Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
They not tryi g to gut social security like Rowley not closing petrotrin, had already dealt with property tax.shogun wrote:sMASH wrote:Lol at people propping up the dems as good guys... Democrats is sheit.
Wurst was Hillary, keeping her backroom deals with the classified files on she home server.
Too smart to be playing that dumb.
Is that why Trumps own investigators dropped their investigation into her in 2019? Or is that why when the house oversight committee caught Ivanka and Jared and five other Trump officials doing even worse, you were silent?
Deputy national security adviser K.T. McFarland and former adviser Stephen K. Bannon were caught using personal email accounts for official business. Some communications dealing with nuclear technology and Saudi Arabia. McFarland’s account was on effing AOL. lol
Dems are sh!t? True, many are. Specifically establishment/corporate types. Funny that they're still not trying to gut social security/medicare that helps millions, offering students help with college debt in the face of skyrocketing tuition, and renewal of school feeding programs to K-12 kids (that Republicans have been blocking) and even defunding the IRS so they can't go after tax evasion by the wealthiest Americans? The left isn't completely cucking to the elites and giving it all away to their overlords. House Republicans even have the nerve to create "weaponization" sub committees to get back at the investigators investigating THIER corruption, when many Republicans themselves are currently under investigation. Worse still some of those very Republicans under investigation are now lobbying to sit on some of those committees. All that while they voted FOR defanging the house ethics committee. If Dems are sh!t, the GOP is a rotting corpse full of pig excrement. Gang Of Perps.
sMASH wrote:They not tryi g to gut social security like Rowley not closing petrotrin, had already dealt with property tax.
They haven't gotten enough time to settle in to start to do it.
Dem ride the social security cut scare into office. But they never get secured enough to actually go tru with it.adnj wrote:sMASH wrote:They not tryi g to gut social security like Rowley not closing petrotrin, had already dealt with property tax.
They haven't gotten enough time to settle in to start to do it.
Apparently, you have never studied the history of some foreign governments. This has been going on in the US for more than forty years.
Fist was hunter's laptop... Is this from his printer now?Dizzy28 wrote:Second set of docs were found in Biden's garage
The House on Thursday passed a bill aimed at restricting sales from the country’s oil reserves to China. The legislation bars sales of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) to entities under the control, ownership or influence of the Chinese Communist Party, unless that oil will not be exported to China.
The bill passed in a bipartisan 331-97 vote. All 97 “no” votes came from Democrats, but 113 Democrats joined all Republicans who voted in passing the measure.
https://thehill.com/policy/energy-envir ... influence/
adnj wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:So each current example for Joe has to include one for Trump?
Or can Joe's ineptness stand alone in a thread called Joe Biden's murica?
Bc it seems just mentioning Joe's issues triggers some of you all however valid they may be.Dizzy28 wrote:At least one to two times per week he shows he is mentally unfit for the office he holds but somehow it's ok.
Anyone else's posts aren't my responsibility or issue. I posted in response to what you wrote.
In nearly every political system in history, hyper-partisianship has almost always resulted in a reduction of the number of effective, highly-qualified political representives and leaders. It has happened in the United States previously, it is currently happening on a wide scale around the globe.
Once political discourse focuses on personality instead of achievement, prole-drift has already occured.
sMASH wrote:So, some of the new documents dump are about Ukraine, and Biden has family members with close ties to Ukraine, and it's illegal to expose those documents to foreign governments.
Hmmmmmmm
redmanjp wrote:one thing that can make this worse is that these docs were there since he left office in 2017, a much longer time than trump's docs. more time for it to get into the wrong hands.
NYC Mayor Eric Adams Points Finger at Biden Administration over Migrant CrisisBy Ari Blaff
January 16, 2023 8:33 AM
New York City mayor Eric Adams toured the border town of El Paso, Texas, on Sunday and demanded the Biden administration address illegal border crossings. During a press conference with the city’s Democratic mayor Oscar Leeser, Adams underscored that his visit to El Paso was to bring attention to the issue.
We’re pointing the finger at our national government,” Adams said.
“This is a national problem. We must have real immigration reform, and we must immediately have a short-term fix of making sure that the cost of this does not fall on our local cities,” he added.
Adams said last Friday that New York City was at its “breaking point” dealing with an influx of migrants and asylum seekers, many of whom were bussed to the city by frustrated border state politicians such as Leeser.
Leeser got himself in hot water last year for declaring a state of emergency, reportedly in defiance of White House wishes.
According to some estimates, as many as 40,000 migrants have made their way to New York City in the last year from border towns such as El Paso, straining local resources. City Hall reportedly spent $366 million providing services for asylum seekers in 2022, with Adams expecting the figure to potentially rise beyond $2 billion through the first half of 2023.
“Our cities are being undermined. And we don’t deserve this. Migrants don’t deserve this. And people who live in the cities don’t deserve this,” Adams said, demanding that “national leaders” address the issue ” in a real way.”
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/nyc ... nt-crisis/
Ohio Republicans quietly enact ‘alarming’ new voting restrictions
Law puts Ohio among states with strictest voter ID rules and will make it harder for elderly people, the disabled and the poor to vote
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jan/18/activists-sue-ohio-republican-voting-access-restrictions
Ohio Republicans quietly enacted a measure earlier this month that imposes sweeping new restrictions on voting access in the state, including more stringent voter ID requirements, cutting the early voting period and giving voters less time to return their mail-in ballots.
The new law puts Ohio among a handful of states with the strictest voter ID rules in the country. The state had already required voters to show identification at the polls, but allowed an exception for voters who couldn’t produce one, allowing them to present a bank statement, paystub or other document to prove their identity. The new law gets rid of that exception and only allows someone to vote if they provide certain forms of photo ID.
Those new restrictions will make it harder for people who tend to lack identification – elderly people, the disabled and the poor – to vote, voting rights advocates said.
“Black and brown communities have higher numbers of those communities who don’t have ID,” said Camille Wimbish, the election administration director at Ohio Voice, a civic engagement advocacy group. “This is gonna impact Black and brown voters, students, rural voters, military voters, seniors. I mean there’s really everyone who’s gonna be impacted by these substantial changes.”
The new measure also gets rid of early voting on the final Monday before an election – typically a busy day. It extends polling hours on other days instead. It also takes aim at mail-in voting, which surged in popularity during the pandemic. Now, counties will only be able to offer a single ballot drop box, which must be available in front of boards of elections.
The new law also tightens the window during which voters must request and return mail-in ballots. Voters must now request a mail-in ballot seven days before election day instead of three. A ballot postmarked by election day must now arrive no later than four days after election day to be counted, a drop from the 10 days that were allowed.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Dohplaydat, Google Adsense [Bot], venom21 and 230 guests