Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
RedVEVO wrote:^^
Rent depends on the location ..
Closer to Beetham the less is the rent .
Kickstart wrote:Once the goverment charging you a house tax based on the value of your property then that is what landlords will have to use as their justication for rents. Appears the goverment does not want to build anymore houses and wants to control the private rental sector. Or get people to sell their properties. More of a way to slowly strip away the properties of large homeowners. Pretty soon it may be unlawful to own multple homes .
nervewrecker wrote:MaxPower wrote:People working hard and building up houses for rent to make money.
So they cant charge high rent to like up theyself too?
Only allyuh sufferers want nice house for small money?
Pay it or move up!
Don't get me started on how some does keep the landlord place.
I usually look at some layouts to see what I like for my home. I have seen some very nice properties and I get vex seeing how the tenants have it and it not even my place.
Just today I been to a property. Tenant said ac leaking water.
Hauled my ass over there even though I supposed to avoid such environments in my state only to meet a big block of ice. If its not working, turn it the f**k off, how stupid can you be? I rectified it and shut it down so the person cant turn it on till it thaws. Took the tenant name and number, calling tenant, tenant not answering.
How much you wanna bet said tenant wanna haggle price and say how ac wasnt available for a half day?
And on top that they kick out the drain line and have water leaking all over the yard. Yuh eh have it in yuh head to stick it back in? Like I hadda glue it in place
Explain as I and others may not know. From what I am seeing the goverment is trying to lessen people owning multiple properties.ProtonPowder wrote:Kickstart wrote:Once the goverment charging you a house tax based on the value of your property then that is what landlords will have to use as their justication for rents. Appears the goverment does not want to build anymore houses and wants to control the private rental sector. Or get people to sell their properties. More of a way to slowly strip away the properties of large homeowners. Pretty soon it may be unlawful to own multple homes .
If only you had any idea how they actually calculate property tax
The government in my view seems anti home ownership. High Property prices was a result from drug and money laundering bussiness and not mom and pop working and saving to secure their future. This is just all wrong. If a landlord sets a rent then it's up to protential tennant to accept or look else where.ProtonPowder wrote:One thing i learn over the past few years, is that the best place to rent is a building that is already paid off.
These tend to be older buildings, 20-40 years old, owned by older couples post retirement. You would be floored by how much they charge. 2 bedrooms, usually with hot water and a/c for 2500/month. And these are well kept buildings in good areas.
Talking about San Fernando and environs, wouldnt touch the PoS/Diego rental market with a 10 foot pole.
Kickstart wrote:Explain as I and others may not know. From what I am seeing the goverment is trying to lessen people owning multiple properties.ProtonPowder wrote:Kickstart wrote:Once the goverment charging you a house tax based on the value of your property then that is what landlords will have to use as their justication for rents. Appears the goverment does not want to build anymore houses and wants to control the private rental sector. Or get people to sell their properties. More of a way to slowly strip away the properties of large homeowners. Pretty soon it may be unlawful to own multple homes .
If only you had any idea how they actually calculate property tax
Kickstart wrote:The government in my view seems anti home ownership. High Property prices was a result from drug and money laundering bussiness and not mom and pop working and saving to secure their future. This is just all wrong. If a landlord sets a rent then it's up to protential tennant to accept or look else where.ProtonPowder wrote:One thing i learn over the past few years, is that the best place to rent is a building that is already paid off.
These tend to be older buildings, 20-40 years old, owned by older couples post retirement. You would be floored by how much they charge. 2 bedrooms, usually with hot water and a/c for 2500/month. And these are well kept buildings in good areas.
Talking about San Fernando and environs, wouldnt touch the PoS/Diego rental market with a 10 foot pole.
Ok did not knowProtonPowder wrote:Kickstart wrote:Explain as I and others may not know. From what I am seeing the goverment is trying to lessen people owning multiple properties.ProtonPowder wrote:Kickstart wrote:Once the goverment charging you a house tax based on the value of your property then that is what landlords will have to use as their justication for rents. Appears the goverment does not want to build anymore houses and wants to control the private rental sector. Or get people to sell their properties. More of a way to slowly strip away the properties of large homeowners. Pretty soon it may be unlawful to own multple homes .
If only you had any idea how they actually calculate property tax
I talk my liver string out in the property tax thread
http://www.trinituner.com/v4/forums/vie ... 4&t=685417
My parents and other family members own fully paid rental properties. The idea of a good tenant is a fable. They will often pay late and give all sort of excuses not to pay. They are quick to find fault with the appartments. Those that have good income tend to fall in that group. Tennats can be a problemProtonPowder wrote:Kickstart wrote:The government in my view seems anti home ownership. High Property prices was a result from drug and money laundering bussiness and not mom and pop working and saving to secure their future. This is just all wrong. If a landlord sets a rent then it's up to protential tennant to accept or look else where.ProtonPowder wrote:One thing i learn over the past few years, is that the best place to rent is a building that is already paid off.
These tend to be older buildings, 20-40 years old, owned by older couples post retirement. You would be floored by how much they charge. 2 bedrooms, usually with hot water and a/c for 2500/month. And these are well kept buildings in good areas.
Talking about San Fernando and environs, wouldnt touch the PoS/Diego rental market with a 10 foot pole.
Congrats, you missed the point of my post. Not once did i say anything about haggling down somebody uncle.
Older houses owned by older people are more often paid off, and they charge what they deem to be fair, and covers their expenses and profit. They not charging high prices to recoup an investment on inflated land and labour. These people are the ones who make the best landlords if you play nice with them and pay on time.
Ben_spanna wrote:You all go ahead and shrug this off, next thing you know govt really trying to step in and regulate and tax rentals,,, our freedoms are being jeopardized little by little. What we knew as our rights will soon be under fire..
matr1x wrote:Only sufferers have this problem
88sins wrote:just an exmple of the kinda $$ we talking about
I know a couple that owns a few apt buildings along the east-west corridor
one building has 18 apts & rent is 2400/m each. that building alone nets them $518K/year, and they have 2 other buildings, same design & rental prices. Meaning they pulling in a cool $1.5M/year easy, +/- $200K for R&M costs.
If they were to be charged income tax on that revenue, that'd be roughly $388K/year they have to pay this gov't of useless anal fistulas for doing absolutely NOTHING.
yuh feel dem is money satan in joke
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 237 guests