Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Rovin wrote:"police wicked" ... it have cussing in it
video doh want to embed so press d link
https://www.facebook.com/TrinidadBandit ... 5246893256
is how he say he on only volume level 5 - man eh know he amp gains too high orrrr.....
elec2020 wrote:passed a speed trap by nestle (CRH) not too long ago. people lost there jobs and income and struggling to survive and the best thing to do is to make things harder for them? wow..... what a failed state
sam1978 wrote:elec2020 wrote:passed a speed trap by nestle (CRH) not too long ago. people lost there jobs and income and struggling to survive and the best thing to do is to make things harder for them? wow..... what a failed state
So because people lose their jobs and income and struggling to survive , they must speed and be a danger to innocent people on the roads? Why you don’t think before you talk. Real foolish rationale.
That makes it a failed state? How? Some of you just talk for talking sake?
No man in they right mind want that.Rovin wrote:hmmm reverse roles with d WPC, she rel fresh with she self , so much man around & she interfering with d youth man
maybe if we did get a full size pic of she we cud then say small man cuda put ah bag over she face or figure if he on d other side
these kinda stories remind me of adam sandler movie : that's my boy ...
newsday wrote:
Sangre Grande Facebook critic moves to sue CoP over police grilling
Jada Loutoo
ATTORNEYS for Sangre Grande music producer Alan Brizan, who was interviewed by police at his home for hours after a social media tit-for-tat with Police Commissioner Gary Griffith in February, have accused the top cop of intimidation and misfeasance in public office.
A pre-action protocol letter, setting out in detail Griffith’s alleged infractions, was served on the commissioner and the Office of the Attorney General on Thursday.
Brizan was interviewed for hours after he posted information on February 9 to social media relating to the disappearance and murder of court clerk Andrea Bharatt.
The post said that “after two weeks of information on the disappearance of Bharatt, the only three facts established were: Bharatt is dead, two police-detained suspects were “brutally” killed and; “the TTPS all the way up to the commissioner of police were distorting all the facts of the case from day one.”
Brizan was later visited by officers of the Professional Standards Bureau.
Minutes after he made that post, Griffith sent him a message.
Griffith also said he had reported Brizan's post to the Police Complaints Authority (PCA), which was doing an independent investigation, and was contemplating filing a defamation lawsuit of his own.
In the pre-action letter, Brizan is also alleging false imprisonment for three hours when he was subjected to an interview with the police.
Griffith has been accused of using his office to procure, coerce, and/or compel Brizan’s submission to the interview, using it as a tool of intimidation and not for any legitimate police investigation.
The commissioner was also accused of having wilfully and maliciously caused Brizan to alter his Facebook post and engaged in conduct designed to further intimidate the former media writer and graphic artist.
Brizan’s attorneys Akiri Heath-Adams, Joash Huggins, Christophe Rodriguez and Larry Boyer, said the commissioner’s actions caused several breaches of their client’s rights, including the right to security, not to be deprived of his liberty without due process, the right to protection of the law, and the right of freedom of thought and expression.
The letter, written by Heath-Adams, said Griffith caused the two officers who interviewed Brizan at his Guaico home, to detain him knowing there was no reasonable ground to believe he could assist in police investigations into Bharatt’s disappearance and murder.
The letter also said Brizan feared the officers were plotting to use the information they took in a written statement, which he signed, to “implicate him in criminal activity.”
"We have advised the proposed claimant that the actions of Mr Gary Griffith and/or his agents have given rise to actionable claims in the torts of misfeasance in public office, false imprisonment and intimidation," Heath-Adams said in the letter.
"The proposed claimant instructs that the correspondences received from Mr Griffith had the effect of making the proposed claimant feel intimidated and compelled to retract his criticisms and extend praise and appreciation instead," Heath-Adams said.
The attorney said as a result of Griffith's alleged conduct, his client has suffered embarrassment and injury to his dignity and pride and this has been amplified by the widespread publicity which the incident attracted both on social and in print media.
The letter said Brizan would be entitled to significant damages.
Griffith has 28 days in which to respond to the letter.
If I'm unemployed / struggling and somehow I can afford petrol, I hadda be a kant to be speeding and finding ways to give the government money that I don't have. Unless it's a medical emergency, where the heck am I going? And given the fact that unless you're supposed to be outside for WORK PURPOSES, why would I be in a rush to go nowhere / somewhere I ought not to be?elec2020 wrote:passed a speed trap by nestle (CRH) not too long ago. people lost there jobs and income and struggling to survive and the best thing to do is to make things harder for them? wow..... what a failed state
elec2020 wrote:sam1978 wrote:elec2020 wrote:passed a speed trap by nestle (CRH) not too long ago. people lost there jobs and income and struggling to survive and the best thing to do is to make things harder for them? wow..... what a failed state
So because people lose their jobs and income and struggling to survive , they must speed and be a danger to innocent people on the roads? Why you don’t think before you talk. Real foolish rationale.
That makes it a failed state? How? Some of you just talk for talking sake?
let's not play dumb here. the goal is not to stop speedsters. The goal is to replenish lost government revenue due to the restrictions. Cause, if the priority was crime prevention then what the hell going on with the other areas? Every week is at least 3 rapes, 4 robberies and 5 murders. Give or take. So where the crime prevention tactics for that? Or is it that you telling me that the greatest threat to my safety during a period of strict restrictions is errant drivers. Thank the lord cause i was terrified that an errant driver was going to bonske me while i on the second floor of my home. Who needs burglar proof anymore? When TTPS tackling the greatest threat to our safety over the lockdown. Errant drivers.
killercow wrote:If I'm unemployed / struggling and somehow I can afford petrol, I hadda be a kant to be speeding and finding ways to give the government money that I don't have. Unless it's a medical emergency, where the heck am I going? And given the fact that unless you're supposed to be outside for WORK PURPOSES, why would I be in a rush to go nowhere / somewhere I ought not to be?elec2020 wrote:passed a speed trap by nestle (CRH) not too long ago. people lost there jobs and income and struggling to survive and the best thing to do is to make things harder for them? wow..... what a failed state
Common sense doesn't financially discriminate.
Hundreds of small cities and towns throughout the country rely significantly on fines to fund their budgets.
Seems like she's the desperate one here..wtf wrote:No man in they right mind want that.Rovin wrote:hmmm reverse roles with d WPC, she rel fresh with she self , so much man around & she interfering with d youth man
maybe if we did get a full size pic of she we cud then say small man cuda put ah bag over she face or figure if he on d other side
these kinda stories remind me of adam sandler movie : that's my boy ...
Replenishment of revenue? Let's assume a speeding ticket is $2000. In order to raise $20m, there will need to be 10,000 tickets given out. What can the government do with 20m in our predicament now? A better figure would be $200m which equates to 100,000 tickets. That seems to be quite high especially for a revenue generation method. I think your personal bias against the ttps and GG has clouded your judgement. I wonder if you're willing to share what the ttps did to you which explains your constant attack.elec2020 wrote:killercow wrote:If I'm unemployed / struggling and somehow I can afford petrol, I hadda be a kant to be speeding and finding ways to give the government money that I don't have. Unless it's a medical emergency, where the heck am I going? And given the fact that unless you're supposed to be outside for WORK PURPOSES, why would I be in a rush to go nowhere / somewhere I ought not to be?elec2020 wrote:passed a speed trap by nestle (CRH) not too long ago. people lost there jobs and income and struggling to survive and the best thing to do is to make things harder for them? wow..... what a failed state
Common sense doesn't financially discriminate.
your point is noted. as discussed in a subsequent comment, lets not kid ourselves. this is not about discouraging errant driving. its about replenishing revenues due to the impact of restrictions. as, where is this same urgency when it comes to rape, murders and robberies? thats just my view on the whole thing. that the intentions of this exercise are not to protect and serve but to replenish the treasury. in several states it is proven that law enforcement are encouraged to give out fines. in fact fines are the greatest source of revenue for these countries. but in tnt (who like to copy everything foreign) we doing it to solely find errant drivers? the biggest threat to safety in tnt? ok
https://www.governing.com/archive/fine- ... eport.htmlHundreds of small cities and towns throughout the country rely significantly on fines to fund their budgets.
just for the ...k of it lets use some stats.... so according to arrive alive there were 96 fatal MVA in 2020. And according to TTPS stats there were 8336 crimes committed in 2020. So if MVA claims lets say 4 lives so it affected 384 individuals. Thats about 22 times less than individuals affected by crimes committed. But the plague to society that needs urgent addressing is speeding. ok
sMASH wrote:https://newsday.co.tt/2021/05/07/sangre-grande-producer-moves-to-sue-cop-over-police-grilling/newsday wrote:
Sangre Grande Facebook critic moves to sue CoP over police grilling
Jada Loutoo
ATTORNEYS for Sangre Grande music producer Alan Brizan, who was interviewed by police at his home for hours after a social media tit-for-tat with Police Commissioner Gary Griffith in February, have accused the top cop of intimidation and misfeasance in public office.
A pre-action protocol letter, setting out in detail Griffith’s alleged infractions, was served on the commissioner and the Office of the Attorney General on Thursday.
Brizan was interviewed for hours after he posted information on February 9 to social media relating to the disappearance and murder of court clerk Andrea Bharatt.
The post said that “after two weeks of information on the disappearance of Bharatt, the only three facts established were: Bharatt is dead, two police-detained suspects were “brutally” killed and; “the TTPS all the way up to the commissioner of police were distorting all the facts of the case from day one.”
Brizan was later visited by officers of the Professional Standards Bureau.
Minutes after he made that post, Griffith sent him a message.
Griffith also said he had reported Brizan's post to the Police Complaints Authority (PCA), which was doing an independent investigation, and was contemplating filing a defamation lawsuit of his own.
In the pre-action letter, Brizan is also alleging false imprisonment for three hours when he was subjected to an interview with the police.
Griffith has been accused of using his office to procure, coerce, and/or compel Brizan’s submission to the interview, using it as a tool of intimidation and not for any legitimate police investigation.
The commissioner was also accused of having wilfully and maliciously caused Brizan to alter his Facebook post and engaged in conduct designed to further intimidate the former media writer and graphic artist.
Brizan’s attorneys Akiri Heath-Adams, Joash Huggins, Christophe Rodriguez and Larry Boyer, said the commissioner’s actions caused several breaches of their client’s rights, including the right to security, not to be deprived of his liberty without due process, the right to protection of the law, and the right of freedom of thought and expression.
The letter, written by Heath-Adams, said Griffith caused the two officers who interviewed Brizan at his Guaico home, to detain him knowing there was no reasonable ground to believe he could assist in police investigations into Bharatt’s disappearance and murder.
The letter also said Brizan feared the officers were plotting to use the information they took in a written statement, which he signed, to “implicate him in criminal activity.”
"We have advised the proposed claimant that the actions of Mr Gary Griffith and/or his agents have given rise to actionable claims in the torts of misfeasance in public office, false imprisonment and intimidation," Heath-Adams said in the letter.
"The proposed claimant instructs that the correspondences received from Mr Griffith had the effect of making the proposed claimant feel intimidated and compelled to retract his criticisms and extend praise and appreciation instead," Heath-Adams said.
The attorney said as a result of Griffith's alleged conduct, his client has suffered embarrassment and injury to his dignity and pride and this has been amplified by the widespread publicity which the incident attracted both on social and in print media.
The letter said Brizan would be entitled to significant damages.
Griffith has 28 days in which to respond to the letter.
MaxPower wrote:sMASH wrote:https://newsday.co.tt/2021/05/07/sangre-grande-producer-moves-to-sue-cop-over-police-grilling/newsday wrote:
Sangre Grande Facebook critic moves to sue CoP over police grilling
Jada Loutoo
ATTORNEYS for Sangre Grande music producer Alan Brizan, who was interviewed by police at his home for hours after a social media tit-for-tat with Police Commissioner Gary Griffith in February, have accused the top cop of intimidation and misfeasance in public office.
A pre-action protocol letter, setting out in detail Griffith’s alleged infractions, was served on the commissioner and the Office of the Attorney General on Thursday.
Brizan was interviewed for hours after he posted information on February 9 to social media relating to the disappearance and murder of court clerk Andrea Bharatt.
The post said that “after two weeks of information on the disappearance of Bharatt, the only three facts established were: Bharatt is dead, two police-detained suspects were “brutally” killed and; “the TTPS all the way up to the commissioner of police were distorting all the facts of the case from day one.”
Brizan was later visited by officers of the Professional Standards Bureau.
Minutes after he made that post, Griffith sent him a message.
Griffith also said he had reported Brizan's post to the Police Complaints Authority (PCA), which was doing an independent investigation, and was contemplating filing a defamation lawsuit of his own.
In the pre-action letter, Brizan is also alleging false imprisonment for three hours when he was subjected to an interview with the police.
Griffith has been accused of using his office to procure, coerce, and/or compel Brizan’s submission to the interview, using it as a tool of intimidation and not for any legitimate police investigation.
The commissioner was also accused of having wilfully and maliciously caused Brizan to alter his Facebook post and engaged in conduct designed to further intimidate the former media writer and graphic artist.
Brizan’s attorneys Akiri Heath-Adams, Joash Huggins, Christophe Rodriguez and Larry Boyer, said the commissioner’s actions caused several breaches of their client’s rights, including the right to security, not to be deprived of his liberty without due process, the right to protection of the law, and the right of freedom of thought and expression.
The letter, written by Heath-Adams, said Griffith caused the two officers who interviewed Brizan at his Guaico home, to detain him knowing there was no reasonable ground to believe he could assist in police investigations into Bharatt’s disappearance and murder.
The letter also said Brizan feared the officers were plotting to use the information they took in a written statement, which he signed, to “implicate him in criminal activity.”
"We have advised the proposed claimant that the actions of Mr Gary Griffith and/or his agents have given rise to actionable claims in the torts of misfeasance in public office, false imprisonment and intimidation," Heath-Adams said in the letter.
"The proposed claimant instructs that the correspondences received from Mr Griffith had the effect of making the proposed claimant feel intimidated and compelled to retract his criticisms and extend praise and appreciation instead," Heath-Adams said.
The attorney said as a result of Griffith's alleged conduct, his client has suffered embarrassment and injury to his dignity and pride and this has been amplified by the widespread publicity which the incident attracted both on social and in print media.
The letter said Brizan would be entitled to significant damages.
Griffith has 28 days in which to respond to the letter.
Why Brizan dont hush he kant.
Were the suspects killed or they fell off a chair?
Big difference.
Let the investigation do its course and save the social media hot head jump to conclusion rant.
No one cares about you or your “music” Brizan.
sam1978 wrote:You not the same person who accuse people of being UNC when they criticize the PNM?
Just shut your trap and obey the law of the land and you won’t have to worry about ticket and demerit points. How much sense it takes to understand that? You know your brain cells won’t deplete if you use them? Right?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Dohplaydat, Duane 3NE 2NR and 229 guests