Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
hover11 wrote:What do yall think about these restaurants forcing employees to be vaccinated ?
Deborah Thomas-Felix
President of the Industrial Court
To add context to my statement, I was a participant at a webinar that was hosted by the Trinidad and Tobago Chamber of Commerce in January this year. My understanding is that the purpose of this webinar was for the Chamber to gather information on the law and industrial relations practice to assist and guide its members in this time of crisis. The discussion was confined to issues related to the world of work.
One of the participants at the webinar asked whether an employer can order an employee to take a vaccine for the employee to continue his or her employment. Those were not the exact words of the question, but that is the gist of the question. I responded by stating that in industrial relations an employer cannot unilaterally alter or change the existing terms and conditions of employment of workers, especially if there is a recognised majority union present at the establishment.
I went further to add that if an individual is not employed at the establishment but is seeking employment, an employer can insist that the individual gets a vaccine in order to obtain employment at the establishment; that is what is called a “condition precedent” to employment. The individual who is seeking the job can decide to become vaccinated or he can decide not to be employed at that establishment on those terms.
This is similar to when you seek to go to a country and the country requires that you take a vaccine to enter, some countries require that the passenger gets yellow fever vaccination. You, the passenger, can decide whether you are entering the country on those terms or not.
However, it is important to understand that it is very different in the case where someone who is already employed with an establishment and is told that it is mandatory to take a vaccine in order to continue to work. The law states that a fundamental alteration of terms and conditions of employment cannot be done unilaterally. The keyword is “unilaterally”. Dialogue and consultation are key for any change or alterations to existing terms and conditions of employment to be effected
https://guardian.co.tt/article/can-empl ... 93820bf0fd
paid_influencer wrote:supposedly it is acceptable as a condition of new employment or new contracts tho
hover11 wrote:All well and good for new contracts however the employer has no right to change any existing contract of employment unilaterallypaid_influencer wrote:supposedly it is acceptable as a condition of new employment or new contracts tho
redmanjp wrote:hover11 wrote:All well and good for new contracts however the employer has no right to change any existing contract of employment unilaterallypaid_influencer wrote:supposedly it is acceptable as a condition of new employment or new contracts tho
contract workers cud get jam next time they renewing they contract
as for restaurant workers did the say they firing them? or just not allowing them back to work right now?
they can perhaps give those at home a stipend (not the lil $150) to hold them out for a while while the vaccinated ones have to go back to work.
sMASH wrote:their temporary laid off status will be continued.
MaxPower wrote:I support it.
Get with the program especially if they want to be irresponsible.
hover11 wrote:Hello Max,
Hope all is well.What about the employees who cannot take the vaccine due to health issues ?MaxPower wrote:I support it.
Get with the program especially if they want to be irresponsible.
hover11 wrote:Hello Max,
Hope all is well.What about the employees who cannot take the vaccine due to health issues ?MaxPower wrote:I support it.
Get with the program especially if they want to be irresponsible.
Unless being an antivaxxer qualifies as a mental health disorder?paid_influencer wrote:hover11 wrote:Hello Max,
Hope all is well.What about the employees who cannot take the vaccine due to health issues ?MaxPower wrote:I support it.
Get with the program especially if they want to be irresponsible.
what health issues tho? If you have health issues you are being pushed to the front of the line to get the vaccine, because you need it more than everybody else.
the only cautions right now are for persons under 18, and pregnant or breastfeeding women.
hover11 wrote:Hello Max,
Hope all is well.What about the employees who cannot take the vaccine due to health issues ?MaxPower wrote:I support it.
Get with the program especially if they want to be irresponsible.
Only the Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccine has been approved for use by breastfeeding women in Trinidad and Tobago
No vaccine has been granted approval for use by pregnant women in Trinidad and Tobago.
daring dragoon wrote:BOYCOTT THEY MC. if workers are not respected then the organization is disrespectful to all daily and small money workers. so boycott they mc,
daring dragoon wrote:BOYCOTT THEY MC. if workers are not respected then the organization is disrespectful to all daily and small money workers. so boycott they mc,
paid_influencer wrote:daring dragoon wrote:BOYCOTT THEY MC. if workers are not respected then the organization is disrespectful to all daily and small money workers. so boycott they mc,
well wait a second. I hear people saying if the workers unvaxxed they putting customers at risk so: boycott dey mc. Then when the company say they only giving hours to vaxxed employees, also boycott mc.
so is damned if you do damned if you don't
MaxPower wrote:Ok fine it may be difficult to fire them.
What about salary reductions?
I mean, we are in a pandemic.
Let them anti-vaccination employees feel them is god.
hover11 wrote:I'm NOT vaccinated so JUST REMEMBER not to sell customers who are UNVACCINATED like myself. Since we're a threat to the vaccinated ppl I guess. Kinda hypocritical to want vaccinated employees only yet willing to conduct business with unvaccinated patrons.
hover11 wrote:I'm NOT vaccinated so JUST REMEMBER not to sell customers who are UNVACCINATED like myself. Since we're a threat to the vaccinated ppl I guess. Kinda hypocritical to want vaccinated employees only yet willing to conduct business with unvaccinated patrons.
sam1978 wrote:MaxPower wrote:Ok fine it may be difficult to fire them.
What about salary reductions?
I mean, we are in a pandemic.
Let them anti-vaccination employees feel them is god.
Is it true you tell your male Vene employees that they must use Viagra?
Les Bain wrote:Are the covid anti vaxxers solely opposed to the covid vaccines though? Because my initial thought after hearing their explanations is that any sinister vaccine theory (chip, mark of the beast, illuminati blah blah) most likely got sneaked in nice and quiet in your infancy.
ScHoolboySoloQ wrote:Les Bain wrote:Are the covid anti vaxxers solely opposed to the covid vaccines though? Because my initial thought after hearing their explanations is that any sinister vaccine theory (chip, mark of the beast, illuminati blah blah) most likely got sneaked in nice and quiet in your infancy.
Most of them are solely opposed to covid vaccines. Bill Gates increased the amount of covid anti vaxxers with his speech about 'depopulation', then we have our PM saying people in this country is 'living too long'. Those words create an unsettling feeling among the population and feeds our natural instinct to create a conspiracy about an activity or entity we do not fully understand. I have been hearing about the mark of the beast since Sunday school, these recent events along with access to technology just amplified it. It's really nothing new.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests