Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
U studying a dog while the red government is giving away our money via a budgetviedcht wrote:Most times I does hold back, but hard luck tonite.
It shoulda be a child, then I woulda watch some cxnts queef in here. Anybody see where the dog was standing? Anybody see how fowlfxckingly schupid the driver open on that turn? A child or adult coulda be standing on that spot it might have been the same outcome; dead child, dead man, dead woman. Think about that.
We have a choice?zoom rader wrote:U studying a dog while the red government is giving away our money via a budgetviedcht wrote:Most times I does hold back, but hard luck tonite.
It shoulda be a child, then I woulda watch some cxnts queef in here. Anybody see where the dog was standing? Anybody see how fowlfxckingly schupid the driver open on that turn? A child or adult coulda be standing on that spot it might have been the same outcome; dead child, dead man, dead woman. Think about that.
viedcht wrote:Most times I does hold back, but hard luck tonite.
It shoulda be a child, then I woulda watch some cxnts queef in here. Anybody see where the dog was standing? Anybody see how fowlfxckingly schupid the driver open on that turn? A child or adult coulda be standing on that spot it might have been the same outcome; dead child, dead man, dead woman. Think about that.
zoom rader wrote:U studying a dog while the red government is giving away our money via a budgetviedcht wrote:Most times I does hold back, but hard luck tonite.
It shoulda be a child, then I woulda watch some cxnts queef in here. Anybody see where the dog was standing? Anybody see how fowlfxckingly schupid the driver open on that turn? A child or adult coulda be standing on that spot it might have been the same outcome; dead child, dead man, dead woman. Think about that.
Relax uncle. The driver drive cxntish.sam1978 wrote:viedcht wrote:Most times I does hold back, but hard luck tonite.
It shoulda be a child, then I woulda watch some cxnts queef in here. Anybody see where the dog was standing? Anybody see how fowlfxckingly schupid the driver open on that turn? A child or adult coulda be standing on that spot it might have been the same outcome; dead child, dead man, dead woman. Think about that.
Allya does just try to be edgy or just plain illiterate? You thinking just like the dog and would probably end up the same way too .The owner said that according to video footage , the dog was in the road .
They said it was around a corner. Wtf the driver supposed to do ? You talking about if it was a child. Wtf your child would be doing standing around a corner in the road? Who does send a little child in the road by themselves?
Anyway ,it would mean one less illiterate child growing up to be an illiterate adult. If it was an adult ,same thing . Cross the facking road where you could see the oncoming traffic and wait until it's clear.
You and others have the right to vote.viedcht wrote:zoom rader wrote:U studying a dog while the red government is giving away our money via a budgetviedcht wrote:Most times I does hold back, but hard luck tonite.
It shoulda be a child, then I woulda watch some cxnts queef in here. Anybody see where the dog was standing? Anybody see how fowlfxckingly schupid the driver open on that turn? A child or adult coulda be standing on that spot it might have been the same outcome; dead child, dead man, dead woman. Think about that.
Mr ZR that is the problem. It easier to get any politician to address bonksin a family pet or child or adult instead of dealing with their corruption. I was now on FB, and I just laff at this 'kick out pnm' page beating up about everything from Rowley backing faris, to av issue, to whatever else... Setta chest beatup from that page admin and all the commenters. What that doing? Besides appealing to supporters?
Nothing. Not changing anything. Without direct action, it is window dressing.
viedcht wrote:Aye look Yuh learn something from mih. You're very welcomed, uncle
viedcht wrote:Most times I does hold back, but hard luck tonite.
It shoulda be a child, then I woulda watch some cxnts queef in here. Anybody see where the dog was standing? Anybody see how fowlfxckingly schupid the driver open on that turn? A child or adult coulda be standing on that spot it might have been the same outcome; dead child, dead man, dead woman. Think about that.
hustla_ambition101 wrote:https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=3067403576808367&id=100006162637397
Footage of dog. Where the reckless driving? Where was the owner of dog? If you cant train pet to stay in yard get a goldfish
Same way their dogs roam streets is the same way their good boys roam the streets.MaxPower wrote:I don’t like Tootswater Hinds eh, but i am not seeing anything wrong.
I have to agree with his comments.
The owner is to be blamed.
Does not matter she will still vote redBlaze d Chalice wrote:Nah I like Hinds. He keeps the constituency as it should be.
Before seeing the video, I would say shame on the driver for not seeing the dog, but also the dog should not have been outside - owner's fault as well.
But in any case I don't think the driver should have stopped because who TF going to stop over there to 'come out and see' and get rob?
The way the woman describe it was extremely exaggerated and she lie on poor Hinds.
It almost seems as if the woman is a yellow opposition supporter, or was contacted by the yellow opposition.
For all you know, a yellow party supporter could have passed earlier and lured the dog out of the premises with a trail of food ending in that spot.
Redman wrote:How is it that a driver is not responsible for hitting an object that was in the road BEFORE he reach on the street?
Whether the dog supposed to be there or not..it was there.
The detail -made up of the driver and the head of the detail should have just stopped by the people next day to apologize for the accident.
A call from the minister to do the same
They should handle it with some class.
Instead of that crap on FB.
Which UNC people?MaxPower wrote:Redman wrote:How is it that a driver is not responsible for hitting an object that was in the road BEFORE he reach on the street?
Whether the dog supposed to be there or not..it was there.
The detail -made up of the driver and the head of the detail should have just stopped by the people next day to apologize for the accident.
A call from the minister to do the same
They should handle it with some class.
Instead of that crap on FB.
The driver could have been more cautious, but he is not responsible for the loss of the dear dog.
These troublemakers of dog owners cannot even care for their pets and we should handle them with class?
Blasted wrong and strong and then making a issue when they don’t get the sympathy and attention they want.
The dog owner was irresponsible and does NOT deserve an apology in person.
Charge the owner or cut their damn ass.
Tootswater Hinds should engage in legal action for defamation of character. I mean he really is a piece of sheit to me, but in THIS case, he is right.
Shame on these lying UNC people.
MaxPower wrote:Redman wrote:How is it that a driver is not responsible for hitting an object that was in the road BEFORE he reach on the street?
Whether the dog supposed to be there or not..it was there.
The detail -made up of the driver and the head of the detail should have just stopped by the people next day to apologize for the accident.
A call from the minister to do the same
They should handle it with some class.
Instead of that crap on FB.
The driver could have been more cautious, but he is not responsible for the loss of the dear dog.
These troublemakers of dog owners cannot even care for their pets and we should handle them with class?
Blasted wrong and strong and then making a issue when they don’t get the sympathy and attention they want.
The dog owner was irresponsible and does NOT deserve an apology in person.
Charge the owner or cut their damn ass.
Tootswater Hinds should engage in legal action for defamation of character. I mean he really is a piece of sheit to me, but in THIS case, he is right.
Shame on these lying UNC people.
Redman wrote:How is it that a driver is not responsible for hitting an object that was in the road BEFORE he reach on the street?
Whether the dog supposed to be there or not..it was there.
The detail -made up of the driver and the head of the detail should have just stopped by the people next day to apologize for the accident.
A call from the minister to do the same
They should handle it with some class.
Instead of that crap on FB.
Redman wrote:MaxPower wrote:Redman wrote:How is it that a driver is not responsible for hitting an object that was in the road BEFORE he reach on the street?
Whether the dog supposed to be there or not..it was there.
The detail -made up of the driver and the head of the detail should have just stopped by the people next day to apologize for the accident.
A call from the minister to do the same
They should handle it with some class.
Instead of that crap on FB.
The driver could have been more cautious, but he is not responsible for the loss of the dear dog.
These troublemakers of dog owners cannot even care for their pets and we should handle them with class?
Blasted wrong and strong and then making a issue when they don’t get the sympathy and attention they want.
The dog owner was irresponsible and does NOT deserve an apology in person.
Charge the owner or cut their damn ass.
Tootswater Hinds should engage in legal action for defamation of character. I mean he really is a piece of sheit to me, but in THIS case, he is right.
Shame on these lying UNC people.
Help me understand how it is a driver is not responsible for the vehicle he is in control of, rolling over an object in the road.
Lets put that into the context of a trained driver on a security detail on the job.
Sad accident-compounded by a stupid response from those responsible.
Ben_spanna wrote:Redman wrote:MaxPower wrote:Redman wrote:How is it that a driver is not responsible for hitting an object that was in the road BEFORE he reach on the street?
Whether the dog supposed to be there or not..it was there.
The detail -made up of the driver and the head of the detail should have just stopped by the people next day to apologize for the accident.
A call from the minister to do the same
They should handle it with some class.
Instead of that crap on FB.
The driver could have been more cautious, but he is not responsible for the loss of the dear dog.
These troublemakers of dog owners cannot even care for their pets and we should handle them with class?
Blasted wrong and strong and then making a issue when they don’t get the sympathy and attention they want.
The dog owner was irresponsible and does NOT deserve an apology in person.
Charge the owner or cut their damn ass.
Tootswater Hinds should engage in legal action for defamation of character. I mean he really is a piece of sheit to me, but in THIS case, he is right.
Shame on these lying UNC people.
Help me understand how it is a driver is not responsible for the vehicle he is in control of, rolling over an object in the road.
Lets put that into the context of a trained driver on a security detail on the job.
Sad accident-compounded by a stupid response from those responsible.
So next time a driver mounts a pavement and knocks down a pedestrian , all you have to do in court to avoid manslaughter charges is refer to this case then?
Ben_spanna wrote:Redman wrote:MaxPower wrote:Redman wrote:How is it that a driver is not responsible for hitting an object that was in the road BEFORE he reach on the street?
Whether the dog supposed to be there or not..it was there.
The detail -made up of the driver and the head of the detail should have just stopped by the people next day to apologize for the accident.
A call from the minister to do the same
They should handle it with some class.
Instead of that crap on FB.
The driver could have been more cautious, but he is not responsible for the loss of the dear dog.
These troublemakers of dog owners cannot even care for their pets and we should handle them with class?
Blasted wrong and strong and then making a issue when they don’t get the sympathy and attention they want.
The dog owner was irresponsible and does NOT deserve an apology in person.
Charge the owner or cut their damn ass.
Tootswater Hinds should engage in legal action for defamation of character. I mean he really is a piece of sheit to me, but in THIS case, he is right.
Shame on these lying UNC people.
Help me understand how it is a driver is not responsible for the vehicle he is in control of, rolling over an object in the road.
Lets put that into the context of a trained driver on a security detail on the job.
Sad accident-compounded by a stupid response from those responsible.
So next time a driver mounts a pavement and knocks down a pedestrian , all you have to do in court to avoid manslaughter charges is refer to this case then?
All true, its a chead with much to do about nutting same as the UNC cheadj.o.e wrote:This thread goin on forever when an irresponsible owner let their pet roam the streets freely
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Dohplaydat, redmanjp and 150 guests