Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
hover11 wrote:Where is civilian Gary why is he so quiet?
pugboy wrote:gg didn’t make any media appearance this week?
what happening?
X210345MaxPower wrote:pugboy wrote:gg didn’t make any media appearance this week?
what happening?
Appearance for?
GG gone tru from the time he had to resort to stooping so low to appear on Inshan sheit show.
Redress10 wrote:rollingstock wrote:bluefete wrote:RollingStock: How do you feel when you do all the hard work, get the evidence, make an arrest and a lawyer gets the perp off in court, to go back on the street and do the same thing again?rollingstock wrote:So leave them to just kill persons? Why a judicial system then?
Hope your family members don't travel in a car with a suspect and they decide to light it up and call him a murderer/rapist and you just have to take it as is with no recourse.
When a police service resorts to extra judicial killings it only proves to me that the powers to be clueless and have no idea how to deal with crime.
You feel dejected, after a few times you start to question whether it makes sense even working.
I've reach the point where I try not to care about the outcome.
Half of alluh in here really clueless yes. Men in here blaming the police but ignoring the parliamentarians who skylark and play games in Parliament?
Keep that same energy next time UNC abstain from a crime bill
You know next week he in overdrive rightpugboy wrote:a whole week and no social media rant from GG
a new record
Mmoney607 wrote:He was getting results, you was seeing a difference, Gary was the best commissioner since Burroughs. Look since he gone, crime gone up. Rowley didn't want Gary because Gary not fraid to lock up nobody.
Question, why is crime high?MaxPower wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:He was getting results, you was seeing a difference, Gary was the best commissioner since Burroughs. Look since he gone, crime gone up. Rowley didn't want Gary because Gary not fraid to lock up nobody.
Crime was still high under Gary.
The results are not good enough and no major significance.
Maybe better than past COPs but rather than competing and boasting, we need to get the crime rate LOW.
GG failed the people of T&T. He just bought love with the words in his press conference.
E. All of the above, but they more focused on D. Crime is nothing new in Trinidad we have become desensitized to 500 murders a year but only when women are murdered then there is an uproar, yet the government of the day targets a woman for their missteps and inactions instead of having accountabilityzoom rader wrote:Question, why is crime high?MaxPower wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:He was getting results, you was seeing a difference, Gary was the best commissioner since Burroughs. Look since he gone, crime gone up. Rowley didn't want Gary because Gary not fraid to lock up nobody.
Crime was still high under Gary.
The results are not good enough and no major significance.
Maybe better than past COPs but rather than competing and boasting, we need to get the crime rate LOW.
GG failed the people of T&T. He just bought love with the words in his press conference.
A.GG is a failure?
B.Red government employed the wrong person?
C.Citizens to blame?
D. Kams to blame?
Nah, they all went St Mary's so they good citizenspugboy wrote:GG caught any big fish ?
#askingforafriend
Marlene and her husband count?pugboy wrote:GG caught any big fish ?
#askingforafriend
hover11 wrote:Marlene and her husband count?pugboy wrote:GG caught any big fish ?
#askingforafriend
VII wrote:Crime was still high under Gary but there was a system that was bearing fruit with criminals being intercepted because of better management of assets etc.. right now we're back into the Willaims slow walk.. "am am am" ..
VII wrote:Crime was still high under Gary but there was a system that was bearing fruit with criminals being intercepted because of better management of assets etc.. right now we're back into the Willaims slow walk.. "am am am" ..
alfa wrote:Gary doesn't know it yet but it was never his job to fight crime. His position was that of an administrator and in that sense he did do certain things well. Introduction of body cams, taser as well as attempting to introduce polygraph tests for officers were all great administrative initiatives. Gary was never required to patrol on foot in hotspots with SORT as we saw him do an was a liability in doing so. The whole team would be more focused on protecting the boss instead of the actual mission.
He did do his job well as an administrator and the other antics he performed were purely for show. I still maintain that the role of actual crime fighting has to be initiated and sustained by the individual district sargents or whoever is the boss in a station. If you need a commissioner to say let's raid this drug block or let's do a patrol at this suspected port of entry then something is inherently wrong in the ttps
rollingstock wrote:VII wrote:Crime was still high under Gary but there was a system that was bearing fruit with criminals being intercepted because of better management of assets etc.. right now we're back into the Willaims slow walk.. "am am am" ..
More like better PR.
Jacob and/or whoever after should take a page from his book.
Mmoney607 wrote:alfa wrote:Gary doesn't know it yet but it was never his job to fight crime. His position was that of an administrator and in that sense he did do certain things well. Introduction of body cams, taser as well as attempting to introduce polygraph tests for officers were all great administrative initiatives. Gary was never required to patrol on foot in hotspots with SORT as we saw him do an was a liability in doing so. The whole team would be more focused on protecting the boss instead of the actual mission.
He did do his job well as an administrator and the other antics he performed were purely for show. I still maintain that the role of actual crime fighting has to be initiated and sustained by the individual district sargents or whoever is the boss in a station. If you need a commissioner to say let's raid this drug block or let's do a patrol at this suspected port of entry then something is inherently wrong in the ttps
Nah we need a commissioner that on the ground, not one who sit down in a nice ac office in shirt and tie whole day.
rollingstock wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:alfa wrote:Gary doesn't know it yet but it was never his job to fight crime. His position was that of an administrator and in that sense he did do certain things well. Introduction of body cams, taser as well as attempting to introduce polygraph tests for officers were all great administrative initiatives. Gary was never required to patrol on foot in hotspots with SORT as we saw him do an was a liability in doing so. The whole team would be more focused on protecting the boss instead of the actual mission.
He did do his job well as an administrator and the other antics he performed were purely for show. I still maintain that the role of actual crime fighting has to be initiated and sustained by the individual district sargents or whoever is the boss in a station. If you need a commissioner to say let's raid this drug block or let's do a patrol at this suspected port of entry then something is inherently wrong in the ttps
Nah we need a commissioner that on the ground, not one who sit down in a nice ac office in shirt and tie whole day.
And CEO's of manufacturing companies should be on the assembly line.
Any other dumb ideas?