Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
That's not a poll. You need to start a new thread. And get tuners to vote. In the thread.sMASH wrote:I interested. Could a poll be put up to see how many jabs people have taken?
To get out of the complexity of primary 1st and secondary second doses... Just post up a poll.
How many jabs u took?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
I Jess interested.
sMASH wrote:MSNBC MAINNNNNNNSTREAM media host says people NEEDDD to get boosted, or suffer like him cause he didn't boost.
Cause that's how vaccines work
https://youtube.com/watch?v=B3JkMR87izA ... IECMiOmarE
sMASH wrote:https://youtube.com/watch?v=sidjKoHS6NE&si=EnSIkaIECMiOmarE
Soooo, the UK ban the Vax fur under 50....
They say targeting groups..
But more like targeted away from most groups.
*adnj: they're wrong*
timelapse wrote:That's not what they said.After two whole years of this thread, you still have zero clue as to how vaccines work.Also, the average cepep worker stop using 'covee'.They now referring to it as 'the roners' . Keep up mate.sMASH wrote:The amount of break tru covee infections, prove that is a lie.adnj wrote:sMASH wrote:Inactivated would have a broader specrtum of markers, offering a better analog to the live virus, and less risk from one specific potential flaw.adnj wrote:All current COVID vaccines contain the SARS-COV-2 spike protein.sMASH wrote:That's the only difference from now and the other vaxes in the past.redmanjp wrote:If the vax didn't use the spike protein from the virus would it be safer?
If I ever come in a position to steer a health program, I will not recommend mRNA for broadcast vaccination. Only use it fur target medical procedures... Like the cancer application.
Use the old, tried and tested ways.
Will ban mRNA
SARS-CoV-2 enters the human host cell using the S protein. S protein specific antibodies prevent the virus from entering human cells.
What you posted is just something that was made up.
*take the mRNA, they said. It will stop covee, they said*
Lulzz.
maj. tom wrote:rather than the intelligence of a primate....
drchaos wrote:
Timelapse memory real lapsin
Man forget the whole take the jab to stop the spread song.
But I guess when facts conveniently don't add up people just blank them out so they can be comfortable with their reality.
Sooo, it banned for healthy people where the risk/benefit ratio isn't met.adnj wrote:sMASH wrote:https://youtube.com/watch?v=sidjKoHS6NE&si=EnSIkaIECMiOmarE
Soooo, the UK ban the Vax fur under 50....
They say targeting groups..
But more like targeted away from most groups.
*adnj: they're wrong*
CLAIM: The United Kingdom is banning anyone under the age of 50 from getting COVID-19 vaccines.
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. While the country will stop widely providing the vaccine to those under 50 next month, anyone deemed to have a clinical need, such as those at risk of severe illness, as well as frontline healthcare workers and caregivers, will still be able to get the shot.
"likely" meaning they just making sheit up with out doing the stats to prove their point.adnj wrote:drchaos wrote:
Timelapse memory real lapsin
Man forget the whole take the jab to stop the spread song.
But I guess when facts conveniently don't add up people just blank them out so they can be comfortable with their reality.
Old information from a year ago that you have apparently blanked out so that you can be comfortable with your reality. Omicron is the culprit.
Vaccinated people also had less viral variation than unvaccinated people. It is likely that the mutations occured in the immunocompromised and unvaccinated at a rate higher than in people that were vaccinated. Have a read:
One way in which viral variants can become dominant is by increasing their transmissibility, through faster replication or an enhanced ability to spread outside the body. Another route to dominance uses an increased ability to escape from immune systems that have learnt — through infection or vaccination — to recognize the virus.
Delta achieved its dominance with the former method: the virus could replicate much faster and to higher levels than could previous variants. “Delta did a lot of things through brute force,” says Nathan Grubaugh, an epidemiologist at Yale School of Public Health in New Haven, Connecticut. Omicron seems to replicate even more quickly than Delta, but the number of virus particles in the body never reaches the same level, suggesting that the variant’s advantage lies elsewhere. ...
Infected people who had received two vaccine doses had almost two times higher odds of having Omicron than Delta, and those who had received three doses had three times higher odds of having Omicron.
That suggests that the Omicron variant is much better than Delta at breaking through the immunity conferred by vaccines.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00283-4
UK NHS is the only source of COVID vaccines in the UK. Vaccines are not being made available to people at less risk because of the cost of making them available.sMASH wrote:Sooo, it banned for healthy people where the risk/benefit ratio isn't met.adnj wrote:
CLAIM: The United Kingdom is banning anyone under the age of 50 from getting COVID-19 vaccines.
AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. While the country will stop widely providing the vaccine to those under 50 next month, anyone deemed to have a clinical need, such as those at risk of severe illness, as well as frontline healthcare workers and caregivers, will still be able to get the shot.
Again, if ur healthy u don't need it. And if ur not healthy, u could still get infected and/or blood clots.
It had men saying they taking the jab cause they don't want to spread it to their grand parents.drchaos wrote:timelapse wrote:That's not what they said.After two whole years of this thread, you still have zero clue as to how vaccines work.Also, the average cepep worker stop using 'covee'.They now referring to it as 'the roners' . Keep up mate.sMASH wrote:The amount of break tru covee infections, prove that is a lie.adnj wrote:sMASH wrote:Inactivated would have a broader specrtum of markers, offering a better analog to the live virus, and less risk from one specific potential flaw.adnj wrote:All current COVID vaccines contain the SARS-COV-2 spike protein.sMASH wrote:That's the only difference from now and the other vaxes in the past.redmanjp wrote:If the vax didn't use the spike protein from the virus would it be safer?
If I ever come in a position to steer a health program, I will not recommend mRNA for broadcast vaccination. Only use it fur target medical procedures... Like the cancer application.
Use the old, tried and tested ways.
Will ban mRNA
SARS-CoV-2 enters the human host cell using the S protein. S protein specific antibodies prevent the virus from entering human cells.
What you posted is just something that was made up.
*take the mRNA, they said. It will stop covee, they said*
Lulzz.
Timelapse memory real lapsin
Man forget the whole take the jab to stop the spread song.
But I guess when facts conveniently don't add up people just blank them out so they can be comfortable with their reality.
2023 after the fact,they lost the argument and still fighting to be right.Them guys clearly have nothing of importance in their lives to be thinking about.If only they could analyse the state of the economy so well....adnj wrote:drchaos wrote:
Timelapse memory real lapsin
Man forget the whole take the jab to stop the spread song.
But I guess when facts conveniently don't add up people just blank them out so they can be comfortable with their reality.
Old information from a year ago that you have apparently blanked out so that you can be comfortable with your reality. Omicron is the culprit.
Vaccinated people also had less viral variation than unvaccinated people. It is likely that the mutations occured in the immunocompromised and unvaccinated at a rate higher than in people that were vaccinated. Have a read:
One way in which viral variants can become dominant is by increasing their transmissibility, through faster replication or an enhanced ability to spread outside the body. Another route to dominance uses an increased ability to escape from immune systems that have learnt — through infection or vaccination — to recognize the virus.
Delta achieved its dominance with the former method: the virus could replicate much faster and to higher levels than could previous variants. “Delta did a lot of things through brute force,” says Nathan Grubaugh, an epidemiologist at Yale School of Public Health in New Haven, Connecticut. Omicron seems to replicate even more quickly than Delta, but the number of virus particles in the body never reaches the same level, suggesting that the variant’s advantage lies elsewhere. ...
Infected people who had received two vaccine doses had almost two times higher odds of having Omicron than Delta, and those who had received three doses had three times higher odds of having Omicron.
That suggests that the Omicron variant is much better than Delta at breaking through the immunity conferred by vaccines.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00283-4
sMASH wrote:"likely" meaning they just making sheit up with out doing the stats to prove their point.adnj wrote:[/spoiler] That's not what they said.After two whole years of this thread, you still have zero clue as to how vaccines work.Also, the average cepep worker stop using 'covee'.They now referring to it as 'the roners' . Keep up mate.
Timelapse memory real lapsin
Man forget the whole take the jab to stop the spread song.
But I guess when facts conveniently don't add up people just blank them out so they can be comfortable with their reality.
Old information from a year ago that you have apparently blanked out so that you can be comfortable with your reality. Omicron is the culprit.
Vaccinated people also had less viral variation than unvaccinated people. It is likely that the mutations occured in the immunocompromised and unvaccinated at a rate higher than in people that were vaccinated. Have a read:
One way in which viral variants can become dominant is by increasing their transmissibility, through faster replication or an enhanced ability to spread outside the body. Another route to dominance uses an increased ability to escape from immune systems that have learnt — through infection or vaccination — to recognize the virus.
Delta achieved its dominance with the former method: the virus could replicate much faster and to higher levels than could previous variants. “Delta did a lot of things through brute force,” says Nathan Grubaugh, an epidemiologist at Yale School of Public Health in New Haven, Connecticut. Omicron seems to replicate even more quickly than Delta, but the number of virus particles in the body never reaches the same level, suggesting that the variant’s advantage lies elsewhere. ...
Infected people who had received two vaccine doses had almost two times higher odds of having Omicron than Delta, and those who had received three doses had three times higher odds of having Omicron.
That suggests that the Omicron variant is much better than Delta at breaking through the immunity conferred by vaccines.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00283-4
Herd immunity targets shifted with each more transmissible variant. It is highly likely that COVID would not have mutated as quickly if more people had vaccinated due to fewer replications of the virus in infected hosts.sMASH wrote:It had men saying they taking the jab cause they don't want to spread it to their grand parents.drchaos wrote:timelapse wrote:That's not what they said.After two whole years of this thread, you still have zero clue as to how vaccines work.Also, the average cepep worker stop using 'covee'.They now referring to it as 'the roners' . Keep up mate.sMASH wrote:The amount of break tru covee infections, prove that is a lie.adnj wrote:sMASH wrote:Inactivated would have a broader specrtum of markers, offering a better analog to the live virus, and less risk from one specific potential flaw.adnj wrote:All current COVID vaccines contain the SARS-COV-2 spike protein.sMASH wrote:That's the only difference from now and the other vaxes in the past.
If I ever come in a position to steer a health program, I will not recommend mRNA for broadcast vaccination. Only use it fur target medical procedures... Like the cancer application.
Use the old, tried and tested ways.
Will ban mRNA
SARS-CoV-2 enters the human host cell using the S protein. S protein specific antibodies prevent the virus from entering human cells.
What you posted is just something that was made up.
*take the mRNA, they said. It will stop covee, they said*
Lulzz.
Timelapse memory real lapsin
Man forget the whole take the jab to stop the spread song.
But I guess when facts conveniently don't add up people just blank them out so they can be comfortable with their reality.
But the trial data BEFOOOOORE it got emergency approval showed too many person still getting post infection.. So the chance of spreading it was still high enough that it wasn't a good enough safeguard measure to protect the elderly.
Remeber they saying before the Vax that u need 60% immunity to have heard immunity.
Then as the Vax got taken into the populations and the vaxed was still getting infected, thst figure changed to 70, then 80. Until the mantra was thst there is no such thing as heard immunity.
The science didn't change, just the real world performance and the statistics.
It no such thing as heard immunity with mRNA vaxes.. Lol. Cause mRNA is gene therapy and should be given on a case by case bespoke basis.
It have plenty vaxers worried what will happen to them in the next 5 years.
timelapse wrote:2023 after the fact,they lost the argument and still fighting to be right.Them guys clearly have nothing of importance in their lives to be thinking about.If only they could analyse the state of the economy so well....adnj wrote:drchaos wrote:
Timelapse memory real lapsin
Man forget the whole take the jab to stop the spread song.
But I guess when facts conveniently don't add up people just blank them out so they can be comfortable with their reality.
Old information from a year ago that you have apparently blanked out so that you can be comfortable with your reality. Omicron is the culprit.
Vaccinated people also had less viral variation than unvaccinated people. It is likely that the mutations occured in the immunocompromised and unvaccinated at a rate higher than in people that were vaccinated. Have a read:
One way in which viral variants can become dominant is by increasing their transmissibility, through faster replication or an enhanced ability to spread outside the body. Another route to dominance uses an increased ability to escape from immune systems that have learnt — through infection or vaccination — to recognize the virus.
Delta achieved its dominance with the former method: the virus could replicate much faster and to higher levels than could previous variants. “Delta did a lot of things through brute force,” says Nathan Grubaugh, an epidemiologist at Yale School of Public Health in New Haven, Connecticut. Omicron seems to replicate even more quickly than Delta, but the number of virus particles in the body never reaches the same level, suggesting that the variant’s advantage lies elsewhere. ...
Infected people who had received two vaccine doses had almost two times higher odds of having Omicron than Delta, and those who had received three doses had three times higher odds of having Omicron.
That suggests that the Omicron variant is much better than Delta at breaking through the immunity conferred by vaccines.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00283-4
It shifted cause the vax was sheit at stopping transmission.adnj wrote:Herd immunity targets shifted with each more transmissible variant. It is highly likely that COVID would not have mutated as quickly if more people had vaccinated due to fewer replications of the virus in infected hosts.sMASH wrote:It had men saying they taking the jab cause they don't want to spread it to their grand parents.drchaos wrote:timelapse wrote:That's not what they said.After two whole years of this thread, you still have zero clue as to how vaccines work.Also, the average cepep worker stop using 'covee'.They now referring to it as 'the roners' . Keep up mate.sMASH wrote:The amount of break tru covee infections, prove that is a lie.adnj wrote:sMASH wrote:Inactivated would have a broader specrtum of markers, offering a better analog to the live virus, and less risk from one specific potential flaw.adnj wrote:All current COVID vaccines contain the SARS-COV-2 spike protein.
Will ban mRNA
SARS-CoV-2 enters the human host cell using the S protein. S protein specific antibodies prevent the virus from entering human cells.
What you posted is just something that was made up.
*take the mRNA, they said. It will stop covee, they said*
Lulzz.
Timelapse memory real lapsin
Man forget the whole take the jab to stop the spread song.
But I guess when facts conveniently don't add up people just blank them out so they can be comfortable with their reality.
But the trial data BEFOOOOORE it got emergency approval showed too many person still getting post infection.. So the chance of spreading it was still high enough that it wasn't a good enough safeguard measure to protect the elderly.
Remeber they saying before the Vax that u need 60% immunity to have heard immunity.
Then as the Vax got taken into the populations and the vaxed was still getting infected, thst figure changed to 70, then 80. Until the mantra was thst there is no such thing as heard immunity.
The science didn't change, just the real world performance and the statistics.
It no such thing as heard immunity with mRNA vaxes.. Lol. Cause mRNA is gene therapy and should be given on a case by case bespoke basis.
It have plenty vaxers worried what will happen to them in the next 5 years.
How can you say the vax was sheit if people like you weren't taking it.Thats like saying seatbelts ineffective and you not buckling upsMASH wrote:It shifted cause the vax was sheit at stopping transmission.adnj wrote:Herd immunity targets shifted with each more transmissible variant. It is highly likely that COVID would not have mutated as quickly if more people had vaccinated due to fewer replications of the virus in infected hosts.sMASH wrote:It had men saying they taking the jab cause they don't want to spread it to their grand parents.drchaos wrote:timelapse wrote:That's not what they said.After two whole years of this thread, you still have zero clue as to how vaccines work.Also, the average cepep worker stop using 'covee'.They now referring to it as 'the roners' . Keep up mate.sMASH wrote:The amount of break tru covee infections, prove that is a lie.adnj wrote:sMASH wrote:Inactivated would have a broader specrtum of markers, offering a better analog to the live virus, and less risk from one specific potential flaw.
Will ban mRNA
SARS-CoV-2 enters the human host cell using the S protein. S protein specific antibodies prevent the virus from entering human cells.
What you posted is just something that was made up.
*take the mRNA, they said. It will stop covee, they said*
Lulzz.
Timelapse memory real lapsin
Man forget the whole take the jab to stop the spread song.
But I guess when facts conveniently don't add up people just blank them out so they can be comfortable with their reality.
But the trial data BEFOOOOORE it got emergency approval showed too many person still getting post infection.. So the chance of spreading it was still high enough that it wasn't a good enough safeguard measure to protect the elderly.
Remeber they saying before the Vax that u need 60% immunity to have heard immunity.
Then as the Vax got taken into the populations and the vaxed was still getting infected, thst figure changed to 70, then 80. Until the mantra was thst there is no such thing as heard immunity.
The science didn't change, just the real world performance and the statistics.
It no such thing as heard immunity with mRNA vaxes.. Lol. Cause mRNA is gene therapy and should be given on a case by case bespoke basis.
It have plenty vaxers worried what will happen to them in the next 5 years.
The seller sold u all dreams.
Never buckled up before it was enforced.timelapse wrote:How can you say the vax was sheit if people like you weren't taking it.Thats like saying seatbelts ineffective and you not buckling upsMASH wrote:It shifted cause the vax was sheit at stopping transmission.adnj wrote:Herd immunity targets shifted with each more transmissible variant. It is highly likely that COVID would not have mutated as quickly if more people had vaccinated due to fewer replications of the virus in infected hosts.sMASH wrote:It had men saying they taking the jab cause they don't want to spread it to their grand parents.drchaos wrote:timelapse wrote:That's not what they said.After two whole years of this thread, you still have zero clue as to how vaccines work.Also, the average cepep worker stop using 'covee'.They now referring to it as 'the roners' . Keep up mate.sMASH wrote:The amount of break tru covee infections, prove that is a lie.adnj wrote:
SARS-CoV-2 enters the human host cell using the S protein. S protein specific antibodies prevent the virus from entering human cells.
What you posted is just something that was made up.
*take the mRNA, they said. It will stop covee, they said*
Lulzz.
Timelapse memory real lapsin
Man forget the whole take the jab to stop the spread song.
But I guess when facts conveniently don't add up people just blank them out so they can be comfortable with their reality.
But the trial data BEFOOOOORE it got emergency approval showed too many person still getting post infection.. So the chance of spreading it was still high enough that it wasn't a good enough safeguard measure to protect the elderly.
Remeber they saying before the Vax that u need 60% immunity to have heard immunity.
Then as the Vax got taken into the populations and the vaxed was still getting infected, thst figure changed to 70, then 80. Until the mantra was thst there is no such thing as heard immunity.
The science didn't change, just the real world performance and the statistics.
It no such thing as heard immunity with mRNA vaxes.. Lol. Cause mRNA is gene therapy and should be given on a case by case bespoke basis.
It have plenty vaxers worried what will happen to them in the next 5 years.
The seller sold u all dreams.
Oho.sMASH wrote:Never buckled up before it was enforced.timelapse wrote:How can you say the vax was sheit if people like you weren't taking it.Thats like saying seatbelts ineffective and you not buckling upsMASH wrote:It shifted cause the vax was sheit at stopping transmission.adnj wrote:Herd immunity targets shifted with each more transmissible variant. It is highly likely that COVID would not have mutated as quickly if more people had vaccinated due to fewer replications of the virus in infected hosts.sMASH wrote:It had men saying they taking the jab cause they don't want to spread it to their grand parents.drchaos wrote:timelapse wrote:That's not what they said.After two whole years of this thread, you still have zero clue as to how vaccines work.Also, the average cepep worker stop using 'covee'.They now referring to it as 'the roners' . Keep up mate.sMASH wrote:The amount of break tru covee infections, prove that is a lie.
*take the mRNA, they said. It will stop covee, they said*
Lulzz.
Timelapse memory real lapsin
Man forget the whole take the jab to stop the spread song.
But I guess when facts conveniently don't add up people just blank them out so they can be comfortable with their reality.
But the trial data BEFOOOOORE it got emergency approval showed too many person still getting post infection.. So the chance of spreading it was still high enough that it wasn't a good enough safeguard measure to protect the elderly.
Remeber they saying before the Vax that u need 60% immunity to have heard immunity.
Then as the Vax got taken into the populations and the vaxed was still getting infected, thst figure changed to 70, then 80. Until the mantra was thst there is no such thing as heard immunity.
The science didn't change, just the real world performance and the statistics.
It no such thing as heard immunity with mRNA vaxes.. Lol. Cause mRNA is gene therapy and should be given on a case by case bespoke basis.
It have plenty vaxers worried what will happen to them in the next 5 years.
The seller sold u all dreams.
How to manage ur health to success.
Yes... And dint need to worry bout vaccine injury, on top of covee infectiontimelapse wrote:Oho.sMASH wrote:Never buckled up before it was enforced.timelapse wrote:How can you say the vax was sheit if people like you weren't taking it.Thats like saying seatbelts ineffective and you not buckling upsMASH wrote:It shifted cause the vax was sheit at stopping transmission.adnj wrote:Herd immunity targets shifted with each more transmissible variant. It is highly likely that COVID would not have mutated as quickly if more people had vaccinated due to fewer replications of the virus in infected hosts.sMASH wrote:It had men saying they taking the jab cause they don't want to spread it to their grand parents.drchaos wrote:timelapse wrote:That's not what they said.After two whole years of this thread, you still have zero clue as to how vaccines work.Also, the average cepep worker stop using 'covee'.They now referring to it as 'the roners' . Keep up mate.
Timelapse memory real lapsin
Man forget the whole take the jab to stop the spread song.
But I guess when facts conveniently don't add up people just blank them out so they can be comfortable with their reality.
But the trial data BEFOOOOORE it got emergency approval showed too many person still getting post infection.. So the chance of spreading it was still high enough that it wasn't a good enough safeguard measure to protect the elderly.
Remeber they saying before the Vax that u need 60% immunity to have heard immunity.
Then as the Vax got taken into the populations and the vaxed was still getting infected, thst figure changed to 70, then 80. Until the mantra was thst there is no such thing as heard immunity.
The science didn't change, just the real world performance and the statistics.
It no such thing as heard immunity with mRNA vaxes.. Lol. Cause mRNA is gene therapy and should be given on a case by case bespoke basis.
It have plenty vaxers worried what will happen to them in the next 5 years.
The seller sold u all dreams.
How to manage ur health to success.
Statistically you not dead yet.
Makes sense
So you still fraid needlessMASH wrote:Yes... And dint need to worry bout vaccine injury, on top of covee infectiontimelapse wrote:Oho.sMASH wrote:Never buckled up before it was enforced.timelapse wrote:How can you say the vax was sheit if people like you weren't taking it.Thats like saying seatbelts ineffective and you not buckling upsMASH wrote:It shifted cause the vax was sheit at stopping transmission.adnj wrote:Herd immunity targets shifted with each more transmissible variant. It is highly likely that COVID would not have mutated as quickly if more people had vaccinated due to fewer replications of the virus in infected hosts.sMASH wrote:It had men saying they taking the jab cause they don't want to spread it to their grand parents.drchaos wrote:
Timelapse memory real lapsin
Man forget the whole take the jab to stop the spread song.
But I guess when facts conveniently don't add up people just blank them out so they can be comfortable with their reality.
But the trial data BEFOOOOORE it got emergency approval showed too many person still getting post infection.. So the chance of spreading it was still high enough that it wasn't a good enough safeguard measure to protect the elderly.
Remeber they saying before the Vax that u need 60% immunity to have heard immunity.
Then as the Vax got taken into the populations and the vaxed was still getting infected, thst figure changed to 70, then 80. Until the mantra was thst there is no such thing as heard immunity.
The science didn't change, just the real world performance and the statistics.
It no such thing as heard immunity with mRNA vaxes.. Lol. Cause mRNA is gene therapy and should be given on a case by case bespoke basis.
It have plenty vaxers worried what will happen to them in the next 5 years.
The seller sold u all dreams.
How to manage ur health to success.
Statistically you not dead yet.
Makes sense
When it have mRNA in it.. Yes.timelapse wrote:So you still fraid needlessMASH wrote:Yes... And dint need to worry bout vaccine injury, on top of covee infectiontimelapse wrote:Oho.sMASH wrote:Never buckled up before it was enforced.timelapse wrote:How can you say the vax was sheit if people like you weren't taking it.Thats like saying seatbelts ineffective and you not buckling upsMASH wrote:It shifted cause the vax was sheit at stopping transmission.adnj wrote:Herd immunity targets shifted with each more transmissible variant. It is highly likely that COVID would not have mutated as quickly if more people had vaccinated due to fewer replications of the virus in infected hosts.sMASH wrote:It had men saying they taking the jab cause they don't want to spread it to their grand parents.
But the trial data BEFOOOOORE it got emergency approval showed too many person still getting post infection.. So the chance of spreading it was still high enough that it wasn't a good enough safeguard measure to protect the elderly.
Remeber they saying before the Vax that u need 60% immunity to have heard immunity.
Then as the Vax got taken into the populations and the vaxed was still getting infected, thst figure changed to 70, then 80. Until the mantra was thst there is no such thing as heard immunity.
The science didn't change, just the real world performance and the statistics.
It no such thing as heard immunity with mRNA vaxes.. Lol. Cause mRNA is gene therapy and should be given on a case by case bespoke basis.
It have plenty vaxers worried what will happen to them in the next 5 years.
The seller sold u all dreams.
How to manage ur health to success.
Statistically you not dead yet.
Makes sense
sMASH wrote:Wear ur mask to prevent the spread of covee,, it worked the first times
When your money keeps getting tighter, your team keeps losing, the government doesn't care, your family doesn't listen, and you're getting closer to the grave everyday, antivax proves that you're still in control.matix wrote:sMASH wrote:Wear ur mask to prevent the spread of covee,, it worked the first times
Haha, I like that pic. Good idea to scare some people.
@ brother Smash, is taking the vaccine a personal choice?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: [X]~Outlaw and 131 guests