Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
sMASH wrote:Ivers up to 10 times dosage in trials had no adverse reactions.
But yes. The problems that was experienced in America ws due to over dosage.
1 mg per 10lbs. We will work with that.
sucre251 wrote:why this person keep making new threads and posting the same video?
why all of a sudden a drug company making billion$$$ is a problem for some insane conspiracy nuts, when they have been doing it for decades on everything from vaccines to pills to weight loss to hair loss treatments? Why now?
sMASH wrote:Ivers up to 10 times dosage in trials had no adverse reactions.
But yes. The problems that was experienced in America ws due to over dosage.
1 mg per 10lbs. We will work with that.
sucre251 wrote:"people understand the new compound does the same thing as the noble prize winning compound"
You ain't understand sheit. Stop pretending you even know what a drug molecule is or how it activates a receptor's specificity.
redmanjp wrote:some good info here- hope they evaluate it
but based on the thread title i hope u not planning on using the veterinary version (as some have done) which is not meant for humans to treat anything - those doses are huge and would be an overdose for humans which can cause neurological adverse effects.
axe wrote:0.2 - 0.4 ml per kg body weight
sucre251 wrote:why this person keep making new threads and posting the same video?
why all of a sudden a drug company making billion$$$ is a problem for some insane conspiracy nuts, when they have been doing it for decades on everything from vaccines to pills to weight loss to hair loss treatments? Why now?
Les Bain wrote:Wouldn't be surprised if these horse medicine supporters whip out the Purina when the Kellogg's box empty.
cureus wrote:Final discussion
In this citywide ivermectin prophylaxis program, a large, statistically significant decrease in mortality rate was observed after the program began among the entire population of city residents. When comparing subjects that used ivermectin regularly, non-users were two times more likely to die from COVID-19 while ivermectin users were 7% less likely to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 (p = 0.003).
Although this study is not a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, the data were prospectively collected and resulted in a massive study sample that allowed adjustment for numerous confounding factors, thus strengthening the findings of the present study.
Due to the well-established, long-term safety profile of ivermectin, with rare adverse effects, the absence of proven therapeutic options to prevent death caused by COVID-19, and lack of effectiveness of vaccines in real-life all-cause mortality analyses to date, we recommend that ivermectin be considered as a preventive strategy, in particular for those at a higher risk of complications from COVID-19 or at higher risk of contracting the illness, not as a substitute for COVID-19 vaccines, but as an additional tool, particularly during periods of high transmission rates.
Conclusions
In a citywide ivermectin program with prophylactic, optional ivermectin use for COVID-19, ivermectin was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death rates from COVID-19.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: foreignused, st7, VexXx Dogg and 201 guests