Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:redmanjp wrote:hey the poll- can ppl revote after they get vaxxed? should be able to so we can see the updated stats.
what if Govt decide to reopen certain sports and spectating as Safe Zones? Motor Sports for instance. they already did it for horseracing not so?
Ok the poll has now been set where you can re-vote if your vaccine status changes
Not vaxxed atm but nice tryDe Dragon wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:redmanjp wrote:hey the poll- can ppl revote after they get vaxxed? should be able to so we can see the updated stats.
what if Govt decide to reopen certain sports and spectating as Safe Zones? Motor Sports for instance. they already did it for horseracing not so?
Ok the poll has now been set where you can re-vote if your vaccine status changes
How about if you're vaxxed, but identify as unvaxxed? Asking for a hover
De Dragon wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:redmanjp wrote:hey the poll- can ppl revote after they get vaxxed? should be able to so we can see the updated stats.
what if Govt decide to reopen certain sports and spectating as Safe Zones? Motor Sports for instance. they already did it for horseracing not so?
Ok the poll has now been set where you can re-vote if your vaccine status changes
How about if you're vaxxed, but identify as unvaxxed? Asking for a hover
[cough] branded ivermectin[/cough]De Dragon wrote:dogg wrote:in the pipeline:Merck said molnupiravir, the antiviral drug it’s developing with Miami-based Ridgeback Biotherapeutics, could halve the risks of hospitalization or death when given to recently diagnosed patients at risk of severe illness, according to interim results from a late-stage clinical trial.
If approved, molnupiravir would be the first antiviral pill for Covid-19 on the market and become a valuable tool in the fight against the virus.
Rivals are not far behind, with Pfizer, Roche and Atea Pharmaceuticals all expecting results from late-stage clinical trials this year.
Pfizer is testing whether its pill—PF-07321332—can prevent infection in people exposed to the virus or benefit patients who have not been hospitalized with Covid-19.
Roche and Boston-based Atea are also testing whether their antiviral, AT-527, can help treat or prevent Covid-19 and very early results suggested an ability to reduce the amount of virus in the body.
Fingers crossed!
In B4 hoover and the "doctor" with their opposition to this as well
LGBTQU+st7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:redmanjp wrote:hey the poll- can ppl revote after they get vaxxed? should be able to so we can see the updated stats.
what if Govt decide to reopen certain sports and spectating as Safe Zones? Motor Sports for instance. they already did it for horseracing not so?
Ok the poll has now been set where you can re-vote if your vaccine status changes
How about if you're vaxxed, but identify as unvaxxed? Asking for a hover
pugboy wrote:i find things get quiet these days on ivermectin
is it no longer an effective treatment like the hydroxy ?
NopeVexXx Dogg wrote:With the local stats weighing heavily that 95%+ of hospitalized COVID patients are not vaccinated, and the bed space is unavailable - are people changing their minds?
Tuner antivaxxers, what say you?
Do these stats sway your opinions?
hover11 wrote:NopeVexXx Dogg wrote:With the local stats weighing heavily that 95%+ of hospitalized COVID patients are not vaccinated, and the bed space is unavailable - are people changing their minds?
Tuner antivaxxers, what say you?
Do these stats sway your opinions?
VexXx Dogg wrote:hover11 wrote:NopeVexXx Dogg wrote:With the local stats weighing heavily that 95%+ of hospitalized COVID patients are not vaccinated, and the bed space is unavailable - are people changing their minds?
Tuner antivaxxers, what say you?
Do these stats sway your opinions?
Thanks for the reply.
If (God forbid) you get COVID, will you visit the hospital for treatment? Or would you stay home, self-treat and hope your immune system go handle it?
Mmoney607 wrote:The statistics on the health of people who are hospitalized have not changed, therefore, views on vaccination have not changed.
I guess they didn't get the memoadnj wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:The statistics on the health of people who are hospitalized have not changed, therefore, views on vaccination have not changed.
hover11 wrote:I guess they didn't get the memoFB_IMG_1635946285326.jpgadnj wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:The statistics on the health of people who are hospitalized have not changed, therefore, views on vaccination have not changed.
adnj wrote:hover11 wrote:I guess they didn't get the memoFB_IMG_1635946285326.jpgadnj wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:The statistics on the health of people who are hospitalized have not changed, therefore, views on vaccination have not changed.
1. You are not vaccinated
2. You don't get tested daily
3. Not everyone around you was vaccinated
4. Not everyone around you was tested
5. You weren't in a photo of the leaders of the 20 wealthiest nations
adnj wrote:The pandemic appears to have spared Africa so far. Scientists are struggling to explain why
Antibody studies suggest large numbers of infections have occurred but the death toll remains low
After testing more than 3000 blood donors, Uyoga and colleagues estimated in a preprint last month that one in 20 Kenyans aged 15 to 64—or 1.6 million people—has antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, an indication of past infection. That would put Kenya on a par with Spain in mid-May when that country was descending from its coronavirus peak and had 27,000 official COVID-19 deaths. Kenya's official toll stood at 100 when the study ended. And Kenya's hospitals are not reporting huge numbers of people with COVID-19 symptoms.
Marina Pollán of the Carlos III Health Institute in Madrid, who led Spain's antibody survey, says Africa's youthfulness may protect it. Spain's median age is 45; in Kenya and Malawi, it's 20 and 18, respectively. Young people around the world are far less likely to get severely ill or die from the virus. And the population in Kenya's cities, where the pandemic first took hold, skews even younger than the country as a whole, says Thumbi Mwangi, an epidemiologist at the University of Nairobi. The number of severe and fatal cases "may go higher when the disease has moved to the rural areas where we have populations with advanced age," he says.
https://www.science.org/content/article ... xplain-why
sMASH wrote:Even that I posted it, I will say data from Africa to prove any direction must be taken with a grain of salt, cause of above mentioned Size and systems not geared to collect that data reliably.
Even if there were mass deaths, people prolly so acustmed to it, might just fly under the radar, and miss the statisticians
High vitamin d, high exposure to viruses, hard physical work leading to more fitness, low Vax rate leading to more robust physiology to deal with Corona viruses.
And then high ivermectin use
You still beating the ivermectrin drum? It doesn't work. The most plausible reason for low deaths is the reduction of a highly susceptible (old) population.sMASH wrote:Even that I posted it, I will say data from Africa to prove any direction must be taken with a grain of salt, cause of above mentioned Size and systems not geared to collect that data reliably.
Even if there were mass deaths, people prolly so acustmed to it, might just fly under the radar, and miss the statisticians
High vitamin d, high exposure to viruses, hard physical work leading to more fitness, low Vax rate leading to more robust physiology to deal with Corona viruses.
And then high ivermectin use
adnj wrote:You still beating the ivermectrin drum? It doesn't work. The most plausible reason for low deaths is the reduction of a highly susceptible (old) population.sMASH wrote:Even that I posted it, I will say data from Africa to prove any direction must be taken with a grain of salt, cause of above mentioned Size and systems not geared to collect that data reliably.
Even if there were mass deaths, people prolly so acustmed to it, might just fly under the radar, and miss the statisticians
High vitamin d, high exposure to viruses, hard physical work leading to more fitness, low Vax rate leading to more robust physiology to deal with Corona viruses.
And then high ivermectin use
sMASH wrote:coating the virus cells, interrupting the mechanism of interacting with cells in the body, preventing infection.
thats not from the people that use it, just the professionals that investigated why it is that people wanted to use the ivermectin.
totally off label use.
no manufacturer or body is studying the prophylactic use of ivermectin, any study of data of the places that already use ivermectin, always say they see no correlation, but better research is needed.
ivermectin is over priced tt$4 a mg and u only need 1mg per 10lb every couple months.
the endovet posted earlier is like tt$1 per mg and both the active ingredients in it, are used for humans... just that the endovet is for animals.
that new drug they merk came out with is us$700 per course. and u still have to use it in the early stages and may not be effective all the time.
even if the ivermectin is not effective against covid, the only harm is that u get rid of worms... so like, whats the problem in letting people use it?
cnn went at lenghts to stress that joe rogan used ivermectin that is a horse medicine, but didnt go to lenghts to say that he recovered in swift time.
Joe Rogan most likely recovered because of the monoclonal antibodies that he also took. That we actually have evidence on working. Ivermectin didn't do sheit.sMASH wrote:coating the virus cells, interrupting the mechanism of interacting with cells in the body, preventing infection.
thats not from the people that use it, just the professionals that investigated why it is that people wanted to use the ivermectin.
totally off label use.
no manufacturer or body is studying the prophylactic use of ivermectin, any study of data of the places that already use ivermectin, always say they see no correlation, but better research is needed.
ivermectin is over priced tt$4 a mg and u only need 1mg per 10lb every couple months.
the endovet posted earlier is like tt$1 per mg and both the active ingredients in it, are used for humans... just that the endovet is for animals.
that new drug they merk came out with is us$700 per course. and u still have to use it in the early stages and may not be effective all the time.
even if the ivermectin is not effective against covid, the only harm is that u get rid of worms... so like, whats the problem in letting people use it?
cnn went at lenghts to stress that joe rogan used ivermectin that is a horse medicine, but didnt go to lenghts to say that he recovered in swift time.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: shake d livin wake d dead and 92 guests