Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Rule of the day , don't have a family especially in TT88sins wrote:Serious questions for allyuh tho, specifically for the patriarchs.
If you had to chose between providing for your family and your personal happiness/enjoyment, which takes precedent for you?
Is it true or false, that you can easily forsake your own happiness/enjoyment and find some form of contentment in providing for your family?
hover11 wrote:T&T women now surpass men in obtaining advanced degrees. This is in keeping with a longstanding trend of women and girls outpacing males academically. Unfortunately, this is not yet bringing about equality of treatment in the labour market.
For more: https://guardian.co.tt/opinion/time-to- ... 0b63fea135
The glass ceiling is still very much there
Stop ridiculing men
AS a young man, I am fed up with these gender-based violence movements making waves in the media. The last straw was Sharon Clark Rowley’s interview on TV6 with Marlan Hopkinson last Monday.
There are only two genders—male and female. Why call it gender-based violence? Violence is violence, anyhow you take it. These gender-based violence movements are nothing but man-hating movements—in other words, misandry. They are peddled by left wing feminists who have an agenda against masculinity and the patriarchy.
Men’s mental health is not taken seriously; nice guys get walked all over.
Feminism has created a behaviour of unaccountability and “Do as I say and not as I do” in females. They insist on not needing a man and celebrating working in a male-dominated field. Alimony fraud and exploitation is not taken seriously; as a matter of fact, females celebrate it.
In 2024, what rights does a man have that a woman doesn’t? There is a war on masculinity, and there is war against fathers, where feminists insist on being or eliminating the father figure.
Men in 2024 have to walk on eggshells. We are heckled for chivalry and labelled “mansplaining” for being a gentleman. Respect is earned. Unrealistic expectations are being labelled as “standards” and “setting boundaries”, and the man is somehow to be blamed. Now, Mrs Rowley hasn’t gotten the message yet, but the choice of partner has a lot to do with domestic violence.
Men need to be their best selves. We need masculinity. The world needs strong male role models. Society needs fathers, and having the opposite gender ridicule our protective, problem-solving, provisional nature is part of the problem.
Violence, period, is unacceptable. Peace through strength is the answer to solving conflict. Compromise between both genders is the way forward.
Kendell Karan
Chaguanas
DMan7 wrote:^ That fella looks like he subscribes to "those" types of youtube channels as he's parroting the same points that those channels parrots on a daily basis.
redmanjp wrote:which ones? fresh and fit?
DMan7 wrote:^ Men has no desire to start such movements. If in the future men become oppressed by women who dominate all levels of society in other words a matriarch, I doubt men would care enough like women did in the past to get themselves out of that oppression by forming a movement.
88sins wrote:Random question
With the trend over the years of society pushing feminism and the feminist agenda, what you think would happen if men started masculism and a masculine agenda?
Your thoughts?
88sins wrote:Random question
With the trend over the years of society pushing feminism and the feminist agenda, what you think would happen if men started masculism and a masculine agenda?
Your thoughts?
paid_influencer wrote:88sins wrote:Random question
With the trend over the years of society pushing feminism and the feminist agenda, what you think would happen if men started masculism and a masculine agenda?
Your thoughts?
what do you mean started
hindu marriage was/is a property exchange
it was law that a spouse couldn't be raped
if the girl didn't like the living conditions, they would beat she and send she back to her husband
men bore no repercussions for domestic violence, so go ahead and beat she more when she reach back
is not indian alone i bashing.
men in long time caribbean society engaging in all kinda vice and making pickney and disappearing
men saying after 12 is lunch
men harassing/stalking/raping women and saying she look for it and the court agreeing
men singing all kinda thing about this race woman and that race woman and getting award for "national culture"
i donno why you think masculine agenda is some new thing to start
paid_influencer wrote:bossman, I get handle my scene. No baddess could come around me and say I spilt any seed and get she pregnant. All my seed is conserved.
If you accept the child as your from day 1, that is your choice. Ent make sense she have to make jail etc when u choose to do that. If the court making you pay for somebody else child, well that is a issue in the existing case law that should be appealed as far as it will go.
redmanjp wrote:The old feminism of the 60s which gave women equal rights was fine but not the latest version.
The idea is to 'break down the patriarchy' or so they say - we men are dispensible in the process.
They do it in all the sitcoms and comedies. The father is made fun of all the time - hardly ever the mother or wife.
When they break down the heads of families and divide them ( men and women) against each other families get weaker and since families are the pillar of society, society gets weaker and a weak society is easier to control.
Divide and rule
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 133 guests