Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Habit7 wrote:Kickstart wrote:Do tell us how Mr Panday came out of Jail or how he was freed?
Whats the latest with Marlene case?
How about you read and understand what you are posting about, then post.
Habit7 wrote:Ppl went to COP because Panday was made out as a crook with the Airport scandal.
Habit7 wrote:Habit7 wrote:Ppl went to COP because Panday was made out as a crook with the Airport scandal.
The Airport accusations came out in 1999, Ramesh and friends left UNC in 2001 causing the election, he was sentenced in 2006 and COP contested the 2007 election while contesting his criminal court case.
What nonsense are you asking about Panday being freed when it was after all of that? Panday was seen as a crook.
Stop trying to play intelligent. You talking nonsense and when I correct you, you are saying I am backpedalling. Either you don't understand what backpedalling means or you are play too stupid to understand that you are wrong.
He avoiding answering as to why Mr Panday was freed.De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Habit7 wrote:Ppl went to COP because Panday was made out as a crook with the Airport scandal.
The Airport accusations came out in 1999, Ramesh and friends left UNC in 2001 causing the election, he was sentenced in 2006 and COP contested the 2007 election while contesting his criminal court case.
What nonsense are you asking about Panday being freed when it was after all of that? Panday was seen as a crook.
Stop trying to play intelligent. You talking nonsense and when I correct you, you are saying I am backpedalling. Either you don't understand what backpedalling means or you are play too stupid to understand that you are wrong.
So he wasn't freed?
If as you say Mr Panday was a crook then what does that make theHabit7 wrote:Habit7 wrote:Ppl went to COP because Panday was made out as a crook with the Airport scandal.
The Airport accusations came out in 1999, Ramesh and friends left UNC in 2001 causing the election, he was sentenced in 2006 and COP contested the 2007 election while contesting his criminal court case.
What nonsense are you asking about Panday being freed when it was after all of that? Panday was seen as a crook.
Stop trying to play intelligent. You talking nonsense and when I correct you, you are saying I am backpedalling. Either you don't understand what backpedalling means or you are play too stupid to understand that you are wrong.
Kickstart wrote:He avoiding answering as to why Mr Panday was freed.De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Habit7 wrote:Ppl went to COP because Panday was made out as a crook with the Airport scandal.
The Airport accusations came out in 1999, Ramesh and friends left UNC in 2001 causing the election, he was sentenced in 2006 and COP contested the 2007 election while contesting his criminal court case.
What nonsense are you asking about Panday being freed when it was after all of that? Panday was seen as a crook.
Stop trying to play intelligent. You talking nonsense and when I correct you, you are saying I am backpedalling. Either you don't understand what backpedalling means or you are play too stupid to understand that you are wrong.
So he wasn't freed?
Kickstart wrote:He avoiding answering as to why Mr Panday was freed.De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Habit7 wrote:Ppl went to COP because Panday was made out as a crook with the Airport scandal.
The Airport accusations came out in 1999, Ramesh and friends left UNC in 2001 causing the election, he was sentenced in 2006 and COP contested the 2007 election while contesting his criminal court case.
What nonsense are you asking about Panday being freed when it was after all of that? Panday was seen as a crook.
Stop trying to play intelligent. You talking nonsense and when I correct you, you are saying I am backpedalling. Either you don't understand what backpedalling means or you are play too stupid to understand that you are wrong.
So he wasn't freed?
Just as you showed that Mr Rowley and other PNM MPs was cleared of wrong doing why can't you also you show how Mr Panday was cleared. How hard is that?Habit7 wrote:Rowley was cleared of Landate http://triniblag.blogspot.com/2008/02/r ... eared.html
and Cleaver Heights http://jyoticommunication.blogspot.com/ ... using.html
Franklin Khan was cleared and the judge recommended charges for Kamla and Anand for trying to frame him https://www.stabroeknews.com/2010/09/27 ... gainst-ag/
idk what is the issue with Shamfa
Al Rawi cleared https://www.tv6tnt.com/news/7pmnews/int ... 3566a.html
Darryl was fired, he is not in govt
Marlene is a crook, no contest there, she is not in govt
Email gate is inconclusive https://www.looptt.com/content/emailgat ... -says-ttps
I don't know how all of that is relevant to or denies the fact that Panday was see as a crook. But I wait to see where next you will shift the goalpost.
De Dragon wrote:Dummy7 also doesn't realize that the same reason Panday was freed, was the same reason his God JUHN Scarfy avoided penalty in the Landate affair.
Kickstart wrote:Just as you showed that Mr Rowley and other PNM MPs was cleared of wrong doing why can't you also you show how Mr Panday was cleared. How hard is that?
Habit7 wrote:Rowley was cleared of Landate http://triniblag.blogspot.com/2008/02/r ... eared.html
and Cleaver Heights http://jyoticommunication.blogspot.com/ ... using.html
Franklin Khan was cleared and the judge recommended charges for Kamla and Anand for trying to frame him https://www.stabroeknews.com/2010/09/27 ... gainst-ag/
idk what is the issue with Shamfa
Al Rawi cleared https://www.tv6tnt.com/news/7pmnews/int ... 3566a.html
Darryl was fired, he is not in govt
Marlene is a crook, no contest there, she is not in govt
Email gate is inconclusive https://www.looptt.com/content/emailgat ... -says-ttps
I don't know how all of that is relevant to or denies the fact that Panday was see as a crook. But I wait to see where next you will shift the goalpost.
I am afraid that posted Habit 7 is very one-sided and appears to me as a coward and goes off on different topicstimelapse wrote:You clearly have blinders on.If Mr.Panday was cleared, but in your words, seen as a crook, what makes PNM members that were also cleared by the courts so special that they are not seen by you as crooks?
Care to explain?Habit7 wrote:Rowley was cleared of Landate http://triniblag.blogspot.com/2008/02/r ... eared.html
and Cleaver Heights http://jyoticommunication.blogspot.com/ ... using.html
Franklin Khan was cleared and the judge recommended charges for Kamla and Anand for trying to frame him https://www.stabroeknews.com/2010/09/27 ... gainst-ag/
idk what is the issue with Shamfa
Al Rawi cleared https://www.tv6tnt.com/news/7pmnews/int ... 3566a.html
Darryl was fired, he is not in govt
Marlene is a crook, no contest there, she is not in govt
Email gate is inconclusive https://www.looptt.com/content/emailgat ... -says-ttps
I don't know how all of that is relevant to or denies the fact that Panday was see as a crook. But I wait to see where next you will shift the goalpost.
You showed why Mr Rowley was cleared why can't you show why Mr Panday was cleared/freed.Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Dummy7 also doesn't realize that the same reason Panday was freed, was the same reason his God JUHN Scarfy avoided penalty in the Landate affair.
And just like your clueless friend, that point is irrelevant to the fact that COP saw Panday as a crook. I don't know why me referencing what came after, takes away from that fact.Kickstart wrote:Just as you showed that Mr Rowley and other PNM MPs was cleared of wrong doing why can't you also you show how Mr Panday was cleared. How hard is that?
Because it is irrelevant to how COP saw him in 2007.
How many times do I have to say it?
timelapse wrote:You clearly have blinders on.If Mr.Panday was cleared, but in your words, seen as a crook, what makes PNM members that were also cleared by the courts so special that they are not seen by you as crooks?
Care to explain?
Kickstart wrote:I am afraid that posted Habit 7 is very one-sided and appears to me as a coward and goes off on different topicstimelapse wrote:You clearly have blinders on.If Mr.Panday was cleared, but in your words, seen as a crook, what makes PNM members that were also cleared by the courts so special that they are not seen by you as crooks?
Care to explain?Habit7 wrote:Rowley was cleared of Landate http://triniblag.blogspot.com/2008/02/r ... eared.html
and Cleaver Heights http://jyoticommunication.blogspot.com/ ... using.html
Franklin Khan was cleared and the judge recommended charges for Kamla and Anand for trying to frame him https://www.stabroeknews.com/2010/09/27 ... gainst-ag/
idk what is the issue with Shamfa
Al Rawi cleared https://www.tv6tnt.com/news/7pmnews/int ... 3566a.html
Darryl was fired, he is not in govt
Marlene is a crook, no contest there, she is not in govt
Email gate is inconclusive https://www.looptt.com/content/emailgat ... -says-ttps
I don't know how all of that is relevant to or denies the fact that Panday was see as a crook. But I wait to see where next you will shift the goalpost.
Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Dummy7 also doesn't realize that the same reason Panday was freed, was the same reason his God JUHN Scarfy avoided penalty in the Landate affair.
And just like your clueless friend, that point is irrelevant to the fact that COP saw Panday as a crook. I don't know why me referencing what came after, takes away from that fact.Kickstart wrote:Just as you showed that Mr Rowley and other PNM MPs was cleared of wrong doing why can't you also you show how Mr Panday was cleared. How hard is that?
Because it is irrelevant to how COP saw him in 2007.
How many times do I have to say it?
De Dragon wrote:Did the COP put this out as an official party position? Or like all of your "facts" originated in your rectum?
COP candidate for Tabaquite, Anand Ramlogan, gave listeners five reasons not to vote UNC A. He said the UNC A was fighting only to win Opposition (not Government), had fault-lines in its leadership council which included the vaulting ambition of his rival Ramesh Maharaj, had UNC leader Basdeo Panday under a cloud of corruption including court cases which if successful would constitutionally disqualify him from serving in Parliament, involved Mrs Panday who said she had received $1.2 million without telling her husband, and had leaders who did not hold the people’s trust. “Who in their right minds would trust Ramesh, Jack and Panday with $200 billion?” asked Ramlogan.
https://archives.newsday.co.tt/2007/11/ ... e-hurdles/
You still have not answered the question as to why Mr Panday was freed.Habit7 wrote:timelapse wrote:You clearly have blinders on.If Mr.Panday was cleared, but in your words, seen as a crook, what makes PNM members that were also cleared by the courts so special that they are not seen by you as crooks?
Care to explain?
The context was the COP's view of Panday in 2007.
But Panday's allegations is not the same as those highlighted. Panday had coconspirators locally and internationally. The international ones were tried, sentenced, served time, apologised to T&T and Al Rawi even recently got back some of the money they stole through civil action. The local ppl are using their money and political connections to stymie the trial (Section 34) and avoid extradition.
If I checked the amount of money that went into my wife's account over the years I am sure she received 2.5 Million from her job and investmests. I am sure she won't tell me cause whats hers is hers and wants mine is also hers.Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Did the COP put this out as an official party position? Or like all of your "facts" originated in your rectum?COP candidate for Tabaquite, Anand Ramlogan, gave listeners five reasons not to vote UNC A. He said the UNC A was fighting only to win Opposition (not Government), had fault-lines in its leadership council which included the vaulting ambition of his rival Ramesh Maharaj, had UNC leader Basdeo Panday under a cloud of corruption including court cases which if successful would constitutionally disqualify him from serving in Parliament, involved Mrs Panday who said she had received $1.2 million without telling her husband, and had leaders who did not hold the people’s trust. “Who in their right minds would trust Ramesh, Jack and Panday with $200 billion?” asked Ramlogan.
https://archives.newsday.co.tt/2007/11/ ... e-hurdles/
I wonder where you and ZR second account going to move the goalpost to next.
Kickstart wrote:If I checked the amount of money that went into my wife's account over the years I am sure she received 2.5 Million from her job and investmests. I am sure she won't tell me cause whats hers is hers and wants mine is also hers.Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Did the COP put this out as an official party position? Or like all of your "facts" originated in your rectum?COP candidate for Tabaquite, Anand Ramlogan, gave listeners five reasons not to vote UNC A. He said the UNC A was fighting only to win Opposition (not Government), had fault-lines in its leadership council which included the vaulting ambition of his rival Ramesh Maharaj, had UNC leader Basdeo Panday under a cloud of corruption including court cases which if successful would constitutionally disqualify him from serving in Parliament, involved Mrs Panday who said she had received $1.2 million without telling her husband, and had leaders who did not hold the people’s trust. “Who in their right minds would trust Ramesh, Jack and Panday with $200 billion?” asked Ramlogan.
https://archives.newsday.co.tt/2007/11/ ... e-hurdles/
I wonder where you and ZR second account going to move the goalpost to next.
Miss Panday got 1.2 million over the years aswell. The newspaper only reported the total amount of money that went into the account for a number of years. It was never one lump sum as stated in the press. You are trying very hard to twist things around.
In Indian hindu culture it is the woman that controls the finances. The husband brings homes his earnings and gives to the wife who pays the bills and sees about the household. They also invest the money. The older Indian women from years gone by used to buy gold as investment to keep the value of they money. They would often pawn gold when things was hard. This practice is still done in some older families and in India who are the largest gold buyers in the world. I don't expect this modern society to understand old Indian ways of life far much for the media and the courts.
Habit7 wrote:Kickstart wrote:If I checked the amount of money that went into my wife's account over the years I am sure she received 2.5 Million from her job and investmests. I am sure she won't tell me cause whats hers is hers and wants mine is also hers.Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Did the COP put this out as an official party position? Or like all of your "facts" originated in your rectum?COP candidate for Tabaquite, Anand Ramlogan, gave listeners five reasons not to vote UNC A. He said the UNC A was fighting only to win Opposition (not Government), had fault-lines in its leadership council which included the vaulting ambition of his rival Ramesh Maharaj, had UNC leader Basdeo Panday under a cloud of corruption including court cases which if successful would constitutionally disqualify him from serving in Parliament, involved Mrs Panday who said she had received $1.2 million without telling her husband, and had leaders who did not hold the people’s trust. “Who in their right minds would trust Ramesh, Jack and Panday with $200 billion?” asked Ramlogan.
https://archives.newsday.co.tt/2007/11/ ... e-hurdles/
I wonder where you and ZR second account going to move the goalpost to next.
Miss Panday got 1.2 million over the years aswell. The newspaper only reported the total amount of money that went into the account for a number of years. It was never one lump sum as stated in the press. You are trying very hard to twist things around.
In Indian hindu culture it is the woman that controls the finances. The husband brings homes his earnings and gives to the wife who pays the bills and sees about the household. They also invest the money. The older Indian women from years gone by used to buy gold as investment to keep the value of they money. They would often pawn gold when things was hard. This practice is still done in some older families and in India who are the largest gold buyers in the world. I don't expect this modern society to understand old Indian ways of life far much for the media and the courts.
Neither the newspapers or I am saying anything.
Those are the words of SC Anand Ramlogan.
Don't you check the facts before posting someone elses rambles?Habit7 wrote:Kickstart wrote:If I checked the amount of money that went into my wife's account over the years I am sure she received 2.5 Million from her job and investmests. I am sure she won't tell me cause whats hers is hers and wants mine is also hers.Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Did the COP put this out as an official party position? Or like all of your "facts" originated in your rectum?COP candidate for Tabaquite, Anand Ramlogan, gave listeners five reasons not to vote UNC A. He said the UNC A was fighting only to win Opposition (not Government), had fault-lines in its leadership council which included the vaulting ambition of his rival Ramesh Maharaj, had UNC leader Basdeo Panday under a cloud of corruption including court cases which if successful would constitutionally disqualify him from serving in Parliament, involved Mrs Panday who said she had received $1.2 million without telling her husband, and had leaders who did not hold the people’s trust. “Who in their right minds would trust Ramesh, Jack and Panday with $200 billion?” asked Ramlogan.
https://archives.newsday.co.tt/2007/11/ ... e-hurdles/
I wonder where you and ZR second account going to move the goalpost to next.
Miss Panday got 1.2 million over the years aswell. The newspaper only reported the total amount of money that went into the account for a number of years. It was never one lump sum as stated in the press. You are trying very hard to twist things around.
In Indian hindu culture it is the woman that controls the finances. The husband brings homes his earnings and gives to the wife who pays the bills and sees about the household. They also invest the money. The older Indian women from years gone by used to buy gold as investment to keep the value of they money. They would often pawn gold when things was hard. This practice is still done in some older families and in India who are the largest gold buyers in the world. I don't expect this modern society to understand old Indian ways of life far much for the media and the courts.
Neither the newspapers or I am saying anything.
Those are the words of SC Anand Ramlogan.
SuperiorMan wrote:My outside woman is PNM and the sex so good.
Fitizy wasn't responsible for this you wishful PNM supporter.Blaze d Chalice wrote:So not even a week pass since Fitzy get put in the new position and already a drug bust and gun bust.
Fitzy wukking boi.
You know I didn't like Fitzy so much especially, when he got wetting in Beetham but I have to say the man really performing.
He also said on the Covit - Don't blame the Venez, blame the disobedient Trinis. And he is 100% right.
And one for Zoom, Fitzy dem continue to grant work permit and entry for them India Expo thing.
You should be happy.SuperiorMan wrote:My outside woman is PNM and the sex so good.
This is also true.
MADNESS IN THIS PLACE!!!!!
HINDS can you explain to the public during the deadly Covid pandemic lockdown presently..why is it that only Indian nationals are allowed to come into the country and reopen these bogus flea markets like by Medford Gas Station in Chaguanas which reopened yesterday during the announcement of a lockdown???
Do they have special rights? Or even work permits? The same applies to the VENES! Is it a FREE FOR ALL EXCEPT IF YOU'RE A TRINI??? Citizens crying to come home and locked out but we open to these two particular groups? WHAT REALLY GOING ON?????
Blaze d Chalice wrote:So not even a week pass since Fitzy get put in the new position and already a drug bust and gun bust.
Fitzy wukking boi.
You know I didn't like Fitzy so much especially, when he got wetting in Beetham but I have to say the man really performing.
He also said on the Covit - Don't blame the Venez, blame the disobedient Trinis. And he is 100% right.
And one for Zoom, Fitzy dem continue to grant work permit and entry for them India Expo thing.
You should be happy.SuperiorMan wrote:My outside woman is PNM and the sex so good.
This is also true.
Habit7 wrote:timelapse wrote:You clearly have blinders on.If Mr.Panday was cleared, but in your words, seen as a crook, what makes PNM members that were also cleared by the courts so special that they are not seen by you as crooks?
Care to explain?
The context was the COP's view of Panday in 2007.
But Panday's allegations is not the same as those highlighted. Panday had coconspirators locally and internationally. The international ones were tried, sentenced, served time, apologised to T&T and Al Rawi even recently got back some of the money they stole through civil action. The local ppl are using their money and political connections to stymie the trial (Section 34) and avoid extradition.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 212 guests