Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
alfa wrote:Rockram wrote:Has anyone asked themselves what makes a prestige school, prestigious? When you put the top performing students together and make them compete.... together with strong institutional structures usually associated with the denominational schools. Put anyone of those students with a mix of poor/mediocre students and performance will drop.
A school by itself is just 4 walls and a roof. The teachers all have the same qualifications as the moe does not recognize schools as prestige per say. Simply put prestige students and prestige parents make prestige schools
Dohplaydat wrote:alfa wrote:Rockram wrote:Has anyone asked themselves what makes a prestige school, prestigious? When you put the top performing students together and make them compete.... together with strong institutional structures usually associated with the denominational schools. Put anyone of those students with a mix of poor/mediocre students and performance will drop.
A school by itself is just 4 walls and a roof. The teachers all have the same qualifications as the moe does not recognize schools as prestige per say. Simply put prestige students and prestige parents make prestige schools
This should have been obvious from the get go.
Just a side note, many think these prestige schools have the best facilities and teachers. Far from the truth. Back in my days at least our facilities and classrooms were far worse from most government schools. We had 10 ancient barely working computers, while most other high schools had brand new computer labs with many more PCs.
They're only successful because of the caliber of student and their drive/motivation to do well.
The question we have to ask ourselves is why do indo-trinidadians value education so much more that afro-trinidadians.
Dohplaydat wrote:The question we have to ask ourselves is why do indo-trinidadians value education so much more that afro-trinidadians.
Dohplaydat wrote:They're only successful because of the caliber of student and their drive/motivation to do well.
The question we have to ask ourselves is why do indo-trinidadians value education so much more that afro-trinidadians.
MaxPower wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:The question we have to ask ourselves is why do indo-trinidadians value education so much more that afro-trinidadians.
Good question.
And racism should be out the door here as both indos and afros have the SAME opportunity to succeed.
Its all about applying yourself.
Both indos and afros, more so afros, have to PUT in the work.
Habit7 wrote:
It has to do with social pressure being greater in one ethnicity than another to perform educationally. I believe all ethnicities value education and send their children for it. But Indos value excelling academically while in Afros there is excelling academically, athletically and/or culturally. In my school, the majority of guys who studied in the US were due to athletic full or partial scholarships. Olatunji Yearwood was a year below me in 6th Form. His mom pulled him out to go study performance art, he is a successful recording artist now. Which Indo-Trini parent pulling them out of school to prepare them to be a soca artiste?
Nevertheless, the outcome is reflected in the table above and more or less Indos and Afros are educated to the proportion of their presence in the population. The Chinese and Lebanese-Syrians are the ones who have double and triple representation in certain education level despite their proportion. And there you might suggest wealth being a greater factor, than ethnicity
However, for some educated only means doctor, lawyer, engineer, etc but is the stereotype being reflected in the reality among the ethnic breakdown of teachers in the public service?
teems1 wrote:MaxPower wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:The question we have to ask ourselves is why do indo-trinidadians value education so much more that afro-trinidadians.
Good question.
And racism should be out the door here as both indos and afros have the SAME opportunity to succeed.
Its all about applying yourself.
Both indos and afros, more so afros, have to PUT in the work.
It has less to do with race, and more so socio economic standing and adjacent culture.
A poor person from a rough neighbourhood will always have a more difficult time than someone from a safe area with well off parents.
Redman wrote:It's incredibly lazy to throw race at everything...
Habit7 wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:They're only successful because of the caliber of student and their drive/motivation to do well.
The question we have to ask ourselves is why do indo-trinidadians value education so much more that afro-trinidadians.
There is the stereotype and then there is the reality
It has to do with social pressure being greater in one ethnicity than another to perform educationally. I believe all ethnicities value education and send their children for it. But Indos value excelling academically while in Afros there is excelling academically, athletically and/or culturally. In my school, the majority of guys who studied in the US were due to athletic full or partial scholarships. Olatunji Yearwood was a year below me in 6th Form. His mom pulled him out to go study performance art, he is a successful recording artist now. Which Indo-Trini parent pulling them out of school to prepare them to be a soca artiste?
Nevertheless, the outcome is reflected in the table above and more or less Indos and Afros are educated to the proportion of their presence in the population. The Chinese and Lebanese-Syrians are the ones who have double and triple representation in certain education level despite their proportion. And there you might suggest wealth being a greater factor, than ethnicity
However, for some educated only means doctor, lawyer, engineer, etc but is the stereotype being reflected in the reality among the ethnic breakdown of teachers in the public service?
Habit7 wrote:Yes Lewis talking nonsense, but at least in this thread, it has served to excite the anti Afros into spewing their racism here. Lewis doesn't represent the PNM, he is a columnist. If you want to play that game then did columnist Sat Maharaj views represents the UNC?
Kamla lost the 2020 election portraying Afros as victims of land inequity that she who try to correct and ran a bunch of ads portraying Afros as sufferers. And I don't blame her too much because she was trying to tap into the angst repeated by many Afros of them being the victims.
But there are opinions and there are facts, the data I showed, shows the facts. PNM doesn't need anybody to close ranks, Afros are 36% of the population and PNM wins 50% of the vote. They are doing just fine maintaining their base and attracting non-Afros. It is the UNC suffering from not attracting ppl outside of their Indo base.
pugboy wrote:that graph/data is seriously wrong and not really presented to reflect anything
Redman wrote:the single data point that has been submitted shows the article as crap.
There seems to be little differences.
Redman wrote:@Wraith King He said it's the census from 2011.
If it's wrong it's easy to change my opinion based on new info.
New info isn't someone saying it wrong.
It would be great if you could post something that we can rely on...
Wraith King wrote:Redman wrote:the single data point that has been submitted shows the article as crap.
There seems to be little differences.
So you're just accepting data Habit7 posted as fact. There's no ownership from any person or institution on the data sheet. Aren't you interested in where it originated before accepting it as fact?
Redman wrote:@Wraith King He said it's the census from 2011.
If it's wrong it's easy to change my opinion based on new info.
New info isn't someone saying it wrong.
It would be great if you could post something that we can rely on...
Redman wrote:You seem to be unable to take your own advice as you have to pugboy.
Calm down...no need to spam the thread
the info is either right or it is wrong.
pugboy wrote:that graph/data is seriously wrong and not really presented to reflect anything
Wraith King wrote:Habit7 wrote:Yes Lewis talking nonsense, but at least in this thread, it has served to excite the anti Afros into spewing their racism here. Lewis doesn't represent the PNM, he is a columnist. If you want to play that game then did columnist Sat Maharaj views represents the UNC?
Kamla lost the 2020 election portraying Afros as victims of land inequity that she who try to correct and ran a bunch of ads portraying Afros as sufferers. And I don't blame her too much because she was trying to tap into the angst repeated by many Afros of them being the victims.
But there are opinions and there are facts, the data I showed, shows the facts. PNM doesn't need anybody to close ranks, Afros are 36% of the population and PNM wins 50% of the vote. They are doing just fine maintaining their base and attracting non-Afros. It is the UNC suffering from not attracting ppl outside of their Indo base.
The thing is Thoedore isn't just a columnist. Wasn't he a lecturer at UTT and responsible for some programme related to SEA? If the graph is a fact give us the source of it so we can verify.
PNM got 49.08% and UNC got 47.09% of the votes casted. So to declare PNM as popular and UNC as unpopular is misleading which based on your past actions is intentional. Again you just keep showing your lack of credibility.
Theodore does represent the red government so does the media and the editor.Habit7 wrote:pugboy wrote:that graph/data is seriously wrong and not really presented to reflect anything
2011 CSO Census Data. You can go on https://cso.gov.tt/census/2011-census-data/ can create your own cross tabulations. I crossed ethnic group against highest qualification ever attained. I can't link directly to it but this is the official pdf
[url]https://redatam.org/bintto/RpWebUtilities.exe/reporte.pdf?LFN=RpBases\Tempo\100972\~tmp_10097201.pdf[/url]Wraith King wrote:Habit7 wrote:Yes Lewis talking nonsense, but at least in this thread, it has served to excite the anti Afros into spewing their racism here. Lewis doesn't represent the PNM, he is a columnist. If you want to play that game then did columnist Sat Maharaj views represents the UNC?
Kamla lost the 2020 election portraying Afros as victims of land inequity that she who try to correct and ran a bunch of ads portraying Afros as sufferers. And I don't blame her too much because she was trying to tap into the angst repeated by many Afros of them being the victims.
But there are opinions and there are facts, the data I showed, shows the facts. PNM doesn't need anybody to close ranks, Afros are 36% of the population and PNM wins 50% of the vote. They are doing just fine maintaining their base and attracting non-Afros. It is the UNC suffering from not attracting ppl outside of their Indo base.
The thing is Thoedore isn't just a columnist. Wasn't he a lecturer at UTT and responsible for some programme related to SEA? If the graph is a fact give us the source of it so we can verify.
PNM got 49.08% and UNC got 47.09% of the votes casted. So to declare PNM as popular and UNC as unpopular is misleading which based on your past actions is intentional. Again you just keep showing your lack of credibility.
You are an expressed racist, that is not me trying to insult you. You have expressed false and diminutive views towards an ethnic group in an attempt to make another look superior. Your attempt to discredit me is laughable. Whatever position you think Theodore has, he doesn't represent the PNM. So for you to say that he or anyone writing a column is PNM pushing racism, it is false. This became political when the UNC MP made it political. If you have an issue with his views in the published column, take it up with the editor.
50% or more accurately 49.05%, in this democracy, means PNM won the popular vote and 22 out of 41 seats. You need to overdose on a bottle of Electionol to come to the realisation that the PNM is popular and is more popular than any other political party in the country. If this was an attempt to show my lack of credibility it failed. You are just a racist trying to feign intelligence, be gone.
Habit7 wrote:pugboy wrote:that graph/data is seriously wrong and not really presented to reflect anything
2011 CSO Census Data. You can go on https://cso.gov.tt/census/2011-census-data/ can create your own cross tabulations. I crossed ethnic group against highest qualification ever attained. I can't link directly to it but this is the official pdf
[url]https://redatam.org/bintto/RpWebUtilities.exe/reporte.pdf?LFN=RpBases\Tempo\100972\~tmp_10097201.pdf[/url]Wraith King wrote:Habit7 wrote:Yes Lewis talking nonsense, but at least in this thread, it has served to excite the anti Afros into spewing their racism here. Lewis doesn't represent the PNM, he is a columnist. If you want to play that game then did columnist Sat Maharaj views represents the UNC?
Kamla lost the 2020 election portraying Afros as victims of land inequity that she who try to correct and ran a bunch of ads portraying Afros as sufferers. And I don't blame her too much because she was trying to tap into the angst repeated by many Afros of them being the victims.
But there are opinions and there are facts, the data I showed, shows the facts. PNM doesn't need anybody to close ranks, Afros are 36% of the population and PNM wins 50% of the vote. They are doing just fine maintaining their base and attracting non-Afros. It is the UNC suffering from not attracting ppl outside of their Indo base.
The thing is Thoedore isn't just a columnist. Wasn't he a lecturer at UTT and responsible for some programme related to SEA? If the graph is a fact give us the source of it so we can verify.
PNM got 49.08% and UNC got 47.09% of the votes casted. So to declare PNM as popular and UNC as unpopular is misleading which based on your past actions is intentional. Again you just keep showing your lack of credibility.
You are an expressed racist, that is not me trying to insult you. You have expressed false and diminutive views towards an ethnic group in an attempt to make another look superior. Your attempt to discredit me is laughable. Whatever position you think Theodore has, he doesn't represent the PNM. So for you to say that he or anyone writing a column is PNM pushing racism, it is false. This became political when the UNC MP made it political. If you have an issue with his views in the published column, take it up with the editor.
50% or more accurately 49.05%, in this democracy, means PNM won the popular vote and 22 out of 41 seats. You need to overdose on a bottle of Electionol to come to the realisation that the PNM is popular and is more popular than any other political party in the country. If this was an attempt to show my lack of credibility it failed. You are just a racist trying to feign intelligence, be gone.
MaxPower wrote:PNM 2025
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 307 guests