, which was al­so shown to the ju­ry.

While the wit­ness claimed that the gun­man who at­tacked Lea­Rooster was wear­ing a black sweater, the footage showed that he was wear­ing a white vest. Al­though the wit­ness claimed that he was a short dis­tance away when the two men were at­tacked and saw their at­tack­ers, he was al­most 75 me­tres away.

The wit­ness al­so said the gun­men came from the op­po­site di­rec­tion which was shown in the footage. The wit­ness al­so claimed that the in­ci­dent last­ed 20-30 sec­onds when the footage showed that it was, in fact, clos­er to 12 sec­onds.

Lea­Rooster was rep­re­sent­ed by Wayne Sturge and Danielle Ram­per­sad, while Criston J Williams rep­re­sent­ed Les Pierre. Sab­ri­na Dougdeen-Jaglal pros­e­cut­ed.

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 22120
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: who should have to answer for this police or witness?

Postby sMASH » July 20th, 2019, 7:28 am

so long that take? might justify resisting arrest.

User avatar
hustla_ambition101
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 8080
Joined: February 1st, 2007, 1:55 pm
Location: waiting....

Re: who should have to answer for this police or witness?

Postby hustla_ambition101 » July 20th, 2019, 10:35 pm

To answer your question OP, the police can only be faulted if the cctv footage was not available and their case hinged on the eyewitness. Facts are limited and the story does not say if the defense used the footage as a trump card. If the police had the footage and still used that shitttty witness then......they have to shoulder the blame

User avatar
hong kong phooey
punchin NOS
Posts: 2973
Joined: July 10th, 2006, 8:37 am
Location: ah lorse

Re: who should have to answer for this police or witness?

Postby hong kong phooey » July 20th, 2019, 11:22 pm

But this witness lied. he wasted the courts time and had 2 people in jail for 10 years
did police do their job and investigate the case ?
was the witness paid by the state ?

Redman
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10430
Joined: August 19th, 2004, 2:48 pm

Re: who should have to answer for this police or witness?

Postby Redman » July 21st, 2019, 6:51 am

It's TTPS responsibility to verify eye witness testimony......which is unreliable.

How long was the cctv footage available to the TTPS ?

User avatar
j.o.e
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6849
Joined: October 5th, 2008, 8:56 pm
Location: On tuner

Re: who should have to answer for this police or witness?

Postby j.o.e » July 21st, 2019, 8:21 am

hong kong phooey wrote:But this witness lied. he wasted the courts time and had 2 people in jail for 10 years
did police do their job and investigate the case ?
was the witness paid by the state ?


Not certain he lied. In a pressure situation memory is very unreliable. A good defense can pole holes in your account. Picture seeing someone get murdered you’re probably hiding, running fearing for your own life. It’s possible misstate facts

rspann
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 11167
Joined: June 25th, 2010, 10:23 pm
Location: Trinituner 24/7

Re: who should have to answer for this police or witness?

Postby rspann » July 21st, 2019, 3:41 pm

j.o.e wrote:
hong kong phooey wrote:But this witness lied. he wasted the courts time and had 2 people in jail for 10 years
did police do their job and investigate the case ?
was the witness paid by the state ?


Not certain he lied. In a pressure situation memory is very unreliable. A good defense can pole holes in your account. Picture seeing someone get murdered you’re probably hiding, running fearing for your own life. It’s possible misstate facts


True. The question is ,how did it take ten years for the evidence to be adduced?

rspann
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 11167
Joined: June 25th, 2010, 10:23 pm
Location: Trinituner 24/7

Re: who should have to answer for this police or witness?

Postby rspann » July 21st, 2019, 3:55 pm

This is not the case where it was a senior police officer who knew them was the witness? Elite or rollingstock ?

Advertisement

Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: alfa, Habit7, st7, The_Honourable, xtech and 170 guests