TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

this is how we do it.......

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

bluefete
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 13258
Joined: November 12th, 2008, 10:56 pm
Location: POS

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby bluefete » June 25th, 2022, 12:18 pm

The sad thing about the overturning of Roe v Wade is the narrative being spun by the media.

This is going to affect "minorities" the most because they do not have access to health care. You all know the coded inference of that saying.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/hea ... 626866002/


This One is from Quite 2018

https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... verturned/

In other words, we would not be able to murder / butcher "minority" unborns like before and that is going to interfere with our agenda.

Take it however you want.

adnj
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10073
Joined: February 24th, 2014, 2:55 pm

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby adnj » June 25th, 2022, 12:41 pm

bluefete wrote:The sad thing about the overturning of Roe v Wade is the narrative being spun by the media.

This is going to affect "minorities" the most because they do not have access to health care. You all know the coded inference of that saying.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/hea ... 626866002/


This One is from Quite 2018

https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... verturned/

In other words, we would not be able to murder / butcher "minority" unborns like before and that is going to interfere with our agenda.

Take it however you want.
You're confused. That's not the media saying that. That's the media repeating one hundred years of social sciences research.

Fact: women who are finanacially disadvantaged AND have unwanted pregnancies face educational and further financial hurdles as a consequence - even with newborn adoption as the goal. And even within universal healthcare systems.

In the United States, black and Latino minorities are disproportionately economically disadvantaged. Look at Central America, Malaysia or China and the same will hold true albeit with a somewhat different affected group.

Before you start reflex typing some shitt in rebuttal, run out there and find real proof that I'm wrong.

alfa
Shifting into 6th
Posts: 2087
Joined: January 19th, 2015, 4:15 pm

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby alfa » June 25th, 2022, 12:55 pm

adnj wrote:
bluefete wrote:The sad thing about the overturning of Roe v Wade is the narrative being spun by the media.

This is going to affect "minorities" the most because they do not have access to health care. You all know the coded inference of that saying.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/hea ... 626866002/


This One is from Quite 2018

https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... verturned/

In other words, we would not be able to murder / butcher "minority" unborns like before and that is going to interfere with our agenda.

Take it however you want.
You're confused. That's not the media saying that. That's the media repeating one hundred years of social sciences research.

Fact: women who are finanacially disadvantaged AND have unwanted pregnancies face educational and further financial hurdles as a consequence - even with newborn adoption as the goal. And even within universal healthcare systems.

In the United States, black and Latino minorities are disproportionately economically disadvantaged. Look at Central America, Malaysia or China and the same will hold true albeit with a somewhat different affected group.

Before you start reflex typing some shitt in rebuttal, run out there and find real proof that I'm wrong.

Not disagreeing with your stats but by that same logic minority communities may be at a higher risk of committing crimes and therefore we should exempt them from the law. Screw personal responsibility especially in light of the horrible after effects of slavery and all that. Affirmative action at its best. Then again in America the left is suggesting that blacks shouldn't require ID to vote as its racist so someone may actually take my post seriously

bluefete
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 13258
Joined: November 12th, 2008, 10:56 pm
Location: POS

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby bluefete » June 25th, 2022, 1:00 pm

adnj wrote:
bluefete wrote:The sad thing about the overturning of Roe v Wade is the narrative being spun by the media.

This is going to affect "minorities" the most because they do not have access to health care. You all know the coded inference of that saying.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/hea ... 626866002/


This One is from Quite 2018

https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... verturned/

In other words, we would not be able to murder / butcher "minority" unborns like before and that is going to interfere with our agenda.

Take it however you want.
You're confused. That's not the media saying that. That's the media repeating one hundred years of social sciences research.

Fact: women who are finanacially disadvantaged AND have unwanted pregnancies face educational and further financial hurdles as a consequence - even with newborn adoption as the goal. And even within universal healthcare systems.

In the United States, black and Latino minorities are disproportionately economically disadvantaged. Look at Central America, Malaysia or China and the same will hold true albeit with a somewhat different affected group.

Before you start reflex typing some shitt in rebuttal, run out there and find real proof that I'm wrong.


You are spewing from the same media / science garbage that is put out there for non-critical thinkers to believe. Some people's heads are really buried deep in the sand.

adnj
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10073
Joined: February 24th, 2014, 2:55 pm

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby adnj » June 25th, 2022, 1:40 pm

bluefete wrote:
adnj wrote:
bluefete wrote:The sad thing about the overturning of Roe v Wade is the narrative being spun by the media.

This is going to affect "minorities" the most because they do not have access to health care. You all know the coded inference of that saying.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/hea ... 626866002/


This One is from Quite 2018

https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... verturned/

In other words, we would not be able to murder / butcher "minority" unborns like before and that is going to interfere with our agenda.

Take it however you want.
You're confused. That's not the media saying that. That's the media repeating one hundred years of social sciences research.

Fact: women who are finanacially disadvantaged AND have unwanted pregnancies face educational and further financial hurdles as a consequence - even with newborn adoption as the goal. And even within universal healthcare systems.

In the United States, black and Latino minorities are disproportionately economically disadvantaged. Look at Central America, Malaysia or China and the same will hold true albeit with a somewhat different affected group.

Before you start reflex typing some shitt in rebuttal, run out there and find real proof that I'm wrong.


You are spewing from the same media / science garbage that is put out there for non-critical thinkers to believe. Some people's heads are really buried deep in the sand.


THAT is another of your infamous reflex posts. Take your thumb out of your assholle and try to look up what you apparently have no fuckking clue about. "Science gabage" vs. what? Your personal opinion? That's pure - I love that shitt.

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 21977
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby sMASH » June 25th, 2022, 5:01 pm

The_Honourable wrote:Mitch McConnell might be an SOB but he's a smart and tough SOB to swing the Supreme Court conservative over the last few years.

The beatup over the next few days going to be epic.
Them fellas does look ridiculous, but the kinda crap they get away with... Is Palpatine level power trading going on.

Nancy dem looking like nancies, and sounding like retards.

But the mainstream left is devolving into a fascist voting block, denouncing any and all criticism as anti their side.
They looking for what they getting.

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 21977
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby sMASH » June 25th, 2022, 5:03 pm

Should have prenatal and post natal abortions to reduce the amount of stray dogs growing up to become cockroaches.


User avatar
The_Honourable
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 8475
Joined: June 14th, 2009, 3:45 pm
Location: In the Land of Stupidity & Corruption

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby The_Honourable » June 25th, 2022, 5:36 pm

Yo damn... :lol:

Image

User avatar
Dizzy28
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 16672
Joined: February 8th, 2010, 8:54 am
Location: People's Republic of Bananas

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby Dizzy28 » June 25th, 2022, 6:43 pm

The Hyde Amendment would like a word!
IMG_20220625_184056.jpg

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 21977
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby sMASH » June 25th, 2022, 7:44 pm

The vet say, it still have bj and back door to help

User avatar
DMan7
punchin NOS
Posts: 4036
Joined: February 2nd, 2021, 5:17 pm

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby DMan7 » June 25th, 2022, 8:30 pm

Hover would love this one.


alfa
Shifting into 6th
Posts: 2087
Joined: January 19th, 2015, 4:15 pm

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby alfa » June 25th, 2022, 8:48 pm

DMan7 wrote:Hover would love this one.



So you're telling me people who support abortion also support forced vaccinations :shock:
Why am I not surprised :D

User avatar
viedcht
Riding on 18's
Posts: 1885
Joined: November 27th, 2014, 4:50 pm

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby viedcht » June 26th, 2022, 9:03 am

Them krakrz does rile up easy Just wish I could live long enough to see that hot lil vixen aoc become President

User avatar
shogun
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14208
Joined: May 6th, 2008, 12:24 pm
Location: Gone Rogue.

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby shogun » June 26th, 2022, 12:15 pm

Another issue that is destined to blow up in the Evangelical "Christian" zealots faces epically. I'm here for it.

Blue state women will be fine. Women in red states will face all the hardship, when pregnancies threaten their lives, back street abortions and having to carry babies with conditions predisposing them to be stillborn also threatening mother's lives. Who do you think they're going to blame? lol People don't seem to understand that choices surrounding abortion is also part of healthcare? Ignorance has consequences.

User avatar
shogun
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14208
Joined: May 6th, 2008, 12:24 pm
Location: Gone Rogue.

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby shogun » June 26th, 2022, 12:18 pm

viedcht wrote: Just wish I could live long enough to see that hot lil vixen aoc become President


Dred, what it is about her f'real though? Something about her kinda damn sexy. Think her dance video when she was in college seal the deal for me. Yeah, AOC could geh it.

User avatar
Les Bain
3ne2nr Toppa Toppa
Posts: 5041
Joined: May 17th, 2012, 9:46 pm
Location: Cruising for chicks

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby Les Bain » June 26th, 2022, 12:21 pm

shogun wrote:
viedcht wrote: Just wish I could live long enough to see that hot lil vixen aoc become President


Dred, what it is about her f'real though? Something about her kinda damn sexy. Think her dance video when she was in college seal the deal for me. Yeah, AOC could geh it.


For me is the voice.

User avatar
Dizzy28
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 16672
Joined: February 8th, 2010, 8:54 am
Location: People's Republic of Bananas

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby Dizzy28 » June 26th, 2022, 6:57 pm

Any of the trinis who vex about the US judgement planning anything here for our even more Draconian abortion laws?

Would like to attend

bluefete
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 13258
Joined: November 12th, 2008, 10:56 pm
Location: POS

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby bluefete » June 26th, 2022, 8:08 pm

adnj wrote:
bluefete wrote:
adnj wrote:
bluefete wrote:The sad thing about the overturning of Roe v Wade is the narrative being spun by the media.

This is going to affect "minorities" the most because they do not have access to health care. You all know the coded inference of that saying.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/hea ... 626866002/


This One is from Quite 2018

https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... verturned/

In other words, we would not be able to murder / butcher "minority" unborns like before and that is going to interfere with our agenda.

Take it however you want.
You're confused. That's not the media saying that. That's the media repeating one hundred years of social sciences research.

Fact: women who are finanacially disadvantaged AND have unwanted pregnancies face educational and further financial hurdles as a consequence - even with newborn adoption as the goal. And even within universal healthcare systems.

In the United States, black and Latino minorities are disproportionately economically disadvantaged. Look at Central America, Malaysia or China and the same will hold true albeit with a somewhat different affected group.

Before you start reflex typing some shitt in rebuttal, run out there and find real proof that I'm wrong.


You are spewing from the same media / science garbage that is put out there for non-critical thinkers to believe. Some people's heads are really buried deep in the sand.


THAT is another of your infamous reflex posts. Take your thumb out of your assholle and try to look up what you apparently have no fuckking clue about. "Science gabage" vs. what? Your personal opinion? That's pure - I love that shitt.


Make it make sense, nah!

“Abortion restrictions are racist,” said Cathy Torres, an organizing manager with Frontera Fund, a Texas organization that helps women pay for abortions. “They directly impact people of color, Black, brown, Indigenous people ... people who are trying to make ends meet.”
https://apnews.com/article/abortion--su ... 37305df5e2


Reflex posts you say:

Let me tell you something - ALL data marginalize one group more than others. When sampling a smaller population, your percentages will be larger.

ALL the data put out is NEGATIVE! There is nothing positive when it comes to one particular group. It is just sickening. Go on. Read the stats below.

And in EVERY case, across the board, IT IS THE WOMAN'S FAULT: For not having access to medical care, for failing to prevent herself from getting pregnant, for not accessing high quality contraceptives and the list goes on.

Let's look at the stats:

Primary nationwide abortion statistics for the United States are available from two sources—privately from the Guttmacher Institute (AGI) and publicly from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Guttmacher’s numbers, published every three years, come from direct surveys of all known and suspected abortion providers in the United States. The CDC numbers, published annually, are derived from actual counts of every abortion reported to state health departments.
https://abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_a ... tatistics/

The usual stories:

RELEVANT DATA AND ANALYSIS
Disparities in Unintended Pregnancy and Medicaid Coverage


Low-income people and people of color are more likely than other groups to experience unintended pregnancy and abortion—and people of color are more likely to rely on Medicaid.

Women of color are more likely than White women to be low income and enrolled in Medicaid. In 2018, 31% of Black women and 27% of Hispanic women aged 15–44 were enrolled in Medicaid, compared with 16% of White women.1

Women of color are much more likely than White women to experience unintended pregnancy. In 2011, Black and Hispanic women had an unintended pregnancy rate of 79 and 58 per 1,000 women, respectively, compared with a rate of 33 per 1,000 among White women.3
https://www.guttmacher.org/evidence-you ... e-abortion

Am J Public Health. 2013 October; 103(10): 1772–177
Disparities in Abortion Rates: A Public Health Approach
Christine Dehlendorf, MD, MAS,corresponding author Lisa H. Harris, MD, PhD, and Tracy A. Weitz, PhD, MPA


Women of lower socioeconomic status and women of color in the United States have higher rates of abortion than women of higher socioeconomic status and White women. Opponents of abortion use these statistics to argue that abortion providers are exploiting women of color and low socioeconomic status, and thus, regulations are needed to protect women.

This argument ignores the underlying causes of the disparities. As efforts to restrict abortion will have no effect on these underlying factors, and instead will only result in more women experiencing later abortions or having an unintended childbirth, they are likely to result in worsening health disparities

In 2008, the abortion rate for non-Hispanic White women was 12 abortions per 1000 reproductive-age women, compared with 29 per 1000 for Hispanic women, and 40 per 1000 for non-Hispanic Black women.

In the past several years, the differences in rates of abortion have received increasing political attention, with those opposed to abortion rights citing differences in abortion rates as evidence of the diabolical nature of the “abortion industry.”

Abortion rights opponents point to racial/ethnic differences in abortion rates as evidence of racism and coercion among those who support the right to obtain abortions.3,4

Not only do these messages explicitly blame those providing abortion for targeting communities of color, they also assign guilt to women of color who decide to have abortions by implying that they are falling victim to a racist conspiracy.

Differences in abortion rates by income are also seen as evidence of exploitation by abortion providers, who are claimed to be aggressively profiting from public funding of abortion for low-income women.5

Although there is no evidence of racial targeting6 or routine profiteering by abortion providers, from the perspective of those who espouse these views, the problem of disparities in abortion rates can only be solved by limiting access to and utilization of abortion services.

National studies have consistently shown that Black adolescents initiate intercourse at younger ages than White adolescents.30,31 By contrast, Hispanics have the oldest mean age of sexual initiation, at age 18 years.

A recent analysis of a nationally representative survey indicated that skepticism about the motivation of family planning providers is widespread; 42% of Blacks and 51% Hispanics surveyed believed that the government promotes birth control to limit minorities, compared with only 25% of Whites.70

Finally, women of color have been found to be more likely to perceive themselves to be infertile, which may decrease their motivation to use contraception.71

In fact, these fears of infertility are not unfounded as women of color and low-SES women have substantially higher rates of infertility than White women and women of higher SES.(WTAF????)


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3780732/


Pew Research on Abortion in the USA (2022):

In the District of Colombia and 29 states that reported racial and ethnic data on abortion to the CDC, 38% of all women who had abortions in 2019 were non-Hispanic Black, while 33% were non-Hispanic White, 21% were Hispanic, and 7% were of other races or ethnicities.

A pie chart showing that in 2019, most abortions were for women who had never had one before

Among those ages 15 to 44, there were 23.8 abortions per 1,000 non-Hispanic Black women; 11.7 abortions per 1,000 Hispanic women; 6.6 abortions per 1,000 non-Hispanic White women; and 13 abortions per 1,000 women of other races or ethnicities in that age range, the CDC reported from those same 29 states and the District of Colombia.


https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2 ... the-u-s-2/


Guttmacher Policy Review
Volume 11, Issue 3, Summer 2008
Abortion and Women of Color: The Bigger Picture
Susan A. Cohen


At every income level, black women have higher abortion rates than whites or Hispanics, except for women below the poverty line, where Hispanic women have slightly higher rates than black women.

Among the poorest women, Hispanics are the most likely to experience an unintended pregnancy. Overall, however, black women are three times as likely as white women to experience an unintended pregnancy; Hispanic women are twice as likely.

Because black women experience so many more unintended pregnancies than any other group—sharply disproportionate to their numbers in the general population—they are more likely to seek out and obtain abortion services than any other group.

In addition, because black women as a group want the same number of children as white women, but have so many more unintended pregnancies, they are more likely than white women to terminate an unintended pregnancy by abortion to avoid an unwanted birth.

https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2008/08/ ... er-picture

adnj
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10073
Joined: February 24th, 2014, 2:55 pm

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby adnj » June 26th, 2022, 9:11 pm

bluefete wrote:
adnj wrote:
bluefete wrote:
adnj wrote:
bluefete wrote:The sad thing about the overturning of Roe v Wade is the narrative being spun by the media.

This is going to affect "minorities" the most because they do not have access to health care. You all know the coded inference of that saying.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/hea ... 626866002/


This One is from Quite 2018

https://www.americanprogress.org/articl ... verturned/

In other words, we would not be able to murder / butcher "minority" unborns like before and that is going to interfere with our agenda.

Take it however you want.
You're confused. That's not the media saying that. That's the media repeating one hundred years of social sciences research.

Fact: women who are finanacially disadvantaged AND have unwanted pregnancies face educational and further financial hurdles as a consequence - even with newborn adoption as the goal. And even within universal healthcare systems.

In the United States, black and Latino minorities are disproportionately economically disadvantaged. Look at Central America, Malaysia or China and the same will hold true albeit with a somewhat different affected group.

Before you start reflex typing some shitt in rebuttal, run out there and find real proof that I'm wrong.


You are spewing from the same media / science garbage that is put out there for non-critical thinkers to believe. Some people's heads are really buried deep in the sand.


THAT is another of your infamous reflex posts. Take your thumb out of your assholle and try to look up what you apparently have no fuckking clue about. "Science gabage" vs. what? Your personal opinion? That's pure - I love that shitt.


Make it make sense, nah!

“Abortion restrictions are racist,” said Cathy Torres, an organizing manager with Frontera Fund, a Texas organization that helps women pay for abortions. “They directly impact people of color, Black, brown, Indigenous people ... people who are trying to make ends meet.”
https://apnews.com/article/abortion--su ... 37305df5e2


Reflex posts you say:

Let me tell you something - ALL data marginalize one group more than others. When sampling a smaller population, your percentages will be larger.

ALL the data put out is NEGATIVE! There is nothing positive when it comes to one particular group. It is just sickening. Go on. Read the stats below.

And in EVERY case, across the board, IT IS THE WOMAN'S FAULT: For not having access to medical care, for failing to prevent herself from getting pregnant, for not accessing high quality contraceptives and the list goes on.

Let's look at the stats:

Primary nationwide abortion statistics for the United States are available from two sources—privately from the Guttmacher Institute (AGI) and publicly from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Guttmacher’s numbers, published every three years, come from direct surveys of all known and suspected abortion providers in the United States. The CDC numbers, published annually, are derived from actual counts of every abortion reported to state health departments.
https://abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_a ... tatistics/

The usual stories:

RELEVANT DATA AND ANALYSIS
Disparities in Unintended Pregnancy and Medicaid Coverage


Low-income people and people of color are more likely than other groups to experience unintended pregnancy and abortion—and people of color are more likely to rely on Medicaid.

Women of color are more likely than White women to be low income and enrolled in Medicaid. In 2018, 31% of Black women and 27% of Hispanic women aged 15–44 were enrolled in Medicaid, compared with 16% of White women.1

Women of color are much more likely than White women to experience unintended pregnancy. In 2011, Black and Hispanic women had an unintended pregnancy rate of 79 and 58 per 1,000 women, respectively, compared with a rate of 33 per 1,000 among White women.3
https://www.guttmacher.org/evidence-you ... e-abortion

Am J Public Health. 2013 October; 103(10): 1772–177
Disparities in Abortion Rates: A Public Health Approach
Christine Dehlendorf, MD, MAS,corresponding author Lisa H. Harris, MD, PhD, and Tracy A. Weitz, PhD, MPA


Women of lower socioeconomic status and women of color in the United States have higher rates of abortion than women of higher socioeconomic status and White women. Opponents of abortion use these statistics to argue that abortion providers are exploiting women of color and low socioeconomic status, and thus, regulations are needed to protect women.

This argument ignores the underlying causes of the disparities. As efforts to restrict abortion will have no effect on these underlying factors, and instead will only result in more women experiencing later abortions or having an unintended childbirth, they are likely to result in worsening health disparities

In 2008, the abortion rate for non-Hispanic White women was 12 abortions per 1000 reproductive-age women, compared with 29 per 1000 for Hispanic women, and 40 per 1000 for non-Hispanic Black women.

In the past several years, the differences in rates of abortion have received increasing political attention, with those opposed to abortion rights citing differences in abortion rates as evidence of the diabolical nature of the “abortion industry.”

Abortion rights opponents point to racial/ethnic differences in abortion rates as evidence of racism and coercion among those who support the right to obtain abortions.3,4

Not only do these messages explicitly blame those providing abortion for targeting communities of color, they also assign guilt to women of color who decide to have abortions by implying that they are falling victim to a racist conspiracy.

Differences in abortion rates by income are also seen as evidence of exploitation by abortion providers, who are claimed to be aggressively profiting from public funding of abortion for low-income women.5

Although there is no evidence of racial targeting6 or routine profiteering by abortion providers, from the perspective of those who espouse these views, the problem of disparities in abortion rates can only be solved by limiting access to and utilization of abortion services.

National studies have consistently shown that Black adolescents initiate intercourse at younger ages than White adolescents.30,31 By contrast, Hispanics have the oldest mean age of sexual initiation, at age 18 years.

A recent analysis of a nationally representative survey indicated that skepticism about the motivation of family planning providers is widespread; 42% of Blacks and 51% Hispanics surveyed believed that the government promotes birth control to limit minorities, compared with only 25% of Whites.70

Finally, women of color have been found to be more likely to perceive themselves to be infertile, which may decrease their motivation to use contraception.71

In fact, these fears of infertility are not unfounded as women of color and low-SES women have substantially higher rates of infertility than White women and women of higher SES.(WTAF????)


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3780732/


Pew Research on Abortion in the USA (2022):

In the District of Colombia and 29 states that reported racial and ethnic data on abortion to the CDC, 38% of all women who had abortions in 2019 were non-Hispanic Black, while 33% were non-Hispanic White, 21% were Hispanic, and 7% were of other races or ethnicities.

A pie chart showing that in 2019, most abortions were for women who had never had one before

Among those ages 15 to 44, there were 23.8 abortions per 1,000 non-Hispanic Black women; 11.7 abortions per 1,000 Hispanic women; 6.6 abortions per 1,000 non-Hispanic White women; and 13 abortions per 1,000 women of other races or ethnicities in that age range, the CDC reported from those same 29 states and the District of Colombia.


https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2 ... the-u-s-2/


Guttmacher Policy Review
Volume 11, Issue 3, Summer 2008
Abortion and Women of Color: The Bigger Picture
Susan A. Cohen


At every income level, black women have higher abortion rates than whites or Hispanics, except for women below the poverty line, where Hispanic women have slightly higher rates than black women.

Among the poorest women, Hispanics are the most likely to experience an unintended pregnancy. Overall, however, black women are three times as likely as white women to experience an unintended pregnancy; Hispanic women are twice as likely.

Because black women experience so many more unintended pregnancies than any other group—sharply disproportionate to their numbers in the general population—they are more likely to seek out and obtain abortion services than any other group.

In addition, because black women as a group want the same number of children as white women, but have so many more unintended pregnancies, they are more likely than white women to terminate an unintended pregnancy by abortion to avoid an unwanted birth.

https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2008/08/ ... er-picture


So. Now that you got that out of your system, what's your point?

I posted:
adnj wrote:Fact: women who are finanacially disadvantaged AND have unwanted pregnancies face educational and further financial hurdles as a consequence - even with newborn adoption as the goal. And even within universal healthcare systems.

In the United States, black and Latino minorities are disproportionately economically disadvantaged. Look at Central America, Malaysia or China and the same will hold true albeit with a somewhat different affected group.


New fact: nearly half of the abortions performed in the US were to women below the income level poverty line.
The of percentage of women below the income level poverty line in the US is 12%.
US women below the income level poverty line are 8 times as likely to seek pregnancy termination compared to those that are not.

While you're waiting for IT to make sense, I'm waiting for YOU to make sense.

Image

User avatar
viedcht
Riding on 18's
Posts: 1885
Joined: November 27th, 2014, 4:50 pm

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby viedcht » June 26th, 2022, 10:03 pm

This not even parallel to the topic, so alyuh free to buss mih head within reason...

I was approached by an individual who claims that his wife (they are of a certain ethnicity) was wrongly operated on, and her 'entire womb' was removed "unnecessarily" by the doctors, citing his and wifeys belief that the doctors do it for spite so they wouldn't have any more children . He said the diagnosis was cancer. He says that there are other folks "like we so"(hair) that it happened to. This was pre covid.

I doubt any misconduct on the Medical Professionals part. Just biased paranoia from the patient and family...


This nonsense going on in merica is partly deluded Crixtian values, partly deluded 'political victory' by the Reds.
Just now they going after gun law abolishment.

User avatar
Les Bain
3ne2nr Toppa Toppa
Posts: 5041
Joined: May 17th, 2012, 9:46 pm
Location: Cruising for chicks

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby Les Bain » June 27th, 2022, 8:47 am

https://www.npr.org/2022/06/26/11077102 ... white-life
"A historic victory for white life." - Mary Miller

TFG stands in the background, his shit-eating grin widens as the crowd cheers in response.
Ent they always meant to say something else? She probably meant whites and good minorities.

User avatar
teems1
punchin NOS
Posts: 3445
Joined: March 15th, 2007, 4:44 pm

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby teems1 » June 27th, 2022, 9:49 am

Dizzy28 wrote:Any of the trinis who vex about the US judgement planning anything here for our even more Draconian abortion laws?

Would like to attend


Trinidad copies what the US does, which is why big changes like this affect us.

Take any homophobic church goer, let them go spend 2 weeks in NYC with their relatives, and they come back thinking gay people aren't so bad after they've been exposed to them.

User avatar
Dizzy28
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 16672
Joined: February 8th, 2010, 8:54 am
Location: People's Republic of Bananas

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby Dizzy28 » June 27th, 2022, 10:01 am

teems1 wrote:
Dizzy28 wrote:Any of the trinis who vex about the US judgement planning anything here for our even more Draconian abortion laws?

Would like to attend


Trinidad copies what the US does, which is why big changes like this affect us.

Take any homophobic church goer, let them go spend 2 weeks in NYC with their relatives, and they come back thinking gay people aren't so bad after they've been exposed to them.


This can't affect us until we actually do something to our law. Outrage can't and doesn't trump the legislation of a country.

User avatar
timelapse
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 8113
Joined: June 20th, 2012, 7:13 pm

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby timelapse » June 27th, 2022, 10:19 am

Dizzy28 wrote:
teems1 wrote:
Dizzy28 wrote:Any of the trinis who vex about the US judgement planning anything here for our even more Draconian abortion laws?

Would like to attend


Trinidad copies what the US does, which is why big changes like this affect us.

Take any homophobic church goer, let them go spend 2 weeks in NYC with their relatives, and they come back thinking gay people aren't so bad after they've been exposed to them.


This can't affect us until we actually do something to our law. Outrage can't and doesn't trump the legislation of a country.
Lord knows when we will update our archaic laws, especially that idiotic summary offenses act

User avatar
maj. tom
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10875
Joined: March 16th, 2012, 10:47 am
Location: ᑐᑌᑎᕮ

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby maj. tom » July 2nd, 2022, 7:40 pm

A 10-year-old girl was denied an abortion in Ohio after the Supreme Court ruled last week that it was overturning Roe v. Wade, demonstrating the tangible impacts that the high court’s decision is having on patients seeking access to the medical procedure.

A child abuse doctor in Ohio contacted Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an obstetrician-gynecologist in Indiana, after receiving a 10-year-old patient who was six weeks and three days pregnant, the Indianapolis Star reported.

That patient is now heading west to Indiana given that an abortion ban in Ohio, which prohibits the medical procedure when fetal cardiac activity begins, around six weeks, had become effective quickly after the high court issued its decision.

Ohio is among a number of states that have rolled back abortion access since the Supreme Court eliminated the constitutional right to an abortion.
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/3544588-10-year-old-girl-denied-abortion-in-ohio/

redmanjp
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 16197
Joined: September 22nd, 2009, 11:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby redmanjp » July 3rd, 2022, 2:38 pm

Do pro choicers support Financial abortions for men(my money my choice) ? If a woman can kill it shouldn't men have the right do not support it for 18 years?

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/gye7en/financial_abortion_your_body_your_choice_my_money/


User avatar
Duane 3NE 2NR
Admin
Posts: 27138
Joined: March 24th, 2003, 10:27 am
Location: T&T
Contact:

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby Duane 3NE 2NR » July 8th, 2022, 11:24 pm

Biden signs executive order to protect access to reproductive health care services.


RedVEVO
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 8191
Joined: March 8th, 2017, 1:05 am

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby RedVEVO » July 9th, 2022, 6:12 am

^^

Biden cannot do anything - it's all politics for the Democrats :roll:

The Judges just said this is not a constitutional matter and the Federal Gov't should not meddle .

Each State will now decide on how to handle this matter per it's constituents .

adnj
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10073
Joined: February 24th, 2014, 2:55 pm

Re: Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade; states can ban abortion in the US

Postby adnj » July 9th, 2022, 6:38 am

RedVEVO wrote:^^

Biden cannot do anything - it's all politics for the Democrats :roll:

The Judges just said this is not a constitutional matter and the Federal Gov't should not meddle .

Each State will now decide on how to handle this matter per it's constituents .


Wrong.

Advertisement

Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR, Habit7, st7 and 129 guests