Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
DMan7 wrote:Let children convince their parents to let them get vaccinated. It could be a birthday present or Christmas gift. What a treat!
hover11 wrote:If the parents against very little the children can doDMan7 wrote:Let children convince their parents to let them get vaccinated. It could be a birthday present or Christmas gift. What a treat!
DMan7 wrote:hover11 wrote:If the parents against very little the children can doDMan7 wrote:Let children convince their parents to let them get vaccinated. It could be a birthday present or Christmas gift. What a treat!
Couldn't a case be made for child abuse by not letting their children take a life saving vaccine in a pandemic? If they looking for loopholes to make vaccines mandatory for employees I'm pretty sure someone gonna come up with the child abuse angle here. Just wait for it.
hover11 wrote:You tethering on a fine line there, the state getting involved in the parents and their roles in families....if this is the case then all vaccines must be made mandatory not just this one and also some families against it for religious and cultural beliefsDMan7 wrote:hover11 wrote:If the parents against very little the children can doDMan7 wrote:Let children convince their parents to let them get vaccinated. It could be a birthday present or Christmas gift. What a treat!
Couldn't a case be made for child abuse by not letting their children take a life saving vaccine in a pandemic? If they looking for loopholes to make vaccines mandatory for employees I'm pretty sure someone gonna come up with the child abuse angle here. Just wait for it.
redmanjp wrote:hover11 wrote:You tethering on a fine line there, the state getting involved in the parents and their roles in families....if this is the case then all vaccines must be made mandatory not just this one and also some families against it for religious and cultural beliefsDMan7 wrote:hover11 wrote:If the parents against very little the children can doDMan7 wrote:Let children convince their parents to let them get vaccinated. It could be a birthday present or Christmas gift. What a treat!
Couldn't a case be made for child abuse by not letting their children take a life saving vaccine in a pandemic? If they looking for loopholes to make vaccines mandatory for employees I'm pretty sure someone gonna come up with the child abuse angle here. Just wait for it.
quite a few of them already are like MMR in order to enter primary school
matr1x wrote:Apparently ppl need to learn to read. Phizer is not approved for children younger than 16
COVID -19 Vaccination Arrangements for Citizens/Residents aged 12-18 Inclusivematr1x wrote:Apparently ppl need to learn to read. Phizer is not approved for children younger than 16
Medical treatment? Yes. A vaccine? Probably not. You would need to prove imminent harm in order to prove child abuse or neglect. If it is the child's natural parent, the bar is even higher.DMan7 wrote:hover11 wrote:If the parents against very little the children can doDMan7 wrote:Let children convince their parents to let them get vaccinated. It could be a birthday present or Christmas gift. What a treat!
Couldn't a case be made for child abuse by not letting their children take a life saving vaccine in a pandemic? If they looking for loopholes to make vaccines mandatory for employees I'm pretty sure someone gonna come up with the child abuse angle here. Just wait for it.
it's the same use that was there for 12 and up all along.hover11 wrote:So then l why are we giving it to 12 year old childrenmatr1x wrote:Apparently ppl need to learn to read. Phizer is not approved for children younger than 16
adnj wrote:Medical treatment? Yes. A vaccine? Probably not. You would need to prove imminent harm in order to prove child abuse or neglect. If it is the child's natural parent, the bar is even higher.DMan7 wrote:hover11 wrote:If the parents against very little the children can doDMan7 wrote:Let children convince their parents to let them get vaccinated. It could be a birthday present or Christmas gift. What a treat!
Couldn't a case be made for child abuse by not letting their children take a life saving vaccine in a pandemic? If they looking for loopholes to make vaccines mandatory for employees I'm pretty sure someone gonna come up with the child abuse angle here. Just wait for it.
DMan7 wrote:adnj wrote:Medical treatment? Yes. A vaccine? Probably not. You would need to prove imminent harm in order to prove child abuse or neglect. If it is the child's natural parent, the bar is even higher.DMan7 wrote:hover11 wrote:If the parents against very little the children can doDMan7 wrote:Let children convince their parents to let them get vaccinated. It could be a birthday present or Christmas gift. What a treat!
Couldn't a case be made for child abuse by not letting their children take a life saving vaccine in a pandemic? If they looking for loopholes to make vaccines mandatory for employees I'm pretty sure someone gonna come up with the child abuse angle here. Just wait for it.
This isn't just taking a vaccine but a vaccine in a pandemic which carries greater weight than taking a vaccine during normal times. Someone important somewhere is already planning to use this child abuse angle I'm sure it's only a matter of time.
hover11 wrote:You would have to prove that the child was in imminent danger from not taking this vaccine, as far as we know, children mortality rate when it comes to covid is very lowDMan7 wrote:adnj wrote:Medical treatment? Yes. A vaccine? Probably not. You would need to prove imminent harm in order to prove child abuse or neglect. If it is the child's natural parent, the bar is even higher.DMan7 wrote:hover11 wrote:If the parents against very little the children can doDMan7 wrote:Let children convince their parents to let them get vaccinated. It could be a birthday present or Christmas gift. What a treat!
Couldn't a case be made for child abuse by not letting their children take a life saving vaccine in a pandemic? If they looking for loopholes to make vaccines mandatory for employees I'm pretty sure someone gonna come up with the child abuse angle here. Just wait for it.
This isn't just taking a vaccine but a vaccine in a pandemic which carries greater weight than taking a vaccine during normal times. Someone important somewhere is already planning to use this child abuse angle I'm sure it's only a matter of time.
hover11 wrote:You would have to prove that the child was in imminent danger from not taking this vaccine, as far as we know, children mortality rate when it comes to covid is very lowDMan7 wrote:adnj wrote:Medical treatment? Yes. A vaccine? Probably not. You would need to prove imminent harm in order to prove child abuse or neglect. If it is the child's natural parent, the bar is even higher.DMan7 wrote:hover11 wrote:If the parents against very little the children can doDMan7 wrote:Let children convince their parents to let them get vaccinated. It could be a birthday present or Christmas gift. What a treat!
Couldn't a case be made for child abuse by not letting their children take a life saving vaccine in a pandemic? If they looking for loopholes to make vaccines mandatory for employees I'm pretty sure someone gonna come up with the child abuse angle here. Just wait for it.
This isn't just taking a vaccine but a vaccine in a pandemic which carries greater weight than taking a vaccine during normal times. Someone important somewhere is already planning to use this child abuse angle I'm sure it's only a matter of time.
That will increase infringe on the international rights of a child to education.Ben_spanna wrote:i figure in about three weeks the government will either announce that school children be mandated to take the vaccine in order to attend school , or children who are unvaccinated will have to PAY a hefty tuition from now on for their condinuted education which will also serve as a partial health insurance for their benefit.
Gladiator wrote:That will increase infringe on the international rights of a child to education.Ben_spanna wrote:i figure in about three weeks the government will either announce that school children be mandated to take the vaccine in order to attend school , or children who are unvaccinated will have to PAY a hefty tuition from now on for their condinuted education which will also serve as a partial health insurance for their benefit.
adnj wrote:L.A. is set to become the first major U.S. school district to require vaccinations for students.
Los Angeles is poised to become the first major school district in the United States to mandate coronavirus vaccines for students 12 and older who are attending class in person.
The district’s elected Board of Education will meet Thursday afternoon to vote on the measure, which is expected to pass with broad support. The Los Angeles Unified School District is the second largest in the nation, serving over 600,000 students, and the mandate could set an important national precedent.
Students would need their first vaccine dose by Nov. 21 and their second by Dec. 19 to begin the next semester fully inoculated. Those who turn 12 after those dates will have 30 days after their birthday to receive their first shot.
Students participating in in-person extracurricular activities will need both shots by the end of October. The resolution mentions “qualified and approved exemptions,” but does not offer details.
The district offers online independent study for those who opt out of in-person learning this year, but so far, only a tiny percentage of students have chosen it.
According to the Los Angeles County Department of Health, 58 percent of the district’s 12-to-18-year-olds have already received at least one vaccine dose.
“Our goal is to keep kids and teachers as safe as possible and in the classroom,” said Nick Melvoin, a Los Angeles school board member, in a written statement expressing support for the resolution. “A medical and scientific consensus has emerged that the best way to protect everyone in our schools and communities is for all those who are eligible to get vaccinated.”
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/09/09 ... ement-kids
De Dragon wrote:adnj wrote:L.A. is set to become the first major U.S. school district to require vaccinations for students.
Los Angeles is poised to become the first major school district in the United States to mandate coronavirus vaccines for students 12 and older who are attending class in person.
The district’s elected Board of Education will meet Thursday afternoon to vote on the measure, which is expected to pass with broad support. The Los Angeles Unified School District is the second largest in the nation, serving over 600,000 students, and the mandate could set an important national precedent.
Students would need their first vaccine dose by Nov. 21 and their second by Dec. 19 to begin the next semester fully inoculated. Those who turn 12 after those dates will have 30 days after their birthday to receive their first shot.
Students participating in in-person extracurricular activities will need both shots by the end of October. The resolution mentions “qualified and approved exemptions,” but does not offer details.
The district offers online independent study for those who opt out of in-person learning this year, but so far, only a tiny percentage of students have chosen it.
According to the Los Angeles County Department of Health, 58 percent of the district’s 12-to-18-year-olds have already received at least one vaccine dose.
“Our goal is to keep kids and teachers as safe as possible and in the classroom,” said Nick Melvoin, a Los Angeles school board member, in a written statement expressing support for the resolution. “A medical and scientific consensus has emerged that the best way to protect everyone in our schools and communities is for all those who are eligible to get vaccinated.”
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/09/09 ... ement-kids
Well done LA.
Ben_spanna wrote:CNN has quite good coverage with regards to masking mandates and schools.. its so sad that a majority of the issues with kids wqearing masks to school is political motivation.
So many kids getting sick because those nasty a55 republicans refusing to send their kids to school with masks.. but people s kids are now suffering because of these retarded idiots.
here we just have idiots who refuse to listen to the science and numbers and believe that they dont need a vaccine.. and that of their kids, they refuse to vaccinate but yet if schools reopen physically and its only available to vaccinated kids they are the most angry.... look around the world and vaccinate your fr1gg1ng kids or keep them home and STFU!
Ben_spanna wrote:I know in the US this entire VAccinated/Unvaxxed is almost entirely Politically motivated , but what is the real problem here? educated vs ignorant ??? , Science vs Creation? or are people that small minded that false videos and scandals have convinced them that the virus is a hoax?
redmanjp wrote:i wonder if the spread of delta would affect that reopening