TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

Re: PNM in Gov't

this is how we do it.......

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

Kickstart
Riding on 16's
Posts: 1152
Joined: September 25th, 2019, 2:13 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Kickstart » April 23rd, 2021, 1:10 pm

Habit7 wrote:
Kickstart wrote:Do tell us how Mr Panday came out of Jail or how he was freed?

Whats the latest with Marlene case?

How about you read and understand what you are posting about, then post.


No Sir, You explain why Mr Panday is not in Jail , if the courts freed Mr Panday then surely they must have a reason to do so. Are you back peddling once again ?

I have been reading you post for some time now and you always engage in shifting and not answering the questions when you are confronted . You change things around and you refuse you answer certain questions from other posters .

User avatar
Habit7
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 11548
Joined: April 20th, 2009, 10:20 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Habit7 » April 23rd, 2021, 1:39 pm

Habit7 wrote:Ppl went to COP because Panday was made out as a crook with the Airport scandal.

The Airport accusations came out in 1999, Ramesh and friends left UNC in 2001 causing the election, he was sentenced in 2006 and COP contested the 2007 election while contesting his criminal court case.

What nonsense are you asking about Panday being freed when it was after all of that? Panday was seen as a crook.

Stop trying to play intelligent. You talking nonsense and when I correct you, you are saying I am backpedalling. Either you don't understand what backpedalling means or you are play too stupid to understand that you are wrong.

User avatar
De Dragon
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17902
Joined: January 27th, 2004, 3:49 am
Location: Enjoying my little miracles............

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby De Dragon » April 23rd, 2021, 1:46 pm

Habit7 wrote:
Habit7 wrote:Ppl went to COP because Panday was made out as a crook with the Airport scandal.

The Airport accusations came out in 1999, Ramesh and friends left UNC in 2001 causing the election, he was sentenced in 2006 and COP contested the 2007 election while contesting his criminal court case.

What nonsense are you asking about Panday being freed when it was after all of that? Panday was seen as a crook.

Stop trying to play intelligent. You talking nonsense and when I correct you, you are saying I am backpedalling. Either you don't understand what backpedalling means or you are play too stupid to understand that you are wrong.

So he wasn't freed? :roll:

Kickstart
Riding on 16's
Posts: 1152
Joined: September 25th, 2019, 2:13 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Kickstart » April 23rd, 2021, 1:51 pm

De Dragon wrote:
Habit7 wrote:
Habit7 wrote:Ppl went to COP because Panday was made out as a crook with the Airport scandal.

The Airport accusations came out in 1999, Ramesh and friends left UNC in 2001 causing the election, he was sentenced in 2006 and COP contested the 2007 election while contesting his criminal court case.

What nonsense are you asking about Panday being freed when it was after all of that? Panday was seen as a crook.

Stop trying to play intelligent. You talking nonsense and when I correct you, you are saying I am backpedalling. Either you don't understand what backpedalling means or you are play too stupid to understand that you are wrong.

So he wasn't freed? :roll:
He avoiding answering as to why Mr Panday was freed.

Kickstart
Riding on 16's
Posts: 1152
Joined: September 25th, 2019, 2:13 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Kickstart » April 23rd, 2021, 1:55 pm

Habit7 wrote:
Habit7 wrote:Ppl went to COP because Panday was made out as a crook with the Airport scandal.

The Airport accusations came out in 1999, Ramesh and friends left UNC in 2001 causing the election, he was sentenced in 2006 and COP contested the 2007 election while contesting his criminal court case.

What nonsense are you asking about Panday being freed when it was after all of that? Panday was seen as a crook.

Stop trying to play intelligent. You talking nonsense and when I correct you, you are saying I am backpedalling. Either you don't understand what backpedalling means or you are play too stupid to understand that you are wrong.
If as you say Mr Panday was a crook then what does that make the

Landate Scandal
Cleaver heights
Mr Khan
Shamfa
Camile
AG rent scam
Darrel behaviour
Marleine Court case.
Email gate

In you eyes one crime is better 9 crimes from the PNM

You Sir are ridiculous

User avatar
De Dragon
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17902
Joined: January 27th, 2004, 3:49 am
Location: Enjoying my little miracles............

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby De Dragon » April 23rd, 2021, 2:05 pm

Kickstart wrote:
De Dragon wrote:
Habit7 wrote:
Habit7 wrote:Ppl went to COP because Panday was made out as a crook with the Airport scandal.

The Airport accusations came out in 1999, Ramesh and friends left UNC in 2001 causing the election, he was sentenced in 2006 and COP contested the 2007 election while contesting his criminal court case.

What nonsense are you asking about Panday being freed when it was after all of that? Panday was seen as a crook.

Stop trying to play intelligent. You talking nonsense and when I correct you, you are saying I am backpedalling. Either you don't understand what backpedalling means or you are play too stupid to understand that you are wrong.

So he wasn't freed? :roll:
He avoiding answering as to why Mr Panday was freed.

In case you've not picked up on it, that's his MO when challenged. Go silent (not a bad thing) then come back with some irrelevant nonsense.

User avatar
De Dragon
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17902
Joined: January 27th, 2004, 3:49 am
Location: Enjoying my little miracles............

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby De Dragon » April 23rd, 2021, 2:05 pm

Kickstart wrote:
De Dragon wrote:
Habit7 wrote:
Habit7 wrote:Ppl went to COP because Panday was made out as a crook with the Airport scandal.

The Airport accusations came out in 1999, Ramesh and friends left UNC in 2001 causing the election, he was sentenced in 2006 and COP contested the 2007 election while contesting his criminal court case.

What nonsense are you asking about Panday being freed when it was after all of that? Panday was seen as a crook.

Stop trying to play intelligent. You talking nonsense and when I correct you, you are saying I am backpedalling. Either you don't understand what backpedalling means or you are play too stupid to understand that you are wrong.

So he wasn't freed? :roll:
He avoiding answering as to why Mr Panday was freed.

In case you've not picked up on it, that's his MO when challenged. Go silent (not a bad thing) then come back with some irrelevant nonsense.

User avatar
Habit7
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 11548
Joined: April 20th, 2009, 10:20 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Habit7 » April 23rd, 2021, 2:14 pm

Rowley was cleared of Landate http://triniblag.blogspot.com/2008/02/r ... eared.html
and Cleaver Heights http://jyoticommunication.blogspot.com/ ... using.html
Franklin Khan was cleared and the judge recommended charges for Kamla and Anand for trying to frame him https://www.stabroeknews.com/2010/09/27 ... gainst-ag/
idk what is the issue with Shamfa
Al Rawi cleared https://www.tv6tnt.com/news/7pmnews/int ... 3566a.html
Darryl was fired, he is not in govt
Marlene is a crook, no contest there, she is not in govt
Email gate is inconclusive https://www.looptt.com/content/emailgat ... -says-ttps

I don't know how all of that is relevant to or denies the fact that Panday was see as a crook. But I wait to see where next you will shift the goalpost.

User avatar
De Dragon
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17902
Joined: January 27th, 2004, 3:49 am
Location: Enjoying my little miracles............

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby De Dragon » April 23rd, 2021, 2:19 pm

Dummy7 also doesn't realize that the same reason Panday was freed, was the same reason his God JUHN Scarfy avoided penalty in the Landate affair.

Kickstart
Riding on 16's
Posts: 1152
Joined: September 25th, 2019, 2:13 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Kickstart » April 23rd, 2021, 2:27 pm

Habit7 wrote:Rowley was cleared of Landate http://triniblag.blogspot.com/2008/02/r ... eared.html
and Cleaver Heights http://jyoticommunication.blogspot.com/ ... using.html
Franklin Khan was cleared and the judge recommended charges for Kamla and Anand for trying to frame him https://www.stabroeknews.com/2010/09/27 ... gainst-ag/
idk what is the issue with Shamfa
Al Rawi cleared https://www.tv6tnt.com/news/7pmnews/int ... 3566a.html
Darryl was fired, he is not in govt
Marlene is a crook, no contest there, she is not in govt
Email gate is inconclusive https://www.looptt.com/content/emailgat ... -says-ttps

I don't know how all of that is relevant to or denies the fact that Panday was see as a crook. But I wait to see where next you will shift the goalpost.
Just as you showed that Mr Rowley and other PNM MPs was cleared of wrong doing why can't you also you show how Mr Panday was cleared. How hard is that?

Looks to me that you are very once sided and hoping to paint a different picture and labeling Mr Panday a criminal.
Last edited by Kickstart on April 23rd, 2021, 2:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Habit7
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 11548
Joined: April 20th, 2009, 10:20 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Habit7 » April 23rd, 2021, 2:29 pm

De Dragon wrote:Dummy7 also doesn't realize that the same reason Panday was freed, was the same reason his God JUHN Scarfy avoided penalty in the Landate affair.

And just like your clueless friend, that point is irrelevant to the fact that COP saw Panday as a crook. I don't know why me referencing what came after, takes away from that fact.
Kickstart wrote:Just as you showed that Mr Rowley and other PNM MPs was cleared of wrong doing why can't you also you show how Mr Panday was cleared. How hard is that?

Because it is irrelevant to how COP saw him in 2007.

How many times do I have to say it?
Last edited by Habit7 on April 23rd, 2021, 2:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
timelapse
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 8113
Joined: June 20th, 2012, 7:13 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby timelapse » April 23rd, 2021, 2:29 pm

You clearly have blinders on.If Mr.Panday was cleared, but in your words, seen as a crook, what makes PNM members that were also cleared by the courts so special that they are not seen by you as crooks?
Care to explain?
Habit7 wrote:Rowley was cleared of Landate http://triniblag.blogspot.com/2008/02/r ... eared.html
and Cleaver Heights http://jyoticommunication.blogspot.com/ ... using.html
Franklin Khan was cleared and the judge recommended charges for Kamla and Anand for trying to frame him https://www.stabroeknews.com/2010/09/27 ... gainst-ag/
idk what is the issue with Shamfa
Al Rawi cleared https://www.tv6tnt.com/news/7pmnews/int ... 3566a.html
Darryl was fired, he is not in govt
Marlene is a crook, no contest there, she is not in govt
Email gate is inconclusive https://www.looptt.com/content/emailgat ... -says-ttps

I don't know how all of that is relevant to or denies the fact that Panday was see as a crook. But I wait to see where next you will shift the goalpost.

Kickstart
Riding on 16's
Posts: 1152
Joined: September 25th, 2019, 2:13 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Kickstart » April 23rd, 2021, 2:35 pm

timelapse wrote:You clearly have blinders on.If Mr.Panday was cleared, but in your words, seen as a crook, what makes PNM members that were also cleared by the courts so special that they are not seen by you as crooks?
Care to explain?
Habit7 wrote:Rowley was cleared of Landate http://triniblag.blogspot.com/2008/02/r ... eared.html
and Cleaver Heights http://jyoticommunication.blogspot.com/ ... using.html
Franklin Khan was cleared and the judge recommended charges for Kamla and Anand for trying to frame him https://www.stabroeknews.com/2010/09/27 ... gainst-ag/
idk what is the issue with Shamfa
Al Rawi cleared https://www.tv6tnt.com/news/7pmnews/int ... 3566a.html
Darryl was fired, he is not in govt
Marlene is a crook, no contest there, she is not in govt
Email gate is inconclusive https://www.looptt.com/content/emailgat ... -says-ttps

I don't know how all of that is relevant to or denies the fact that Panday was see as a crook. But I wait to see where next you will shift the goalpost.
I am afraid that posted Habit 7 is very one-sided and appears to me as a coward and goes off on different topics

Kickstart
Riding on 16's
Posts: 1152
Joined: September 25th, 2019, 2:13 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Kickstart » April 23rd, 2021, 2:38 pm

Habit7 wrote:
De Dragon wrote:Dummy7 also doesn't realize that the same reason Panday was freed, was the same reason his God JUHN Scarfy avoided penalty in the Landate affair.

And just like your clueless friend, that point is irrelevant to the fact that COP saw Panday as a crook. I don't know why me referencing what came after, takes away from that fact.
Kickstart wrote:Just as you showed that Mr Rowley and other PNM MPs was cleared of wrong doing why can't you also you show how Mr Panday was cleared. How hard is that?

Because it is irrelevant to how COP saw him in 2007.

How many times do I have to say it?
You showed why Mr Rowley was cleared why can't you show why Mr Panday was cleared/freed.

All this vigor for Mr Rowley but Mr Panday to you is Criminal that is in his home doing gardening rather than in jail.

Keep evading the questions poster Habit 7

User avatar
Habit7
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 11548
Joined: April 20th, 2009, 10:20 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Habit7 » April 23rd, 2021, 2:39 pm

timelapse wrote:You clearly have blinders on.If Mr.Panday was cleared, but in your words, seen as a crook, what makes PNM members that were also cleared by the courts so special that they are not seen by you as crooks?
Care to explain?

The context was the COP's view of Panday in 2007.

But Panday's allegations is not the same as those highlighted. Panday had coconspirators locally and internationally. The international ones were tried, sentenced, served time, apologised to T&T and Al Rawi even recently got back some of the money they stole through civil action. The local ppl are using their money and political connections to stymie the trial (Section 34) and avoid extradition.

User avatar
Habit7
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 11548
Joined: April 20th, 2009, 10:20 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Habit7 » April 23rd, 2021, 2:41 pm

Kickstart wrote:
timelapse wrote:You clearly have blinders on.If Mr.Panday was cleared, but in your words, seen as a crook, what makes PNM members that were also cleared by the courts so special that they are not seen by you as crooks?
Care to explain?
Habit7 wrote:Rowley was cleared of Landate http://triniblag.blogspot.com/2008/02/r ... eared.html
and Cleaver Heights http://jyoticommunication.blogspot.com/ ... using.html
Franklin Khan was cleared and the judge recommended charges for Kamla and Anand for trying to frame him https://www.stabroeknews.com/2010/09/27 ... gainst-ag/
idk what is the issue with Shamfa
Al Rawi cleared https://www.tv6tnt.com/news/7pmnews/int ... 3566a.html
Darryl was fired, he is not in govt
Marlene is a crook, no contest there, she is not in govt
Email gate is inconclusive https://www.looptt.com/content/emailgat ... -says-ttps

I don't know how all of that is relevant to or denies the fact that Panday was see as a crook. But I wait to see where next you will shift the goalpost.
I am afraid that posted Habit 7 is very one-sided and appears to me as a coward and goes off on different topics

Ok dude who gave me an irrelevant list that I easily refuted in 2mins

User avatar
De Dragon
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17902
Joined: January 27th, 2004, 3:49 am
Location: Enjoying my little miracles............

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby De Dragon » April 23rd, 2021, 2:53 pm

Habit7 wrote:
De Dragon wrote:Dummy7 also doesn't realize that the same reason Panday was freed, was the same reason his God JUHN Scarfy avoided penalty in the Landate affair.

And just like your clueless friend, that point is irrelevant to the fact that COP saw Panday as a crook. I don't know why me referencing what came after, takes away from that fact.
Kickstart wrote:Just as you showed that Mr Rowley and other PNM MPs was cleared of wrong doing why can't you also you show how Mr Panday was cleared. How hard is that?

Because it is irrelevant to how COP saw him in 2007.

How many times do I have to say it?

Did the COP put this out as an official party position? Or like all of your "facts" originated in your rectum?

User avatar
Habit7
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 11548
Joined: April 20th, 2009, 10:20 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Habit7 » April 23rd, 2021, 3:24 pm

De Dragon wrote:Did the COP put this out as an official party position? Or like all of your "facts" originated in your rectum?

COP candidate for Tabaquite, Anand Ramlogan, gave listeners five reasons not to vote UNC A. He said the UNC A was fighting only to win Opposition (not Government), had fault-lines in its leadership council which included the vaulting ambition of his rival Ramesh Maharaj, had UNC leader Basdeo Panday under a cloud of corruption including court cases which if successful would constitutionally disqualify him from serving in Parliament, involved Mrs Panday who said she had received $1.2 million without telling her husband, and had leaders who did not hold the people’s trust. “Who in their right minds would trust Ramesh, Jack and Panday with $200 billion?” asked Ramlogan.

https://archives.newsday.co.tt/2007/11/ ... e-hurdles/

I wonder where you and ZR second account going to move the goalpost to next.

Kickstart
Riding on 16's
Posts: 1152
Joined: September 25th, 2019, 2:13 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Kickstart » April 23rd, 2021, 3:46 pm

Habit7 wrote:
timelapse wrote:You clearly have blinders on.If Mr.Panday was cleared, but in your words, seen as a crook, what makes PNM members that were also cleared by the courts so special that they are not seen by you as crooks?
Care to explain?

The context was the COP's view of Panday in 2007.

But Panday's allegations is not the same as those highlighted. Panday had coconspirators locally and internationally. The international ones were tried, sentenced, served time, apologised to T&T and Al Rawi even recently got back some of the money they stole through civil action. The local ppl are using their money and political connections to stymie the trial (Section 34) and avoid extradition.
You still have not answered the question as to why Mr Panday was freed.

Kickstart
Riding on 16's
Posts: 1152
Joined: September 25th, 2019, 2:13 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Kickstart » April 23rd, 2021, 4:03 pm

Habit7 wrote:
De Dragon wrote:Did the COP put this out as an official party position? Or like all of your "facts" originated in your rectum?

COP candidate for Tabaquite, Anand Ramlogan, gave listeners five reasons not to vote UNC A. He said the UNC A was fighting only to win Opposition (not Government), had fault-lines in its leadership council which included the vaulting ambition of his rival Ramesh Maharaj, had UNC leader Basdeo Panday under a cloud of corruption including court cases which if successful would constitutionally disqualify him from serving in Parliament, involved Mrs Panday who said she had received $1.2 million without telling her husband, and had leaders who did not hold the people’s trust. “Who in their right minds would trust Ramesh, Jack and Panday with $200 billion?” asked Ramlogan.

https://archives.newsday.co.tt/2007/11/ ... e-hurdles/

I wonder where you and ZR second account going to move the goalpost to next.
If I checked the amount of money that went into my wife's account over the years I am sure she received 2.5 Million from her job and investmests. I am sure she won't tell me cause whats hers is hers and wants mine is also hers.

Miss Panday got 1.2 million over the years aswell. The newspaper only reported the total amount of money that went into the account for a number of years. It was never one lump sum as stated in the press. You are trying very hard to twist things around.

In Indian hindu culture it is the woman that controls the finances. The husband brings homes his earnings and gives to the wife who pays the bills and sees about the household. They also invest the money. The older Indian women from years gone by used to buy gold as investment to keep the value of they money. They would often pawn gold when things was hard. This practice is still done in some older families and in India who are the largest gold buyers in the world. I don't expect this modern society to understand old Indian ways of life far much for the media and the twisted courts.
Last edited by Kickstart on April 23rd, 2021, 4:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Habit7
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 11548
Joined: April 20th, 2009, 10:20 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Habit7 » April 23rd, 2021, 4:06 pm

Kickstart wrote:
Habit7 wrote:
De Dragon wrote:Did the COP put this out as an official party position? Or like all of your "facts" originated in your rectum?

COP candidate for Tabaquite, Anand Ramlogan, gave listeners five reasons not to vote UNC A. He said the UNC A was fighting only to win Opposition (not Government), had fault-lines in its leadership council which included the vaulting ambition of his rival Ramesh Maharaj, had UNC leader Basdeo Panday under a cloud of corruption including court cases which if successful would constitutionally disqualify him from serving in Parliament, involved Mrs Panday who said she had received $1.2 million without telling her husband, and had leaders who did not hold the people’s trust. “Who in their right minds would trust Ramesh, Jack and Panday with $200 billion?” asked Ramlogan.

https://archives.newsday.co.tt/2007/11/ ... e-hurdles/

I wonder where you and ZR second account going to move the goalpost to next.
If I checked the amount of money that went into my wife's account over the years I am sure she received 2.5 Million from her job and investmests. I am sure she won't tell me cause whats hers is hers and wants mine is also hers.

Miss Panday got 1.2 million over the years aswell. The newspaper only reported the total amount of money that went into the account for a number of years. It was never one lump sum as stated in the press. You are trying very hard to twist things around.

In Indian hindu culture it is the woman that controls the finances. The husband brings homes his earnings and gives to the wife who pays the bills and sees about the household. They also invest the money. The older Indian women from years gone by used to buy gold as investment to keep the value of they money. They would often pawn gold when things was hard. This practice is still done in some older families and in India who are the largest gold buyers in the world. I don't expect this modern society to understand old Indian ways of life far much for the media and the courts.

Neither the newspapers or I am saying anything.

Those are the words of SC Anand Ramlogan.

User avatar
De Dragon
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17902
Joined: January 27th, 2004, 3:49 am
Location: Enjoying my little miracles............

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby De Dragon » April 23rd, 2021, 4:09 pm

Habit7 wrote:
Kickstart wrote:
Habit7 wrote:
De Dragon wrote:Did the COP put this out as an official party position? Or like all of your "facts" originated in your rectum?

COP candidate for Tabaquite, Anand Ramlogan, gave listeners five reasons not to vote UNC A. He said the UNC A was fighting only to win Opposition (not Government), had fault-lines in its leadership council which included the vaulting ambition of his rival Ramesh Maharaj, had UNC leader Basdeo Panday under a cloud of corruption including court cases which if successful would constitutionally disqualify him from serving in Parliament, involved Mrs Panday who said she had received $1.2 million without telling her husband, and had leaders who did not hold the people’s trust. “Who in their right minds would trust Ramesh, Jack and Panday with $200 billion?” asked Ramlogan.

https://archives.newsday.co.tt/2007/11/ ... e-hurdles/

I wonder where you and ZR second account going to move the goalpost to next.
If I checked the amount of money that went into my wife's account over the years I am sure she received 2.5 Million from her job and investmests. I am sure she won't tell me cause whats hers is hers and wants mine is also hers.

Miss Panday got 1.2 million over the years aswell. The newspaper only reported the total amount of money that went into the account for a number of years. It was never one lump sum as stated in the press. You are trying very hard to twist things around.

In Indian hindu culture it is the woman that controls the finances. The husband brings homes his earnings and gives to the wife who pays the bills and sees about the household. They also invest the money. The older Indian women from years gone by used to buy gold as investment to keep the value of they money. They would often pawn gold when things was hard. This practice is still done in some older families and in India who are the largest gold buyers in the world. I don't expect this modern society to understand old Indian ways of life far much for the media and the courts.

Neither the newspapers or I am saying anything.

Those are the words of SC Anand Ramlogan.

Well you're known for being unoriginal, so I guess you hiding behind someone else's words is expected. I mean it's not as if a man who had suffered a stroke wasn't degraded by a nasty, uncouth lout from mason Hall which was all the more disgusting because there wasn't even a fight, just vindictive and spiteful small mindedness.

User avatar
SuperiorMan
punchin NOS
Posts: 2899
Joined: December 1st, 2020, 2:35 am

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby SuperiorMan » April 23rd, 2021, 4:13 pm

I had sex with my PNM woman last night.

Kickstart
Riding on 16's
Posts: 1152
Joined: September 25th, 2019, 2:13 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Kickstart » April 23rd, 2021, 4:18 pm

Habit7 wrote:
Kickstart wrote:
Habit7 wrote:
De Dragon wrote:Did the COP put this out as an official party position? Or like all of your "facts" originated in your rectum?

COP candidate for Tabaquite, Anand Ramlogan, gave listeners five reasons not to vote UNC A. He said the UNC A was fighting only to win Opposition (not Government), had fault-lines in its leadership council which included the vaulting ambition of his rival Ramesh Maharaj, had UNC leader Basdeo Panday under a cloud of corruption including court cases which if successful would constitutionally disqualify him from serving in Parliament, involved Mrs Panday who said she had received $1.2 million without telling her husband, and had leaders who did not hold the people’s trust. “Who in their right minds would trust Ramesh, Jack and Panday with $200 billion?” asked Ramlogan.

https://archives.newsday.co.tt/2007/11/ ... e-hurdles/

I wonder where you and ZR second account going to move the goalpost to next.
If I checked the amount of money that went into my wife's account over the years I am sure she received 2.5 Million from her job and investmests. I am sure she won't tell me cause whats hers is hers and wants mine is also hers.

Miss Panday got 1.2 million over the years aswell. The newspaper only reported the total amount of money that went into the account for a number of years. It was never one lump sum as stated in the press. You are trying very hard to twist things around.

In Indian hindu culture it is the woman that controls the finances. The husband brings homes his earnings and gives to the wife who pays the bills and sees about the household. They also invest the money. The older Indian women from years gone by used to buy gold as investment to keep the value of they money. They would often pawn gold when things was hard. This practice is still done in some older families and in India who are the largest gold buyers in the world. I don't expect this modern society to understand old Indian ways of life far much for the media and the courts.

Neither the newspapers or I am saying anything.

Those are the words of SC Anand Ramlogan.
Don't you check the facts before posting someone elses rambles?

If I was a salesman and had competition I would do my utmost best to discredit the other person' products

User avatar
SuperiorMan
punchin NOS
Posts: 2899
Joined: December 1st, 2020, 2:35 am

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby SuperiorMan » April 23rd, 2021, 7:38 pm

My outside woman is PNM and the sex so good.

User avatar
Blaze d Chalice
Riding on 17's
Posts: 1593
Joined: April 14th, 2019, 11:35 am

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Blaze d Chalice » April 24th, 2021, 2:27 pm

So not even a week pass since Fitzy get put in the new position and already a drug bust and gun bust.

Fitzy wukking boi.

You know I didn't like Fitzy so much especially, when he got wetting in Beetham but I have to say the man really performing.

He also said on the Covit - Don't blame the Venez, blame the disobedient Trinis. And he is 100% right.

And one for Zoom, Fitzy dem continue to grant work permit and entry for them India Expo thing.
You should be happy.

SuperiorMan wrote:My outside woman is PNM and the sex so good.

This is also true.

User avatar
widdyphuck
18 pounds of Boost
Posts: 2458
Joined: July 23rd, 2017, 2:24 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby widdyphuck » April 24th, 2021, 2:32 pm

Blaze d Chalice wrote:So not even a week pass since Fitzy get put in the new position and already a drug bust and gun bust.

Fitzy wukking boi.

You know I didn't like Fitzy so much especially, when he got wetting in Beetham but I have to say the man really performing.

He also said on the Covit - Don't blame the Venez, blame the disobedient Trinis. And he is 100% right.

And one for Zoom, Fitzy dem continue to grant work permit and entry for them India Expo thing.
You should be happy.

SuperiorMan wrote:My outside woman is PNM and the sex so good.

This is also true.
Fitizy wasn't responsible for this you wishful PNM supporter.
Fitzy ain't even know where the warf is in south.

User avatar
Blaze d Chalice
Riding on 17's
Posts: 1593
Joined: April 14th, 2019, 11:35 am

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Blaze d Chalice » April 24th, 2021, 2:43 pm

Then dat is performance.
If the man don't even know where it is, probably never even been there, man eyes closed, but still have the area on lock and intercepting them guns and cookeen, I would have to say I feel safer already.

MADNESS IN THIS PLACE!!!!!
HINDS can you explain to the public during the deadly Covid pandemic lockdown presently..why is it that only Indian nationals are allowed to come into the country and reopen these bogus flea markets like by Medford Gas Station in Chaguanas which reopened yesterday during the announcement of a lockdown???
Do they have special rights? Or even work permits? The same applies to the VENES! Is it a FREE FOR ALL EXCEPT IF YOU'RE A TRINI??? Citizens crying to come home and locked out but we open to these two particular groups? WHAT REALLY GOING ON?????


I not from Fitzy constituency, but if I was, I would vote for him next rongs.

User avatar
SuperiorMan
punchin NOS
Posts: 2899
Joined: December 1st, 2020, 2:35 am

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby SuperiorMan » April 24th, 2021, 3:09 pm

Blaze d Chalice wrote:So not even a week pass since Fitzy get put in the new position and already a drug bust and gun bust.

Fitzy wukking boi.

You know I didn't like Fitzy so much especially, when he got wetting in Beetham but I have to say the man really performing.

He also said on the Covit - Don't blame the Venez, blame the disobedient Trinis. And he is 100% right.

And one for Zoom, Fitzy dem continue to grant work permit and entry for them India Expo thing.
You should be happy.

SuperiorMan wrote:My outside woman is PNM and the sex so good.

This is also true.


Hello Blaze d Chalice,

What was your experience like with PNM women as compared to UNC women?

User avatar
timelapse
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 8113
Joined: June 20th, 2012, 7:13 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby timelapse » April 24th, 2021, 3:32 pm

Calder Hart and Johnny O Halleran were locals?
Try harder
Habit7 wrote:
timelapse wrote:You clearly have blinders on.If Mr.Panday was cleared, but in your words, seen as a crook, what makes PNM members that were also cleared by the courts so special that they are not seen by you as crooks?
Care to explain?

The context was the COP's view of Panday in 2007.

But Panday's allegations is not the same as those highlighted. Panday had coconspirators locally and internationally. The international ones were tried, sentenced, served time, apologised to T&T and Al Rawi even recently got back some of the money they stole through civil action. The local ppl are using their money and political connections to stymie the trial (Section 34) and avoid extradition.

Advertisement

Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 212 guests